Friday, September 27, 2019

First Contact: Robert Emmons, Jr. (IL-01)

>

I'll have to ask Mr. Emmons how he thinks that turned out

Blue America is at the very beginning stages of getting to know-- sounds so much better than "vetting," right?-- Robert Emmons, the progressive Democrat challenging longtime Chicago Congressman Bobby Rush. When he first e-mailed and asked for our endorsement, I was super-slammed with the whistleblower papers being released so I responded with this e-mail, thinking it might give me some breathing space to postpone a phone conversation by a few days so I could catch up. "Nice to hear from you, Robert.," I wrote. "Before we talk on the phone, can you tell me the case you're making against Rush and how you sense that is going over in the community?" The other possibility with a request like that-- a telling one-- is that a candidate doesn't have it together to respond at all. Almost half the candidates who request endorsements don't have what it takes to carry out a simple task like that. It saves me a lot of time and energy because then I know right off that bat that there's nothing we can do to help them.

But not Emmons. He was ON IT-- and FAST! Here's his response:
Here is a sample of our case:

We respect Bobby Rush, but he has failed our community for far too long. When Barack Obama ran against Bobby Rush in 2000, he said that Bobby Rush is out of touch and represents a reactive politics. We couldn’t agree more, and 20 years has made the situation even more dire.

I want to point out that we have a vision for the district that goes beyond politics. We want to make this the last generation to be faced with everyday gun violence by addressing the root causes. This is not an issue that Bobby doesn’t care about. This is an issue that we have disagreements on how to solve. Militarizing and criminalizing our community is not the answer. Addressing poverty and environmental racism’s is the answer. Our campaign is predicated on the belief that we are the solution together; that the solutions to our community’s most pressing needs are in the minds and hearts of those who have been hurt by the laws designed to hold them down.

  Issues:
Bobby Rush voted for the disastrous 1994 crime bill. This further exacerbated the vicious cycle of poverty and hence violence in communities of color across the nation.
25 years after the Crime Bill passage, he still supports local policies that are “tough on crime”. For example he supports proposals of 50 million dollars on drone surveillance on the Southside of Chicago. Evidence has proven this strategy to be ineffective and a terrible use of resources. This means that even though he has apologized for the 94’ crime bill, he hasn’t learned from the impacts it has had.
He has always taken money from the fossil fuel industry. This is while we in the First’ have some of the highest percentages of people with asthma in the nation(including myself).
He sits on the committee on Energy and Commerce. He called the Green New Deal a smash and grab. This isn’t surprising due to his relationship with the fossil fuel industry.
He has one of the poorest run constituent services. Electeds around the district have said that they can’t work with him.
He has spurred division in our district. More recently in the Chicago Mayoral elections.
Our District is ready for reinvigoration. We have felt an energy in the district that we haven’t felt in our lives.
We have built a multi-generational coalition across the district.
Our campaign has 40xs more small dollar contributions than Bobby Rush. We have proven to be about the people.
We received endorsements from public officials, YoungPac, People For Bernie Sanders, and more recently Brand New Congress.
We have already started working with elected officials to make our district stronger. 
Our campaign has received support from folks in 43 states.

I hope this helps to begin. Please let us know if you’d like to discuss these points further. 


And that was good enough to set up a phone call so we can begin the process of making sure Mr. Emmons will make a member of Congress we know we will be able to count on to do the right things for IL-01 and for the country. After all, these congressional candidates wind up as senators and governors and cabinet secretaries and even presidents. We have to make sure we're not going to wind up with some fast-talking crook like Joe Biden. I promise to let you know how it goes. So far my gut is telling me, we have a good one here. Here's the video he released on his campaign site; sounds good, right?





Labels: , , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 12:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

hard to imagine Pelosi ever doing jack shit about guns. but I suppose the sun could rise in the west tomorrow.

Every "progressive" democrap running for congress should be asked one and only one question: "what can you do that Pelosi or scummer cannot and will not smother to 'bolivian'?"

The nra isn't neutered yet. they have hundreds of millions of Russian and ??? money to launder and slather over the two American fascist/neonazi parties. How much does this guy have?

 
At 11:25 AM, Blogger someITguy said...

No.

Starting with gun control is not a good sign.

This is the first g; "Four Gs" God (choice), Guns, Gays (LGBT rights), and Greens (the environment).

The four g's are not problems that are supposed to solved.

These are the issues that Centrist Dems have developed and expanded over forty years to keep us from talking about economics. To use up the oxygen.

There have been some changes, Clinton explicity talked up race to derail talk about economic inequality. Very, very clever. Now any attempt to talk about class makes you suspect on race. It puts centrists in heaven to have lefties called out this way.

Back in the 80s, "the environment" was symbolic tree-hugging. The environment has now become big enough as a problem, that rich people might have to pay taxes to fix it, and that usually puts it off limits.
So GND got a little bit of a late start, as a way to subvert a centrist-approved, rich-people-safe, issue, but it is almost as clever.
If you want to know why centrists hate the GND, it's turning their safe talking point, one of their tools to keep from talking about economics, into something toxic that they can't use any more.

As an experiment, add up all the time you hear people talking about economics, i.e. unions, anti-trust, etc., and compare it to the time spent talking anything, anything that isn't that.

News organization used to have labor reporters.

 
At 2:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

SomeIT makes solid points.

As the American society continually decays, things that were once reasonably healthy become contentious issues.

tax cuts for the rich and corporations made inequality suddenly more relevant.
billions more people plus corporate indifference to the planet made ecology and climate important.
social acceptance of suppression of the nonrich and nonwhite made things like hate, vote fraud and so on important.
Since the Reagan devolution in 1980, there has also been aggressive war, torture, monopolization, wall street CRIME, foreigner interference in elections, refusal to enforce laws, crimes in office, lies, perjury and treason... all of which have become normalized.

Thus, society has a lot more horse shit it is trying to remedy than before 1980.

Because nobody since before 1980 has even tried to remedy anything. They like to have a lot of shit to run on... but never try to fix any of it once elected.

If you think that anyone from either party will even TRY to fix one single issue after 2020 -- you're a fool.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home