Wednesday, July 24, 2019

The Biggest Moments Of Today's Judiciary Committee Hearing

>

Likely Western New York candidate for Congress, Nate McMurray: "The GOP really has become the party of conspiracies-- while ignoring what’s right before them. It’s like the house is on fire, and they want you to look at mold in the basement. But we have it, word for word... THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT EXONERATED"

One of the most compelling moments this morning was made by Jamie Raskin of Maryland (below). After he was finished I asked him what the Committee was trying to accomplish. He told me that he thinks "we demonstrated that there is overwhelming evidence in the Report that  President Trump repeatedly obstructed justice. I was one of the Members who described in fine-grained detail a specific episode of obstruction and mine was Trump’s outrageous witness tampering with Michael Cohen. I only had three and a half minutes but I think the point was made. Despite Attorney General Barr’s best efforts, the Administration’s fog of propaganda is lifting."

Mike Siegel, a candidate for Congress-- previously an attorney for the city of Austin-- watched the hearings today and soon after Jerry Nadler gaveled the session to a close he told me that "Robert Mueller has done his part to document criminal activity by Donald Trump. Although he is clearly weary of these proceedings, today he confirmed the core findings of his report. It’s in the hands of Congress. If I were there, I’d support starting impeachment proceedings. But either way, this is the fork in the road. Go big or go home."

Ted Lieu (D-CA):




This is what Ted told me after he was finished questioning Mueller: "I simply walked Special Counsel Mueller through the three elements of the crime of Obstruction of Justice. Mueller agreed that Donald Trump had met the first two elements and then I read the third element verbatim from his report, which stated there was 'substantial evidence' of corrupt intent. Without the Department of Justice OLC Opinion preventing the indictment of a sitting President, Donald Trump would have been indicted. That's why over 1,000 former federal prosecutors signed a letter stating that any other person would have been indicted if they had done what the President did. In America, no one should be above the law. It is clear that right now we have a person in the Oval Office who has committed multiple felonies."

Jerry Nadler (D-NY):




Ken Buck (R-CO)




Jamie Raskin (D-MD)




Marqus Cole is a prominent attorney in Georgia running for Congress in an open suburban Atlanta seat. He watch the Buck questioning with a great deal of interest and he shared his impressions with me. "With one word," he said-- referring to Mueller's 'yes' response-- "in one moment, the man that was tasked with investigating the sitting President provided Pelosi, House Democrats and the country with everything we need to know. To review: without any question, the President of the United States is an unindicted co-conspirator to a federal crime in which a fellow co-conspirator was sentenced to three years in federal prison. Now, separate from that crime we have Mueller saying in one word that the President could be charged with a second a separate criminal offense. I want to be crystal clear; an impeachment inquiry needs to be opened right away. The House is the sole body in the entire country that has that power, authority and obligation to do so. House members should put aside party, politics and questions of whether the Senate will remove from office. It is time to impeach the unindicted con-conspirator to a federal crime that currently occupies the White House."

Val Demings (D-FL)




Hank Johnson (D-GA)




Kina Collins is another congressional candidate (Chicago) who watched the Mueller testimony carefully. "Robert Mueller's testimony today," she said, "confirmed what many of us have believed from the beginning-- that the president and his administration were involved in obstruction of justice and were aware of Russian interference with the 2016 election. I want it to be clear-- I stand with representatives like Maxine Waters who have been vocal from day one with calls to 'Impeach this man.' Because Democratic leaders have slow walked this issue, we have quickly descended into one of the darkest and most corrupt periods in our country's history. There are consequences for the choices we make in how we proceed next. I know what side of history I am standing on, and if I was in Congress now, I would be voting for impeachment hearings to begin. We can't keep playing these games when the morality and integrity of our entire democracy are at stake."




Adam Schiff did an excellent job later at the House Intelligence Committee. His introduction (above) was powerful and he was able to get Mueller to be very clear (below) that his investigation was neither a "witch hunt" nor "a hoax," that Russia helped Trump win the election and that the Trump campaign knew it and coordinated with the Russians and that Trump was trying to make a lot of money in his dealings with Putin and the Russians. Mueller also warned the Intelligence Committee several times that the Russians are currently trying to interfere with the 2020 elections.




New Mexico Secretary of State-- and Senate candidate-- Maggie Toulouse Oliver issued a statement after the Judiciary Committee adjourned. "The Mueller Report and the Special Counsel’s testimony on Capitol Hill today," she wrote, "provide more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment proceedings. For the good of our democracy, I am asking Congressman Luján to join my call for impeachment so that we can hold this president accountable and prevent any further abuses of power by him... Anyone who has read the Mueller Report can see there is evidence that the president, in an effort to protect himself, fired FBI Director James Comey, forced Attorney General Jeff Sessions to step down, and even attempted to have the Special Prosecutor fired. The president is not above the law and it is Congress’ job to hold him accountable. We can’t wait any longer. We must take action now to protect our democratic process by impeaching President Donald Trump. What’s more, we can hold this president accountable and still pass important legislation like the Green New Deal and Medicare for All."

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

At 1:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

With the known caveat that no Nazi will ever be impeached for anything (the Nazis will never impeach one of their own and the democraps won't ever impeach ANYONE), there could NOT be any big moments.

Saith Raskin: "we demonstrated that there is overwhelming evidence in the Report that President Trump repeatedly obstructed justice"

DUH! it's in the report. And it was admitted to by the fat fuck. so... pointless.

The only possible benefit to this grandstand play by the democraps is that now a lot of lazy fucktards had pretty much the whole report read to them (congresswhore would ask, "did you say X in the report" or would read the actual reference, and Mueller would say "yes").

But, again and still, to what end? the Nazis will always refuse to impeach one of their own. And Pelosi will always forbid impeaching ANYONE for anything, even obstruction (which is serious shit... or it used to be back when we had meaningful laws-n-shit).

And whenever someone hinted at asking something that could not be quoted from the report or Mueller's previous statement, he said basically "no comment".

The hearings were a waste. this is a waste. and this shithole is a wasteland.

 
At 5:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In addition to the comments of 1:43 (which I endorse),

Ted Lieu did a fair job of establishing a legal basis for an inquiry. Just don't expect one to be on the docket any time soon. Nancy took it off the table.

Jerry Nadler forgot everything he learned in Law School about questioning witnesses. He did a horrible job about half of the time, asking open questions which didn't put Mueller on the spot to deliver the answer Nadler sought.

Republican Ken Buck did a better job in defense of Trump, and delivered a lot of phrases for the Republican political commercial creators to abuse in the coming campaign. They won't remember to thank the Democrats for the gifts.

Jamie Raskin and Val Demings did good jobs of establishing arguments to follow in an inquiry. It's a shame that effort will be wasted once it's clear that there won't be an inquiry.

Hank Johnson needed to watch the clock better. He had a good line of questioning going when his time ended.

While the Judicial Committee Democrats didn't fare as badly as Maxim Dadashev recently did, they clearly didn't use well the extra time they gave the Republicans to attack Mueller's report to come up with how to present what Mueller's report contained in a devastating fashion. The Republicans appear to have again used the Rope-a-Dope strategy to exhaust the Democratic assault on one of their own criminals.

And we're counting on these inept paladins to save the nation from Trump?

SSMH

 
At 7:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pelosi offers three additional excuses why there won't be an impeachment inquiry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9VwxxR4828

When someone tells you she's a compliant Republican tool, believe her.

 
At 8:10 AM, Anonymous wjbill said...

what's the point of the hearings if Pelosi keeps carrying water for Trump regarding impeachment?

 
At 3:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

exactly, 8:10. it's a grandstand play to convince morons to keep voting for the democraps because they are less horrible. that is all.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home