Sunday, October 27, 2019

No, Tulsi Is NOT Going To Run As A Third-Party Candidate For President

>


One of Tulsi's colleagues in Congress-- asked me for anonymity inorder to share some thoughts with me about her for DWT. I didn't ask her about Tulsi. She just brought her up on her own after she announced last week that she isn't running for reelection. Below are parts of the conversation that don't give away her identity.

She asked me to read this Igor Derysh piece at Salon about the foolish speculation that Tulsi may run as a third-party candidate. Last month I told you that Tulsi wasn't going to run for her House seat and that she's running for governor of Hawaii in 2022. People though I made it up; I didn't. And I can yell you as categorically that anyone talking about her running as a third party candidate is talking out of their ass. She isn't going to. Not under any circumstance. She wants to be president-- and is sure she will be-- and knows running as a third party candidate will give her as much a chance as ever becoming president as Jill Stein has. Being governor, on the other hand, would help.

My friend the congresswoman said that she thinks that "what’s happening is that she realizes that she can always run for Governor or Senator after this, but not if she’s defeated for her House seat. It’s also possible, however, that being the undercard at all of those Sanders rallies three years ago just went to her head, and she really thinks that she ought to be President."

No, she didn't need that. She was raised inside a bizarre cult by people who drilled it into her head that she would be president. Ever step she makes, every breath she takes is in furtherance of that inevitability.

"I don’t think that that’s going to work well for her," my friend replied. "She’s not Japanese or Filipino. Being a female combat veteran can get you elected to Congress, because no one really cares who represents them in Congress (and most people can’t even name their Member of Congress). But there are a huge number of special interests who care greatly who is Governor, especially in Hawaii (where the state government pretty much runs the state). Those special interests are going to back a compliant Japanese or Filipino candidate, to take advantage of the identity politics."




We had some back and forth about Hawaiian politics at that point and then she continued: "At some point, someone will check and see how many times she actually went back to Hawaii from DC during her terms in Congress. And someone else, someone besides you, will write about her and Michael Grimm. And someone else will write about her ties to Hindu extremist groups woven into her fundraising network. I actually think that she has come close to being what the country needs: a public critic of the military-industrial complex and endless military intervention. We spend billions of dollars bombing the crap out of people in countries that our idiot President couldn’t find on a globe, even if all the country names were on it, since he can’t read. But her level of self-absorption is so high that when she actually makes some useful point in that regard, it’s as though she’s emerging from a dream state."



I spoke with a friend of mine who's in the state legislature in Honolulu and follows Tulsi closely-- and warily. He agrees that the whole craziness last week isn't going to help her political ambitions. "Tulsi is in a no-win situation," he told me this morning. "If she stays in Congress, she'll continue to face withering criticism of her missed votes and lack of attention to her district from Kai Kahele, who had a real chance to defeat her in the primary. By giving up her seat, she blunts those attacks, but makes it much harder to get back into office by, for example, running for governor in 2022. Hawaii requires 70 percent of donations to a state candidate to come from in state, which means she'd no longer be able to rely primarily on her mainland Hindu nationalist donor base. Being out of office means the establishment support will dwindle. Last but not least, there are many well-known candidates already running, including Lt. Gov. Josh Green, Honolulu Mayor Kirk Caldwell, former State Senator Jill Tokuda, and potentially state Senator Kai Kahele, even if he wins the 2020 congressional race. Tulsi would be far from the favorite in the 2022 gubernatorial race."

Labels: ,

6 Comments:

At 2:53 PM, Blogger Gadfly said...

Shit, I wrote about the Tulsi/RSS stuff when she first left the DNC 3.5 years ago. https://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2016/03/sandernistas-tulsi-gabbard-bigotry.html

 
At 2:55 PM, Blogger Gadfly said...

Did a roundup of Tulsi Kool-Aid stuff early this year. Since then, have written about the lies of her being the piece candidate and more. https://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2019/01/drinking-tulsi-gabbard-kool-aid-and.html Just click the Tulsi Gabbard tag at the end of that piece after you look through it.

As for the Salon deal? I don't think she'll go third party but I wouldn't categorically exclude it, either. And yes, if she runs for statewide office in 2022, she'll get her ass kicked.

 
At 4:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tulsi is one of those brave individuals, who has has shown lots of courage. The informed people in this country salute to the likes of her, Sanders, Robert Reich, AOC, and others.

 
At 4:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm still trying to understand what Tulsi saw in Mikey "Suits" Grimm!!! I guess being a Republican Mafioso lights her wick?

There are things I like about Tulsi Gabbard, but they are balanced by things about her that negate those positives. Narendra Modi might as well have a toothbrush mustache and a stiff right arm, yet Tulsi is open in her support for him. There are other planks in her platform that slant in the direction of authoritarianism, but clarity on such things isn't evident.

I've had more than enough with candidates who aren't open about who they are and what they stand for. Just being against things isn't enough.

 
At 4:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A whole lot doesn't add up about what DWT writes about Tulsi, and though you don't like her (obvious) there needs to be some integrity and self questioning that perhaps you may have this wrong. Another of your post that really is nothing but a biased hit piece i.e. DWT writes {She was raised inside a bizarre cult by people who drilled it into her head that she would be president. Every step she makes, every breath she takes is in furtherance of that inevitability.). Tulsi quits the DNC vice chair to back Bernie, why? because she thinks that will help her become President? Hmmm. Next- She's a medic in the army and served tours of duty in active war zones and continues to serve still? How does continuing risking her life help her so called "every move" directed at being President. She has the veteran credential, she doesn't need to continue as a congreess member. She avidly and prominently states she is running for President to reverse the destruction/cost/and danger of US foreign policy regime change war mistakes. What candidate speaks out against war and goes against the main stream press's pro war sponsors and cheerleaders to get avid negative press and smears thrown at her. So she's done nothing that would back up your statement that her every move is in pursuit of her being president. If anything she's consistently done everything to destroy her chances of being President by taking gutsy, outspoken positions. Yet DWT cannot write objectively about her and keeps trying to smear her "six ways to Sunday" facts be damn. Criticize Tulsi for backing Bernie vs the DNC, going against empire wars, serving in the army as a medic, saying she backs pardoning Snowden and Assange, consistently bringing up the futility of US regime change wars or even her current abortion stance but to smear based on how she was raised, saying her views will always be the same as her parents views, that she can serve in a war zone and see things many of us don't and not be able to change her mind? How bout DWT tell me what is wrong with her positions today? Maybe Tulsi has the capability to change but DWT does not? Guess you were a Jared Golden supporter, so we should believe you cannot change and will always be a Jared Golden supporter huh?

 
At 8:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And the Amazing Kreskin 4:02 again demonstrates his incredible ability to inject his inane biases that everyone but him is right (wing)! Applause! Applause!!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home