Serious Question: Marco Rubio Knows EXACTLY What Trump Is-- Why Why Is His Head Still Up Trump's Ass?

You don't usually see major newspapers calling sitting senior senators in their own cities a "reliable sycophant" in an headline. But Sunday, the Miami Herald decided an editorial about Marco Rubio and Señor Trumpanzee needed just that: As Trump’s reliable sycophant, Rubio drags us further into the president’s swamp.

For all his huffing and puffing about Trump, Rubio rarely over votes against him. His Trump adhesion score is 90.9%, even higher than Rick Scott's! Besides Scott, Cory Gardner (R-CO), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Patrick Toomey (R-PA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Josh Hawley (R-MO), Todd Young (R-FL), John Kennedy (R-LA), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Steve Daines (R-MT), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Ben Sasse (R-NE), James Lankford (R-OK), Michael Enzi (R-WY), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rand Paul (R-KY) have all voted less in lockstep with Trump than Rubio has.

The editors of Rubio's hometown paper went to town on him because Rubio refused to denounce Trump as a racist for the barrage iff attacks he's been making against 4 congresswomen of color, AOC, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. They called his weak response "pathetic" and laughed at Time Magazine's long ago assertion that Rubio could be "The Savior of the Republican Party." The Herald editors wrote that "He was supposed to be a rising star who would help shake the party up after the disastrous election of 2012. The son of immigrants, he would help the party overcome its long-term demographic challenge as its older base shrinks and America becomes ever more diverse. But Rubio flamed out in the 2016 presidential election, among the last victims of Donald Trump’s brutal, degrading, slash-and-burn campaign-- though not before lowering himself by trying to beat Trump at his own game, ridiculing the size of his opponent’s hands, suggesting that it reflected on other aspects of Trump’s physiology."

Rubio tried to regain a bit of dignity when he left the race. “America needs a vibrant conservative movement,” he said. “But one that’s built on principles and ideals, not on fear, not on anger and not on preying on people’s frustrations.”


But during the first two-and-a-half years of Trump’s presidency, Rubio abandoned the pretense of idealism or principles, except, perhaps, in his on-target approach to the crisis in Venezuela. Otherwise, he has transformed from Trump critic to a sycophantic cheerleader-- derided by former adviser and Washington Post columnist Max Boot as a “Trump fan-boy”-- to the point that he’s willing to kill Obamacare even though his own state leads the nation in enrollment.

The Miami native who some, including us, thought could lead the Republican Party in finding a reasonable path on comprehensive immigration reform and help it broaden its appeal to minorities in America could not find the spine to do more than mildly criticize Trump after his blatantly racist attacks on four Democratic congresswomen.

Trump told the women that they should “go back” to the countries they came from instead of complaining about his policies-- never mind that three of the women were born in America and the fourth has been a U.S. citizen longer than Trump’s own wife.

Rubio wouldn’t say if he thought Trump’s racist tweet was racist. He only conceded that, “The president shouldn’t have written that.”

Even after Trump whipped a crowd in Greensville, North Carolina, into a hateful froth against U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar that erupted in chilling chants of “Send her back! Send her back!”-- Rubio couldn’t muster the courage to truly object to the horrifying display of blatant racism. He called the chant “grotesque,” which it was, but he reserved most of his vitriol for “left wing politicians and many in the media.”


How disappointing. Obviously, he was not the only Republican to punt or remain silent last week. But, Rubio, in particular, should know the dangers of this moment and the path down which Trump is taking his followers, his party and the nation. He should have a deeper understanding of America’s tortured racial history and comprehensive knowledge of the animosity once faced by Cuban immigrants like his parents. He can do better. It leads us to ask whether he thinks his Senate bill, filed Thursday, to extend TPS for Haitians is compensation for his timidity in the face of Trump’s “go back” tweets.

Rubio, far from the Republicans’ savior, seems just another slick politician with his finger in the wind-- pushing the party deeper into Trump’s swamp.

Instead of calling Trump to task, Rubio decided to call Democrats "self-righteousness," "political bullies" and "hypocrites." Republican Party strategist (and co-host of The View) Ana Navarro responded by pointing out that Rubio's probably should have been more offended by Trump's "go back where you came from" posture towards the 4 congresswomen since Rubio knows his own "parents came here, fleeing poverty [and] who represents a community where they were told, 'We won’t rent to Cubans, to blacks or to dogs ... you can’t drink from this water fountain'-- I have seen him try to justify this." These days are long gone:




The Democrats ran the weakest imaginable candidate against Rubio in 2016, spoiled, conservative nothing Patrick Murphy, and Rubio still managed to beat him 4,822,182 (52.0%) to 4,105,251 (44.3%). But in the two massive counties serviced by The Herald, Murphy beat Rubio in Miami-Dade (54.6% to 43.3%) and 63.8% to 34.1% in Broward. Democrats don't get another swing at Rubio until 2022, likely to be a good Republican year if the Democrats don't accomplish any fundamental change-- which is basically what their frontrunner, Status Quo Joe, has promised his donors.




Immigrants by Nancy Ohanian (Rubio's mother?)