Monday, January 08, 2018

The Story of 2017 (Part 2)


Life in the New Stone Age (upper image; source). Life in the Old Stone Age (lower image; source). The Neolithic era, or New Stone Age, started with the move from hunter-gatherer life to agriculture, lasted just a few thousand years, and ended with the discovery and use of metals. The Paleolithic era, or Old Stone Age, lasted many millions of years before it. We're on our way back through the later Neolithic era to the earlier one.

by Gaius Publius

2017 has been an such unusual year in so many ways that its unusuality has masked the ways in which it has been a very usual year, a very much more-of-the-same series of months. This piece continues our look at 2017 through the most significant pieces we've written last year.

Part 1 is here, with a longer introduction to the year itself. Briefly, these have been the themes of the year:

     • The feckless Democrats, who seem to insist on throwing away a perfectly good opportunity to make a new first impression, to clean-sweep a political return in a country aching for actual political change.

     • The Republican Party, attempting at last to "win absolutely" after generations spent combatting the New Deal, the Great Society, and that Party's most hated phrase in the U.S. Constitution — "promote the general welfare."

     • The continuation of the failed electoral revolt of 2016, which saw its one real champion lose, defeated by his own party, and its one fake champion win.

     • The next phase in the Praetorian Guard-ization of the security state, which is working overtime to unseat an unfit, though elected president. (Do you really think Russia is the only foreign power to ever influence an American election? If you do, you haven't been paying attention.)

     • And finally, the relentless devolutionary march to the Old Stone Age as the last, minimal window of escape from a world-historical change in climate closes as we watch.

These were the stories of 2017 from the perspective of our seat at the Chair by the Window.

The Story of 2017, Part 2

Without further ado, here is the rest of our list, eleven further pieces of writing that defined the year for us.

May 22 — The Dying Fossil Fuel Industry

Big Oil has a fatal disease, two of them in fact, and either or both are going to end its life as an industry. The only real question for us is not when the industry collapses, but how it collapses.

A sudden collapse that happens fairly quickly would also be chaotic, but that may not be bad, all things considered. Imagine what could happen in the country and the world if oil prices fall to, say, $25 per barrel from today's price of about $50 per barrel. Smaller fossil fuel companies would disappear as suddenly as firefly light on a hot summer evening. The industry would be in economic turmoil, desperate for funding.

You can almost hear the cries for even greater government subsidies, added to the already massive global subsidies it now receives, $1.82 trillion, or 3.8 percent of global GDP. This would amount to our next big national bailout after the Wall Street bailout of 2009, as before with taxpayer money.

Would Americans foot the bill for a second massive bailout, so soon after the first? Would they do it if Big Oil is the recipient? I think the political chaos surrounding that public discussion would be deadly to Big Oil all on its own.

A chaotic event as well, yes, but also very welcome from a climate change standpoint.

June 15 — The Collapsing Social Contract

America's most abundant manufactured product may be pain. 

August 7 — There Is No "Political Center" in Modern America

If there are no voters in the political "center," a strategy based on winning them is likely to fail. So why pursue it? Perhaps because voters aren't what the Democratic Party, or either American political party these days, is pursuing. Perhaps it's because what both parties are actually pursuing ... is money.

September 28 — The American Flag and What It Stands For

During the Nixon era, enemies of Vietnam War protestors and draft dodgers appropriated the flag as a symbol of their own aggression and anger — anger at "the hippies"; at free love (which to a man they envied); at "unpatriotic" protests against the nation's wrongdoing; at anything and anyone who didn't rejoice, in essence, in the macho, patriarchal, authoritarian demands for obedience to right-wing leaders like Richard Nixon.

That's not an overstatement, and everyone reading this knows it. Why do cops wear flags on their uniforms, for example, but not nurses? Ignore the cover-story explanations and ask, is it "national pride" and patriotism the police are expressing, or something closer to their authoritarian anger?

October 2 — Capitalism, Infinite Growth, Climate Change & Manufactured Hopelessness

Why do we see so little move toward positive change, and so much shrinking into simple fear? Militarized late-stage capitalism, targeting a single end — its self defense. As David Graeber noted, "the last thirty years have seen the construction of a vast bureaucratic apparatus for the creation and maintenance of hopelessness, a giant machine designed, first and foremost, to destroy any sense of possible alternative futures."

October 19 — European Colonialism Is the Central Fact of Politics on Earth

What we did, we do — in our Ferguson-like neighborhoods; in our innocence-be-damned, glory-in-punishment courts and prisons; in abandoned storm-torn Puerto Rico; in our eager, invisible bombings and dronings throughout the Middle East and into Asia; in our happy, unironic interference in every election on earth we care about; and so much more.

International colonizing by Western Europe and its Sun King offspring, the United States, is entirely invisible to its perpetrators.

Yet nothing about the state of the world today — from a nearly inevitable climate change disaster to wealth inequality beyond the dreams of avarice — can be understood without accounting for the invisible celebrations of rape and plunder that underpin everything done by the West to the rest of the world.

October 26 — Defining Neoliberalism

In a world where competition is right and good, a world in which the "market" is the defining metaphor for human activity, all social ties are broken, the individual is an atom left to survive as an individual only, the strongest relentlessly consume the weakest — and that's as it should be. It's easy to imagine how the apex predators of our social order would be attracted to this, and insist on it with force.

Thus the bipartisan world we live in today. Under a neoliberal regime, everyone gets what they deserve. Big fish deserve their meal. Little fish deserve their death. And government sets the table for the feast.

October 30 — The Resistance, the #Resistance and Harvey Weinstein

There's something greatly troubling about what the media-fronted #Resistance has morphed into, but I'm having trouble writing about it (it's lightly touched here: "A Nation in Crisis, Again"). Partly the problem is the marshaling of pages of proof; partly the problem is the unstoppable train wreck that's coming. Perhaps I should write about the train wreck instead.

After all, no Praetorian Guard, once it grows muscular, reverts back to a simple barracks unit just because new leadership arrives. And the anti-Trump leadership in both parties is growing us a Praetorian Guard, if we don't have one already. You may be cheering it onward as we speak, but what you're cheering, if you do, enables an unelected, uncontrolled, muscular security state, one you've certainly been appalled by in many other contexts.

Trump will go; but the unelected state grows only stronger, now with help from the #Resistance. Do you see the dilemma? How to write about this to a nation in love with what it will come, but only later, to hate?

November 27 — The Building Is Burning and All the World’s Babies Are In It — Using Force to Fight Climate Change

Just as the climate disaster is and will be a rolling nightmare, advancing from frontier to frontier in its destruction — meaning, it won't all happen at once, but in stages — so is disaster mitigation a rolling series of preventions that can knock off the worst climate effects one by one. But only if we act.

Any number of mitigating events could and will happen in the next 10 years, events that won't cancel climate consequences — that ship has sailed — but that could offset a great many of those effects still in doubt. In that sense, it's not "already over" — that's way too digital, too all-or-nothing an analysis. It's only "already over" if no one acts at all, and that's just not what's happening. That's encouraging.

It's also encouraging that the real (and so far failed) Resistance, which started with Occupy and continued through the 2016 election, has not ended. That fight — against Rule by the Rich — is also the climate fight. 

December 4 — Deficit Talk Is a Trap. Will Democrats Fall Into It?

Government spending is good. It's the way a government that controls its own currency puts money into the economy, making it possible for you and me to buy things. The question isn't, Should government spend money at all? If government spent no money, you would have none yourself. The question is, Whom should the government spend money on — you or the already rich?

Will Democrats take the Republican bait and agree that just their donors deserve largesse? Or will they finally learn the lesson of the Failed Revolt of 2016 and spend to benefit their voters as well? The Tax Cut bill of 2017 sets up this trap. Will Democrats walk into it?

December 18 — What Would Happen If Sanders Ran for President in 2020?

A look into the farther political future, all the way to 2020. If Sanders ran again, or a credible, not money-owned, Sanders-like candidate ran in his place, how would he or she be treated? I'm not talking about a Sanders-lite, or a Sanders-masked neoliberal, but an actual threat to the status quo, as Sanders was. Eight questions about how he would be treated by the Party and the press — in the primary, in the general election, and finally if he won the presidency.

A Year of Consequences

Thus ended, for us, the year of consequences, 2017, the year that followed the crossroads year of 2016.

When we think of climate crossroads, many of us think of the election of 1980, an election that Reagan arguably stole from a man who would have put us on course to address — with just enough time to do it — the emerging climate emergency.

When we think of economic crossroads, those who don't regret the failed Obama opportunity of 2009 — he had an FDR Congress, an FDR crisis, an FDR popular mandate, and laid them all at the feet of his donor class — those of us without Obama on our minds think of Sanders, Clinton and Trump; the Failed Revolt of 2016; and the road not allowed to be taken.

Our betters chose another path for us, and the rest, I'm afraid, will merely be consequences, the train wreck mentioned above, easily foreseen. Perhaps we won't write about the train wreck after all, but something less widely anticipated. History, after all, doesn't end with the Trump-and-Pence presidency. That's just where its next phase starts.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


At 12:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...


"The continuation of the failed electoral revolt of 2016, which saw its one real champion lose, defeated by his own party, and its one fake champion win."

It's one APPARENT champion was not defeated, he was ratfucked. And he proved his status was only apparent by turtling and campaigning for perhaps the most ANTI-champion of all time.

"When we think of economic crossroads, those who don't regret the failed Obama opportunity of 2009 — he had an FDR Congress, an FDR crisis, an FDR popular mandate, and laid them all at the feet of his donor class — those of us without Obama on our minds think of Sanders, Clinton and Trump; the Failed Revolt of 2016; and the road not allowed to be taken."

Truer words never have appeared here on DWT. But it wasn't just an economic crossroads. It was the crossroads between the life and death of human society, and the colossally stupid and evil American voters chose death.
The revolt failed because the money has too many firewalls, because "change" candidates are not, but mostly because the American people are wholly incapable of any kind of revolt. 2016 was a revolt, but it was a revolt that allowed the Nazi minority to ascend, not unlike the Nazi ascension in Germany, because all other options seemed wholly unpalatable ($hillbillary is the worst fucking democrap candidate in history).

As in Germany, the money aides and abets as a way to keep real populism and progressivism back-burnered. But as in Germany, the money will also be destroyed (mostly) in the end also.

At 12:26 PM, Anonymous Hone said...

Excellent, Noah. One point I would like to make about "international colonizing" by the west:

There are despots with grandiose ambitions all over the world, not just the west. The west is not by any means the sole source of evil determined to colonize - mankind as a whole has an evil side and such individuals exist everywhere. China, Russia, Japan, Egypt, Africa - all of these places have their own megalomaniacs who aim to take over other places. It is a sad, destructive side of human nature and the west does not own it. (Though it sure is a part owner and has made a huge mess of it!)

One recent example backing up your point about the west (and there are many, unfortunately):

Watching the first episode of the Vietnam series by Ken Burns was especially interesting. I did not realize that De Gaulle, that wonderful resistance hero, served a primary role by reverting right back to efforts to re-colonize Vietnam as soon as WW II was over. This led the defeat of the French and the eventual involvement of the United States. So De Gaulle, through his colonial mentality, set the stage for our involvement in that horrible and unnecessary war that killed so many Americans and Vietnamese (not that the USA was not responsible for its own decisions to proceed). What an asshole De Gaulle turned out to be! No leader is all good, that's for sure.

At 7:17 AM, Blogger Tony Wikrent said...

Everything on this page could have been summarized by noting only the incessant explicit and implicit attacks on the Constitutional mandate to promote the General Welfare. This mandate is the single most important feature of the infant American republic which differentiated it from the monarchies, oligarchies, and despotisms of every other country in the world at the time.

Even the legacy of European colonialism can be subsumed under the story of how and why the promotion of the General Welfare has been attacked and weakened, because almost all the political combat in the history of American political economy has been a fight between those who wanted to fulfill the original founding vision of a new republic of, by, and for the people, and those who want to impose instead a hierarchical structure with privilege, power, and wealth at the apex. The Civil War was only the most violent and deadly manifestation of this fight.

Had the original founding vision of a new republic been followed, the legacy of European colonialism would have been largely (not entirely) extirpated. The turning point on this issue, I think, was the death of Franklin Roosevelt, and whatever happened afterwards in the U.S. State Department and other federal bureaucracies that caused a reversal of FDR's policy of anti-colonialism. This is a story almost entirely forgotten now, but it is clear in the history of the argument between Roosevelt and Churchill over the disposition of the Brutish Empire after WW2.

It is also pertinent to note here that Roosevelt's worst strategic failure was his refusal to allow a thorough investigation and prosecution of the top CEOs and Wall Street financiers who attempted to organize a military putsch against FDR. Had the plot revealed by Marine Corps General Smedley Butler--who the plotters attempted to recruit to head their coup--been used to prosecute and jail these top CEOs and Wall Street financiers, much of the origins of the anti-New Deal modern conservative and libertarians movements would have been eliminated, and the attacks on the General Welfare by those movements crippled, and probably contained.

At 12:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tony, that's probably the finest comment/augmentation to anything on DWT I've ever seen. TYVVM.

I'm sad to agree with you about FDR turtling in the face of the coup conspiracy. But then we've seen a succession of Democrats' cowardice in such matters. LBJ should have put Nixon in the docket for treason. Carter should have put Reagan in the docket for treason. Obamanation should have postponed the 2016 election pending a thorough investigation of Russia, collusion and even democrap vote fraud in the primaries.

It's also notable that nearly, if not actually, zero mentions of the 'general welfare' clause is used to justify anything the supreme court decides. You see a lot of interstate commerce and so forth mentioned (money, in short). I guess this is not coincidence. If the court started finding for the general welfare, about 98% of what has changed since 1960 via lege and social meme would be repudiated, wouldn't it.

At 12:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

L00K, Bern was in from the start and $0LD-0UT ever deeper; after knowing (as a fed) her e-mail situation was Federally (Records Act) ILLEGAL. He and $tein, T00; proved second and third string DEM $tooges, against US. AND it's All burning (Poppy) Bush Wall $treet-theater; with the only question remaining : whether Trump's part of Poppy's putsch by collusion 0r extortion, 0R N0T. (N0T is proving ever more unlikely).


Post a Comment

<< Home