TOM DELAY IS NOT A VIRGIN-- AND THIS AIN'T THE FIRST TIME HE'S BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED SCREWIN' THE POOCH
>
"I have done nothing wrong, I have violated no law, no regulation, no rule of the House."
-Tom DeLay
"Tom DeLay is morally probably the highest level public servant I have ever met."
-Ben Stein
"Tom DeLay is a virgin and he was immaculately conceived and so were his parents. We are checking on his grandparents and we'll get back to you."
-Mike Hawk and Philbert Suggs (joint statement)
Tom DeLay's recent indictment for money-laundering with the intent of illegally influencing an election isn't a rare ethical lapse. But it is small potatoes for one of the most egregiously corrupt politicians in the history of our Congress. The first I remember paying any attention to the then undistinguished former exterminator from Texas was 1988 when he aggressively thrust himself into the public eye in an absurd defense of Dan Quayle. He had been elected 4 years earlier but when questions were raised about Republican vice-presidential nominee Dan Quayle's use of family connections to get into the Indiana National Guard (the exact same way George II avoided the War in VietNam), DeLay came out swingin' for Quayle, claiming that he himself had tried to enlist at the same age, but was told those damn ethnic minorities had already filled all the available positions and there were none left for him. People just laughed at the little-known Texan loudmouth, although the WASHINGTON POST followed up and reported that DeLay had received student deferments while he was at Baylor (and even AFTER he was expelled from Baylor for being drunk and disorderly, earning the sobriquet "Hot Tub Tom"). After this, he disappeared back into the bowels of the GOP caucus for a while. But like the termites and rats he used to exterminate, he was busy causing plenty of damage where the light don't shine.
In 1994 he was elected House Majority Whip and devoted much of his energy to undermining President Clinton and using his Whip position to insure Clinton would be impeached for lying about getting a blowjob. Right around that time it broke in the press that DeLay had committed perjury during a civil lawsuit brought against him by a former business partner a few years earlier. DeLay wound up settling the suit out of court in order to avoid serious criminal charges that he had-- take one guess-- violated federal and state election laws!
Before we get into DeLay's long list of criminal activities, I want to remind you about another escapade in prime time for a DeLay whose name had already become a household word. He made headlines as a psycho and panderer for his role in the Terri Schiavo controversy. On Palm Sunday weekend in March 2005, several days after the brain-damaged Florida woman's feeding tube was disconnected for the third time, and sensing an opportunity to exploit a family's private pain and suffering to score some cheap political points, DeLay and some House cronies met in emergency session plotting to pass a bill allowing Schiavo's parents to petition the removal of the feeding tube to a federal judge. DeLay hysterically called the removal of the feeding tube "an act of barbarism." He was mocked for his blatant hypocrisy by critics when the L.A. TIMES revealed that he had consented to ending the life support for his own father, who was in a comatose state because of a debilitating accident in 1988 just as DeLay was becoming Assistant GOP Whip in Congress. His best-remembered quote from the Schiavo circus he fomented was made on March 20: "Terri Schiavo is not brain-dead; she talks and she laughs, and she expresses happiness and discomfort. Terri Schiavo is not on life support."
On October 6, 2004, the House Ethics Committee UNANIMOUSLY (meaning all the Republicans on the committee recognized he was a lying sack of unethical shit) admonished DeLay on 2 counts. The first count stated that DeLay "created the appearance that donors were being provided with special access to Representative DeLay regarding the then-pending energy legislation." The second count said that DeLay "used federal resources in a political issue" by asking the Federal Aviation Administration and Justice Department to help track Texas legislators during the battle over Texas redistricting.
Seven months later a Texas judge ruled that a committee formed by DeLay had violated state law by not disclosing over $600,000 worth of fundraising money, mostly from the credit card industry (they love him because he let them write a bankruptcy bill that screws working people while protecting dishonest corporations and the wealthy). Some of the money was spent on manning phone banks and posting wanted posters on Federal Highways calling for the arrest of Democratic legislators with an 800 number to call if seen after the Democratic caucus left to Oklahoma in order to prevent redistricting legislation from passage. The Federal Highway Administration offered to cooperate in arresting the Democrats, forcing the Democrats to travel to Oklahoma by plane instead of by automobile. Although not a member of the Texas state legislature, DeLay became involved, by contacting-- some would say bullying-- 3 Federal Aviation Administration offices (in Oklahoma City, Fort Worth and in D.C.), 4 FBI offices (Dallas, Corpus Christi, Austin and Ardmore, Oklahoma), 2 U.S. Marshalls offices (in Texas' Western and Northern Districts), the U.S. Attorney in San Antonio, the Office of Legislative Affairs at John Ashcroft's Kafka-esque Department of Justice, and, last but not least, the Air and Marine Interdiction Coordination Center (in Riverside, California).
Meanwhile, back at the bi-partisan House Ethics Committee, DeLay was UNANIMOUSLY (I bet he HATES that word!) admonished because he "offered to endorse Representative [Nick] Smith's son in exchange for Representative Smith's vote in favor of the Medicare bill." Actually, that charge was a face-saving compromise since what DeLay had actually done was far worse, in effect destroying Smith's son's political career in a brutal act of revenge (against a fellow conservative Republican who felt he ought to represent his district's needs instead of the Big Pharma lobbyists who funnel so much loot into DeLay's political machine). At the same time, the Ethics committee deferred action on another count related to fund raising while that matter was subject to state criminal action. That state investigation eventually led to the felony indictment last week.
On August 11, 2005, the Federal Elections Commission audited Americans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee, one of several shady Political Action Committees founded by DeLay, and found that it failed to report more than $300,000 in debts owed to vendors and incorrectly paid for some committee activities with money from another DeLay-connected political committee.
The FEC also found that another of DeLay's front organizations, ARMPAC, misreported receipts and the ending cash balance for 2001 activities and the beginning cash-on-hand, receipts, disbursements and ending cash-on-hand for 2002. ARMPAC also failed to report $322,306 owed to 25 vendors.
Twenty days before DeLay himself was indicted by the Travis County grand jury, a FEDERAL grand jury indicted Texans for a Republican Majority for illegally accepting (soliciting) a political contribution of $100,000 from the Alliance for Quality Nursing Home Care, and the Texas Association of Business on 4 counts, including charges of unlawful political advertising, unlawful contributions to a political committee and unlawful expenditures (including to political candidates. A week later, on September 13, 2005, a federal grand jury indicted Jim Ellis, who heads Americans for a Republican Majority, and John Colyandro, former executive director of Texans for a Republican Majority, who already faced charges of money laundering in the case. DeLay's boy Colyandro also faces 13 counts of unlawful acceptance of a corporate political contribution.
Now I'm sure you want me to get into DeLay's troubling relationship with K Street (the 35,000 lobbyists in DC). First off is his pointed-- and very successful-- effort to parlay his control of Congress into an enforced dominance of K Street. With cronies Rick Santorum, and Grover Norquist, DeLay launched a campaign (in 1995) encouraging lobbying firms to hire only Republicans for top positions. DeLay made it clear that firms that had Democrats in positions of authority, would not be granted the ear of Majority Party members. Having worked in the music business I experienced this first hand as the RIAA wound up incongruously hiring some right-wing partisan hack.
DeLay was also complicit in stirring up controversy in the wake of a series of high-profile violent crimes and death threats against judges when he said that "the men responsible [for Terri Schiavo's death] will have to answer to their behavior." DeLay's comments came soon after the February 28, 2005 murder of the mother and husband of Chicago Judge Joan Lefkow, and the March 11, 2005 killing of Atlanta Judge Rowland Barnes. DeLay watchers accused him of inciting violence against judges when their decisions were unpopular with the public. Ralph Neas, President of People for the American Way, said that DeLay's comments were "irresponsible and could be seen by some as justifying inexcusable conduct against our courts." DeLay publicly apologized for the remark after conservative colleagues started wondering out loud if he is more a dangerous thug than he was previously thought to be.
As for the biggest piece of the Tom DeLay puzzle, the most important thing to look at is his bag man/consiglieri Jack Abramoff. I don't want to go over all the points I've been writing about for the last few months but no examination at Tom DeLay is complete without a look at the symbiotic relationship he has with the GOP's #1 lobbyist and biggest crook (other than DeLay himself). Abramoff was arrested a couple months ago and faces a myriad of charges in jurisdictions large and small across the country. Ultimately he may well face murder charges for having ordered the gangland-style execution of a partner of his and DeLay's. Does this sound incredible? It does to me too. Roland says I'm out of my mind and refuses to listen. Its definitely not on CNN, let alone Fox. But Krugman mentioned it in the NY TIMES the other day and Air America has started discussing it. It's just a matter of time... Please click back to September 28th and read a piece I wrote called "DELAY IS PROBABLY THE MOST CORRUPT CONGRESSIONAL LEADER IN HISTORY. BUT IS HE ALSO INVOLVED IN MURDER??"
Conclusion: Tom DeLay, Ben Stein, Philbert Suggs and Mike Hawk are all liars and probably certifiably insane. Since I started with some quotes, let me end with one too. DeLay had this to say to the Associated Press today: "I can do my job with or without the title. That doesn't concern me."
2 Comments:
This week's NEWSWEEK has a story by Jonathan Alter making a case that DeLay is the most corrupt and unethical House Leader ever-- and he's being kind to the GOP kingpin! Even scarier than the corruption and ethical lapses, is the fact that DeLay is a fanatic and delusional extremist bent not just on personal wealth and power, but also on remaking the United States into some kind of authoritarian theocracy.
TOM DELAY'S HOUSE OF SHAME
Congress has always had its share of extremists. But the DeLay era is the first time the fringe has ever been in charge.
Oct. 10, 2005 issue - A decade ago, I paid a call on Tom DeLay in his ornate office in the Capitol. I had heard a rumor about him that I figured could not possibly be true. The rumor was that after the GOP took control of the House that year, DeLay had begun keeping a little black book with the names of Washington lobbyists who wanted to come see him. If the lobbyists were not Republicans and contributors to his power base, they didn't get into "the people's House." DeLay not only confirmed the story, he showed me the book. His time was limited, DeLay explained with a genial smile. Why should he open his door to people who were not on the team?
Thus began what historians will regard as the single most corrupt decade in the long and colorful history of the House of Representatives. Come on, you say. How about all those years when congressmen accepted cash in the House chamber and then staggered onto the floor drunk? Yes, special interests have bought off members of Congress at least since Daniel Webster took his seat while on the payroll of a bank. And yes, Congress over the years has seen dozens of sex scandals and dozens of members brought low by financial improprieties. But never before has the leadership of the House been hijacked by a small band of extremists bent on building a ruthless shakedown machine, lining the pockets of their richest constituents and rolling back popular protections for ordinary people. These folks borrow like banana republics and spend like Tip O'Neill on speed.
I have no idea if DeLay has technically broken the law. What interests me is how this moderate, evenly divided nation came to be ruled on at least one side of Capitol Hill by a zealot. This is a man who calls the Environmental Protection Agency "the Gestapo of government" and favors repealing the Clean Air Act because "it's never been proven that air toxins are hazardous to people"; who insists repeatedly that judges on the other side of issues "need to be intimidated" and rejects the idea of a separation of church and state; who claims there are no parents trying to raise families on the minimum wage—that "fortunately, such families do not exist" (at least Newt Gingrich was intrigued by the challenges of poverty); who once said: "A woman can't take care of the family. It takes a man to provide structure." I could go on all day. Congress has always had its share of extremists. But the DeLay era is the first time the fringe has ever been in charge.
The only comparison to DeLay Co. might be the Radical Republicans of the 1860s. But the 19th-century Radical Republican agenda was to integrate and remake the South. The 21st-century Radical Republican agenda is to enact the wish list of the tobacco and gun lobbies, repeal health and safety regulations and spend billions on shameless pork-barrel projects to keep the GOP at the trough. Another analogy is to Republican Speaker Joe Cannon, who ran the House with an iron fist a century ago. But Cannon had to contend with Progressive Republicans who eventually stripped him of his power. DeLay's ruling radical conservative claque remains united, at least for now.
Comparisons with fellow Texan Sam Rayburn fall short, too. Rayburn was respected on both sides of the aisle for his rock-solid integrity. He and most other House speakers carefully balanced their support for corporate interests like the oil depletion allowance with at least some sense of the public good. And they had to share much of their power with committee chairmen. Today, seniority is much less important. Chairmen are term-limited (six years) or tossed if they displease DeLay. And this crowd views "the public interest" as strictly for liberal pantywaists.
How have they succeeded? A new book, "Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy," by Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson, explains how the GOP is simply better than the Democratic Party at the basic blocking and tackling of politics, including the exploitation of cultural and religious issues. The authors argue that even if DeLay goes down, the zealotry and corporate shilling will continue as long as the GOP controls the House. Consider DeLay's temporary replacement, Missouri Rep. Roy Blunt. The Washington Post reported last week that Blunt is respected by Republican members in part because he has "strong ties to the Washington lobbying community." That's a qualification for office?
The only reason the House hasn't done even more damage is that the Senate often sands down the most noxious ideas, making the bills merely bad, not disastrous. What next for the House of Shame? If DeLay's acquitted, he'll be back in power. If he's convicted, his proteges will continue his work. Reform efforts by fiscal conservatives determined to curb their borrow-and-spend colleagues are probably doomed. The only way to get rid of the termites eating away the people's House is to stamp them out at the next election.
© 2005 Newsweek, Inc.
My friend "A" has managed to pull himself away from his non-stop monitoring of Bill O'Liely in order to send me the following piece about a 2003 petition to expel DeLay from the House:
TOM DELAY'S ETHICS VIOLATIONS--
Petition signed by 2,200 Americans demanding the expulsion of U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay presented to House Ethics Committee members by Jackson Thoreau.
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Texas resident presented a petition on Friday to the two top Congress members of the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct related to the behavior of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land.
Some 2,200 Americans - including some fellow Republicans fed up with DeLay's tactics - have signed a petition requesting that DeLay be expelled from the House of Representatives for misconduct and violation of House rules, especially the first rule of the House Code of Ethics.
That first rule states, "A member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives shall conduct himself at all times in a manner which shall reflect creditably on the House of Representatives."
"Tom DeLay has not behaved in a manner that 'reflects creditably' on the House or on our country," said Jackson Thoreau, 44, a freelance writer who wrote the petition and presented it to aides to the House committee members.
"He led the partisan power grab in Texas this year to gain more Republican seats through redistricting eight years before the state was scheduled to do so. That process forced Texans to waste millions while healthcare, education and other needs went unmet. And that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to DeLay's pattern of abuses and disgraceful conduct."
Other examples of DeLay's abuses in the petition include:
=> DeLay obstructed justice for low-paid sweatshop workers on the island of Saipan by taking large campaign contributions from Saipan's chief lobbyist and blocking any Congressional investigation of the appalling conditions there.
=> DeLay obstructed justice by lying to the FBI when he charged that the reporter who broke the Henry Hyde adultery story in the 1990s had been working with the White House to expose Hyde.
=> During a deposition for a lawsuit filed by a former business partner in the pest company in 1994, DeLay lied that he had not been an officer of the company for two or three years. On congressional financial disclosure forms filed in 1995, he listed himself as chairman of the company's board of directors.
=> In 1997, DeLay actually shoved Rep. David Obey [D-Wisconsin] and called him a "chicken shit" on the House floor. That same year, DeLay tried to impeach federal judges he didn't like.
=> In 1998, DeLay said that people with "foreign-sounding names" probably aren't Americans.
Even fellow Republicans have signed the petition asking that DeLay be removed from office, much like former U.S. Rep. James Traficant was in 2002. For example, Vicki Hill of Sugar Land, Tx., wrote: "Thank God someone else thinks the same thing - he makes me ashamed to be a Republican."
And Mark O. Hammontree of Austin wrote, "I will switch to DEM from REP over redistricting!"
The petition and signatures can be seen on the Internet at http://www.petitiononline.com/tdl0000/petition.html.
Thoreau gave copies of the petition, as well as examples of the signatures, to the offices of Rep. Joel Hefley, chairman of the House Standards committee, and Rep. Alan B. Mollohan, ranking minority member of that committee. He asked that the committee, which starts the process of expulsion, open an investigation into DeLay's abuses.
Thoreau also distributed copies of the petition to other politicians on that committee, to DeLay himself, and to media members in the National Press Building and other places.
Post a Comment
<< Home