Wednesday, November 20, 2019

When Will Chicago Blue Dog Dan Lipinski Just Jump The Fence And Switch Parties?

>


Chicago's top political reporter, Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times, just blew up Blue Dog Dan Lipinski's reelection campaign by exposing an internal campaign document about how to appeal to Republican voters. The idea was to get Republicans to vote for him "by highlighting his vote against Obamacare while wooing independents by reminding them he opposed its repeal."
Other highlights from the strategy document suggesting messages to various voter demographics in the 3rd Congressional District:
Hispanics were to be flagged about Lipinski’s “pro-Dreamer votes” while Republicans would be targeted with “pro border patrol” messaging.
Lipinski is anti-abortion and that would be the emphasis for Republicans and Catholics, but not for outreach to other women, millennials, teachers, independents, union members and nurses.
A drive to persuade Republicans to vote in the Democratic primary would include reaching out to GOP officeholders; getting letters from “GOP surrogates”; and through Facebook “ads targeting independents.”
Lipinski, from Western Springs, is in a three-way March contest against Marie Newman, from La Grange, who almost beat him in 2018, and Rush Darwish, from Palos Hills, who runs a radio and television production business. This is the biggest congressional Democratic primary in Illinois.

Details about Lipinski’s campaign strategy were contained in a Google document Lipinski’s political director Jerry Hurckes inadvertently sent to someone.

Screenshots of the Hurckes documents were shared with others, including Richard Rodriguez, a founding member of the Will County Progressives and a national board member of Our Revolution, spawned from Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign.

Hurckes has long ties to Lipinski, first elected in 2004. He served as chief of staff to his father, Rep. Bill Lipinski, who represented the district for 22 years. Hurckes’ wife, MaryAnn, also works for the Lipinski campaign, according to federal campaign finance records.

Lipinski told the Sun-Times there are “serious ethical issues” for whoever circulated the Hurckes document.

“I have never seen this document until today,” Lipinski said last week, “...I am still not exactly sure who in my campaign may have put this together, but I had not, so this is not anything that I have approved.”

Lipinski said the strategies “are not necessarily my thoughts.”

The district is heavily Democrat. Republican Will County Board Member Mike Fricilone, from Homer Glen, is making a bid, but he’s raised little money to run a viable campaign. He only had $775 cash on hand as of Sept. 30. There will likely be a pool of persuadable crossover Republicans.

Newman and Darwish are progressives; Lipinski is a social conservative.

Rodriguez, who backs Newman, told the Sun-Times the different messages in the document shows Lipinski “is willing to play two different acts to hold his seat. I believe he is talking out of both sides of his mouth.”

Rodriguez said the document makes it “very clear to me there is strategy to target Republican voters. And that is a problem to me, that the DCCC is going to support an incumbent that is relying on Republicans to vote in a Democratic primary in a strongly Democratic district.”

Rodriguez has been outspoken in his criticism of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee “blacklist.”

The DCCC, under chair Rep. Cheri Bustos, D-Ill., officially backs incumbents. Bustos ordered the DCCC not to do business with vendors who work for Democratic challengers. Newman lost several consultants as a result of that blacklist.

It’s not unusual for candidates to evolve on issues or to seek crossover support. What is not common, however, is touting old and new positions at the same time, depending on the audience. Here’s some background.

In 2010, Lipinski voted against the Affordable Care Act, nicknamed Obamacare, because of his anti-abortion related concerns over some funding provisions in the bill. Since then, Lipinski has voted against Republican attempts to repeal the law.

In 2010, he also voted against the DREAM Act, to give legal protections to youths in the U.S. illegally through no fault of their own. Through the years he has joined other Democrats in backing the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to protect “Dreamers,” nicknamed DACA.

The Lipinski campaign document included talking points to describe Lipinski and Newman.

Newman: “self absorbed”; “opportunist” and “Socialist.”

Lipinski: “vote conscience”; “labor unions;” “doesn’t check the wind”; “already on committees” and “character.”




Said Lipinski, “I think it’s a good summary, probably, of how I see myself, and I am not going to comment about Marie Newman.”

Newman campaign manager Ben Hardin said, “I think what is truly opportunistic is Congressman Lipinski’s willingness to mislead his constituents.”

Darwish communications director Andrew Patinkin said, “Lipinski is a Democrat in name only,” who “has to rely on Republican voters” while Darwish “represents the values and beliefs” of district residents.
After reading Lynn Sweet's piece, Marie Newman wrote that "The kind of cynicism displayed in the Lipinski campaign memo is why a lot of people are turned off from politics. Since he has not voted with the Democrats on critical issues, this memo suggests he is turning his attention to Republicans instead. This is why I am running-- because I believe this district needs a real Democrat who will fight for everyday issues and represent working people, lower health care costs, and fight for our Democratic values."

Newman continued that "We have a golden opportunity to make a change in our community this March. An opportunity to elect someone to Congress who will truly be an advocate for workers and working families. I am so honored to have the endorsement of Abe Matthew, and I know that with his help, we can make that change a reality."

Goal ThermometerLipinski is one of the most reactionary of all the Republican-lite Blue Dogs in Congress often stands with the GOP against the Democratic agenda. ProgressivePunch has graded his voting record an "F." Progressive Marie Newman has been endorsed by presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Jay Inslee, Kirsten Gillibrand. Conservative Democrats who may back Lipinski-- namely Biden and Delaney-- haven't spoken openly about him and haven't endorsed him. Please consider contributing to Marie's campaign at the Chicagoland campaign thermometer on the right.

Members of Congress with the guts to stand up to Cheri Bustos and endorse Marie include Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ro Khanna (D-CA) and AOC (D-NY). Other progressive members are preparing to. Marie has also been endorsed by Blue America, Indivisible, Planned Parenthood, MoveOn, DFA, NARAL, Justice Democrats, PCCC, PDA, the National Organization for Women, Our Revolution, Daily Kos, the American Postal Workers Union, and many other organizations, many of which do not normally endorse against Democratic incumbents.


Labels: , , , , ,

2 Comments:

At 10:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

While it has been a long time, this district was where many of the people who worked for or retired From Inland Steel lived. Inland Steel was one of the first leveraged buyouts in modern American history, and thousands of people were harmed by this. Father Lipinski had to have been involved to provide cover for the vultures.

 
At 1:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

only matters if those inland steel people know who were/are screwing them. I'd guess they don't have a clue who to blame, which is why Lip is still there.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home