Trump Has Been Trying To Manipulate Pandemic Statistics to Help His Election Campaign
>
First he tried, with some success, to get control of the reporting apparatus. Then he forced FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn to lie about a treatment's efficacy-- Hahn has since apologized to the American people. And his newest stunt is to change the testing guidelines to make himself look better by making it look like there are fewer cases. Unfortunately, that will be deadly.
Washington Postreporters Amy Goldstein and Lena Sun wrote yesterday that "An abrupt shift this week in government testing guidelines for Americans exposed to the novel coronavirus was directed by the White House coronavirus task force, surprising and dismaying many public health experts. The new guidance, introduced this week without any announcement in a posting on the website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, eliminated advice that everyone exposed to the virus through close contact with an infected individual get tested to find out whether they are positive, regardless of whether they have symptoms. Several leading infectious-disease experts say they feared the change will increase public confusion and further spread of the disease. The CDC estimates that 40 percent of those infected with the coronavirus have no symptoms but may spread it to other people."
Fauci said he is "concerned about the interpretation of these recommendations and worried it will give people the incorrect assumption that asymptomatic spread is not of great concern. In fact it is."
UPDATE: Oops! NEVERMIND!
Today, CDC Director Robert Redfield walked back the new Trumpanzee campaign testing guidelines. "Testing," he said, "is meant to drive actions and achieve specific public health objectives. Everyone who needs a COVID-19 test, can get a test. Everyone who wants a test does not necessarily need a test; the key is to engage the needed public health community in the decision with the appropriate follow-up action." A post in Popular Science this morning blasts the Trumpist regime's monkeying around with COVID statistics to help Trump's reelection campaign, claiming that all Redfield has done is further confuse a situation that the Trump Regime has made needlessly confusing to the American people.
Washington Postreporters Amy Goldstein and Lena Sun wrote yesterday that "An abrupt shift this week in government testing guidelines for Americans exposed to the novel coronavirus was directed by the White House coronavirus task force, surprising and dismaying many public health experts. The new guidance, introduced this week without any announcement in a posting on the website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, eliminated advice that everyone exposed to the virus through close contact with an infected individual get tested to find out whether they are positive, regardless of whether they have symptoms. Several leading infectious-disease experts say they feared the change will increase public confusion and further spread of the disease. The CDC estimates that 40 percent of those infected with the coronavirus have no symptoms but may spread it to other people."
In its new form, the testing guidance says that, for people who have been within six feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes, “you do not necessarily need a test.” The previous federal guidelines had urged tests for people who had been exposed, whether they had developed symptoms of not.CNN reported yesterday that the change in guidelines came "as a result of pressure from the upper ranks" of the increasingly fascist regime and the decision was made when Fauci was not around. "It's coming from the top down."
The new iteration says exposed people without symptoms still might warrant a test if they are especially vulnerable to the virus or if one is recommended by their source of medical care or by state or local public health officials.
...Former CDC Director Tom Frieden said that reducing testing among individuals exposed to an infected person could be detrimental.
“Not testing asymptomatic contacts may allow the spread of disease,” he said. There’s a big difference between not testing asymptomatic college students and not testing contacts” of an exposed person.
...Frieden said that, because testing materials and labs’ capacity have been stretched thin, it makes sense to set priorities for who needed to get tested the most. “But that’s not what they’re saying,” he said. “They’re saying don’t test asymptomatic people.” He noted that people who are asymptomatic are able to spread the virus to others before they develop symptoms. “[W]e don’t know what proportion of all spread comes from people who are asymptomatic,” Frieden said. “We know it’s not negligible.”
The new version of the guidance also says that someone who has been in a place with high covid-19 transmission and has attended a public or private gathering of more than 10 people without widespread mask-wearing or physical distancing does “not necessarily need a test” unless that person is a vulnerable individual, or the person’s health-care provider or state or local public health departments recommend a test.
Fauci said he is "concerned about the interpretation of these recommendations and worried it will give people the incorrect assumption that asymptomatic spread is not of great concern. In fact it is."
[T]he new directive also lines up with a trend in policy and rhetoric from the White House. President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested the US should do less testing.Although most of the states that are currently having the most cases also have Trump-puppet governors only one of them, Tennessee, is in the top 15 states administering tests. The 15 states with the most new cases Tuesday and Wednesday along with the number of tests per million residents (anything less than a quarter million is failure):
Dr. Carlos del Rio, an infectious disease specialist and associate dean of Emory University School of Medicine, said on CNN Newsroom on Wednesday that the CDC has not provided evidence to explain the changes.
"I mean, the evidence that I'm aware of as of today is that close to 40% of the cases of the infections are asymptomatic and asymptomatic people transmit the infection," Del Rio said.
"So, not testing-- I mean, if you have been in contact with somebody for a few minutes, that's okay. But if you have been in contact for 50 minutes and that people doesn't have a mask, I think you need to be tested regardless if you have symptoms or not. We know especially young people going into the house and then transmit inside the household. So, the guidelines baffle me and I really don't understand them."
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo accused the Trump administration of using the CDC as a political tool for the campaign.
"The only plausible rationale is they want fewer people taking tests because, as the president has said, if we don't take tests you won't know that people are covid positive and the number of covid positive people will come down," Cuomo told reporters Wednesday. "It fosters his failed policy of denial," he said of the President.
• Texas +12,856 (178,258 tests per million residents)
• California +11,277 (274,162 tests per million residents)
• Florida +5,893 (209,503 tests per million residents)
• Georgia +4,337 (237,406 tests per million residents)
• Illinois +3,837 (302,357 tests per million residents)
• Tennessee +2,749 (307,333 tests per million residents)
• North Carolina +2,631 (202,230 tests per million residents)
• Missouri +2,336 (162,817 tests per million residents)
• Ohio +1,898 (174,663 tests per million residents)
• Virginia +1,828 (190,194 tests per million residents)
• Michigan +1,794 (290,513 tests per million residents)
• Indiana +1,767 (199,433 tests per million residents)
• Mississippi +1,705 (198,965 tests per million residents)
• South Carolina +1,542 (188,889 tests per million residents)
• Arizona +1,045 (196,073 tests per million residents)
UPDATE: Oops! NEVERMIND!
Today, CDC Director Robert Redfield walked back the new Trumpanzee campaign testing guidelines. "Testing," he said, "is meant to drive actions and achieve specific public health objectives. Everyone who needs a COVID-19 test, can get a test. Everyone who wants a test does not necessarily need a test; the key is to engage the needed public health community in the decision with the appropriate follow-up action." A post in Popular Science this morning blasts the Trumpist regime's monkeying around with COVID statistics to help Trump's reelection campaign, claiming that all Redfield has done is further confuse a situation that the Trump Regime has made needlessly confusing to the American people.
Labels: CDC, Chris Martenson, coronavirus, testing
4 Comments:
Another faux pas of the CDC from earlier in August that has gotten little attention was about wearing vented masks, which they have maligned and warned against, with zero data to back up their claim. It seems the airline industry pressured the CDC to do this and they complied. Readers are referred to a DWT article earlier this week about this issue. Although the vented mask brou-ha-ha is a minor blip compared to the two new ones about plasma and testing, it is another example of how the CDC can no longer be trusted to give information based on science. The rot is expanding.
The deep do-doo pile of b.s. from the CDC, the FDA and just about any other institution within the executive branch keeps growing.
As a union officer, I have been having a running battle with our employer over protective equipment.
They claim to be following CDC guidelines in equipment selection and the establishment of safety practices. What doesn't help the effort one bit is the overt pressure from Trump to weaken or eliminate standards in favor of the poor corporations struggling to remain profitable no matter how many of their employees they push into the contagion to sicken or die in the process.
Despite this, too many of the members remain staunch supporters of Trump. It's like they don't or won't see that their support of Trump is working against their very health and safety. They buy into the BS regarding having more concern that their employer's economic health be given precedence over their own physical health. It's like they can't die for profits fast enough.
I am so thoroughly disgusted with them that I question why I continue to represent them, and daily consider resigning and leaving them to the fate they clearly prefer.
Responding to 6:33:
The cognitive dissonance of many union members continues to astonish me. They support the same political party that works so hard to destroy the power of the unions. The unions that made their comfortable (maybe) middle class lifestyle even possible.
Hone, vented masks are actually more effective spreaders than diffusive masks. The focused jet of exhale projects whatever is in that exhale further and faster than diffusing masks. It's simple fluid dynamics.
I don't know for certain why the airlines pressured the CDC. But I know my fluid dynamics.
There are no perfect masks. There must be gasses and some material exhaled into the ambient air. Personally, I'd prefer that someone who is a spreader NOT wear a vented mask, especially in an airplane on a long flight, since all air gets recirculated over and over.
And if I were a spreader, I'd never want to project my virus as far and fast as possible... unless I were in a room full of republicans. I avoid that as much as possible, though.
Post a Comment
<< Home