Ted Lieu: Instead Of Holding Stupid Hearings About Why Republican Legislators Don't Get Enough Likes On Facebook, We Will Be Holding Hearings On Whether Any Crimes Were Committed
>
The Washington Post has a squad devoted to reporting on Trump's lies. Monday they wrote about his deranged address at CPAC-- the one that crackpot editor of Reason, Nick Gillespie, insists won him the 2020 election: "Powered by his two-hour stemwinder at the Conservative Political Action Conference on March 2-- which featured more than 100 false or misleading claims-- President Trump is on pace to exceed his daily quota set during his first two years in office. The president averaged nearly 5.9 false or misleading claims a day in his first year in office. He hit nearly 16.5 a day in his second year. So far in 2019, he’s averaging nearly 22 claims a day.
That Trump lies a lot should surprise no one with a functioning brain. At the moment only 4% of the statements PolitiFact have checked out by him are true-- YES, only 4%! Saving grace: another 15% of his statements have been found mostly true. that means just over 4 out of 5 of Trump's checked statements are rated half true, another way of saying half false (14%), mostly false (21%), flat out false (34%) or such big lies that they are rated "Pants on Fire" (14%). Lying isn't an impeachable offense per se. But in Trump's case, it endangers the security of the nation and should absolutely be part of the impeachment process.
In response to a tweet by Bob Cesca after Trump's CPAC breakdown ("This crackpot has the nuclear codes in his pocket. Sleep tight, world."), top Republican Party strategist Stuart Stevens tweeted that "It is impossible to watch Trump’s two hour meltdown at CPAC and think this person is of sound mind." In case you're unaware of who Stevens is, he was Romney's chief strategist in 2012 and worked for President Bush, Governors Haley Barbour (R-MS), Tom Ridge (R-PA), Bill Weld (R-MA), Paul Cellucci (R-MA), and Bob Riley (R-AL), as well as Senators Thad Cochran (R-MS), Dick Lugar (R-IN), Mel Martinez (R-FL), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ).
Mental health isn't impeachable but theoretically there is a way of removing a mentally deranged president, like Trump-- the 25th Amendment. Here's a brief analysis:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: "The counsel’s office and relevant White House officials will review it and respond at the appropriate time." As I mentioned yesterday-- but worth repeating today-- Judiciary Committee member and Air Force JAG officer, Ted Lieu told me that "Unlike last term, the House Judiciary Committee will actually conduct oversight over the Executive Branch. Instead of holding stupid hearings about why Republican legislators don't get enough likes on Facebook, we will be holding hearings on whether any crimes were committed by Executive Branch officials and those within their orbit. We have launched a massive investigation into Trump, his family and his associates. We do not work for Trump. We are part of a separate and coequal branch of government. And we intend to honor our oath of office."
That Trump lies a lot should surprise no one with a functioning brain. At the moment only 4% of the statements PolitiFact have checked out by him are true-- YES, only 4%! Saving grace: another 15% of his statements have been found mostly true. that means just over 4 out of 5 of Trump's checked statements are rated half true, another way of saying half false (14%), mostly false (21%), flat out false (34%) or such big lies that they are rated "Pants on Fire" (14%). Lying isn't an impeachable offense per se. But in Trump's case, it endangers the security of the nation and should absolutely be part of the impeachment process.
In response to a tweet by Bob Cesca after Trump's CPAC breakdown ("This crackpot has the nuclear codes in his pocket. Sleep tight, world."), top Republican Party strategist Stuart Stevens tweeted that "It is impossible to watch Trump’s two hour meltdown at CPAC and think this person is of sound mind." In case you're unaware of who Stevens is, he was Romney's chief strategist in 2012 and worked for President Bush, Governors Haley Barbour (R-MS), Tom Ridge (R-PA), Bill Weld (R-MA), Paul Cellucci (R-MA), and Bob Riley (R-AL), as well as Senators Thad Cochran (R-MS), Dick Lugar (R-IN), Mel Martinez (R-FL), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ).
Mental health isn't impeachable but theoretically there is a way of removing a mentally deranged president, like Trump-- the 25th Amendment. Here's a brief analysis:
[W]hat happens if the President becomes unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office? Several Presidents suffered debilitating illnesses and injuries. For weeks and months at a time, the country was left without effective or accountable presidential leadership. Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 provided for the Vice President to step in when the President had an “inability to discharge [his] powers and duties,” but it provided no decision-maker, no procedures, and no definition of “inability.” Nor did it make clear whether the Vice President would act as President only until the President recovered, or instead would become President for the duration of the term. No Vice President wanted to seem like a usurper. In practice, power was never transferred and presidential inner circles typically concealed the President’s condition.That's never going to work against Trump. He could be filmed naked, eating grass on the front lawn of the White House and screaming obscenities at passers-by and still be declared perfectly sane by Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo, Steven Mnuchin, Patrick Shanahan, William Barr, Rick Perry, Betsy DeVos, Wilbur Ross, Alex Acosta and Mr. and Mrs. (and Miss) Mitch McConnell, et al. And that takes us back to... Jerry Nadler, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. Yesterday, the committee's attorneys sent letters to 81 individuals, companies and government entities seeking a wide range of materials that should be able to help prove that Trump is guilty of clearly impeachable offenses. In the letters, Nadler wrote that "This is a critical time for our nation. President Trump and his administration face wide-ranging allegations of misconduct that strike at the heart of our constitutional order." The letters will lead to closed door interviews and open hearings and some of the recipients include Trumpanzee, Jr., Allen Weisselberg, David Pecker, Alan Garten, Rhona Graff, Ivanka, Kushner-in-law, Steve Bannon, Tom Barrack, Reince Priebus, Don McGahn, Jay Sekulow, KT McFarland, Hope Hicks, Sean Spicer, Corey Lewandowski, Paul Manafort, Anatoli Samochornov, Brad Parscale, Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, George Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Carter Page, Erik Prince, Jeff Sessions, Michael Caputo, Randy Credico, Sam Nunberg, Viktor Vekselberg, Tony Fabrizio, as well as Wikileaks and the NRA. I still haven't been able to confirm if either of the Mercers, who were clearly behind Putin-Gate, have gotten letters yet.
...Section 4 addresses the dramatic case of a President who may be unable to fulfill his constitutional role but who cannot or will not step aside. It provides both a decision-maker and a procedure. The initial deciding group is the Vice President and a majority of either the Cabinet or some other body that Congress may designate (though Congress has never done so). If this group declares a President “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” the Vice President immediately becomes Acting President. If and when the President pronounces himself able, the deciding group has four days to disagree. If it does not, the President retakes his powers. But if it does, the Vice President keeps control while Congress quickly meets and makes a decision. The voting rule in these contested cases favors the President; the Vice President continues acting as President only if two-thirds majorities of both chambers agree that the President is unable to serve.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: "The counsel’s office and relevant White House officials will review it and respond at the appropriate time." As I mentioned yesterday-- but worth repeating today-- Judiciary Committee member and Air Force JAG officer, Ted Lieu told me that "Unlike last term, the House Judiciary Committee will actually conduct oversight over the Executive Branch. Instead of holding stupid hearings about why Republican legislators don't get enough likes on Facebook, we will be holding hearings on whether any crimes were committed by Executive Branch officials and those within their orbit. We have launched a massive investigation into Trump, his family and his associates. We do not work for Trump. We are part of a separate and coequal branch of government. And we intend to honor our oath of office."
Labels: 25th amendment, House Judiciary Committee, impeaching Trump, Jerry Nadler, Ted Lieu
10 Comments:
I didn't see a single word indicating that Nancy Pelosi is on board with such a move. Nothing is going to come from any action by Nadler until she does.
Wrong. Pelosi is probably directing this whole charade. The letters are asking nice for proof of guilt. They won't get any truthful responses, and they should not expect any.
What they might get are highly selective replies that will be designed to show nothing about trump and certainly nothing about themselves.
The option (after a few weeks of waiting) after that MIGHT be subpoenas.
At that point it will take the rest of this congress to do the refusals, threats, claims of executive privilege, claims of national security and finally surrender by Nadler et al.
What this really is, dear moron lefties, is Pelosi and nadler fooling all of you into thinking that the democraps really are doing something.
The gamble that Pelosi just played is this: *IF* trump wins another term (better than even odds given the DNC) *AND* the democraps keep the house (less than even odds given Pelosi), then what?
I suppose they can just start the whole charade over again from ground zero. Or by then they might just have totally surrendered.
If Ted actually said that, he proved he's a moron.
We already know that crimes were committed. He can't say so because that would point out the refusal of the democraps to act appropriately. Not that many of their voters can connect those dots. But Pelosi still does seem to care about optics a little.
Pelosi's refusal to impeach is only going to be laid even more bare as her dereliction of her duty. cohen gave them documentary proof of some crimes. He testified without proof of many more. Other crimes were off limits due to the (alleged) southern district of NY investigation. And trump's emergency declaration is an anticonstitutional power grab. One can only speculate on what might come next.
still, the democraps ARE doing more in the way of pretense than they did in 2007 when they utterly spiked Kucinich's articles targeting cheney and gonzalez. It appears they will pretend to try to do ... something ... until the end of this congress.
optics.
If any of you Anoymouses above listened to The Last Word last night and heard Frank Rich speak, Frank confirmed what I have thought and we all know - if the Dems impeach Trump, it is extremely unlikely the Senate would get the 2/3 votes to convict him and that would let Trump off the hook, crow about how innocent he is and claim that he WON. Imagine us all eating that!!! Time to swallow the poison or leave for Costa Rica!
So the Dems do have to consider their move to impeachment very carefully and build a case that hopefully will be so freaking strong that there would be a real chance that enough Republicans will turn around.
Of course, if the Dems do not impeach Trump, they will not be doing their constitutional duty and that also would be very problematic for them and alienate many or most Dems. Myself included.
Yeah, a real quagmire, a real conundrum. Oy vayzmire!!!!
The Last Word? The DNC Said It And I Believe It So That Settles It Show?
No thanks. I get enough lies from the DNC trolls who hang out here.
Hone, if the democraps hold a real trial, like their constitutional duty demands, they will force the Nazi senate to do one of two things:
1) convict -- there will be hundreds of potential actual crimes to consider plus treason in the form of colluding with Russia to goon our elections and to launder money.
2) face whatever consequences there might be to NOT convict in the face of total proof of so many crimes and treason.
Yeah, there may not be any consequences. But then that's on us/US ain't it.
We've shrunk from every single opportunity before. We've never insisted anyone actually act in our interests before... why would this be different.
But at least they'd force the Nazis to make a choice.
Pelosi won't do this because she sees consequences in her caucus for doing her fucking job. cowardice and stupidity far worse than Neville chamberlain.
Hone, I no longer read any entries on this blog I.D. as Anon. They are too lazy to create a handle as you and I have done. Hence they have no value as far as they're comments are concerned.
6:22, how soon we forget thousands of kidnappings (of kids) and several murders by ICE. Those could be death penalty crimes, no? If not, they should be.
So sorry to disappoint your snowflake sensibilities, zeeman. I didn't realize that Howie turned control of the site over to you.
To expand on 4:22, not only will the senate Nazis possibly face consequences for declaring the obviously guilty trump innocent, it will also be a moment for American voters to possibly look in the mirror.
After a public trial like that, and after hundreds of crimes SHOULD be proved beyond any shadow of a doubt, it might be time for americans to ponder their own guilt in giving such evil so much power.
The question I have is this: How many of those 62 million will still vote to re-elect trump after he's been proven guilty of treason, kidnapping, torture, murder, fraud, money laundering, campaign finance fraud and a myriad of violations of the constitution?
What that might mean is of zero consequence, since it will open the door for biden or whomever the DNC rigs the nom for, plus some number of new fascist democraps in the senate. And we already saw what that looks like back in 2007. So.. nothing will be Undone... and the next worse than trump Nazi will become inevitable.
but at least a few Nazi voters might discover, temporarily, a vestige of a conscience. maybe none. that's what I don't know.
Post a Comment
<< Home