Friday, June 28, 2019

Did Democratic Primary Voters Notice Last Night That It Really IS Time For Biden To Pass The Torch?

>

Biden (senile): "Wish you were here," passing the torch to himself

I had a feeling Biden might not do well in the debate. But I never expected to see the total self-destruction. He should have been seated on a lawn chair with a hose to douse the other candidates for stepping on his lawn. Eric Swalwell summed it up before it even began! “I was six years old when a presidential candidate came to the California Democratic convention and said ‘It’s time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans.’ That candidate was then-Senator Joe Biden. Joe Biden was right when he said it was time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans 32 years ago. He’s still right today. If we’re going to solve the issues of automation, pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issues of climate chaos, pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issue of student loan debt, pass the torch. If we’re going to gun violence for families who are fearful of sending their kids to school, pass the torch.” Biden’s pathetic response: “I’m still holdin’ onto that torch.” It was the beginning of his debate-long meltdown.



He was angry and defensive and clearly the most awful would-be nominee on the stage! It got far, far worse during his argument with a very predatory and relatively skillful debater, Kamala Harris. He didn't seem prepared for the ambush that was absolutely coming his way. She had it all rehearsed and ready to go as soon as the opportunity-- in this case, Marianne Williamson's statement about slavery reparations-- came up. Watch:



She addressed him directly in a way that could not end well for him: “I do not believe you are a racist… but…” He claimed he “did not praise racists,” which he did and which she did not accuse him of doing. Watch the tape again. He was responding to his own, utterly unacknowledged, inner guilt about praising racists, not to what she said about him “talking about the reputations of two United States senators who built their… careers on the segregation of race in this country.” She also mentioned he worked with them to pass anti-busing legislation. He as much as called her a liar for saying he praised racists. But he did— over and over and over. She was only wrong about Ione thing: when she said he isn’t a racist. His long racist record in Delaware and then in the U.S. Senate is a racist record. No one ever says it out loud, but, let’s face it, he was chosen by the first black president to be his running mate to balance the ticket— a black and a racist, the ultimate Democratic Party balance. He also lied about busing. He didn’t just work for busing on a federal level. Previously to being elected to the Senate, he cynically built his reputation in Delaware as the anti-busing (pro-segregation) Democrat. And defending racism by citing “states rights” is a bad move in a post-‘50s Democratic primary. His revenge was to remind people— obliquely enough so most people probably didn’t get it— that Kamala was a very flawed prosecutor who was locking up black people for pot smoking. Still, the bullshit was seeping out of every pore in Biden’s traumatized body when he responded:

“Everything I have done in my career— I ran because of civil rights…” He first ran for office to prevent blacks from being able to exercise their constitutionally protected civil rights. Harris does no one any good by her crap about “I do not believe you are a racist.” Who cares if he is or isn;’t a racist? His RECORD is racist, regardless of what polite society decides it sees in his heart. As Biden said himself later in the debate: “My time’s up.”



People are saying Kamala had the best night. She may have, but she didn’t really drive the stake through Biden’s heart, just wounded him (perhaps mortally). As for the rest of her night… all she really does is repeat— WORD FOR WORD— Bernie’s talking points. Fine if she wants to steal the senator’s great ideas, but at least she ought to try putting them in her own words. Ans maybe Ione day we’ll find out if she has any ideas of her own (aside from setting Steve Mnuchin free for some meekly campaign contributions).

But for Biden— and his glass jaw— last night was a disaster, one he won;’t recover from. Whether it was the inevitable racism thing or his defense of the NRA or his inability to speak to a question about his judgment about leading the support for the unjustifiable invasion of Iraq— not just a bad vote— a leadership role. In fact, towards the end of the debate, one of the moderators, Chuck Todd, I think, asked each candidate to state in a couple of words, what he or she would prioritize once they were elected and in office, Biden started babbling about defeating Trump. Biden is the only Democrat who could possibly make Trump look relatively fit for office. A Biden nomination would be like a death knell for the Democratic Party. I think many Democratic primary voters saw that last night.

Will we see mass suicide at Biden campaign headquarters? No more checks? No  more chances for a White House gig in 2021?


The big take-away, besides Biden’s self-destruction, was that Bernie’s ideas dominated both nights of debate. The Democratic narrative is Bernie’s narrative, not Biden’s, not Kamala Harris’ and certainly not McKinsey Pete’s. As Elaine Godfrey put it late last night in The Atlantic, “Several of the candidates seemed to define themselves against Sanders, reflexively comparing and contrasting their agenda with his. It was a reminder of just how popular the senator from Vermont’s ideas have become since his first campaign, in 2016: His policies have dominated discussion for much of the past three years, helping pry open the Democrats’ Overton window, inch by inch. That’s especially true when it comes to health care. When asked about the pragmatism of progressives’ proposals, Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado said, ‘I agree with Bernie’ on his goal of universal health care. But ‘where I disagree is on his solution of Medicare for All.’ South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, for his part, criticized what he sees as an impractical shift to a Medicare for All system. ‘Every person in politics who allows that phrase to escape their lips has a responsibility to explain how you are supposed to get from here to there,’ Buttigieg said.”
When the subject turned to student debt, the candidates jabbed at Sanders’s new proposal to cancel all Americans’ student debt, to the tune of $1.6 trillion, with no income or other restrictions. “I believe in free college for those whom cost could be a barrier,” Buttigieg said. “I just don’t believe it makes sense to ask working-class families to subsidize even the children of billionaires.” Biden explained that he would want to give students tuition-free community college instead.

The candidates, again and again, were playing the game on Sanders’s turf. He didn’t receive the Democratic Party’s nomination in 2016, and he might not secure it in 2020. But when the issues he’s long championed are being debated before 15 million Americans, in some ways he’s already won.


No, he will already have won, when he wins— when WE win, not the corporatists and Wall. Street banksters who have taken over both political parties, the GOP long ago and the Democrats, when Bill Clinton was getting a blow job from some ditz in the Oval Office. Bernie made it clear over and over again that it will take a political revolution to beat these forces. When that happens he/we win. Last night’s best quote wasn’t really from Kamala Harris’ useful attack on Biden. It was from Bernie: "Scientists tells us we have 12 years before irreversible damage. We have to come together against this common enemy, and transition the world off fossil fuels."




Labels: , , , ,

7 Comments:

At 5:46 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To answer the title question: no. of course not.

After 40 years (biden has been there for all of it), what voters should have noticed is that it's long overdue for them to make the democrap party pass the torch to a REAL left, liberal and progressive party.

The candidates who raised their hands in support of MFA (for immigrants) should have been asked the follow-up question: why doesn't your party support mfa for americans?
The candidates who support GND and/or something to address CO2 should have been asked: why does your party not support GND?
All those candidates who truthfully called trump a liar, criminal and existential threat should be asked: why does your party not support impeachment (of anyone for anything.... EVER)?

is it insanity to always project the claims of advocacy by a candidate onto their party when soooooo clearly that candidate is lying and that party is averse to that advocacy?
Or is it stupidity.

OF course, it could be both. prolly is.

 
At 6:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The response of the Party to reality IS the story right now. It isn't yet being covered.

I don't expect them to take off the blindfolds, pull their fingers out of their ears, or turn on their brains. They are welded to the idea that they can become the Republican Party by taking over the suburban voters, a strategy which failed miserably for Hillary. That strategy isn't going to save them any better than the Maginot Wall saved France in two major wars. They will stay with Biden even after Trump chews him up and spits him out, and now that the Supremecist Republican Court has authorized gerrymandering for political reasons, they can wither away into inconsequence.

 
At 6:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's true that the vast majority of American voters love Bernie's ideas. It's been true for about 90 years and counting.

it's also true that they haven't ELECTED anyone based on their demonstrated devotion to any of those ideas. In fact, it's ALSO true that they've elected (or tried to elect) a party that is openly, in their deeds, HOSTILE to all of those ideas.

Sooooo... are these voters truly left? Are they insane? Are they colossal dipshits?

ayup. they are.

It's ironic, kind of, that some of the democrap candidates are trying out a novel approach -- honesty. Everyone who attacks Bernie's ideas as "socialist" or "unrealistic" or whatever are actually MORE HONEST about it than are those who are tap dancing and certainly more honest than Bernie and Elizabeth (who both know nothing will ever be done and even endorsed their anti- in 2016).

with voters like that, it's really hard to know which lie will resonate any particular cycle. being a democrap candidate is hard.

 
At 8:26 AM, Anonymous ap215 said...

I was only interested to see what Sanders & Yang did in the debate Bernie did pretty good when he spoke about policy health care etc so i thought he did well Yang however was non-existent outside of his opening statement he didn't muscle his way though the debate too much so that was poor Biden though was out of sync he wasn't prepared for anything at all Harris & the other candidates totally owned him it was a dismal night for him & the establishment.

 
At 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The DNC controls the debates and the helpless DNC media controls the questions. Why aren't the moderators political science professors or people with actually knowledge of facts and history? The whole thing is simply an extension of the Sunday morning talk show beholden to our sponsors products. Why is that? Why are commercial breaks allowed? Well everything has a shadow on this earth and from within that shadow is the reflection of why entertainment produces Kings. Way to goooo Pavlov!

 
At 11:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bernie and Biden looked like they were at the far end of the family table at Thanksgiving dinner. I volunteered for Bernie in 2016. I canvased for him in 2016. I gave him way too much money but I believed in him. Then he endorsed Her Majesty at the Democratic convention. He's dead to me.

He's way too old to be president. I won't vote for him in 2020

 
At 2:21 PM, Blogger Modestybl said...

Yeah you will, if he's the nominee...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home