Biden is Going To Be The Most Progressive President Since FDR? Did Some Put Some DMT In Bernie's Joint?
>
The Bernie/Biden unity task forces presented their proposals to Biden this week. No Green New Deal, no Medicare-for-All, no reparations for slavery, no legalized pot, no free college... none of the beautiful, bold ideas that invigorated young voters this cycle. In fact, Biden is promising what he's always promised: no fundamental change, just a little correction around the edges on a few things... a very little and very few. Overall, he's better than Trump and if that doesn't motivate voters-- and I think it will-- he'll lose. He isn't offering anyone anything but a warm bucket of piss... better than Trump's steaming platter of shit. This sure isn't going to get me to vote for him:
Yesterday, the NY Times assigned half a dozen reporters-- Maggie Astor, Lisa Friedman, Dana Goldstein, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Margot Sanger and Jim Tankersley-- to go through the proposals, which Biden will probably not accept anyway (don't forget, Biden has been an arch conservative for his entire career in public service), and write about them. The writer of the piece called the task force and its reports the "clearest sign yet that the moderate and progressive wings of the Democratic Party are trying to unite far more than they did in 2016" and The Times saw what came out as an indication "that progressives succeeded in pushing some proposals leftward, influencing Mr. Biden’s policy platform." Progressives don't think so but The Times is basically part of the Biden propaganda machine now as is, more or less, Bernie and every other Democratic elected official.
Here's the Times' short version:
• Health care: Expanding government-run plans, without ‘Medicare for all’
• Criminal justice: Broad agreement on many priorities, but not on marijuana
• Climate change: New near-term targets, but no fracking ban
• The economy: Closing racial gaps and creating jobs programs
• Education: Rethinking Obama-era priorities
• Immigration: A focus on undoing Trump policies
What a disappointment-- for anyone who wasn't aware of who Biden is and unaware that the task force who absolutely refrain from embarrassing him with proposals too far to the left, like legalizing marijuana, which Biden adamantly rejects even though huge majorities of Americans want, and even a majority of Republicans. Watch Trump sniff that out and get to his left on boo, something that will absolutely attract some young voters and give Trump a patina of... something vaguely attractive in the compare and contrast department. Here's the whole package of recommendations, most of which will be weakened by Biden even further to make them much less progressive:
Health care: Expanding government-run plans, without ‘Medicare for all’Obviously, the far right will label this plan as Socialism! Kevin McCarthy was already on Fox & Friends clutching his pearls over Biden surrendering to the Bernie-led socialist wing of the party.
The task force’s recommendations stop far short of Mr. Sanders’s signature health care policy initiative, a single-payer “Medicare for all” system that would enroll all Americans in a generous government-run health plan.
Instead, the task force supports a government-run insurance option that would be offered to all Americans on a sliding scale according to income-- and automatically provided to low-income Americans free.
A so-called public option has always been a part of Mr. Biden’s health plan, but the recommendations specify new details, such as a requirement that certain prescription medicines be offered without any out-of-pocket spending by patients. Similar to Mr. Biden’s most recent health proposal, this one would allow Americans to become eligible for Medicare coverage at 60 instead of the current threshold, 65. The document also suggests considering how Medicare could expand its benefits to cover treatment for dental care, vision and hearing loss.
The task force also recommends special insurance options for people during the coronavirus pandemic. For those who lost coverage because they became unemployed, the task force suggests that the federal government pay the full cost of continuing that coverage under the federal law known as COBRA. People without previous coverage would be allowed to buy a new plan with no deductible, at a price determined by their income, or an existing Obamacare plan.
Criminal justice: Broad agreement on many priorities, but not on marijuana
Mr. Biden’s views on criminal justice had already shifted drastically since he helped pass the 1994 crime bill, and the task force’s recommendations reinforce that transformation. They call for eliminating private prisons, ending cash bail and eliminating mandatory minimum sentences, steps that both candidates supported in the primary; eliminating private prisons, in particular, was something Mr. Sanders championed early.
The task force also suggested a federal standard for police departments’ use of force, a national database of police officers who commit misconduct and an end to sentences of life without parole for juvenile offenders.
It did not, however, bridge a notable gap between the Biden and Sanders platforms. The task force called for decriminalizing marijuana and legalizing it at the federal level for medical use, but for letting the states decide whether to legalize it for recreational use. That is the position Mr. Biden held in the primary, in contrast to Mr. Sanders, who supports full legalization.
Climate change: New near-term targets, but no fracking ban
The climate change task force, led by former Secretary of State John Kerry and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, declared rising planet-warming emissions a nationwide “emergency.” It also directly tied the effort to reduce fossil fuels to a need to address racial injustices that have led low-income communities to bear a disproportionate level of air and water pollution.
The recommendations make no mention of the Green New Deal, an ambitious plan that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and other supporters of Mr. Sanders have championed.
There is also no mention of a national ban on fracking, which Mr. Biden has avoided calling for, despite pressure from young climate activists. But there are other signs that progressives on the task force were able to push Mr. Biden to the left.
Specifically, critics of Mr. Biden’s plan to invest $1.7 trillion in order to achieve net-zero emissions before 2050 had complained that his platform included few details on how it would achieve that faraway goal. The recommendations set a number of specific near-term benchmarks that Democrats would promise to reach. They include moving all electric power off fossil fuels by 2035; achieving carbon-neutrality in all new buildings by 2030; and installing 500 million solar panels in the next five years.
The economy: Closing racial gaps and creating jobs programs
The economics recommendations to Mr. Biden include more expansive and expensive plans than he has embraced in the campaign. They are heavily focused on addressing racial inequality and on getting Americans back to work in the wake of the recession caused by the pandemic.
The task force suggested that Mr. Biden consider several plans that his more liberal rivals had championed during the Democratic primaries, though at times it stopped short of endorsing them.
The recommendations call for “a comprehensive agenda for communities of color with ambition that matches the scale of the challenge and with recognition that race-neutral policies are not a sufficient response to race-based disparities.”
The details include asking Mr. Biden to “explore” a so-called baby bonds proposal to provide every child with a government-funded savings account at birth, a policy favored by Darrick Hamilton, an Ohio State University economist who was one of Mr. Sanders’s appointees.
A section on job creation urges consideration of another plan favored by Mr. Sanders’s appointees: a large-scale federal employment program in areas such as infrastructure development. “In order to ensure that everyone who wants to work has a pathway to employment,” the recommendation says, “the government must enact measures to create jobs and jobs programs like those effectively used during the New Deal.”
Education: Rethinking Obama-era priorities
On K-12 education, the task force report represents something of a shift away from the policy commitments of the Obama-era Democratic Party.
Instead of emphasizing standardized tests to drive accountability for teachers and students, the document talks about holistic tests of students’ skills and the importance of schools as community centers that provide a broad array of social services, such as health care and meals.
While the Obama administration was strongly supportive of charter schools, the task force promises to subject charters, which are publicly funded but privately managed, to stricter federal scrutiny, echoing policy plans released by Mr. Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat, during the primary.
The document commits to tripling federal aid for low-income schools and to increasing funding for students with disabilities. School desegregation by race and class has emerged in recent years as a major concern for progressives. The task force commits to addressing the problem through strategies like busing and magnet schools, but does not mention a specific amount of funding. (Mr. Biden’s opposition to federally mandated busing was a major campaign issue last year, but he has never opposed voluntary busing.)
While many supporters of Mr. Sanders were excited by his promise of universal free tuition at public four-year colleges, the task force stops short of that commitment. It says instead that public universities should be free for families earning under $125,000 per year, and that community colleges should be free for all.
Immigration: A focus on undoing Trump policies
The report indicated that the immigration agenda of a Biden administration would focus on undoing President Trump’s restrictionist policies, which have been anathema to Democrats.
The task force recommended that Mr. Biden work with Congress to maintain protections for about 700,000 young immigrants known as Dreamers from deportation, a program that Mr. Trump is trying to end. It also recommended ending Mr. Trump’s travel restrictions against 13 countries, most of which have substantial Muslim populations.
The report said Mr. Biden should end a program that forced more than 60,000 migrants to wait in Mexico while their asylum cases wound through immigration courts, and should stop diverting asylum seekers to Central American countries. Mr. Biden should increase the number of refugees who can be allowed into the United States to 125,000 per year, from Mr. Trump’s level of 18,000, and raise that cap over time, the committee said. And it called for ending the national emergency declaration that Mr. Trump has used to siphon billions of dollars in Pentagon funding for a wall along the southwestern border.
The task force stopped short of calling for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be abolished, as some in the party have called for. Instead, the report recommends increasing oversight of immigration enforcement and border agencies with the creation of an ombudsman and a panel. There was also no suggestion that unauthorized border crossings should be decriminalized and made a civil offense, a change Mr. Sanders has supported, although the committee recommended prioritizing prosecutions of human traffickers.
Labels: 2020 presidential election, Chris Hayes, Democratic wing of the Democratic Party, progressives vs Democrats
7 Comments:
"The Bernie/Biden unity task forces presented their proposals to Biden this week. No Green New Deal, no Medicare-for-All, no reparations for slavery, no legalized pot, no free college... none of the beautiful, bold ideas that invigorated young voters this cycle. In fact, Biden is promising what he's always promised: no fundamental change, just a little correction around the edges on a few things... a very little and very few."
Just remember these 2 FACTS:
1) these are only what he's going to promise the potted plants to keep them voting. in reality, the potted plants won't get even one of them, though they'll pick one and pretend to try only to have the Nazi senate "stop" them. Harriet Reid was pretty good at this one. And he could do it with 60. scummer MIGHT have 52.
2) Bernie has completely sold out, as if any sentient person didn't already know this. If this is Bernie's MPP/FDR, then Bernie is either among the dumbest people on earth or he just sold out each and every one of his stated principles for the last time (his only principle left is party first/only).
"Overall, he's better than Trump"
He is better than trump only in theory and only in the way obamanation was "better" than cheney and his sock puppet. In utterly refusing to undo any evil done before, obamanation simply became the next lower step on the escalator... not better... but maybe a little less worser than his opponent could have been.
this is the apex of a biden admin.
and then what? a far worse Nazi president and admin and shit show.
I refuse to reward ignorance and venal incompetence with my vote.
"No Green New Deal, no Medicare-for-All, no reparations for slavery, no legalized pot, no free college... none of the beautiful, bold ideas that invigorated young voters this cycle."
Newsflash: None of those things were ever going to pass Congress anyway. Not unless Progressives managed to replace the entire Congressional Delegation, minus a few progressives like AOC which sure as hell wasn't going to happen in this or any foreseeable near future election. It wouldn't have matter a fig if Bernie had won and demanded those things. Nobody with a grain of sense would believe Chuck Shumer and Nancy Pelosi would come out for "reparations" or "Medicare for all." Or that their colleagues will replace either of them in the leadership.
You might get 20 votes in the House for some of these things, and who knows how many in the Senate? Not many.
As for Bernie's election, on the day Milenials and Gen Z vote at the same rates as Boomers then Bernie's ideas will have a chance. Don't kid yourself that "the establishment" was against Bernie's socialism. The Democratic establishment has ALWAYS been against Socialism since Eugene Debs. Progressives are going to have to overcome that reluctance, the way Reich-Wingers took over the GOP.
It can be done, but until the generations that favor socialism start voting in much higher percentages -- just like the Hell-Bent Trumpite MAGA hordes -- nothing is going to happen.
It's a fundamental error to think that some candidate is going to come along and you can vote for him, get him elected and "poof! Magic radical change!"
People are going to have to lobby and fight for every inch, just as they have been forced to do for every change since 1861.
It's only going to matter who the President is because Trump is Mussolini. If we can't defeat him, then he gets to install his Dictatorship. And then there will be re-education camps for people like every one of you.
As Trump openly says, "I mean it. I don't kid." He seriously wants to imprison and kill anyone who won't bow before him. If he gets re-elected, he'll get his chance.
You will have to be utterly delusional to think there's no difference between him and Biden because Biden won't work for reparations or Single-Payer.
This is not good. It's not unexpected given who is advising Biden, given how he is funding his campaign, and given what Biden's entire nearly 50 year political career says about him, but the health care policy in particular could be worse than the status quo.
e.g. is the "public option" actually a public insurance plan, or is it going to be something more like Medicare Advantage? If an actual "public option" it might be better than nothing. If they have a "public plan" that is really just a private plan, it's not going to work.
The long national nightmare won't end in November, even if Biden wins. The only real hope at this point is that people who vote for Biden, continue to apply heat if he wins election. If more conservative Dems start losing seats in primaries in 2022, that's really the only way that I see a chance for any kind of a breakthrough. There is absolutely no way though that Biden and the people around Biden are going to resolve the current multiple crises facing the U.S. for a majority of the population. Given the current state of things too, the completely failure to deal with COVID-19, and the near-term economic fallout before November, the entire system is going to face a major legitimacy crisis. Of course Trump has got to go, but replacing the worst president in U.S. history with James Buchanan 2.0 is no real answer either (the idea that Biden has any FDR or even LBJ in him is a sick joke; the context around him, with a bunch of conservative Dems winning Senate primaries, also spells near-term doom for achieving any kind of progressive policy goals).
Cugel,
No question, if Bernie had won the nomination and the presidency, he would be facing massive resistance from the Democratic Party. Our system is basically run by bribery and self-dealing -- and that reality governs both parties. It's entirely possible that a 78-year old Sanders would have ended up like Carter too. The national media would be hostile to him as well, because they are owned by the same interests and benefit from a system driven by bribery and self-dealing that keeps the boot on the neck of the poor, minorities, and the young.
However, a Bernie election would have at least forced these issues to the surface, and forced the party to show its hand publicly. That process won't happen in year 1 or 2, now it may take 4 to 10 years.
The understanding was always that the 2022 mid-term was a necessary component of getting things done. Sanders faced massive resistance on a smaller scale when he was Mayor of Burlington too. It took a multi-year effort to vote out reactionary forces (Dems and Repubs). Once that happened, Burlington ended up being one of the best run small cities in the country. However, it wasn't enough just to win an executive position in one election. System change takes time, but you don't get system change either by voting for a candidate who says "nothing will fundamentally change".
Having said that, the fact that we have missed that exit ramp this past primary season, is an utter disaster, because Biden is as much of a dead end for a majority of the population as Trump (Trump's circle of winners -- may not even include himself. With Biden, 10-15% may benefit from his presidency in the very near-term). In much the same way that Trump's denial of science is hitting reality over COVID-19, the political system's inability to deal with climate change in a timely fashion -- something that will not happen under Biden either -- has been an elite Dem version of science denialism as well.
I agree with you that the political will is nearly impossible to overcome, that the system is corrupted by money, and Biden's generation of rich, pols, would sooner squeeze every last dollar of profit out of the oil sector, than to leave a habitable planet to the next generation.
The same is true with respect to heatlh care and every other major issue.
Some voters may have known this and voted for Biden anyways. However, I don't think a lot of voters understand what they are getting with Biden. The national media wasn't exactly interested in informing the public about Biden's record during the 2020 primary campaign either.
In the near-term, however, we'll see what is considered realistic and possible in a system that is facing a major legitimacy crisis in the near-term due to hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths, mass unemployment and homelessness, an increasing impact from climate change, global instability, and younger generations throughout much of the western world, including the U.S., that have no real assets and thus no real stake in maintaining the current political order (people who have been on the losing end going back at least a generation).
The things that Sanders was proposing weren't "nice things" that would be "nice to have". They were the kind of things that are necessary to have, if you want to maintain a liberal democracy, that still has some kind of popular legitimacy. If you want an oligarchy run by a few rich families, then popular legitimacy isn't as much of a consideration, and the continuation of a system run on the basis of bribery and self-dealing isn't either.
Cugel sayeth truth.
validates out 3 truths I've pointed out:
1) Bernie is shit
2) American lefty voters (who vote) are dumber than shit
3) American voters who don't vote have nobody and no party to vote FOR.
Voting for Biden no problem.
I voted for Bernie in primaries 4 years ago & had no problem getting on the Hilary Bus. She "won" the primary.
I voted for Bernie again in the primaries, Biden Won. I will have NO problem getting
on the Biden bus.
Trump decimated the Klown Kar Republicant primaries 4 years ago & Republicants got on the Trump bus and he won the electoral college.
Get ON the Biden Bus so Trump does not get 4 more years. Then we continue to influence w more progressive people & policies.
Post a Comment
<< Home