World Without Us: Death of Insects and the Third Great Tsunami
>
by Thomas Neuburger
I've written in the past about "twin tsunamis" approaching the U.S. and the world — the chaos caused by out-of-control climate change and the blossoming of pre-revolutionary America, the America that elected Trump and almost elected Sanders, into revolutionary America, the America fed up here with life under the predatory rule of the very very rich and the corporations they control.
But there's a third great tsunami as well, one related to the destruction of our habitat, the environment of the world we depend on for physical sustenance, and only partly the consequence of climate change itself.
Put simply, we're destroying our world. Or rather, remaking it so it's uninhabitable by ... us. This radical transformation takes many forms, from acidification of the ocean, which will alter for millions of years what kinds of species it supports, to destruction of our soil and food supply so that a single, politically powerful company can prosper.
We're also killing off the world's insects:
Plummeting insect numbers 'threaten collapse of nature'A world without insects, or dramatically stripped of them, is a world without us. This is the path we're on. This is the third tsunami, and like the others, its mist is wetting our faces as we speak.
Exclusive: Insects could vanish within a century at current rate of decline, says global review
The world’s insects are hurtling down the path to extinction, threatening a “catastrophic collapse of nature’s ecosystems”, according to the first global scientific review.
More than 40% of insect species are declining and a third are endangered, the analysis found. The rate of extinction is eight times faster than that of mammals, birds and reptiles. The total mass of insects is falling by a precipitous 2.5% a year, according to the best data available, suggesting they could vanish within a century.
The planet is at the start of a sixth mass extinction in its history, with huge losses already reported in larger animals that are easier to study. But insects are by far the most varied and abundant animals, outweighing humanity by 17 times. They are “essential” for the proper functioning of all ecosystems, the researchers say, as food for other creatures, pollinators and recyclers of nutrients.
This doesn't change the implications for the 2020 election, which I'll return to later, but it certainly adds to them.
Labels: 2020 presidential election, climate, Gaius Publius, mass extinction, pathology of the wealthy, societal collapse, Thomas Neuburger
6 Comments:
Yes!
I suspect, however, that Americans are not bad off enough (yet) to care enough to do something radical to address these issues. The Depression was what gave FDR the political will of the people to implement the New Deal. The Green New Deal should be on the horizon, as fast as possible, but I doubt it will happen. Many Americans are still way too complacent: too busy watching DVDs and Netflix, playing video games, socializing on their phones, buying cheap gas and shopping, shopping, shopping. A big ubiquitous dent to people's pocketbooks is needed. Hey, maybe we will be lucky and something catastrophic will occur to get the general public to really care? What a horrible thing to say. I apologize.
Since we are too stupid and greedy for our own good, Mother Nature WILL see to it that we don't get any dinner, much less dessert. Money will mean absolutely nothing. Let the Republicans and their selfish masters try to live on that!
The version of the Easter Island collapse, as told in "Collapse"-- Diamond, is a microcosm of what humankind is doing to itself planet-wide.
The privileged ones decided to erect massive statues to their own glory... maybe... and they cut down all the trees on the island to use as fuel and as rollers to get those big stone faces from the quarry to their places of erection many miles away.
Eventually they cut down the last tree, the climate changed making the island arable land unable to provide for the population... and the population plummeted by 95% to what it is today.
It is unknown whether anyone tried to point out to the privileged one(s) about the trees... but we see the results proving that they did not listen.
Humankind is just not built for this. If decisions are truly democratic, too many of us will always be too stupid, greedy and short-sighted for a collective remedy to ever be affected. These same flaws guarantee that those who arrogate power in any way they can will also be unable and unwilling to affect any kind of useful changes either.
Since the fate of humankind is not in doubt, I only hope that all those American dipshits who deny science will live long enough to have their stupidity proven to them as they die slowly and in agony wondering why their gawd had forsaken them.
It's kind of ironic that the planet's relative climate stability for the past 15000 years enabled the rise of humankind and their collective destruction of that stability... in just a couple of centuries.
In the long run, it's all moot anyway. The sun will go red giant in another billion years or so... and the earth will become a sterile cinder. Humankind will just get there a billion years earlier.
RE: "I only hope that all those American dipshits who deny science will live long enough to have their stupidity proven to them as they die slowly and in agony..."
That's not how it's gonna happen. The dishits will blame gay marriage, socialists, atheists -anyone but themselves. It was ever thus.
sadly, 5:11, you're correct. part of the reason humankind is wholly incapable of fixing this.
another fine contribution by TN/GP. This facet of the problem hasn't been covered at all... except for the bees.
Sad to say, again and still, it's already too late.
Post a Comment
<< Home