It's Not Like If Trump Disappeared Everything Would Be Hunky-Dory With The GOP
>
Early Monday morning, the Wall Street Journal warned that Trump's government shutdown "is curtailing infrastructure projects, food-processing inspections and economic data used by Wall Street. But on a more micro level, it is showing signs of disrupting commerce as hundreds of thousands of federal workers missed out on their first payday of the closure late last week... While the economic gashes aren’t enough to derail the recovery, now in its 10th year, they appear to be at least temporarily diminishing the vigor of an expansion that was already projected to slow in 2019. Output is now expected to grow at a 2.2% pace in the first quarter, less than an estimated 3.1% growth recorded in 2018." A couple of hours later the Washington Post reported that Republicans are worried that the shutdown is doing the party some harm and is just one manifestation of "the difficult balancing act Senate Republicans will probably face over the next two years, trapped between a mercurial GOP president and an emboldened new House Democratic majority."
The Bulwark, a new neocon website, looked at it from a different perspective, running a throw-away piece calling for their readers to get ready for the Trump primary!. The list 5 who might take up the call: Jeff Flake (DEFCON 5), Nikki Haley (DEFCON 2), Jim Mattis (DEFCON 1), Mitt Romney (DEFCON 3) and Jon Kasich (DEFCON 4). "If Mattis were to run," wrote Jonathan Last, "it would be an existential threat to Trump because he would run not as an anti-Trumpite, but as a whistleblower. The message would be: I served this president. I was on the inside. I know what it looks like. And he’s not fit for office. It’s one thing to have some undersecretary of agriculture making that argument. Having it come from a beloved general who is regarded as one of the great military minds of his generation? Yikes." He's considerably less concerned by a Kasich challenge:
Funnily enough, Kasich probably helped Trump in 2016 by hanging around in the primaries and siphoning off anti-Trump votes that otherwise could have consolidated around Ted Cruz.
Also funnily enough, Kasich’s brand of centrist reform-ish conservatism is not all that far from Trump’s. (Never forget that Trump campaigned on leaving Social Security and Medicare untouched and said that repealing Obamacare the way Cruz wanted to would leave people “dying in the streets.”)
The difference, of course, is attitudinal. Kasich is laid-back and genial, so people take his centrism for cuckitude. Trump is crude and aggressive, so people take his centrism as True ConservatismTM.
As such, Kasich is probably the least-threatening mainstream challenger for Trump. By running to Trump’s left as an anti-Trumper, Kasich wouldn’t put any of Trump’s base in play. And many of the potential Kasich supporters may have already fled the GOP. So why have him this high on our list? Because he’s the most likely to actually run.
Most likely for sure. And Last may or may not have already read Kasich's Monday morning dire OpEd in USA Today, Republican Party is mired in the 1950s and ignores today's America at its peril, when he wrote that. Kasich doesn't seem to have much regard for the movers and shakers of his own party, earning them that they need to stop bitching and start doing stuff for people.
It’s a new year and almost two decades into a new century, yet so much about American life and our political leadership-- notably in my own Republican Party-- seems stuck in the 1950s. While nearly every aspect of the world around us has been changing, sometimes with breakneck speed, and while the complexion and complexities of our demographics have shifted so dramatically, those who fancy themselves as leaders are plodding far behind the march of time. Sadly, too many Americans are content to plod along with them.Kasich, now an ex-governor, just signed with CNN as a senior political commentator (expect a Trumpanzee rant within 24 hours) and just hired United Talent Agency to represent him. The UTA press release, distributed Monday quotes Kasich saying he's excited to keep his voice active "across the world" and to share his experiences and observations "to help improve the lives of others." So will he run as a Republican or as an independent? UTA says it will "help Kasich navigate the next phase of his career in civic engagement, by continuing to inspire audiences to lead purpose-driven lives of service."
Perhaps they think denial is protection from the change that swirls around them. No doubt they’re threatened by the new diversity of voices that have joined the public chorus, by the long-ignored problems that a new generation wants to solve, by an unsettled world that no longer follows America’s lead. But they’ve learned absolutely nothing from their skunking in the midterm elections. They didn’t watch, or chose to ignore, the new Congress being sworn in the other day. It was a more energetic, diverse and self-assured group than those chambers have seen before.
But ignoring change like that won’t stop it. And failing to find solutions to our problems will only lead to greater challenges down the road. A case in point: Opponents of Obamacare ask how such a thing came to be, oblivious to the fact that their own inaction is to blame. By ignoring giant holes in America’s health care system and failing to find a ways to fix them with hard work and compromise, they watched that vacuum filled with a behemoth they deplore.
Yet people like these at all levels of government find themselves caught on the same, well-worn treadmill time and again. By failing to come up with fresh ideas and real solutions for our most vexing problems, congressional Republicans, the White House and other power structures in Washington let those problems fester or reluctantly patch them up with half-baked solutions that only make things worse. That same change-ignoring inertia holds back progress in our states.
Think of the problems that cry out for solutions: health care, immigration, deficits and debt, income inequality, urban violence, drugs, climate and environment, free trade, prescription costs, infrastructure decay, cybersecurity, education and workforce readiness, student debt… how many pages do I have to go on?
These aren’t new problems, but many have grown worse. And none can be ignored any longer in a younger, more diverse and more demanding America that’s increasingly impatient with the old way of thinking. This emerging leadership won’t be put off, ignored or disenfranchised, but I’m confident that they will be open to new ideas and the kind of commonsense approaches that truly solve problems-- and solve them for all Americans, not just a privileged few.
In this changing world, successful leaders must look each problem squarely in the eye, listen to their customers, and realize how dramatically those customers have changed. No one will survive by practicing politics the way Sears or RadioShack practiced retail, stuck in the 1950s while the world moved on with Amazon, Uber and others who have broken the mold. For Republicans, this means breaking their own self-made mold of being naysayers instead of doers. It means designing market-driven, center-right solutions that actually solve problems while revealing their compassion.
Guess who! |
Labels: John Kasich, primarying Trump
8 Comments:
once again, you need to differentiate between the Nazi PARTY and the Nazi VOTERS.
If trump went away, the PARTY would not change except maybe to pander to its former voters who had disengaged due to utter disgust. There aren't that many of those anyway, so they might not even bother to pander.
The VOTERS are now just plain evil, filled with hate and fear and they would seek out another trump hatemonger they can ID with. I really don't believe any other policy positions matter. They are single-issue voters. Other positions might peel off a point or two from those independent non-participants. That's about all.
So... do a piece analyzing why the absence of the Clintons and obamanation (or bernie and elizabeth and AOC) wouldn't change the democraps at all. Why their voters are too fucking stupid to not vote for whomever the democrap oligarchy (money) gives them so the PARTY has zero incentive to change (except to move to the right some more to pick off a few of those remaining "reasonable" Nazi voters (maybe a tenth of a point).
@Anonymous...you know, you almost had me there for a second. You actually said something that was 100% correct about Trump and the GOP--that Trump is only a symptom of the true rot and corruption of the GOP.
And then you had to pull your bothsiderism bullshit and go after Democrats. Because why the hell not.
To quote THE PRISONER: "Whose side are you on?"
Wait--don't answer that. Not ready to struggle through another mountain of bothsiderism bullshit. The GOP is the true threat to the US and yet you pull this assburgery binary bullshit of running after Democrats (and sure, toss in insults at Sanders, Warren, and AOC because I guess they're just not pure enough for you, I guess). Nothing will ever be good enough for you, so why not burn the whole fucking thing down, right?
Idiot.
Does this guy ever one time give any positive thoughts on the Democrats every single week DWT writes an article on the Dems & out comes negative lunatic Anonymous with his Democrap hatred criticism posts you're a sick tired act Anonymous no one gives a flying fuck what you post.
Go the fuck away!
The list 5 who might take up the call [to primary trump]:
Jeff Flake (DEFCON 5) His name says it all.
Nikki Haley (DEFCON 2) After what she did to the Cradle of the Confederacy?
Jim Mattis (DEFCON 1) Hard ro run with a K-bar in your back
Mitt Romney (DEFCON 3) Lost once. We won't be fooled again.
Jon Kasich (DEFCON 4) A true threat. Been pretending to be far more moderate than he really is, and people ARE falling for it.
Never a rogue asteroid when you really need one.
Marc MaKenzie and Anonymous at 4:29 thank you. I have been saying this for a long time. This Anonymous POS comes on DWT every single day to belittle, whine and complain about everything DWT writes and it is getting very tiresome. I have constantly told them to leave as we are sick and tired of reading these rants! Get lost - no one gives a shit about what you think about anything.
6:31
Maybe you'd like to charge your Nemesis with Thoughtcrime? The Party must not be challenged in any way.
So many Anal Anon's. Wish you commentators would use an identifying handle instead of Anon @ 8:21 or 6:31. Get the picture. Feel as though I'm reading the book of bible Anon. 6:66. Just make up a phony name. i.e. zeeman. We really don't care.
still outnumbered by those who must believe that the enemy of their enemy is their BFF. The inability to think in anything more complex than a binary spectrum is the human flaw that dooms the species to ultimate extinction.
The Nazi party and voters are pure evil. This is not new, of course.
But the democraps are no better. This developed since the '80s so it's kind of new-ish.
If you just want to defeat Nazis, democraps are your destiny.
If you actually want things to change for the better, you must find a different color than red and blue. Perhaps your DNA is not capable of this. I don't know.
As for DWT... they are far more effectively critical of the democrap party than I am. Their proofs of the permanent perfidy of the party is far more granular and far more relentless.
The only difference between me and DWT is I experienced my epiphany in the '80s. DWT shares its binary limitation with marc et al.
And, btw marc, I mentioned Bernie, Elizabeth and AOC to prove that their presence has not changed the democrap PARTY one bit. Bernie has been around for decades, Elizabeth for a decade-ish and AOC is their brightest star today... and the party continues to veer further rightward, become more corrupt and now flirts with hate issues.
Bernie, Elizabeth, AOC, Pramila and some others are not proof that the democraps can ever be rehabilitated. Like trump with the Nazis, they are symptoms. If the party were worth a shit, they would not be the remote outliers that they seem to be today.
Post a Comment
<< Home