Saturday, November 16, 2019

Bloomberg's Ugly Trump-Like Sexism Makes Him Absolutely Unfit To Be The Democratic Nominee

>


Bloomberg is running in 3 super-Tuesday states so far: Alabama Arkansas and Tennessee but his campaign always says he hasn't decided if he's running for president or not yet. Sounds crazy to me but... he's also spending $100,000,000 on digital ads in battleground states the way you or I might spent $100. Michael Scherer and John Wagner, writing for the Washington Post, reported that the first ads popped up yesterday in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona and that "the outlay far exceeds what any other Democrat already in the race has spent on advertising."

The New York Times reported that the ads will stay up through the primary season even if Bloomberg ultimately decides to run only in Alabama Arkansas and Tennessee. (He's not actually in the ads.)

The announcement of the ad campaign might take some of the attention off all the stories that inundated the press this week about Bloomberg's sexism. Bloomberg's arrogance makes him incapable to responding directly to a long litany of example of his misogyny but he did have a lackey, tell the media that "Mike has come to see that some of what he has said is disrespectful and wrong. He believes his words have not always aligned with his values and the way he has led his life."

On Thursday Mediaite reported that "Bloomberg’s demeaning or outright disturbing comments about women and sexual assault date back decades. In mid-to-late ’90s, four women sued Bloomberg LP for sexual harassment and details that came out of the suit include the billionaire allegedly demanding a woman sales executive 'Kill it!' when she announced that she was pregnant. While discussing the same sales executive getting engaged, the lawsuit claimed Bloomberg looked at her engagement ring and said, 'What, is the guy dumb and blind? What the hell is he marrying you for?' before asking several days later if she was 'still engaged,' adding, 'What, is he that good in bed, or did your father pay him off to get rid of you?' In an incredible argument insisting he did not make sexually inappropriate comments about the sales executive, Bloomberg said in a deposition that he thought the phrase 'I’d do her' was a reference to having a friendship with someone, not sex. The suit was settled out of court and Bloomberg claims he passed a lie-detector test proving his innocence, but the supposed test results were never released."




In a late ’90s lawsuit over Bloomberg LP’s sexist work culture, a woman employee claimed she had been raped by her superior, but in a deposition, Bloomberg suggested that she was lying by saying that the only time he believes rape accusations are when there’s “an unimpeachable third-party witness” vouching for the victim. The suit accused Bloomberg of using phrases like, “I’d do that piece of meat” and “I’d do her in a second;” the billionaire took issue with just one part of those comments, saying, “I don’t recall ever using the term ‘meat’ at all.” A Village Voice report from 2001 suggested that Bloomberg may have quietly settled the suit out of court with the woman, like he did in the lawsuit years previous.

In a book from the early ’90s-- titled, The Portable Bloomberg: The Wit and Wisdom of Michael Bloomberg-- written by Bloomberg LP staffers to canonize some of their boss’s most memorable quotes, the lines "If women wanted to be appreciated for their brains, they’d go to the library instead of to Bloomingdale’s" and "I know for a fact that any self-respecting woman who walks past a construction site and doesn’t get a whistle will turn around and walk past again and again until she does get one" are attributed to the billionaire. When journalist Michael Wolff wrote about the book, he reached out to former Bloomberg LP executive Elisabeth DeMarse, who confirmed that the quotes were accurate, adding that Bloomberg “was touched” by it because “He loves things that are about himself.”


Business Insider made him sound like Trump! "In his 1997 autobiography, Bloomberg wrote that he kept 'a girlfriend in every city' during his years on Wall Street in the 1960s and 70s. And he once told a reporter, 'I like theater, dining, and chasing women ... Let me put it this way: I am a single, straight billionaire in Manhattan. What do you think? It's a wet dream.'... In 2008, at least 58 women filed a class-action lawsuit against Bloomberg LP alleging pregnancy discrimination. The women alleged they were demoted, had their salaries cut, or were otherwise mistreated after they returned from maternity leave. One of the women's complaints alleged that an executive at the company said, 'I'm not having any pregnant bitches working for me.'" A Democratic Party presidential nominee? Maybe in Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee... nowhere else.


Labels: , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 6:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

... and the democrap party continually moves into the republican party's former territory and assimilates all their traits and principles.

seriously, how can all you lesser evilists justify sticking with them? wasn't Bloomberg the 'stop and frisk' mayor?

come on people, what's it going to take for that epiphany?

 
At 9:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

@6:20 am

". and the democrap party continually moves into the republican party's former territory and assimilates all their traits and principles." Yeah, let me know when they start deliberately squelching the black vote, demonizing gays and adopting full-on anti-abortion policies. Idiot.

What epiphany are you talking about? The Democrats have transformed into a corporate-neoliberal party heavily dependent on the money they get from the one-percent, but they remain willing (at times) to do moderately decent things for average people. Are they willing to go out on a limb do BIG things that might challenge the status quo in America? No, but when in charge they appoint sane judges and pass legislation which does more good than harm. If you're too resolutely stupid to understand that some people would look at the current political scene and decide that the Democrats, while inadequate, are nonetheless infinitely preferable to the deliberate chaos and insanity of the Republican Party, why waste time posting stuff on the internet that makes you look like such an intractable, childish moron?

Bloomberg's plan is probably to collect enough delegates so that he may be able to establish himself as some kind of a force for a future brokered convention. It is nit-picking I guess, but he is not a serial rapist like Trump. As for the idea that the Democratic Party would have room for someone like him - how did I describe them? They have become a neo-liberal/corporate centered (fascist) party, so as far as party establishment is concerned, of course there's room for him. He will not get the nomination. And the fact that someone as bad as him CANNOT become the Democratic Party's candidate while a racist idiot like Donald Trump CAN ascend to the presidency through the Republican Party is all any sane person would need to see the clear difference between the two entities. But again - aside from you obviously not being especially bright, I suspect you also need mental care as well.

As ever, GFY.

 
At 12:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:52, you mean when they sit on their thumbs while the Nazis suppress blacks, demonize gays and implement anti-women policies? You mean Pelosi refusing to impeach for killing poor brown kids at the border? you mean Pelosi refusing to impeach for torture and arbitrary war? you mean obamanation (and kamala harris) refusing to stand up for homeowners and job-losers but making the bankers whole? you mean how they stood tall for marriage equality and repealing DADT and DOMA (in case you missed it, they were on the sidelines for all 3 sitting on their thumbs)? You mean when obamanation's admin took the supreme court's repudiation of big parts of the voting rights bill and reaffirmed the rights of blacks to vote (again, in case you were busy with your mirror, obamanation did bupkus)? You mean how the DNC rigged several 2016 primaries to make $hillbillary the nom (read donna brazille's goddamn book)? You mean having thousands of "superdelegates" just in case the DNC doesn't like what voters want?

easy to react when you hate. not so easy to think it through and, you know, get it right. you know, for once. hypothetically, of course.

the democraps are worse than the republicans were in 2004. They learned from them and are now practitioners of most of what the Nazis did. And they spend more of their time telling you morons why those policies of Bernie and Elizabeth cannot be done than they tell you what they will do.

but by all means, elect all the democraps you want if all you want is NOT the Nazis. Enjoy the fascism. it's all yours.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home