Friday, March 08, 2019

Bernie Has Broken Through With African American Voters In A Way He Couldn't In 2016

>

While Bernie was being arrested fighting for integration, Biden was building a career based on backing segregation

African-American voters were extremely loyal to Clinton in 2016. I'm not implying that Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't work her corporate fingers to the bone stealing the primaries for Hillary-- she clearly did-- but I am saying that any legitimacy in Clinton's win was due as much to African American voters' good feelings about the family legacy (or myth) than to her corporate donors and the odious Wasserman Schultz. Where African American voters turned out in strength, they saved Clinton, not just across the South, where it was most apparent, but in the big vote-rich states that Bernie would have otherwise won, like New York, Illinois and California. African American turnout was depressed in Milwaukee and Detroit and Bernie carried Wisconsin and Michigan. Bernie won big Hispanic-majority districts in Chicago, New York and Los Angeles but was clobbered in the black-majority districts in the same cities.

Bernie has worked hard to grow is African American support across the country and-- to a great extent-- he has been succeeding, although Biden-- despite a shockingly and reprehensibly racist political biography-- is so identified with Obama that many black voters look no further.

Ryan Grim reported that Bernie is leading all other announced candidates in support from black voters, according to a new poll from Morning Consult. finds. Only Status Quo Joe Biden, who hasn't announced yet and hasn't been subjected to any real scrutiny, leads him.
Despite a persistent notion that his supporters are disproportionately white male “bros,” the new survey suggests that Sanders is actually slightly more popular among black Democratic voters than white ones, indicating that the narrative that developed during the 2016 campaign may no longer hold, if it ever did.

Sanders’s support among black voters, at 28 percent, puts him in second place among that demographic, behind Biden, at 32 percent. He trailed Biden 31-25 among whites.

There appears to be a strong class element at play in the finding. The same poll found that the demographics Sanders is least popular with-- at 19 and 17 percent, respectively--  are Democrats who make more than $100,000 per year and Democrats who have post-graduate degrees (two qualities that typically, if not always, overlap). Because of structural wealth and income gaps, that population is heavily white.

Sanders, meanwhile, receives his strongest support support from those making less than $50,000-- a group that is, for the same reasons, much more diverse. The poll found that 30 percent of those with the lowest incomes backed Sanders.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), meanwhile, has half as much support, at 14 percent, among black voters as Sanders, according to supplementary polling data provided to The Intercept by Morning Consult. The findings are drawn from a sample of 2,587 black, likely Democratic primary voters.

New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker comes in fourth at 6 percent among black voters. Elizabeth Warren and Beto O’Rourke both registered 4 percent, while Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Attorney General Eric Holder, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, and others all clocked in at 1 percent. (Holder and Bloomberg have said they’re not running.)

...The preference for Sanders among black voters might be better explained by ideology than identity. February’s Harvard-Harris poll found that 56 percent of black voters preferred a “mostly socialist” economic system, against 44 percent who want a “mostly capitalist” one.

The findings pose both challenges and opportunities for Sanders. Wealthy and middle-class Democrats tend to be more likely to vote than the working class and poor, but Sanders is running a 50-state field and digital program that aims to unleash over a million Sanders volunteers to register and turn out voters who have stayed home in the past. That work could then pay dividends in the general election, which was decided in three states by just tens of thousands of votes in 2016.

Registering and turning out new voters has long been the vision of progressive campaigns. But because it’s extraordinarily difficult, most campaigns stick to the traditional approach of raising big money to pay for television ads that persuade undecided but dependable voters. The upside of the Sanders strategy is that it could reshape the political electorate, creating new possibilities for his agenda in Washington.
Yesterday, Gallup reported on the favorability of the presidential hopefuls among American adults. Among those describing themselves as Democrats or independents leaning Democratic:



Meanwhile, Trump is busy too... working to delegitimize the results of the 2020 election in advance. (Don't forget what Michael Cohen said about Trump's probable unwillingness to allow a peaceful transition of power.) "All of that rhetoric," reported Chris Cillizza for CNN, "fits into a very clear pattern: Convince the Trump base that it is not possible for him to lose a fair and legitimate election in 2020. Thus, if he loses, it must be, by definition, illegitimate."


Labels:

6 Comments:

At 1:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Polling still shows that all lefty voters are majority dumbfucktards. biden still leads Bernie?

In a cluster fuck of a shithole based on colossal stupidity among the electorate, it becomes trivial for someone like trump to convince his base that they cannot lose except by fraud.

Not that fraud is all that rare... it's just that the fraud is usually favoring the Nazi side.

If only someone had decided that voting should be free, fair and verifiable... say in 2008... and had made sure it was so. But no, they needed fraud available to make sure their 2016 nom was $hillbillary.

Only one of many issues in the electoral mandate that obamanation and that democrap majority refused to fix. Even after the SC whacked the Voting Rights consent decree, they refused. They refused the whole fucking mandate.

And now we have trump... maybe forever.

 
At 2:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What that might mean is the DNC will have to suppress the black vote so that NOT Bernie is the nom. I'm sure they have some kind of plan in place... maybe just rig the convention again. something. we'll see pretty soon.

 
At 5:20 PM, Anonymous Bernblue said...

Two groups that really have it on the line in 2020 are poor AA voters and labor unions. They each have a dream candidate in Bernie, the type of candidate that might not come around for another generation. If both of these groups got behind Bernie he will no doubt be elected and lead the way to much needed change. If they don't they may not get another chance for a long, long time. It's really up to them and their leadership. They must be wise in their choice and not fall for the same old. same old.

 
At 7:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Aside from my belief that Bernie is a mirage, let's look at history. Bernie is not the generational candidate you said. He's more like once-in-a-century.

AA voters are notoriously morons, though. They supported Clinton for no discernible reason. He assisted in moving a lot of their jobs overseas and helped banks create the 2008 crash that hurt more of them than other demos. They supported obamanation strictly because of their common melanin levels. Certainly they did not support him because he did anything at all for them once in the white man's house.

labor unions? even dumber than the AA voters. Why would labor support a party that is as corrupt and fascist? because they're imbeciles.

Also looking back, if Bernie truly wants to be the 'revolutionary' he claims, he's going about it all wrong.
The greatest revolutionary, FDR, ran as the "better elitist" and "not Hoover" in '32. He didn't become a revolutionary until after he was elected. And his party cared about the nation (which is certainly not true today).

Bernie is RUNNING as a revolutionary. He's made himself radioactive in his own PARTY even as he has excited the sentient among the dumbfucktard left. What happened in '16 is because of this. It won't change in '20.

Name one single successful binary party candidate that EVER got elected as an overt 'revolutionary' since Lincoln. Or before Lincoln.

You claim you are a revolutionary in this cluster fuck of a shithole with this dumb of an electorate... and you lose.

 
At 11:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Why would labor support a party that is as corrupt and fascist?"

Being a union member myself, I have some insight regarding this question.

Most union members themselves are bigots, and staunch Republican voters seeking safety from lower-wage workers of all kind, citizen or not. Too many union workers closely fit the stereotype presented by the corporatists - stupid, lazy, and incompetent. Most would have been fired if management weren't just as stupid, lazy, and incompetent.

When my Local is approached for campaign volunteers, no one ever steps up to apply. They won't lift a finger to assist themselves in making their union a viable defense against the capriciousness of management, so no one smart would expect them to act in other ways they can't see and don't understand that just might benefit them. They are too busy watching FOX and believing every word.

This is just about every union in America. When Reagan fired PATCO and all of the other unions sat silently on their hands, that was the end of unions in America. If management weren't stupid, lazy, and incompetent, and if they bothered to care to have done so, there would be no unions in America today.

 
At 1:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Part of the decay of unions is the free flow of capital and jobs out of the usa to asia.

Another part is the automation that has eliminated millions of blue-collar jobs since the '60s.

But 11:41 makes a solid point. a big part of the problem here, as generally in the usa, is how stupid we've all become over the decades of maleducation and brainwashing from the teevee machine, social media (each other) and from the pulpit.

It's tragic that union leadershit still supports the democraps who haven't had any use for labor except their donations since 1980 at least.
It's downright scandalous yet predictable that the rank-and-file will support the Nazi party, who treat labor worse than the democraps do.

anyone else get the vision of the lemmings running off the cliff? Or maybe the school of herring "schooling" so that a blue whale can gulp them all down in one bite (the whale is the money party in that analogy)?

truly a cluster fuck of a shithole.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home