Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Pelosi Is Wrong About Impeachment

>

Al Green, wearing Grayson's tie

Even deranged Trump ex-fan girl Ann Coulter refers to him as a "shallow, narcissistic conman." Shallow and narcissistic aren't impeachable. Conman probably is. But Pelosi says he's not worth the trouble-- and the divisiveness-- an impeachment would stir up. One of the first Democrats to introduce an impeachment resolution was Texas Democrat Al Green. He's listened to Pelosi's arguments-- and isn't persuaded. Yesterday, Politico reported that he's still moving forward and is ready to force a floor vote. When I saw him in that picture wearing one of Alan Grayson's ties, I called Grayson and asked him if he's still as enthusiastic a believer in impeaching Trump as he was last year. "Yes," he responded emphatically, "Trump is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. Therefore, he should be removed from office. He doesn’t get some kind of pass just because he’s a demagogue."

That's just how Green sees it. He's very much not into putting "political expediency ahead of moral imperative... This is not about the speaker. It wasn’t about the speaker before she became speaker, and it’s not about the speaker now. It’s not about any one person-- it’s really not even about the president as much as it is about what he’s doing. It’s about his behavior that is harmful to society."
He pushed back on the notion, raised by Pelosi and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who would oversee any impeachment proceedings, that broad bipartisan support was needed to pursue impeachment.

“If we wait on Republicans, who are not going to buy in, then there won’t be an impeachment,” he said, citing recent polling of Trump’s support among his party. “We should not wait on people who are not coming. That bipartisan ship has already gone to the bottom of the sea of sophistry.”

“I did not reflect on [Pelosi's] words,” he said, saying he instead thinks about the words of voters who approach him about impeachment.

But he ripped “status quo opinion-makers and opinion-shapers” who would refuse the “loyal opposition” a chance to be heard.

“That’s your prerogative. I am not angry with you, I am not upset with you, I just tell the truth about you,” Green said. “I not only speak truth to power, I speak the truth about power.”

Green's enthusiasm for voting to impeach Trump at this stage is largely unmatched in the party, as evidenced by the lack of votes his impeachment articles got the last time he forced a vote on them.

But holding up a framed vote sheet from the last floor vote on his articles of impeachment, which only got 66 votes-- far short of the 218 needed to pass-- Green predicted that this time around, he would get at least one more vote.

But, he mused, “when you’re standing on righteousness, one can be a majority.”
Pelosi may have many reasons for coming out the way she did Monday against impeaching Trump-- mostly around political expediency. But part of the equation is her unfortunate tendency to always be fighting the last war. Clinton shouldn’t have been impeached, she is thinking, and "therefore" (she thinks) neither should Trump. That’s not the way it works. In fact, it's outrageous. The U.S. Constitution says that when you commit treason, bribery, high crimes or misdemeanors, you are removed from office-- period. If you take the oath of office seriously, then that’s what you’ve got to do to Trump. That’s what it means to uphold the Constitution. Pelosi and Nadler should know better than to whiff on this. Let Pence and McTurtle make the argument that Trump should not be impeached-- and let Pelosi do her constitutional job and impeach him. She owes that to America. He may not be worth it-- I'll give her that-- but the country is worth it. Let's think about America first.

Pelosi handpicked-- very carefully-- Adam Schiff to head the House Intelligence Committee. And sure enough, soon after she croaked out her latest "off the table" diktat, Schiff was on NPR advocating that Trump go to prison after he's out of office. Like most Americans, Schiff feels there's already sufficient evidence to support an indictment of Trump-- even before Mueller's report is issued. I'm sorry, but these people are all derelict of duty for not impeaching him. Asked about impeachment, Schiff parroted Pelosi: "I see little to be gained by putting the country through that kind of wrenching experience as I've often remarked in the past. The only thing worse than putting the country through the trauma of an impeachment is putting the country through the trauma of a failed impeachment." How about the trauma of letting an arch criminal like Trump get away with everything because Congress is afraid to take him on?


Labels: , , , , ,

7 Comments:

At 10:20 AM, Blogger Skeptical Partisan said...

DJT may not be worth the effort of impeachment but he's not the only factor in the equation. The U.S. Constitution, voting rights, climate disruption, global peace/nuclear war, etc... these are worth impeachment.

 
At 10:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The democraps should be happy that we don't have access to recall on them. I'd vote to do so if we did. Dereliction of duty would be the reason.

 
At 11:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

horse shit with a bull shit chaser.

1) as we learned in 2007, articles submitted do NOT always get heard in committee, which is a prerequisite before anyone can "force" a floor vote. In 2007, it was Pelosi ordering Conyers to not allow it to be heard in committee. In 2019 it shall be Pelosi ordering Nadler to not allow it.

period.

2) any psycho-analysis of Pelosi's motives as "fighting the last war" is bull shit. $he is loathe to fight ANY war. Pelosi is a political coward who is anathema to doing her fucking job as speaker AND as an alleged Democrat. Her entire history of democrap "leader" has been one of risk-avoidance as much as service to her donors.

period.

But thank the gawds that we spent years and billions electing a buttload of democraps so that she could avoid doing her job while faithfully serving her donors.

so I guess we all got what we deserved.... except trump.

 
At 5:49 PM, Anonymous angryspittle said...

Maybe we could warm up by impeaching Kavanaugh who lied through his teeth during his confirmation hearings before the Judiciary committee?

 
At 6:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

angry, if anyone is to be impeached, we'll have to elect someone other than democraps. Pelosi will never impeach anyone for anything.... because that would be DOING something (her fucking job!) and her mantra is to never ever DO anything when she can pretend instead.

since we elected a bunch of democraps handing Pelosi the gavel again, I can only conclude one of two things (possibly both):

1) we're dumber than shit
2) we don't WANT anyone impeached no matter what they do/did.

 
At 6:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

obamanation's criminal charges need to start with refusal to enforce the Vienna Accords on Torture. He's publicly admitted "we tortured some folks", which makes his refusal to prosecute a crime by the same statute.

If we do cheney, Rumsfeld et al, we also then need to do obamanation.

but as to the deterrence... we prosecuted and executed several Japanese war criminals for torture (including waterboarding) after WWII. Didn't do shit to deter cheney, rummy et al.

Still, America will always deserve its rep as a lawless regime until we take that action against cheney and the rest. Not that it means a damn thing to anyone in this shithole.

 
At 6:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nancy is not worth the trouble.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home