Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Question For Post-Partisans: Can We Get There By Leaving The Driving To The Same Ralph Kramdens Who Keep Running Us Off The Road?

>

Gene Sculatti is an old friend of mine. When I first met him he was the subversive executive inside the big scary major record label. He hired me to write articles in the Warner Bros inhouse magaizne and he flew me down to the company's redwood Burbank headquarters to introduce the company's apprehensive senior executives to DEVO. This is the first time Gene is writing for DWT. I'm over the moon.


by Gene Sculatti 
 
I probably shouldn’t be doing this. Writing in the heat of the moment, reacting to the news of Daschle removing himself from consideration for head of Secretary of Health & Human Services. But, jeez, how many times do we have to go through all this-- us, plain Americans, progressives, people of any party or none who want a long overdue turnaround? Is there an endless pool of Daschles out there, smiling pols who just darn forgot to pay a couple hundred grand in taxes, whose living expenses include $200,000 for a car and driver, who, having palmed bushels of healthcare-industry bread, are now to be entrusted with regulating that industry? Just what distinguishes these guys from the opposition party’s charlatan evangelists and Chamber of Commerce boot-lickers? Or is the real distinction not between parties but between all of their class and all of ours? We’re plebes, they’re privileged. One is reminded of Cheney’s rationale for his own right to reckless behaving: “It’s our due.”
 
And where’s Obama? I’m sitting here, like many others, without a full-time job or healthcare, desperate for the changes he and his party promised to implement, and he says he’s sorry, he “screwed up,” that “mistakes were made” in selecting-- or not properly vetting-- Daschle at this critical time. Can you beat that: he screwed up? Hey, pally, we all do, no biggie. (The Apologies of the Week feature on Harry Shearer’s Le Show radio program weekly revels in revealing this kabuki shuck for what it is: Someone’s caught with his pinkie in the Pepperidge Farm jar, he publicly begs forgiveness and it all goes away.)
 
No one’s saying Obama should be infallible in matters of faith and morals. But he did rather advertise himself that way (after one of the most corrupt administrations ever, how hard could it be to do better?). It’s just that so much is at stake now, this time, and he and his crew need to deliver, not dish us the same old slop. Daschle-- and Richardson and Geithner before that-- are black eyes that the Dems don’t need if they’re going to make good on any of their promises to fix things. Here, why not pass Mitch McConnell some fresh ammo?
 
I never thought B.O. walked on water. He made more sense than Hillary, made more of the right points than any Democratic candidate in my lifetime, so he got my vote, and I was touched and energized by his victory.
 
But then, maybe even without drinking the Kool-Aid, I fooled myself anyway.
 
When I was a kid in the early ’60s, growing up in Napa Valley, my dad and uncle used to watch TV wrestling. Sometimes they were joined by Lungo, a wop beanpole inclined toward the gullible. Each week, the villain wrestler would wind up pulling tricks behind the ref’s back and get the best of the hero wrestler. The audience would howl bloody murder. So would Lungo, jumping up and shaking his fist at the screen. Then my uncle would remind him that the whole match was staged, that nothing was really at stake and Lungo would agree, sit back down and settle in for Round Two. As soon as Ray Stevens would clobber Pepper Gomez with a hidden folding-chair, Lungo was up out of his seat, yelling, taken in all over again. 

No matter how hard we want to believe change is here and good’s about to win, we’ve got to be resolute about not being taken in-- by our own blindness or a party or a prez who says we can get there by leaving the driving to the same Ralph Kramdens who keep running us off the road.

UPDATE: Ray and Pepper? Or the real deal?

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At 9:56 AM, Blogger Bruce said...

Terrific post, Gene. My sentiments exactly. Let's have more! Scream it from the rooftops! Repeat after me- "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!" We voted for a Saint Patrick who would rid Washington of the snakes, not someone who would invited them back into the White House.

 
At 9:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gene,

I was listening to NPR this morning and they were yammering about the whole Daschle de railment. Apparently the beltway Kramdens are sad because Daschle is so damn likeable. I understand that it takes give and take to get legislation passed but being likeable? We need a real pain in the ass as HHS head.
I too an unemployed although I paying for health insurance for me and my college age daughter. I have written about my husbands suicide here before but what I haven't shared is how hc insurance played a part in his suicide.At the time of his death he was on 8 different meds and was being seen by a shrink for free. Because even though we paid over $600 a month for this insurance, there were only 2 shrinks available. Anyway I did a short video and sent it to a blogger on daily kos who wrote a diary. Lots of horror stories about insurance and being uninsured. Like my husband being insured these days doesn't mean you get the care you need.

We want what they have and Ralph Kramden will never get if for us.

And we won't get any real change until we shame and embarass our elected officials..

 
At 2:55 PM, Blogger Ronn Spencer said...

Gene, you're one of the finest thinkers, writers and observers we have--and a better friend I could never hope for.

That being said, here comes the obligatory "but."

But what in hell did you realistically expect?

Look, I don't have much of a quarrel with people who, like yourself, voted for Obie as the more moderate Sultan of the Monster Machine. It's understandable. Your choice last year, as you saw it, was to vote for The Bad Party or the Good Party. You voted for the Good and I get it.

After all, the Bad Party's motto was, "Bend Over and Smile"--unacceptable, scratch them.

But the Good Party's slogan, especially when it came to matters of domestic surveillance and saber-rattling in the Middle East was more ominous, more Orwellian.:

"When Bad People do bad things it's BAD. When Good People do bad things, it's GOOD."

Placing your faith in the Bads OR the Goods is like pissing into a movie studio wind machine, using your garbage disposal as a Cuisinart or attempting to lay bricks with porridge. They're all interesting ideas if your writing in the absurdist spirit of Terry Southern, Samuel Beckett or Ionesco.

It's the perfect idea for a classic farce isn't it? Neither party is capable of unseating the entrenched interests or limiting their abuses because, quite simply, they ARE the entrenched interests.

Our new Fearless Leader, who will be difficult to criticize because of his ethnicity, his media-manufactured charisma, his "adorable" kids, his "wonderful" wife, and the millions of duped Americans who have canonized him in the greatest wave of improbable mass delusion since the Cabbage Patch Dolls, has no intention of significantly altering the course of this leaky, barnacled, garbage-barge which is about to meet its Moby Iceberg. Before assuming office, Obie transparently demonstrated that business-as-usual will be his primary objective, that preserving the American Empire is his major concern.

Empires never seem to have enough money for its citizens as they would prefer, as clearly seen in the American example, in using their long green to establish and maintain over 700 military bases all over the globe. God forbid some impertinent brown people somewhere, someplace might get the ridiculous notion that they are autonomous and their land and resources don't actually belong to Bechtel, Halliburton, Raytheon, United Fruit or whomever, right?

Gene, the Obama campaign was self-limiting. The Dems focused almost entirely on unseating the Rethuglycans and electing a charismatic "nice-guy" to the Oval Office. The process was freighted with symbols and slogans so simple-minded and manipulative they seemed to be appropriated from a rejected Nike shoe campaign ("Hope & Change," "Yes We Can," "Change We Can Believe In" and similar malarkey).

Hamstrung by a lack of specificity and substance, the entire focus of the Obamatons congealed ickily around an inherently non-progressive objective--to get their fraud elected--not to genuinely modify how we go about doing things in this great, God-fearing oligarchy.

Okay--now what? Business as usual with a younger, better-dressed, less tongue-tied Emperor? Shiny new Humvees with the Obie logo on them, engines roaring and leaving rubber on Afghani asses?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home