Thursday, January 12, 2006

BROOKLYN KNOWS WHAT'S UP! ELIZABETH HOLZMAN MAKES THE CASE FOR IMPEACHING BUSH

>


You know how it is when one of the kids from the old neighborhood makes good? Like everyone feels proud and all. I don't know how Ken feels about this-- because Schumer can be a dirty political lowlife when it suits him-- but overall, he's one of the better U.S. Senators and he's the only current U.S. Senator (not counting disgraced nitwit and clown Norm Coleman) from our old neighborhood in Brooklyn. I mean Coleman I'm embarrassed about. I feel pretty damn good about Schumer. I mean he's not Howard Dean or Barbara Boxer but... well you probably saw how nice he took on that Scalito monstrosity Bush is trying to force onto the Supreme Court! But this isn't about Chuck Schumer. It's another kid from our neighborhood who we can be proud of: Elizabeth Holzman. Remember her, Ken? I think she was like a few years ahead of us in school (or maybe a decade). But she used to go to the same Kings Highway pizzeria and egg-cream soda fountains we did!

Anyway, the new issue of THE NATION has an article she wrote about the compelling case for the impeachment of George Bush. What a great neighborhood we had! Holtzman, a former District Attorney and an awesome crusading congresswoman-- youngest woman to ever serve in Congress-- key to the efforts of excising Nixon from the body politic, wrote the powerful article which draws the parallels between the two criminal presidents.

Recalling the Nixon impeachment, she sighs: "At the time, I hoped that our committee's work would send a strong signal to future Presidents that they had to obey the rule of law. I was wrong." Now of course, she sees that the only impact the holding Nixon to account has been to make Bush more secretive and sneaky and authoritarian. Holzman decries Bush's arrogance in shredding international treaties as well as his disdain for the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions and for the torture scandals "These concerns," she writes "have been compounded by growing evidence that the President deliberately misled the country into the war in Iraq. But it wasn’t until the most recent revelations that President Bush directed the wiretapping of hundreds, possibly thousands, of Americans, in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) -- and argued that, as Commander in Chief, he had the right in the interests of national security to override our country’s laws -- that I felt the same sinking feeling in my stomach as I did during Watergate.

"As a matter of constitutional law, these and other misdeeds constitute grounds for the impeachment of President Bush. A President, any President, who maintains that he is above the law -- and repeatedly violates the law -- thereby commits high crimes and misdemeanors, the constitutional standard for impeachment and removal from office. ... But impeachment and removal from office will not happen unless the American people are convinced of its necessity after a full and fair inquiry into the facts and law is conducted. That inquiry must commence now."

She concludes that there will be a collective sign of relief once Bush is removed and constitutional government is re-established in America. Let's hear it for the home team!

1 Comments:

At 2:30 PM, Blogger KenInNY said...

Hey, it's good to hear from Liz Holtzman again. She seemed destined for big political things, and then those things didn't quite work out. What people in less populous areas may not appreciate is how much competition a rising pol runs into in a densely packed political thicket like New York.

Which is, curiously, how I came to upgrade my old opinion of Chuck Schumer. When he was representing our old CD in Brooklyn, I thought all (or mostly all) he was was a self-promoter with a genius for raising campaign funds.

And then came the election we can call D'Amato's Last Stand, thanks to Chuck Schumer. What Schumer understood was that, especially in a political culture as seriously overpopulated as ours, politics is no game. It's deadly serious business, and you can't apologize for being ambitious. And you not only have to watch carefully for your chances, but when one comes along, YOU HAVE TO BE READY TO LEAP.

It's true that Senator Al's, er, charm had probably started to fade by then, but against most opponents he might well have been able to make the old formula work once again. The basic tactic was to make everyone who could hurt you—all potential "enemies," as it were—scared to death of you.

Campaignwise, this meant: (1) going into any race with so much cash stockpiled that you scared off the "smart" opponents, and then you scared off the others, the ones who weren't smart enough to know better, by going into 24/7 attack-dog mode. (It never hurt to have Rupert Murdoch and his New York Post leading your cheering section.)

Well, our Chuck was ready. He had his war chest all set for the campaign, and he came out wit his guns blazing--with apologies for the mooshed metaphors. It was an inspired campaign. Old Al never knew what hit him. One day in November he was still one of the most powerful people in Washington; the next day he was yesterday's rat droppings.

It was also, incidentally, a campaign that was chock full of issues. And once I started listening to Rep. Chuck, I discovered that he's a lot closer to my ideal pol than I ever imagined. As soon as the election was decided, he made it clear that he intended to represent the entire state of New York, not just the Democratic areas, and I think he's done more for the traditionally Republican areas than any recent Republican officeholder.

In fact, I think he's been a terrific senator.

I would just add that on that Election Day in 1998, New York State voters not only elected Schumer to the Senate but chose Eliot Spitzer as state attorney general. The fact that probably everyone who reads this even knows who Spitzer is is utterly amazing for a NYS attorney general; usually most New Yorkers are hard put to tell you who the state attorney general is. Just now, it would be hard to find any serious observer of NYS politics who DOESN"T think that Spitzer is going to be elected governor next year.

I thought at the time that Chuck and Eliot, our "class of '98," was going to have an outsize impact. So far I haven't been disappointed.

K

 

Post a Comment

<< Home