Sunday, February 17, 2019

BETO... For U.S. Senate?

>

BETO by Nancy Ohanian

Chris Cillizza delivers the most superficial and stupidest way to watch the 2020 nomination race on CNN every month. Yesterday, he moved Bernie, Klobuchar and Castro up in his "power ranking," while Sherrod Brown and Kirsten Gillibrand moved down. "Sliding down to #3," mouthed the silly Cillizza-- with silly cartoon music behind him (apparently someone at CNN knows what a doofus he is)-- "is former Texas Congressman Beto O'Rourke. Now, O'Rourke is the buzz and momentum candidate, even hosting his own competing rally in El Paso..."

Chuck Schumer loves recruiting candidates. Unfortunately he usually picks the worst candidates. Last cycle, his biggest efforts went into 3 extremely conservative Democrats-- Phil Bredesen (TN), Jacky Rosen (NV) and Kyrsten Sinema (AZ). Bredesen lost with just 44.2% of the vote but the other two flipped red seats. Unfortunately they have both already earned F grades for their Senate voting records, entirely predictable, since they both had F grades for their House voting records. In fact, Sinema had the single worst voting record among Dems in the House and after just a month of votes is already voting more conservatively than Doug Jones, Joe Manchin and... Susan Collins! That said, even Schumer can accidentally pick a decent candidate once in a blue moon. And both Texas and the moon seem to be headed in a blue-tinged direction. Look at that brand new polling of Texas voters from PPP:




Beto may be too middle of the road to make the best 2020 presidential nominee, but he'd make a very good Democratic Senate nominee against McTurtle sidekick John Cornyn. There are Texas progressive activists who don't want to hear that, who already have their hearts set on Sema Hernandez, organizer of the Poor People's Campaign and the 2018 DSA primary candidate who drew 245,847 votes (23.7%) in 2018's three-way Senate primary that Beto won with 640,769 votes (61.8%), before he was half as well-known as he is now.

Jim Henson and Joshua Blank of the Texas Politics Project at UT put together all the arguments for Beto to take on the 69 year old Cornyn in less than 2 weeks after he came within 2.6% of beating Cruz. "O’Rourke," they wrote, "is a known commodity to the Texas electorate, and more importantly, won’t be easy to define, or redefine, compared to his less known, and less well-financed, potential competitors... The rampant speculation about a Beto for President campaign in 2020 is a fantasy borne of various combinations of Texas-centric thinking, viral Betomania, and media group think. The idea that O’Rourke is already a top-tier candidate in a very crowded and more experienced Democratic field has been, since its pre-election inception, at best far-fetched and at worst a transparent attempt at generating web traffic. Bluntly put, losing hasn’t made it any more plausible... But O’Rourke's return to the statewide arena for the 2020 campaign could hasten the arrival of something genuinely new to Texas politics: A more competitive political system in which neither party monopolizes politics and policy. A competitive Texas would also have serious implications for the presidential race, more signficant than were he to join the Democratic presidential nomination fight. The stakes are high." They polled for favorability/unfavorability between Beto and Cornyn and the results are encouraging:
Beto- 43% favorable-- 44% unfavorable
Cornyn- 39% favorable-- 34% unfavorable
Their most interesting claim was that "the likely composition of the Texas electorate in 2020 might actually favor Democrats, particularly one who has now demonstrated the ability to turn out low-propensity Democratic leaning voters in 2018." The larger turnout in a presidential year will favor Beto, even in Texas. "Larger Texas electorates are," they wrote, "at least, less conservative, and potentially more moderate or even more liberal than the habitually small turnout affairs that have marked Texas elections for decades. High turnout in 2020 (compared to 2016) would likely benefit a strong Democratic challenger to Cornyn... certainly compared to recent history. And Beto running for Senate would help ensure this higher turnout." It would also help Democratic candidate up and down the ticket and could help Dems flip as many-- and I know this is optimistic-- ten red seats that Dems came close to winning last year. Beto on the ticket will certainly help flip TX-23 (Hurd), TX-10 (McCaul), TX-21 (Roy) and TX-24 (Marchant) and possibly TX-31 (Carter) and TX-22 (Olson). Depending on the Democratic nominee next year, Dan Crenshaw (TX-02) needs the big turnout Beto would generate like a hole in his head.

Goal ThermometerMike Siegel, the progressive Democrat running for the Austin-Houston corridor 10th congressional district, did a lot of campaigning with Beto last year and is eager to do it again next year. Today he told me that "Beto running for Senate might be the best of both worlds. By confining his energetic, inspirational campaigning to Texas, he maximizes statewide turnout and replaces right-wing crony Cornyn with a Democratic senator from Texas. And at the same time, he puts Texas in play for the Democratic nominee for President. Of course, he might be able to accomplish both of these ends as a presidential nominee, as well, especially if Joaquin Castro runs for Senate. Whatever he decides, I hope he makes sure we are doing what is best for Texas and the nation." [Note: that thermometer on the right is Blue America's Take Back Texas contribution tool. Please click on it to contribute to Mike's campaign.]

Beto was a basically unknown backbencher from El Paso when he started his race against Cruz. Now he's a national celebrity with an immense (and growing) database of voters, volunteers and grassroots donors. None of the other potential candidates seem nearly as well-positioned as Beto to make Cornyn's reelection campaign a serious race, which is why Schumer is trying so hard to recruit him. Some might argue it's Joaquin Castro's turn but he's already committed to being chairman of his twin brother's presidential campaign and he was just elected chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and running for Senate means not running for reelection to the House. Other names being talked up include Dallas state Rep. Rafael Anchia, Dallas County judge Clay Jenkins, former gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis and Mark Strama, a former Texas state Rep and an old friend of mine from the People for the American Way Young Elected Officials program who is now a tech executive. Only Davis, though has a statewide profile and I suspect Cornyn would breathe a sigh of relief if one of them wound up as his opponent.


Labels: , , , , ,

8 Comments:

At 7:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In a huge anti-red wave year, beto couldn't beat the most hated senator in history.

beto might be staying in the spotlight. But cornyn isn't hated even 1% as much as tedcruz. And it's still FUCKING TEXAS!!
How much bigger an anti-red wave will it take to push beto across the line as the winner?

 
At 9:03 AM, Blogger Gadfly said...

Nancy, stop smoking Howie's crack (and Siegel's). For a site that claims to hate ConservaDems, y'all sure love some of them.

And, neither of you (nor Siegel) has yet to mention the name of Sema Hernandez, who fought Beto in the 2018 primary and has already announced her 2020 candidacy.

 
At 10:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where is the gain in defeating a staunch Republican with a non-GOPer who votes like one?

 
At 11:48 AM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

Gadfly, I'm not certain who "Nancy" is or what crack you're talking about, but it's apparent you just wanted to strat shouting without bothering to read the post. Take this as a warning: that isn't allowed on this site. Sema Hernandez is in the third paragraph and you would have known that, and perhaps not gone crazy, had you read the post.

As for the goofball in the first comment-- the guy who has been coming on here and saying "It's Texas" for 5 years, I'm no fan of Ted Cruz either but the UT research shows that the hatred for Cruz among Democratic activists nationally and among many Republicans in Washington is NOT shared by voters in Texas. In fact, Cornyn's support among voters there, is far less solid than Cruz's-- which surprised me as well.

As for comment #3, Beto may not be an ideal progressive on issues that are important to YOU, but he did NOT vote like a Republican on a wide array of issues-- from immigration, LGBTQ rights, women's health, foreign policy, etc. His votes and Cornyn's would be different on most important issues that come before the Senate. He isn't Bernie or Elizabeth Warren... but to say there's no gain in replacing Cornyn with Beto, is just nuts. I've argued with Beto about issues for 6 years and he's never hung up on me or reacted in any way other than to pay attention and give what I've said to him consideration. My friend Mike Stark tried that with various Republicans in Congress and has been arrested and thrown in jail three times because they do not want to have a dialogue with anyone who disagrees with them. I can assure you, Beto does. I wouldn't support him in a presidential primary-- something I've made clear over and over again on this blog-- but as a replacement to Cornyn? Wake up, amigo.

One of my friend's shut down her comments section. I don't want to do that here. But let's put a little more thought into what we write here. Keep the crazy-talk for twitter or reddit please.

 
At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Howie, as a lefty friend who must live in texas has told me many times, "it's fucking texas".

That's where there are a fair number of independent-minded socially liberal types who like to vote. But once they enter the booth or start filling out the ballot, they just cannot make themselves actually vote for a democrat, even the REALLY good ones, but especially the republicans masquerading as democrats. And, I'm told, most Texans do, indeed, loathe tedcruz. (full disclosure, this friend has never weighted in on cornyn specifically).

But they'll still vote for tedcruz .. because IT'S FUCKING TEXAS!

A UT poll? you trust a UT poll?

 
At 8:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Howie, you might as well shut down the comments. I rarely visit them because it is inevitably the same troll (maybe two of them) spouting the same nonsense over and over. I would take them seriously if they really were honest proponents of voting for a 3rd party, but the same screeds over and over have ruined the idea that commenting here is worth the effort.

 
At 3:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:36 isn't happy that some of us here dare to say something it doesn't like? Then go find a site you do like. I'm sure Howie isn't on your payroll and has no good reason to only listen to you!

 
At 6:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:36, I've never been anything BUT an honest proponent of voting 3rd. We need that and we need it 30 years ago. I vote Green because they're better than the democraps. I voted for Cynthia McKinney. I point out often, I'm sure you've noticed, that we need a different left movement or nothing will ever change.

Your comment baffles me.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home