Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez-- Not A Garden Variety Democratic Back-Bencher
>
I couldn't vote in my own Twitter poll, but if I could have, I would've picked "inspirational." Maybe I should have offered "inspiring" instead. One respondent suggested "fierce" should've been an option. Another castigated me for not making "courageous" an option. As you can see, it was a battle between those who see her as inspirational and those who see her as brilliant. The youngest woman ever elected to Congress, Ocasio-Cortez has drawn the wrath of the establishment, first by beating "the next Speaker of the House," icon of congressional corruption Joe Crowley, and then by stepping on every toe she could find by behaving as though her campaign promises to her constituents in Queens and the Bronx actually mean something. She hasn't even been sworn in yet and she's already accomplished more than most-- yes-- MOST-- members do after 20 years... and she's become a Fox News Enemy Of The (Dumb) People. And Fox isn't the only media outlet gunning for her. Over the weekend, when Bloomberg News wanted to introduce 5 conservative Democrats who are unlikely to every have anything meaningful to say or ever accomplish a thing-- 5 Blue Dogs and New Dems from the Republican wing of the Democratic Party they would like to see get some attention, their headline was Five House Democrats to Watch (Not Named Ocasio-Cortez).
The other day, a member of the freshman class I've known for 5 or 6 years was grousing-- in a real mean-spirited way-- that he couldn't get any press attention because he isn't a woman of color. He was referring to Ocasio, Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Deb Haaland (D-NM). What an asshole! First of all, he's a man of color and, like the five of them, a member of the Progressive Caucus. He campaigned on many of the cutting edge issues that they campaigned on, although I suspect he doesn't give a damn about any of them and is just mouthing what his consultants told him to mouth to win his super-progressive district. And he isn't the only member burning up with jealously over the attention Ocasio and "her gang" are getting.
I told him if he wants attention, DO something. Don't just sit around waiting for Pelosi and Hoyer to tell you what to do. Ask your constituents what they want and start making waves. That's what Ocasio is doing. That's what Omar, Pressley, Tlaib and Haaland are doing. They know why they're in Congress even if he doesn't. (And he doesn't... for him-- at least in his mind-- its just a career step.)
I don't know the guy who wrote the Bloomberg story, Albert Hunter, so I'm not going to call him a boob, but he did write that "These five members-- Sherrill of New Jersey, Hill of California, Allred of Texas, New York’s Rose and Spanberger of Virginia-- are the story of what is potentially the most significant new class of House members in our lifetime." I disagree. Their significance is strictly in what they can prevent from happening. These are conservatives running-- for whatever reason-- as Democrats who have thrown in their lots with the New Dems and Blue Dogs and who, whether they know it or not, will be, for as long as they remain in Congress, drags on progress that inspirational leaders like Ocasio and his friends are the new face of. None of Hunter's 5 faces, of course, have signed onto the GreenNewDeal. And none of them will, at least not before Hoyer says too.
Hunter's article reminds me of something a worthless old fossil from Nebraska once said, the two decades dead Republican Senator Roman Hruska. Hruska is known for exactly one thing, even apart from being one of the most conservative senators of his day and for going to his end still certain that Watergate was just a hoax to get Nixon. After overt racist Clement Haynsworth was rejected by the Senate for a Supreme Court job, Nixon's second pick-- a notorious closet case named G. Harrold Carswell who was soon after arrested by an undercover cop he groped in a Tallahassee public toilet-- was also under attack. Hruska went to the well to defend him: "Even if he were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos." Sorry for the tangent but Hunter-- the guy from Bloomberg I'm not calling a boob-- wrote that "A few bomb-throwers have attracted the most attention. New York’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, has become the darling of the left wing for her views and the favored target of the right wing, which portrays her as the face of new Democrats. But it’s the first group that could shape the new House. All five new representatives captured Republican-held seats, and four of them beat incumbents... Many of these five are mainstream progressives, who overall trounced Bernie Sanders lefties in the primaries this year, and who are more interested in results than rhetoric."
Maybe I will have to start calling Hunter a boob after all. None of them are "progressives," mainstream or otherwise. And only Mikie Sherrill "beat"-- in a David v Goliath contest, Sherrill being Goliath-- a Bernie Sanders lefty. And what results? Ending regulation on banksters? Loosening gun restrictions? Or, at least in Abigail Spanberger's case, building a wall to keep out immigrants from Mexico? "If successful," wrote the boob from Bloomberg, "they will shape the House majority in the era of Trump. They also will be the top targets of Republicans in the next election and the most at risk if Democrats fail." They are likely to lose their seats in 2022 by deflating the Democratic base in their districts. It's what always happens when garbage center-right candidates get swept into Congress in wave elections.
While these goofballs posture with Republican bloodsuckers, Ocasio is fighting her way to power-- something that is NEVER given, only taken-- by trying to get a position on the vert consequential House Ways and Means Committee. Grassroots allies like DFA, who brush flees like the boob's 5 candidates off like dandruff, are fighting behind her. "If this November’s elections showed us anything," wrote DFA senior staffer Karli Wallace Thompson over the weekend, "it’s that people are ready for fresh, bold, progressive leadership in Congress-- and Representative-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez embodies that. [Note to Bloomberg's boob: pay attention and maybe you'll start getting a clue about what the word "progressive" means.] January hasn’t even begun and already Alexandria is making waves on Capitol Hill by shining a light on the causal corruption and hypocrisy in Washington, and by paying her interns at least $15/hour when many of her colleagues pay them nothing. She’s clearly keeping her promises and continuing to challenge the status quo... Alexandria is in the running for a spot on one of the most powerful committees in the House, the Ways and Means Committee, even though freshmen members are rarely appointed to it. Why? Alexandria is boldly pushing for this position because she firmly believes that Americans deserve to have someone who has shared their struggles representing their interests on the committee that oversees most of the economy, including taxes and revenue. And she’s going up against a Wall Street-backed establishment Democrat in the process."
Urging DFA's tens of thousands of activist members to sign a petition to Pelosi about the appointment, Thompson urges people who back Medicare for All, lower drug prices, and a fair economy for everyone, to have Alexandria’s back. What about Spanberger's back? The xenophobes and Know Nothings are in the other party.
The other day, a member of the freshman class I've known for 5 or 6 years was grousing-- in a real mean-spirited way-- that he couldn't get any press attention because he isn't a woman of color. He was referring to Ocasio, Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (MA), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Deb Haaland (D-NM). What an asshole! First of all, he's a man of color and, like the five of them, a member of the Progressive Caucus. He campaigned on many of the cutting edge issues that they campaigned on, although I suspect he doesn't give a damn about any of them and is just mouthing what his consultants told him to mouth to win his super-progressive district. And he isn't the only member burning up with jealously over the attention Ocasio and "her gang" are getting.
I told him if he wants attention, DO something. Don't just sit around waiting for Pelosi and Hoyer to tell you what to do. Ask your constituents what they want and start making waves. That's what Ocasio is doing. That's what Omar, Pressley, Tlaib and Haaland are doing. They know why they're in Congress even if he doesn't. (And he doesn't... for him-- at least in his mind-- its just a career step.)
I don't know the guy who wrote the Bloomberg story, Albert Hunter, so I'm not going to call him a boob, but he did write that "These five members-- Sherrill of New Jersey, Hill of California, Allred of Texas, New York’s Rose and Spanberger of Virginia-- are the story of what is potentially the most significant new class of House members in our lifetime." I disagree. Their significance is strictly in what they can prevent from happening. These are conservatives running-- for whatever reason-- as Democrats who have thrown in their lots with the New Dems and Blue Dogs and who, whether they know it or not, will be, for as long as they remain in Congress, drags on progress that inspirational leaders like Ocasio and his friends are the new face of. None of Hunter's 5 faces, of course, have signed onto the GreenNewDeal. And none of them will, at least not before Hoyer says too.
Hunter's article reminds me of something a worthless old fossil from Nebraska once said, the two decades dead Republican Senator Roman Hruska. Hruska is known for exactly one thing, even apart from being one of the most conservative senators of his day and for going to his end still certain that Watergate was just a hoax to get Nixon. After overt racist Clement Haynsworth was rejected by the Senate for a Supreme Court job, Nixon's second pick-- a notorious closet case named G. Harrold Carswell who was soon after arrested by an undercover cop he groped in a Tallahassee public toilet-- was also under attack. Hruska went to the well to defend him: "Even if he were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos." Sorry for the tangent but Hunter-- the guy from Bloomberg I'm not calling a boob-- wrote that "A few bomb-throwers have attracted the most attention. New York’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, has become the darling of the left wing for her views and the favored target of the right wing, which portrays her as the face of new Democrats. But it’s the first group that could shape the new House. All five new representatives captured Republican-held seats, and four of them beat incumbents... Many of these five are mainstream progressives, who overall trounced Bernie Sanders lefties in the primaries this year, and who are more interested in results than rhetoric."
Maybe I will have to start calling Hunter a boob after all. None of them are "progressives," mainstream or otherwise. And only Mikie Sherrill "beat"-- in a David v Goliath contest, Sherrill being Goliath-- a Bernie Sanders lefty. And what results? Ending regulation on banksters? Loosening gun restrictions? Or, at least in Abigail Spanberger's case, building a wall to keep out immigrants from Mexico? "If successful," wrote the boob from Bloomberg, "they will shape the House majority in the era of Trump. They also will be the top targets of Republicans in the next election and the most at risk if Democrats fail." They are likely to lose their seats in 2022 by deflating the Democratic base in their districts. It's what always happens when garbage center-right candidates get swept into Congress in wave elections.
Spanberger acknowledges that some other rookies in Congress “want to put down a marker as opposed to enacting policies.” But she already sees “common ground” emerging on a number of issues.
The newcomers may be in for a shock when they try to deal with House Republicans. The party’s new leader, Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, will be constantly looking over his right shoulder and is interested solely in winning political advantage.
But some newcomers say they are already talking to colleagues on the other side of the aisle.
Allred, a young African-American lawyer and former professional football player from an upscale Dallas district, has been talking to Van Taylor, a conservative Republican just elected from an adjoining district, about possible common ground.
Next week Allred has scheduled coffee with a constituent: former President George W. Bush.
Urging DFA's tens of thousands of activist members to sign a petition to Pelosi about the appointment, Thompson urges people who back Medicare for All, lower drug prices, and a fair economy for everyone, to have Alexandria’s back. What about Spanberger's back? The xenophobes and Know Nothings are in the other party.
Labels: 2016 congressional races, Alexandria Ocasio, G. Harrold Carswell, progressives vs Democrats, Roman Hruska
4 Comments:
Great read Howie i would add two more words in the poll about Alexandria Bold & Brave DSA & Justice Democrats picked an absolute gem in their recruitment process plus reading her social media comments against the establishment reporters Fox etc she picks her spots & doesn't back down on anything she's a breath of fresh air i look forward to see what she does in congress even though Nancy & the establishment will be in charge come January.
The corporate media is clearly hard at work doing its job smearing the real progressive by attempting to reshape what the word means. Using reactionary radicals as what the model of a "progressive" is in their presentations, the corporate media is abusing their role to inform the people. They are instead attempting to tell us what to think - and how. Sadly, many will fall for this ruse, and the corruption will continue to remain in control.
I'm going to remain skeptical.
"Ocasio-Cortez has drawn the wrath of the establishment, first by beating "the next Speaker of the House," ... and then by stepping on every toe she could find by behaving as though her campaign promises to her constituents ... actually mean something."
Yeah, she beat Crowley, maybe the most corrupt worthless asshole in the democrap house. A warning to hoyer and even Pelosi, that a very attractive woman who is the correct minority for the district can beat any corrupt worthless pos... provided trump is the president.
But she then licked some toes... she endorsed the anti-AOC for speaker.
It's very possible that AOC's role will end up being that of the Kucinich memorial role as the democraps' token VOCAL progressive ... to keep the EEG flatliners on the left clueless and engaged while Pelosi and the rest of the totally corrupt democrap house well and truly ratfucks them all.
Or have we already forgotten 2007-2011?
We've certainly forgotten how the democraps threw Dennis Kucinich overboard to save Marcy Kaptur, 6:45.
Post a Comment
<< Home