How Far Will The Unpopular And Desperate Queens-Born Casino Operator Go To Hold Onto His Power?
>
I'm going to start with some polling from yesterday. Gallup first. They show Trump sinking below 40%-- 4 points down since the end of February. Republicans like him; everyone else hates him. Now a less known poll from Navigator Research, "a project designed to better understand the American public’s views on issues of the day and help advocates, elected officials, and other interested parties understand the language, imagery and messaging needed to make and win key policy arguments." This particular poll is mostly about Climate Change but they also have some Trump findings: "This month, just 38% believe the president generally does what’s best for the country, a new low and a 6-point decline from December. 62% now tend to say the president puts himself first. Perception of Trump as self-interested has grown more rapidly than overall disapproval. As Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia’s possible involvement winds down, support for the probe has reached an all-time high of 58%."
And that leads right to yesterday's House vote on Jerry Nadler's Resolution 24-- "Expressing the sense of Congress that the report of Special Counsel Mueller should be made available to the public and to Congress." Nadler is the chair of the House Judiciary Committee and is cosponsors included the chairs of 5 other top committees: Maxine Waters (Financial Services), Adam Schiff (Intelligence), Elijah Cummings (Oversight), Eliot Engel (Foreign Affairs), Richard Neil (Way and Means). It passed with 420 votes. Florida Republican Matt Gaetz pulled his head out of Trump's ass long enough to vote "present." He was joined by 3 other Republicans refusing to go on-record favoring the public release of the report.
It also leads to yesterday's Senate vote that Trump lost badly when a large bipartisan majority of senators approved HJ 46, the resolution of disapproval for his phony state of emergency declaration. A dozen Republicans voted with every single Democrat (including right-wingers Sinema and Manchin) against Trump. The Republicans include Lamar Alexander (TN), Roy Blunt (MO), Susan Collins (ME), Mike Lee (UT), Jerry Moran (KS), Lisa Murkowski (AK), Randy Paul (KY), Rob Portman (OH), Mitt Romney (UT), Marco Rubio (FL), Pat Toomey (PA) and Roger Wicker (MS). Publicly Trump says he'll veto it; there are reports that privately, he's furious and looking for revenge.
Thursday morning, rejecting Trump's insistence that he can't be sued in state court, a New York appellate court ruled that Summer Zervos, a former Apprentice contestant, who Trump sexually harassed, can move forward with her defamation suit against Trump now, while he's still "president." In their statement, the justices explained that they "reject defendant President Trump's argument that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents a New York State court-- and every other state court in the country-- from exercising its authority under its state constitution. Instead, we find that the Supremacy Clause was never intended to deprive a state court of its authority to decide cases and controversies under the state's constitution."
Looking bad for what Spy Magazine editor Graydon Carter long, long ago referred to as a "short fingered vulgarian?" He struck back with a veiled threat that it's unimaginable any legitimate president would have ever uttered, "armed pushback," reported Daniel Dale, "against his political opponents." Breitbart News was interviewing Trump when he stopped attacking Paul Ryan long enough to mention "it would be very bad, very bad" if his supporters in the military, police and a motorcycle group were provoked into getting "tough." Trump was arguing that "the left" plays politics in a "tougher" and more "vicious" manner than the pro-Trump right even though "the tough people" are on Trump’s side.
And that leads right to yesterday's House vote on Jerry Nadler's Resolution 24-- "Expressing the sense of Congress that the report of Special Counsel Mueller should be made available to the public and to Congress." Nadler is the chair of the House Judiciary Committee and is cosponsors included the chairs of 5 other top committees: Maxine Waters (Financial Services), Adam Schiff (Intelligence), Elijah Cummings (Oversight), Eliot Engel (Foreign Affairs), Richard Neil (Way and Means). It passed with 420 votes. Florida Republican Matt Gaetz pulled his head out of Trump's ass long enough to vote "present." He was joined by 3 other Republicans refusing to go on-record favoring the public release of the report.
It also leads to yesterday's Senate vote that Trump lost badly when a large bipartisan majority of senators approved HJ 46, the resolution of disapproval for his phony state of emergency declaration. A dozen Republicans voted with every single Democrat (including right-wingers Sinema and Manchin) against Trump. The Republicans include Lamar Alexander (TN), Roy Blunt (MO), Susan Collins (ME), Mike Lee (UT), Jerry Moran (KS), Lisa Murkowski (AK), Randy Paul (KY), Rob Portman (OH), Mitt Romney (UT), Marco Rubio (FL), Pat Toomey (PA) and Roger Wicker (MS). Publicly Trump says he'll veto it; there are reports that privately, he's furious and looking for revenge.
Thursday morning, rejecting Trump's insistence that he can't be sued in state court, a New York appellate court ruled that Summer Zervos, a former Apprentice contestant, who Trump sexually harassed, can move forward with her defamation suit against Trump now, while he's still "president." In their statement, the justices explained that they "reject defendant President Trump's argument that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents a New York State court-- and every other state court in the country-- from exercising its authority under its state constitution. Instead, we find that the Supremacy Clause was never intended to deprive a state court of its authority to decide cases and controversies under the state's constitution."
Looking bad for what Spy Magazine editor Graydon Carter long, long ago referred to as a "short fingered vulgarian?" He struck back with a veiled threat that it's unimaginable any legitimate president would have ever uttered, "armed pushback," reported Daniel Dale, "against his political opponents." Breitbart News was interviewing Trump when he stopped attacking Paul Ryan long enough to mention "it would be very bad, very bad" if his supporters in the military, police and a motorcycle group were provoked into getting "tough." Trump was arguing that "the left" plays politics in a "tougher" and more "vicious" manner than the pro-Trump right even though "the tough people" are on Trump’s side.
“I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump-- I have the tough people, but they don’t play it tough-- until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad,” Trump said.
...The quote prompted criticism and alarm when The Star tweeted it.
“This is how an authoritarian talks. Happening right in front of us,” Brendan Nyhan, a University of Michigan public policy professor who co-founded an initiative monitoring the state of U.S. democracy, said on Twitter.
“We can’t sugar-coat this. The President of the United States is encouraging the military, police, and bikers to violently attack his critics on the left,” liberal journalist Judd Legum tweeted.
“In which the president of the United States threatens street violence against his political opponents,” the liberal advocacy group Public Citizen tweeted. “What happens if Trump loses in 2020? Is that the ‘certain point?’”
Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, who has been convicted of several crimes, testified to Congress in February: “Given my experience working for Mr. Trump, I fear that if he loses the election in 2020, that there will never be a peaceful transition of power.”
Trump made another veiled suggestion of retribution from the military, police and Bikers for Trump at a midterm campaign rally in Georgia in November. After mocking Antifa protesters as weaklings-- “you see these little arms,” he joked-- he said, “And then you see the clubs in their hands. You know, they’re tough guys, right. Where are the Bikers for Trump? Where are the police? Where are the military? Where are the ICE? Where are the Border Patrol? No. No. We’ve taken a lot. We’ve taken a lot, folks.”
Bikers for Trump, which has more than 300,000 followers on Facebook, is not a criminal biker gang.
Bikers for Trump founder Chris Cox, a chainsaw artist described in one 2017 newspaper profile as “exceedingly polite,” offered in advance of Trump’s inauguration in 2017 to form a “wall of meat” between the president and protesters. He said, though, that he expected a peaceful gathering. While group members have had verbal confrontations with anti-Trump protesters, there have not been reports of major violence.
Trump met with some of the Bikers for Trump at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey in August. In November, Cox travelled to Florida and made unfounded allegations of election fraud. In December, Cox and his German shepherd stood outside the courthouse where former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn was to be sentenced for lying to the FBI, with Cox telling Mother Jones Magazine he was “here to make sure [Flynn’s] family is not assaulted or intimidated.”
Trump also endorsed violence against protesters at some of his rallies in 2016. At one rally in Iowa, he urged his supporters to beat up anyone getting ready to “throw a tomato,” saying, “Knock the crap out of them…I promise you I will pay for the legal fees.”
Labels: Bob Mueller, Daniel Dale, Graydon Carter, Resolution of Disapproval, violence
10 Comments:
How far? Oh, pretty far. And this was obvious from the moment he came down the escalator in 2015 to announce his candidacy.
Too bad the mainstream media was more focused on a BS email story and in regurgitating Right-wing/Russian lies about a certain female Presidential candidate that they never really bothered to look closely at this nutball who now squats in the White House.
And don't look for the GOP to grow a sack to get him out either because--news flash!--Trump IS the true face of the GOP.
if it looks like democraps will win in 2020, he could just lay low until the new inauguration and then just trust the democraps to not do anything at all, like obamanation didn't do with bankers and torturers. a VERY safe bet.
He doesn't have the police and military on his side: as they are all sworn to defend the constitution & he's simply just lying again without being challenged on his premise (ask Mattis). He also has about 60% of the US population against him. Let's see him actually fistfight Biden and then see how he likes violence.
I would remind you, 11:27, that trump, Pelosi, hoyer, cliburn, DWS, scummer, obamanation, w, cheney, Clinton, harriet reid, newt, tom delay, Reagan and HW (among thousands over the past 4 decades) ALL swore to protect and defend the constitution. didn't mean shit to them either. just words to pronounce in order to get corporations to pay you.
I'd remind you that all service members swear to protect the constitution too. and they all went to Iraq, Syria and a whole host of other nations for no reason other than to protect the interests of standard oil and wall street.
all those oaths don't mean shit these days.
"He doesn't have the police and military on his side: as they are all sworn to defend the constitution..."
Both entities violate the Constitution daily. When Dubya allegedly declared the Constitution to be "just a piece of paper", the actions of his administration spoke truth to that assertion whether or not he actually said it.
How many people have been illegally murdered with impunity by police since then? And what of the myriad of undeclared wars US forces have been deployed to wage wherever petroleum is found? It is only a matter of time before the Trump monster unleashes his killer forces on the citizenry of the United States.
I saw this coming with the rise of Reagan, but the democraps are only now beginning to rouse to the threat. We can't count on them. They worry that Trump will wag his stubby fingers at them and tell them they are bad.
Several years ago, some "man of god" wrote a blog post where armed attackers swarmed the Congress and shot all of the democraps. When he was called out for advocating political violence, his defenders rose up outraged that anyone would dare to do so.
That very scenario could occur at any time now, for moving from a paedophile ring based in a non-existant basement of a DC pizza parlor to advocating the elimination of Trump's enemies is not a far stretch for the morons who back him.
12:46, agreed with one very major exception: "but the democraps are only now beginning to rouse to the threat"
They've only "risen" to offer a charade of a pretense of a reaction to the threat. The threats are manifold and very real. The democraps haven't DONE shit... except pay closer attention to the optics of pretense.
And both the pizza parlor, which was burned, and the fantasy of killing all democraps, which was planned by the guys recently arrested, prove it is no stretch. It's only a matter of time and the correct amount of inaction by authorities... remembering 9/11 here.
As I am Anon:11:27. What Trump just did was make false premises that the majority of the military and police are on his side and that they are prepared to commit violence against other fellow Americans and members of their own family. Are their no politician or reporters who can ask what evidence he has that the police and military will attack fellow Americans and their own family members who have opposing political beliefs on his behalf? He states these premises as a fact and then gets everyone debating his conclusion and we therefor should be fearful. There is a huge difference between some police and the majority of police killing innocent people. He should be impeached for even making these premise, but at the very least his premises should be questioned before we debate his conclusion.
I did not question his veracity... a fool's errand for sure. I just pointed out that THREATENING armed insurrection if the system properly moves against him is treason and he should be stood up against a wall. There are as many as 200 million who would volunteer for that detail, including moi.
I also observe that the oath of office is merely a noise people (both parties) make in order to start being paid by corporations and lobbyists... nothing more... in this shithole anyway.
I do not presume that trump cannot muster an awful lot of the military. I am skeptical about police, except in the south and in white rural communities. I also wonder what the police would decide would be the pragmatic posture should trump order the big red 1 to occupy DC, NYC and maybe 10 more.
I live in a very red enclave in a very blue state. The police here would be with trump. period.
would the state police be willing to shoot it out with my local city and county Nazi police? The national guard? I don't know.
But I do know that the guy who threatens it, even given the reality of a Nazi shithole, should be impeached, arrested, tried, convicted, shot and hung from a bridge, like a certain doppleganger in Italy... all within the framework of the rule of law.
in this shithole? wall street will probably start loaning his crooked company money again.
Here's some actual data on military support for just the Trump's presidency. Note that his highest support is among the lowest ranked enlisted men and his greatest opposition by higher ranking officers. In military terms he is popular by the least educated and despised among those with better educations i.e like the general population of the US.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2018/10/15/support-for-trump-is-fading-among-active-duty-troops-new-poll-shows/
excerpt from article ("The new survey results also show sharp divides within the ranks. Enlisted men show Trump the most overwhelming support. Military women, meanwhile, have a much harsher view of Trump’s time in office. Officers still have a lower opinion of his presidency than enlisted troops.")
and I remember a lot of the officer corps got themselves "fragged" in Viet Nam when the grunts didn't care for the orders they were being given. I don't know what that might mean if they don't get orders they want to get (to support their fuhrer's demand for an armed insurrection).
I also know the air force is an evangelical shitscape of an org that will probably support trump from bottom to top.
Post a Comment
<< Home