Saturday, March 21, 2020

Insider Trading Senator, Richard Burr, Sold $150,000 Worth Of Shares In Wyndham Hotels Just Before It Lost Two-Thirds Of Its Value-- Smart Move... Also Criminal

>





I've been posting Chris Martenson's COVID-19 podcasts-- and urging readers to subscribe themselves-- since February. Because of his early warnings-- he's usually a week or two ahead of the government/media-- I was able to understand the need to liquidate substantial positions in stocks in my retirement account. But that's different from what Richard Burr (R-NC), Kelly Loeffler (R-GA), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Jim Inhofe (R-OK) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) did. They were getting classified information that wasn't available to ordinary citizens-- although Intel Committee chair Burr did share the info with a handful of his top North Carolina supporters. And these senators bailed on stocks before the crash-- $1.6 million worth in Burr's case.

And at the same time they were selling stocks, the Republicans were publicly urging their constituents to just Trust Trump. The STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) prohibits members of Congress from doing exactly what these 5 senators did-- insider trading. Burr voted against passage of the STOCK Act in 2012-- one of only 3 senators to do so. As they always do, establishment media outlets are minimizing and tamping down the criminal actions these senators took. ProPublica isn't. They're doing the kind of reporting that corporate outlets like CBS News (video above) would never consider:
Soon after he offered public assurances that the government was ready to battle the coronavirus, the powerful chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Richard Burr, sold off a significant percentage of his stocks, unloading between $628,000 and $1.72 million of his holdings on Feb. 13 in 33 separate transactions.

As the head of the intelligence committee, Burr, a North Carolina Republican, has access to the government’s most highly classified information about threats to America’s security. His committee was receiving daily coronavirus briefings around this time, according to a Reuters story.

A week after Burr’s sales, the stock market began a sharp decline and has lost about 30% since.

On Thursday, Burr came under fire after NPR obtained a secret recording from Feb. 27, in which the lawmaker gave a VIP group at an exclusive social club a much more dire preview of the economic impact of the coronavirus than what he had told the public.

“Senator Burr filed a financial disclosure form for personal transactions made several weeks before the U.S. and financial markets showed signs of volatility due to the growing coronavirus outbreak,” his spokesperson said. “As the situation continues to evolve daily, he has been deeply concerned by the steep and sudden toll this pandemic is taking on our economy.”

Burr is not a particularly wealthy member of the Senate: Roll Call estimated his net worth at $1.7 million in 2018, indicating that the February sales significantly shaped his financial fortunes and spared him from some of the pain that many Americans are now facing.

He was one of the authors of the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act, which shapes the nation’s response to public health threats like the coronavirus. Burr’s office did not respond to requests for comment about what sort of briefing materials, if any, on the coronavirus threat Burr may have seen as chair of the intelligence committee before his selling spree.

According to the NPR report, Burr told attendees of the luncheon held at the Capitol Hill Club: “There’s one thing that I can tell you about this: It is much more aggressive in its transmission than anything that we have seen in recent history ... It is probably more akin to the 1918 pandemic.”

He warned that companies might have to curtail their employees’ travel, that schools could close and that the military might be mobilized to compensate for overwhelmed hospitals.

The luncheon was organized by the Tar Heel Circle, a club for businesses and organizations in North Carolina that are charged up to $10,000 for membership and are promised “interaction with top leaders and staff from Congress, the administration, and the private sector.”

Burr’s public comments had been considerably less dire. In a Feb. 7 op-ed that he co-authored with another senator, he assured the public that “the United States today is better prepared than ever before to face emerging public health threats, like the coronavirus.” He wrote, “No matter the outbreak or threat, Congress and the federal government have been vigilant in identifying gaps in its readiness efforts and improving its response capabilities.”

Members of Congress are required by law to disclose their securities transactions.

Burr was one of just three senators who in 2012 opposed the bill that explicitly barred lawmakers and their staff from using nonpublic information for trades and required regular disclosure of those trades. In opposing the bill, Burr argued at the time that insider trading laws already applied to members of Congress. President Barack Obama signed the bill, known as the STOCK Act, that year.

Stock transactions of lawmakers are reported in ranges. Burr’s Feb. 13 selling spree was his largest stock selling day of at least the past 14 months, according to a ProPublica review of Senate records. Unlike his typical disclosure reports, which are a mix of sales and purchases, all of the transactions were sales.

His biggest sales included companies that are among the most vulnerable to an economic slowdown. He dumped up to $150,000 worth of shares of Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, a chain based in the United States that has lost two-thirds of its value. And he sold up to $100,000 of shares of Extended Stay America, an economy hospitality chain. Shares of that company are now worth less than half of what they did at the time Burr sold.

The assets come from accounts that are held by Burr, belong to his spouse or are jointly held.


National emergencies, like the current pandemic, bring out the best in people-- but, apparently, also the worst. Note that all five senators are conservatives, who, ideologically, believe in a grasping me-first perspective. Conservatives shouldn't be serving in government. And when it really matters is in times like this. These 5 should all resign. They won't. Inhofe and Loeffler  are up for election this cycle. Inhofe is 100% safe, since he is an accurate reflection of his constituents, but Loeffler-- who was never elected to anything the first place and just bought the office from a crooked governor--  has a steep uphill climb to be returned to the Senate.Pressure is mounting-- including from Republicans-- on Burr to resign and wait for criminal prosecution. Even Tucker Carlson is talking about resignations:





Labels: , , , ,

8 Comments:

At 5:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Burr was only worth $1.8 million in 2018, a $150,000 position in Wyndham Hotels is ridiculously large. An investigation into Burr's trading should include not only his heavy selling after receiving the classified briefing on Covid-19, but why he has such concentrated positions and whether he's done other trading that could have been based on insider information. Who does he know that is connected to Wyndham and any other large holdings he has had? It is absurd that a member of Congress can legally own individual stocks and trade them on their own. If Burr has close to 10% of his net worth in a single stock, you can't tell me he doesn't have a big incentive to help that company with legislation.

I live in NC and sent Burr an email yesterday saying he is a traitor and I look forward to seeing him on trial for insider trading.

 
At 6:18 AM, Blogger CNYOrange said...

Too bad "we" can't force trump and pence to resign. Lets hope both die soon and Pelosi can take over. I know she's more conservative than we'd like but she would be INFINITELY better than the two reprehensible creatures occupying the WH.

 
At 7:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

First, since the corruption is bipartisan, nobody should hold their breath waiting for indictments. If obamanation/holder can refuse to prosecute anyone for $21 TRILLION in fraud (since it's been ongoing, might be a multiple of that by now), who is going to waste their time on a few million in illegal trades.

second, I must disagree with CNYO on this one. Pelosi could very well be far worse. Not only is she well into her own dotage, something I have witnessed first-hand, her political cowardice would paralyze her and prevent any meaningful action. Putting party first always, she would be too afraid of losing a single potted geranium voter to take any bold action. Whatever she does would have to be focus-group tested for weeks AND thoroughly vetted by all her corporate donors ahead of its doing.

the fact that she will not impeach on emoluments, corruption and kidnapped/separated and dead kids at the border; smothers MFA still; and has gagged AOC and Pramila on it still; should tell you all you need to know about Pelosi.

 
At 8:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

@7:48, really, Pelosi (as bad as she is) could be as bad as the guy who stood in front of the country claiming this virus was a liberal hoax, who as recently as yesterday was touting a malaria drug as a potential miracle drug for this virus with virtually no evidence to support it while a health expert was standing behind him? Yeah, Pelosi is awful but she couldn't possibly be worse than Trump.

 
At 8:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yeah, she could be. She might not lie about it as much, but her paralyzing political fear would mean it would take even longer to react, if she ever did react.

I'll still throw MFA at you. she is still smothering it. If ever it was called for, it is now.

but she can't politically because:
1) health insurance and phrma donors forbid it
2) it would prove that Bernie is right and biden is wrong.
3) it would prove that her smothering it for so long already means she has blood on her hands already.

she'd let 3 million americans die so that she could maintain the cash spigots from health ins and phrma so her party keeps its funding.

not that any of her 65 million potted geranium voters could figure this out.

 
At 8:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"...charged up to $10,000 for membership and are promised "interaction with top leaders and staff from Congress, the administration, and the private sector.' "

The Best Government Corporate Money can buy. No one with a real job can ever think about affording such access, nor receive the kind of attention to concerns.

I disagree, 8:30. As much as I despise Trump, at the moment I can see where his relief proposals will prove to be much more popular than Pelosi's "needs test" strategy, and certainly more helpful.

No action has yet been taken by anyone, but recall how popular Dubya's checks were compared to a possible "tax credit" which isn't going to mean much to the working class without an income right now.

 
At 9:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nobody can be worse than somebody who insists on being in every daily briefing during a health crisis and doing public relations and lying because he doesn't give a damn about how many people die, only about what is being said about him and whether or not he gets reelected. He completely lacks human empathy, he's a moron, and he's surrounded himself with toadies.

 
At 2:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

unless it's someone who is in every briefing, doing damage control for her party and donors and lying because she doesn't give a flying zeptofuck how many people get sick, go broke, become homeless and/or die; only about what the effects might be on her party and how to capitalize on the crisis to get more seats. She completely lacks human empathy (though she puts on a better act), is a moron dotard surrounded by equally corrupt sociopaths who share her 'party first and only' philosophy.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home