Saturday, December 28, 2019

You're Delusional If You Think Trump Has A Patriotic Bone In His Body

>


One of the things the newest survey by YouGov for The Economist looked at is how American voters perceive Trump personally. Most of it made sense. Just 33%-- his base basically-- see him as either outstanding or above average. 49% see him as poor (40%) or below average (9%). A majority of voters say his regime isn’t transparent and that Trump himself does not set a high moral standard. A large plurality say he uses his office to enrich family and friends and 53% view him unfavorably while just 40% have a favorable opinion of him. Most of his allies are mostly viewed negatively or aren’t known by the public. These are the negative/positive ratings of some Trump accomplices:
William Barr- 37/30%
Rudy Giuliani- 48/32%
Mick Mulvaney- 35/20%
Devin Nunes- 35/23%


When asked if specific words apply or not to Trump, mostly the majority of voters have it right. He get more negatives than positives in more traits people admire in a leader:
Honest- 40% negative, 20% positive
Intelligent- 33% negative, 30% positive
Religious- 30% negative, 14% positive
Inspiring- 33% negative, 20% positive
Experienced- 33% negative, 17% positive
Sincere- 37% negative, 22% positive
Steady- 28% negative, 19% positive
Asked if they find him hypocritical 43% said yes and only17% disagreed. 61% say he’s arrogant and only 9% say he isn’t. 43% find him to be a racist and 24% are either too stupid to have noticed or perhaps are racists themselves.

But there is one characteristic that made no sense to me. When asked if Trump us patriotic 32% said he is and just 24% said he isn’t. (44% said they have no opinion.) Gawd what are people missing? Does he have to rewrite the Constitution with one of his magic markers?

Michael Higginbotham is a candidate for Elijah Cummings’ seat in Baltimore. He’s a constitutional law professor and author who teaches at the University of Baltimore School of Law. His CNN Op-Ed yesterday noted that Nixon’s resignation was the first in history of any American president. He think’s Trump should be #2.
Nixon's enemies called him "Tricky Dick." Over the course of his 30-year political career, he showed himself to be vindictive, paranoid and selfish. But his decision to resign could be characterized as an act of patriotism: It spared the nation a painful and extremely divisive process of removing the commander in chief from office. History has recorded that, to paraphrase Shakespeare, nothing in his presidency became him like the leaving of it.

Even a half-century later, the mind of Richard Nixon is a tangled mystery. Deceptive, self-seeking and devious, he was also capable of far-seeing statesmanship (witness his outreach to China) and a genuine concern for America's place in the world. Historians will long debate which side of his character was salient in his decision to resign. But one thing is clear: By resigning, he protected not only his own historical legacy but also the country he had taken an oath to serve.

Donald Trump should follow suit.



…Trump, like Nixon, is accused of participating in a cover-up involving the investigation of political opponents. But Trump's alleged transgressions are worse than Nixon's because they concern an attempt to involve a foreign power in the American political process.

Nixon and Trump also have in common fiercely loyal supporters. Nixon's popularity in his second term had been quite high. He won reelection in 1972 with more than 60% of the popular vote and 520 electoral votes. The Watergate scandal reduced Nixon's political support, but his hardcore supporters urged him to fight on.

But Nixon emphasized country over personal considerations in deciding to resign. While most historians believe the full House would have voted to impeach, and the Senate would have secured the necessary two-thirds vote for removal, the trial process would have been extremely divisive and painful for the country.

In retrospect, we will never know whether a show of stubbornness-- like Trump's-- might have switched the political dynamic and persuaded the Senate to not convict, but we can instead be grateful that Nixon did not put the system to the test.

Bill Clinton, of course, did put the system to test: after an impeachment by the House, he fought and turned back the impeachment effort in the Senate. Yet a generation later, some Democrats wish that he had chosen the Nixon path. It is likely that Clinton's misconduct and his false testimony do not rise to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." Yet no one denies that they were grave blotches on his character, and harmful to how the public perceived the dignity of the office of the president.

Moreover, after Democrats found surprising success in 1998, his actions cost his party dearly in the 2000 election. For the same reason, some Republicans today may quietly hope that Trump will go away before 2020.

At this moment, the question goes beyond what is best politically for Trump, for the Republican party, or for Democrats. The question is not whether Trump can secure enough votes to avoid conviction or whether poll numbers will go up or down.

The sole question should be what is best for the country.

And if Trump forces the nation to go through an impeachment trial in the Senate, the consequences for our democracy are grave.

First, Trump will cause a further erosion of confidence in our democratic institutions, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, if he continues to attack and undermine the nation's intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Second, his insistence on slavish support from Republicans in Congress will weaken-- perhaps permanently-- the separation of powers required to maintain a legislature capable of functioning. Third, his heated rhetoric will widen the gap between Americans of different political beliefs.

The answer is clear: Trump should resign so the country can begin the process of healing. The divisions in the country today are even more corrosive than they were in 1974. That's why it's even more important that Trump emulate the best of Richard Nixon, who, in a rare moment of grace, understood he could only weaken the nation he led by focusing solely on himself, and chose the better path.

In President Trump's acceptance speech of the Republican nomination at the Republican National Convention in 2016, he told the nation, "Nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it." While many mocked the hubris behind that claim, at this moment of national danger it is undoubtedly true: Trump alone can spare the nation the painful ordeal of an impeachment trial in the Senate.


Trump would never do anything for the country, unless it benefitted himself. He's actually worse than Nixon. He's not going to resign, no matter how much damage he does to the country. In fact he's likely to purposefully do as much damage to the country as he can to serve his own perceived interests. He's a horrible, foul person and every House Republican who voted against impeaching him-- that means every single one of them-- and every Republican senator who votes to acquit him, deserves to be defeated in their reelection bids. Every. Single. One. Of. Them.



Labels: ,

3 Comments:

At 7:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"But Nixon emphasized country over personal considerations in deciding to resign. While most historians believe the full House would have voted to impeach, and the Senate would have secured the necessary two-thirds vote for removal, the trial process would have been extremely divisive and painful for the country."

Horse shit!

Nixon would have ridden this out and was happy to do so. But his own party realized they did not want to carry Nixon's stink into the next election. They went to him and told him that there were enough guilty votes to remove him. Therefore, his choice was between being the first prez to quit or the first one to be ridden out on a rail. He chose the former.

And the process still needed to be done because NOT doing so meant that presidential lawlessness goes uninvestigated, unindicted and unpunished. Ford's pardon did not mean we would avoid divisiveness and pain. It meant that a precedent was set that would be repeated many times in the future.

There are many times where a little pain is necessary for a society to remain healthy. Carter ignoring Reagan's treason; LBJ's ignoring Nixon's treason; Pelosi ignoring cheney's and bush's crimes; Pelosi ignoring trump's crimes... for 10 months, and even then ignoring trump's WORSE crimes. These are all such times. And our society is deathly ill partly because nobody did anything about those criminal acts.

 
At 7:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"By resigning, [Nixon] protected not only his own historical legacy but also the country he had taken an oath to serve."

Balderdash!

Nixon resigned prior to being impeached because that was the only way he could have been pardoned by Ford. The Constitution expressly denies the use of the pardon in cases of impeachment. Even to the end, he lived down to his base nature. The welfare of the nation had absolutely nothing to do with his resignation.

 
At 1:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:50 a very salient point that I omitted. By resigning, he became eligible for a pardon.

At the time, I half thought that a court challenge (aimed at the supremes) to the "constitutionality" of a pre-emptive blanket pardon might be made. I guess both parties wanted that precedent in their hip pocket just in case.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home