Sunday, April 02, 2006

WHY DOES DANA ROHRBACHER HATE LATINOS?

>


I met my friend Irwing a couple years ago at a Ramones tribute concert, the day before Johnny Ramone died. Irwing, like a lot of the people at the show, was in a punk rock band. He's a talented guitar player, a serious songwriter and a dedicated musician. I've helped him broaden his horizens by taking him to see some artists that weren't playing in the neighborhood punk clubs. He seemed really impressed by Rickie Lee Jones, Barenaked Ladies and Depeche Mode. A couple days ago we went to see k.d. lang curate a film presentation at the Silverlake Film Festival. On the way, Irwing mentioned he and his whole family had gone downtown the day before to participate in the mammoth demonstrations against the Republican Congress' viciously racist immigration legislation. "The whole family?" Yeah, even his brother who lives in Riverside had driven into L.A. to meet the rest of the family for it. "Why?" I asked. Well, I'm Mexican, he said.

I live in a real polyglot neighborhood. The neighbors on one side are from Austria and on the other side they come from Ethiopia. The area is rich in a cultural diversity that makes it pretty unique and, for Americaa, kind of fascinating-- with people coming from backgrounds in Latin America, Armenia, Korea, China, Thailand, Europe, Iran... A few days ago I met a woman down the street who's originally from Bulgaria. I feel so lucky to live here. I had never thought of Irwing as Mexican. I mean his name isn't Mexican; he doesn't "look" Mexican or speak with a Mexican accent. He plays guitar and keyboards in punk and alternative bands. He's not an illegal immigrant. He's not any kind of immigrant. Like me, he was born in the U.S.A. So why did he schlep all the way Downtown to be in that whole hegdish and with the whole family? He felt-- and he told me everybody felt-- that the approach the Republican Congress was taking is a racist attack on Americans of Latino descent.

That's why there were more than half a million people on the streets in L.A. earlier this week. And that's why the L.A. high schools were nearly empty. Marjorie Cohn has a very perseptive article today at TRUTHOUT called "The New Civil Rights Movement" and I suggest everyone read it. When you finish it, you might have a better understanding of how Republican racists, fascists and demagogues like Jim Sensenbrenner, Tom Tancredo and Dana Rohrbacher are stoking xenophobia and using the immigration issue for their own narrow partisan agenda.

Everyone already knows what vile, drooling right-wing loons Sensenbrenner and Tancredo are, but how does a Southern California congressman wind up in this kind of company? Well, Rohrbacher has always been a wild-eyed extremist and a bit of a kook. He was probably the biggest supporter of the Taliban in the whole Congress and has a disturbing history of supporting other dangerous terrorist orgnizations as well. (One of his more outsanding quotes is "As long as they target people I don’t like, terrorist groups are OK with me.” We never got an answer from him after his pals in The Taliban turned their attention-- and their weapons-- from the Russians Rohrbacher doesn't like to Americans he apparently doesn't care about.) So when Rohrbacher joined the dozen most bigoted right-wing extremists on Capitol Hill yesterday to rail against the Senate's moderate immigration bill no one should have been surprised to hear what he blurted out:

"I say let the prisoners pick the fruits."

The Orange County rubber-stamp Republican hasn't been directly implicated in the scandals that have already led to prison for one of his closest congressional allies, Randy "Duke" Cunningham, but no one who has followed Rohrbacher's shady political career thinks his hands are clean of anything. A big supporter of both Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff, and big recipient of questionable bribes from Jack Abramoff, Rohrbacher is certainly someone worthy of a close look by federal investigators investigating the Republican Culture of Corruption in DC.

The ultimate irony, of course, would be vicious criminals who have wrecked constitutional governance in our nation-- inmates and prospective inmates, like Cunningham, Cheney, Libby, Abramoff, DeLay, Harris, Blackwell, Lewis, Doolittle, Pombo, Goode, Bush and Rohrbacher himself working in orange jumpsuits picking fruits and vegetables in the near future. (in fact, Rohrbacher and Abramoff are so close they could be cellies.)

As for the ginned-up immigration "problem," it's a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party with the corporatists demanding amnesty so they can continue enforcing low wages and continue weakening the bargaining power of workingmen and women and their unions, and the racists screaming for deportation or whatever tune Fox News has them singing today. Just keep in mind what I told you about this last week: Bush is a liar and everything he says is a lie. His immigration lie-- "Americans don't want these jobs"-- can be repeated ad infinitum and it still won't be true. At $5.00/hour they don't. But in a capitalist, free market economy-- as opposed to Bush-ist corporate socialism-- market conditions set wages, not schemes for importing cheap foreign labor.

A few days ago Thom Hartmann penned a piece at Common Dreams that explains the immigration "probelm" for what it really is-- a battle over economics, a battle that pits the working and middle class against the corporatists and oligarchs who don't want to share the wealth with anyone. At least the debate has awakened Latino youth who don't appreciate being turned into the Republicans' new hot button electoral issue.


MONDAY UPDATE: HOW THE RIGHT-WING WORKS THEIR VICIOUS HOT BUTTON ISSUES

There's a truly incredible diary over at Daily Kos, Anatomy of a Wedge Issue: Immigration, that explains the complexities and nuances of the current debate-- and how Rove and the far right exploit and demagogue issues like this to fracture American solidarity, make people forget what an unmitigated disaster 5 years of George Bush has been and spread the worst kind of divisiveness, racism, xenophobia and hatred in our society. I heartily recommend everyone read it.

Labels: ,

7 Comments:

At 8:45 AM, Blogger ohio06win said...

I saw Rohrbacher on the Bill Maher show. Rohrbacher came across as an arrogant, self-righteous prick.

 
At 6:25 AM, Blogger XicanoPwr said...

As for the DKos, Anatomy of a Wedge Issue: Immigration, you can find more information on the immigration issue on his site Migra Matters.
http://migramatters.blogspot.com/

 
At 8:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"His immigration lie-- 'Americans don't want these jobs'-- can be repeated ad infinitum and it still won't be true. At $5.00/hour they don't. But in a capitalist, free market economy-- as opposed to Bush-ist corporate socialism-- market conditions set wages, not schemes for importing cheap foreign labor."

I agree. So, what's the solution? An "amnesty" of any kind will a) let the employers off the hook, and b) encourage millions more to come across illegally in anticipation of the next amnesty. Just like after the last amnesty. It's a vicious circle that apparently no one is interested in ending.

I say all this as a lifetime resident of Southern California, where, as you say, illegal immigrants have been willingly exploited and consequently have reduced the pay scale of all jobs, not just their own. They - illegals - have also turned to emergency rooms as primary medical care and have swollen the schools to bursting.

My opposition to illegal immigration is anything but racist. I'm married to an immigrant - a legal immigrant who waited with her family for a decade and a half to get approval for the entry. I understand fully an illegal immigrant's motives and needs. However, I see that unfettered access to the U.S. is just patently unfair to legal immigrants, who are limited in annual number and under strict requirements of financial responsibility.

I also see that the virtual absence of meaningful border control, lack of cooperation of law enforcement with border management, little deportation, and no enforcement of employer law has fed on the desperation of these individuals who just want something better than what they have, but who end up getting something less than a living wage and no normal living conditions. In short, illegals are happy to be viciously exploited in return for a free pass to CUT IN LINE ahead of legal immigrants.

So the population of illegals has grown unmanaged for 2 decades and makes a complete mockery of what we call immigration management in the first place.

Why have limits at all? Seriously, where do you draw the line on human beings flooding the U.S.? In the big picture the numbers are huge. Millions and millions of people the world over want to enter the U.S. and work. The jobs, at decent pay, don't exist for them, however. Not millions upon millions.

A managed "guest worker" program makes sense in principle, if we just conveniently forget the 12 million free passes included in the deal, and the millions more guaranteed to accumulate over the next decade until the next time.

The problem with the "guest worker" program is that its success relies on proper management and strict enforcement. We're not going to get either, and this issue will be revisited 15 years hence with the same nonsense as this go-round. The same exact platitudes and promises to clean up the system were given exactly 20 years ago. Reagan called it amnesty, Bush calls it "guest worker". Identical.

Seriously, does nobody see this?

 
At 7:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some effort has to be made to send at least a significant portion of the 12 to 20 million illegals home, no matter what we do with the border security and employer sanctions. I would suggest this: Give one person a pass to stay in the country conditionally for every two that goes home to wait three or more years to re-enter. Pay them $80 per week as a stipend in Mexico, or where-ever as the leaving incentive.
Address the "Anchor Baby fiasco" with a Constitional amendment,and
consider while at that, shortening the Senate term to 4 years.The 6 year term is too long for the 21th Century,as the Senate seems only concerned about special interests and large block votes.This is not 1787!!! or 1913, ANYMORE !

 
At 8:57 AM, Blogger ANTONIO said...

The right, who benefits from illegally invading what is now the US and especially the Southwest, is always yapping about the law. Oh, its illegal! Its illegal! They scream triumphantly, as if that settled the question. But the real question is who made the law? The law is like the anti-drug law, or prohibition, it is self-servingly there so others can make millions from it. By making immigrants illegal, they are under the total control of the corporations who hire them. The workers can't unionize, can't get better wages, frequently can't get a place to live other than a barrack, can't live with their spouses or children. The law is very precious to those who exploit the work of others, and they will defend it to the death. The law has brought back conditions that were not seen in this country since slavery. At one time it was illegal for women to vote. It was illegal for Blacks and Whites to marry. It was illegal to teach slaves to read. The government promulgates laws as an instrument of staying in power. Those laws do not have an ethical or moral content. A law that is not respected by the people it is supposed to represent has no moral authority.

 
At 8:59 AM, Blogger ANTONIO said...

The right, who benefits from illegally invading what is now the US and especially the Southwest, is always yapping about the law. Oh, its illegal! Its illegal! They scream triumphantly, as if that settled the question. But the real question is who made the law? The law is like the anti-drug law, or prohibition, it is self-servingly there so others can make millions from it. By making immigrants illegal, they are under the total control of the corporations who hire them. The workers can't unionize, can't get better wages, frequently can't get a place to live other than a barrack, can't live with their spouses or children. The law is very precious to those who exploit the work of others, and they will defend it to the death. The law has brought back conditions that were not seen in this country since slavery. At one time it was illegal for women to vote. It was illegal for Blacks and Whites to marry. It was illegal to teach slaves to read. The government promulgates laws as an instrument of staying in power. Those laws do not have an ethical or moral content. A law that is not respected by the people it is supposed to represent has no moral authority.

 
At 7:40 AM, Blogger Jochi said...

All Neo Kunts/Repukes hate latinos. I see all this people talking with so much hate. If you dont like mexicans in you city MOVE the hell out. You are free to do so. If you think school are crowed "MAKE more money and get thin in to PRivate SChools"

Illegal immigrants contribute BIllions to the economy. If you think other wise you are a blind MF. All your arguments are the SAME. But is just a matter of time the REPUKE party will be gone from CA.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home