Thursday, November 15, 2018

Amazon Rips Off 238 Cities, States and Provinces, Then Builds in NYC and DC

>

Andrew Cuomo's priorities (source)

by Gaius Publius

The world's leading monopolists, Jeff Bezos and Amazon, after much thought (or in fact, very little thought) have picked two cities for their new HQ2, their second national headquarters. Those two cities, of course, were the obvious choices from the start, the only two that made any sense at all.

If you were the world's richest greediest person, looking to re-headquarter what aspires to be the world's most powerful monopoly in cities with prime access to the nation's greatest concentration of money and its greatest concentration of power, in which cities would you build?

New York City and Washington, DC, of course.
Amazon Plans to Split HQ2 Between Long Island City, N.Y., and Arlington, Va.

SEATTLE — After conducting a yearlong search for a second home, Amazon has switched gears and is now finalizing plans to have a total of 50,000 employees in two locations, according to people familiar with the decision-making process.

The company is nearing a deal to move to the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens, according to two of the people briefed on the discussions. Amazon is also close to a deal to move to the Crystal City area of Arlington, Va., a Washington suburb, one of the people said. Amazon already has more employees in those two areas than anywhere else outside of Seattle, its home base, and the Bay Area.

Amazon executives met two weeks ago with Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo in the governor’s Manhattan office, said one of the people briefed on the process, adding that the state had offered potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies. Executives met separately with Mayor Bill de Blasio, a person briefed on that discussion said. Long Island City is a short subway ride across the East River from Midtown Manhattan.
The announcement of Amazon's new HQ2 sparked a "frenzied bidding war" among cities eager to be taken to the cleaners by Bezos and his company, and there are dozens stories about those offers, all cast as outrages. For example, one of the losers — Atlanta, Georgia — offered this:


The winners were not the highest bidders, but nevertheless, they offered quite a bit more, beyond mere privileged access to the world's greatest pool of money and its most plentiful supply of corrupt politicians.

New York is giving, among other things, massive capital gains tax cut to Amazon investors ... and, of course, a helipad. Arlington, Virginia added something more politically useful, advance warning of FOIA requests so the company could file for pre-emptive "protective orders."

But the biggest prize in this story is the data delivered to Amazon itself by everyone involved in the bidding process. Keep in mind, 238 states, provinces and cities sent bids to Amazon. Here's what those bids contained:


Amazon exists, not just to sell its products, but to acquire data that gives them monopoly control of additional markets in which it has no current presence. More from David Dayen writing at In These Times:
But the biggest suckers on HQ2 aren’t New York and Virginia; it’s the other 236 cities that bid on a headquarters they were never going to get. Those bids didn’t just include the size of the bribe; they included a wealth of important data about plans for transportation, housing, education and workforce development. Amazon now has a treasure trove of non-public information about America’s future, in addition to knowing how much cash cities are willing to part with to land an Amazon facility. And it got all that, along with a giant PR benefit from the bidding war, for free.

If you knew a city was going to build a road in a particular place, you could make a lot of money buying up the real estate there. Imagine that on a national scale and you can see how Amazon will grow far wealthier from the data it collected than even the raw dollars extracted from HQ2’s big winners. In fact, this was the real reason Amazon orchestrated the whole charade....

It can even potentially sell this data to other companies who long for similar deals, or at least start up a new business line in negotiating deals between companies and municipal governments.

Monetizing of this new data trove will yield untold billions of dollars in value. It will also embed Amazon deeper and deeper into American life, committing politicians at the state and federal level to become human shields for the company. For example, no senator from New York or Virginia, with Amazon in its backyard, will want to speak too loudly about Amazon’s monopoly attempts. And no mayor or city council member, eager to secure that next warehouse, will have much to say either. [emphasis added]
There's no question that Amazon is evil. The only question is, was it born evil? To answer that, consider this Jeff Bezos story from 1995, the year after Amazon's birth:


Was Amazon born evil? The answer appears to be yes.

GP
 

Labels: , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 9:19 AM, Anonymous ap215 said...

I call them Capitalmazon cause that's who they truly are.

 
At 12:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What this proves is that the rights and interests of We the People are a priority at no level of government. While there maybe a few good people in various positions, the political system is completely rotten -worse than our public infrastructure- and will soon collapse. Corporatists like Bezos -who may know more about you than the NSA does- drool over that prospect.

 
At 2:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bezos and amazon are the reason Sherman was enacted over a century ago.

Reagan's tax cuts and each one since (moving trillions from the treasury to corporations and the wealthy over the decades with which to buy government) are the reason that Bezos and amazon will never be encumbered with a Sherman action -- since the executive branch is tasked with enforcement and the executive branch hasn't given a flying fuck about Sherman since Carter's admin took on At&t.

To expand on what Nixon once said: If the rich do it, it's NOT illegal. The law might be changed or not. Glass-Steagall was repealed. Sherman has not been... so far. But both were ignored for years even before the repeal.

When laws that exist are ignored as inconvenient to those tasked with enforcement, the rule of law doesn't mean shit.

When rule of law doesn't mean shit, you have putinstan and America.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home