Sunday, January 06, 2019

Who Will Pick The Democratic Presidential Nominee? You, That's Who

>

Kamala Harris by Nancy Ohanian

As we saw Saturday morning, Gillibrand has been sniffing around Wall Street for financing for her presidential campaign. But in Saturday morning Elena Schneider was reporting for Politico about another type of fundraising-- building a grassroots army of small donors instead of a few Wall Street fat cats. That's Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, Beto, Cory Booker territory. Can you even imagine plutocrat Mike Bloomberg asking for small contributions? "Democratic presidential contenders," wrote Schneider, "are already locked in an important battle to showcase their viability, racing to build digital armies to power their campaigns. Online support is set to play a pivotal role in the Democratic primaries, after small-dollar donors using ActBlue, the Democratic online fundraising platform, financed the Democratic House takeover-- and, before that, Sen. Bernie Sanders’ underdog 2016 presidential campaign. Potential candidates have spent months building up grassroots digital supporters to fund their campaigns in 2019 and build relationships with voters before they get the chance to go to the polls in 2020."
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand didn’t air a single TV ad in her campaign for reelection in New York last year, instead spending more than half her campaign budget with a firm specializing in digital fundraising. Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) dropped over $1.2 million on Facebook ads targeting grassroots supporters nationwide since May 2018, the fifth-most of any Democrat-- even though Harris wasn’t running for anything last year. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) received donations from people in all 50 states within hours of announcing her presidential exploratory committee on Monday, she told reporters.

The small-dollar fundraising totals that candidates reap this year will be one of the few credible signs of momentum for candidates, months before primary votes are cast, in an era in which polls can bounce around wildly and media attention is split among dozens of candidates and a Twitter-happy president. Small contributions, most of which will come in online, will even be a benchmark for entrance into primary debates, the Democratic National Committee said last month.

Small-dollar fundraising totals will be “the new straw poll” in 2019, said Taryn Rosenkranz, a Democratic digital consultant. She added: “There are so many candidates running, all with similar policy platforms, meaning that small-dollar donations will be one of the best measures of a candidate’s strength for a year when we won’t have many concrete indicators.”

Already, five Democrats have set themselves apart as particularly high-powered digital fundraisers: Gillibrand, Harris, Sanders, Warren and-- ahead of the rest-- former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), whose $80 million 2018 Senate run broke fundraising records. All five received contributions from at least 200,000 unique online donors in 2017 and 2018, according to a Politico analysis of Federal Election Commission records filed by ActBlue, the Democratic online fundraising platform. (O'Rourke's Senate campaign racked up over 700,000 unique donors via ActBlue.)

Gillibrand and Warren each raised over $10 million online while running in noncompetitive Senate races. While O’Rourke, Warren and Sanders-- whose 2016 presidential campaign raised nearly a quarter-billion dollars-- rose to national prominence with prodigious support from small donors, Harris and Gillibrand spent the past two years transforming their political operations so they are powered by online supporters, who provided the majority of their campaign committees’ funding in that period.

“Small-dollar donors are going to pick the Democratic nominee,” said Erin Hill, ActBlue’s executive director. Because of the “unprecedented volume” of online money expected to flow to Democrats in 2020, Hill said she expects ActBlue to double its staff of 100 over the next two years.

“We’ve already seen candidates announcing [their 2020 plans] directly to” online supporters, Hill said, citing Warren’s decision to announce her exploratory committee in an email to her list.
Another way to look at this race to break away from Wall Street and corporate donors has to do with connecting directly with voters through social media. Here are the likely candidates in order of their twitter followers. You'll notice that most of them have two verified accounts and it's likely that many people follow them in both accounts inflating the totals significantly.
@BernieSanders- 8.95 million
@SenSanders- 8.03 million

@SenWarren- 4.71 million
@ewarren- 2.18 million

@CoryBooker- 4.09 million
@SenBooker- 127K

@JoeBiden- 3.19 million

@MarWilliamson- 2.6 million

@KamalaHarris- 2.01 million
@SenKamalaHarris- 587K




@MikeBloomberg- 2.28 million

@SenGillibrand- 1.3 million
@GillibrandNY- 2,099

@BetoORourke- 1.13 million
@RepBetoORourke- 243K

@AmyKlobuchar- 541K
@SenAmyKlobuchar- 19.5K

@EricHolder- 448K

@RepSwalwell- 421K
@EricSwalwell- 24.2K

@SenJeffMerkley- 418k
@JeffMerkley- 98.8K

@SenSherrodBrown- 351k
@SherrodBrown- 48.3k

@EricGarcetti- 289k
@MayorOfLA- 285K

@TulsiGabbard- 217K
@TulsiPress- 111K

@TomSteyer- 212K

@SecretaryCastro- 171K
@JulianCastro- 137K

@GovInslee- 156K
@JayInslee- 23.6K

@HickForCo- 124k
@GovOfCO- 15.2k

@PeteButtigieg- 81.6K

@TerryMcAuliffe- 64.3K

@VoteOjeda2020- 44K

@RepJohnDelaney- 20.2K
@JohnK Delaney- 12K (Delaney For President 2020)

@HowardSchultz- 2,728
@DraftSchultz- 43 followers (Ready for Schultz 2020)- 43 Starbucks baristas autitioning for store manager positions

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

At 10:25 AM, Blogger Ten Bears said...

The media will pick the next democrat presidential nominee. Just like the last one.

 
At 12:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

read the title, skipped the unnecessary rest. it's horseshit.

in a chicken/egg thing, the money/DNC will make their choice(s), and the race will be rigged to keep out Bernie, Elizabeth and anyone else unacceptable to the money.

Or did DWT just awaken from a 4-year coma, unaware of the recent past?

No. Of course DWT did not. But you have to hand it to them. They know their audience... dumbest hominids in the 2m+ year history of hominid-kind.

I wonder how many read the title and immediately knew it was a steaming load. damn few.

 
At 2:30 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

First, please stop listing Beto O'Rourke with Bernie Sanders and other real progressives. I get it—he was more progressive than Cruz, but not by much. What he's good at is looking good and sounding like he's agreeing with some progressive issue while using language that commits him to nothing. There's a good reason progressives call him "Obama 2.0".

And I have to agree with Anonymous 12:43 p.m. It's already clear on social media that people are?
reacting to precisely the kind of celebrity launches they have every other year. The number who went into rabid attack mode of David Sirota's article on Beto's record and funding was indicative of just how much people will be taken in by a pretty face who talks nice. Three years of "Trump is a [fill in the blank]" have set voters up to be conned by anyone who's not Trump—and sadly, that includes too many contributors here.

Right now, the Democrats' only platform for 2020 is "Anybody but Trump." Anyone who thinks the Republicans don't know that, and aren't gearing up to remove The Donald and replace him with nice white boy Pence isn't paying attention. They know if the let Trump go for term 2 they risk losing. And if you've read the new Afterword to the paperback edition of Allen and Parnes Shattered you'll know as clearly as I do that no progressive candidate remotely like Bernie Sanders is going to be allowed anywhere near the nomination. Why else has the ability of Superdelegates to swing the vote been moved to the second ballot?

Unless and until the influence of the Clintons is gone, the Democrats are and will remain GOP Lite.

 
At 6:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Clinton was the catalyst, but even if all the Clintons died, the party would still be total shit.

it's the corruption. corruption not only breeds contempt for the poor, but it also breeds incompetence and political cowardice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home