Close Calls… And 2020 Opportunities For Progressives
>
Is it too soon to start thinking about the 2020 congressional cycle? Not for the Blue America team. We’re even starting to hope who our two first candidates will be to flip red seats blue. One district’s on Long Island-- yeah, we’re looking’ at you, Peter King-- and the other is deep in the heart of Tejas.
Now is the beginning of recruitment time for us. We’re looking for solid, proven progressives who want to run and have the capacity to do two things:
1- run a grueling grassroots campaign
2- be a kick-ass member of Congress
What we’re doing right now is identifying districts to begin the process. The first wave are the districts that Democrats came very close in this cycle. Some of them were districts the DCCC just missed entirely-- for one reason or another, ranging from incompetence to venality-- like TX-10, CA-50, NY-27, IA-04 and NY-02). Others were districts with woefully weak candidates, especially Blue Dogs like in KS-02 and PA-16, seats where Paul Davis’ and Ron DiNicola’s Republican-lite approaches failed to ignite any grassroots enthusiasm. Others were districts with good enough first time candidates running good enough campaigns and who built a strong foundation for a 2020 re-match, like Kara Eastman did in NE-02 and Dana Balter did in NY-24.
So, try to imagine that Trump will stay the same between now and 2020 as he’s been since the mid-1940s when he was born, a malignant narcissistic sociopath and as entitled racist shit. That would make for an even bigger wave-- at least in theory-- than we had this cycle. Much of the low-hanging fruit, though, is now off the table, those red suburban seats that Hillary won in 2016, for example, like FL-27 with an R+5 PVI and where Hillary beat Trump by TWENTY points. There aren’t many quite like that left. But 2018 uncovered new opportunities election pundits hadn’t seen coming, like the aforementioned TX-10 and like GA-07. But let me give you a back-of-the-envelope sketch of the earliest map we’re looking at at Blue America. This is the first round of districts where we want to find-- or have already found-- candidates. The percentage is the winning GOP score from last week:
Now is the beginning of recruitment time for us. We’re looking for solid, proven progressives who want to run and have the capacity to do two things:
1- run a grueling grassroots campaign
2- be a kick-ass member of Congress
What we’re doing right now is identifying districts to begin the process. The first wave are the districts that Democrats came very close in this cycle. Some of them were districts the DCCC just missed entirely-- for one reason or another, ranging from incompetence to venality-- like TX-10, CA-50, NY-27, IA-04 and NY-02). Others were districts with woefully weak candidates, especially Blue Dogs like in KS-02 and PA-16, seats where Paul Davis’ and Ron DiNicola’s Republican-lite approaches failed to ignite any grassroots enthusiasm. Others were districts with good enough first time candidates running good enough campaigns and who built a strong foundation for a 2020 re-match, like Kara Eastman did in NE-02 and Dana Balter did in NY-24.
So, try to imagine that Trump will stay the same between now and 2020 as he’s been since the mid-1940s when he was born, a malignant narcissistic sociopath and as entitled racist shit. That would make for an even bigger wave-- at least in theory-- than we had this cycle. Much of the low-hanging fruit, though, is now off the table, those red suburban seats that Hillary won in 2016, for example, like FL-27 with an R+5 PVI and where Hillary beat Trump by TWENTY points. There aren’t many quite like that left. But 2018 uncovered new opportunities election pundits hadn’t seen coming, like the aforementioned TX-10 and like GA-07. But let me give you a back-of-the-envelope sketch of the earliest map we’re looking at at Blue America. This is the first round of districts where we want to find-- or have already found-- candidates. The percentage is the winning GOP score from last week:
• CA-21 (Central Valley)- 51.0%These were, basically, districts left on the table. Ironically, one of the first candidates we’re looking at isn’t even from one of these districts. New York state Assemblywoman Christine Pellegrino won a special election in 2017 for the 9th district in Nassau County. It’s the most Republican area of NY-02, Peter King’s Nassau-Suffolk South Shore district, still being “protected” by Steve Israel. Pellegrino, one of the best legislators in Albany beat Republican opponent 52-31% in the 2017 special but was defeated by another Republican last week. She’s probably still the best bet to take on King and retire him in 2020. Now all we have to do is try to talk her into it.
• CA-50 (eastern San Diego County)- 52.8%
• GA-07 (Gwinnett suburbs northeast of Atlanta)- 50.2%
• IL-13 (downstate from St. Louis suburbs to Champaign, Springfield and Bloomington)- 50.5%
• IA-04 (northern and western rural Iowa)- 50.4%
• KS-02 (eastern Kansas minus Kansas City)- 48.1%
• KY-06 (Lexington)- 51.0%
• MI-06 (southwest Michigan)- 50.2%
• MN-01 (southern Minnesota)- 50.2%
• MN-08 (northeast Minnesota)- 50.7%
• MO-02 (St. Louis suburbs)- 51.3%
• MT (the whole state)- 51.1%
• NE-02 (Omaha Metro)- 51.6%
• NY-24 (Syracuse)- 53.1%
• NY-27 (Buffalo to Rochester suburbs and exurbs)- 49.5%
• NC-09 (southern tier from Fayetteville to Charlotte)- 49.4%
• OH-01 (Cincinnati + Warren County)- 51.8%
• OH-12 (central Ohio including part of Columbus)- 51.6%
• PA-01 (Bucks County)- 51.3%
• PA-10 (Dauphin, York and Cumberland counties)- 51.4%
• PA-16 (northeast Pennsylvania including Erie and Butler counties)- 51.5%
• TX-10 (northern Austin to Houston exurbs)- 50.9%
• TX-21 (Austin to San Antonio corridor)- 50.3%
• TX-23 (Rio Grande Valley from San Antonio to El Paso)- 49.2%
• TX-24 (Dallas and Tarrant counties)- 50.7%
• TX-31 (Williamson and Bell counties)- 50.6%
• WA-03 (sw Washington, Portland suburbs)- 52.9%
Labels: 2020 congressional elections, Christine Pellegrino, congressional recruitment, NY-02, toxicity of Donald Trump, TX-10
4 Comments:
I hope Liuba runs again in 2020 without the DCCC's help she ran a great campaign.
Premature delusions.
If the democrap house (Pelosi, hoyer et al) takes another enormous dump on voters to serve their corporate donors, as they did in 2009, all your grass-roots delusions will be moot.
In 2010, 15 million of those anti-cheney, anti-crash voters that showed up to vote for the black dude stayed home. Why? Because that democrap FDR majority did absolutely dick for them. No homes lost were returned. No jobs were created. No bankers went to prison. No torturers either. No wars were ended. Nothing.
But the CEOs of health insurance and phrma got served.
Go ahead and make your plans. They won't matter when, not if, the 'craps refuse to do dick for all those voters that you'll need to come out again.
The senate map looks very favorable for the 'craps to keep what they have and maybe pick up 1 or 2 (still a minority number). But the house looks very losable... and with Pelosi and the DCCC's leadershit? They'll do well to lose fewer than 50 seats.
Address this subject in 1 year. We'll see how bad the 'craps do so that a prediction will be better by then.
I agree with 6:48. There aren't enough progressives in the House to prevent disappointments. There will be sell-outs.There will be "bipartisan" abominations pushed through the Congress. And, lots of people aren't going to like what happened to their taxes.
I roughed out the new tax brackets on last year's income. I would have ended up paying $4000 MORE than I actually did. Admittedly, not all of the details are in to have a better forecast. But this isn't going to make many people happy. If the democraps DON'T even raise the issue over the next two years, 2020 will look a whole lot like 2010.
yes, 7:36. point of order: the miniscule tax cut the middle got will sunset in a few years. The trillion in cuts for the billionaire/corporate caste does not.
Pelosi has 'paygo' on her to-do list and nothing else. the real damage of 'paygo' won't probably be felt until after 2020 when some expense, like the next tax cut for billionaires, will result in cuts to sustenance. And americans are morons, so they won't consider that when they vote for either the Nazi or the fascist... but the utter indifference that the democraps will show toward their voters, exactly as they did in 2009, will make millions of those anti-red wave voters stay home again... most of them forever.
Post a Comment
<< Home