Obama's Legacy? (I Mean Aside From Lousing Up The Democratic Party)
>
Remember what an amazing job Obama was doing when the voters gave the Democrats an overwhelming majority in the House and a veto-proof Senate? No? I don't either. He was already defining himself as a determined mediocrity who just wanted to survive the ordeal with nothing bad happening. Voters sensed it too-- starting in the ultra-Democratic state of Massachusetts-- and took away his control of the Senate and then, last November, just wiped out most of the conservative Democrats in the House. It's not the Democrats and left-leaning independents voted for Republicans. They just didn't turn up at the polls. Republcians did-- in droves. Democrats had little reason to, the only motivation being the the Republicans are worse than the Democrats. And they are. In fact, they've proven to be even more worse than anyone could have predicted. But, I'm betting Democrats and left-leaning independents won't show up in 2012 either. That's because Obama has also proven he's more worse than anyone ever dreamed he could be-- even those of us who warnedall along that he had a very conservative record in teh Senate amd was likely to not be a good president. Better than John McCain? Well, of course. An "F" is always worse than a "D," even a D-minus.
The video above never mentions Obama, but former Labor Secretary Robert Reich is certainly including him in the implied aspersions on the horrifying mismanagement by the ruling elite. Before posting that video dealing with the shame of how Obama has allowed the Republicans to destroy the public education system, Reich had a little something to say about another shame-- Obama's folding to right-wing extremists' and terrorists' blackmail:
Anyone who characterizes the deal between the President, Democratic, and Republican leaders as a victory for the American people over partisanship understands neither economics nor politics.
The deal does not raise taxes on America’s wealthy and most fortunate-- who are now taking home a larger share of total income and wealth, and whose tax rates are already lower than they have been, in eighty years. Yet it puts the nation’s most important safety nets and public investments on the chopping block.
It also hobbles the capacity of the government to respond to the jobs and growth crisis. Added to the cuts already underway by state and local governments, the deal’s spending cuts increase the odds of a double-dip recession. And the deal strengthens the political hand of the radical right.
Yes, the deal is preferable to the unfolding economic catastrophe of a default on the debt of the U.S. government. The outrage and the shame is it has come to this choice.
More than a year ago, the President could have conditioned his agreement to extend the Bush tax cuts beyond 2010 on Republicans’ agreement not to link a vote on the debt ceiling to the budget deficit. But he did not.
Many months ago, when Republicans first demanded spending cuts and no tax increases as a condition for raising the debt ceiling, the President could have blown their cover. He could have shown the American people why this demand had nothing to do with deficit reduction but everything to do with the GOP’s ideological fixation on shrinking the size of the government-- thereby imperiling Medicare, Social Security, education, infrastructure, and everything else Americans depend on. But he did not.
And through it all the President could have explained to Americans that the biggest economic challenge we face is restoring jobs and wages and economic growth, that spending cuts in the next few years will slow the economy even further, and therefore that the Republicans’ demands threaten us all. Again, he did not.
The radical right has now won a huge tactical and strategic victory. Democrats and the White House have proven they have little by way of tactics or strategy.
By putting Medicare and Social Security on the block, they have made it more difficult for Democrats in the upcoming 2012 election cycle to blame Republicans for doing so.
By embracing deficit reduction as their apparent goal-- claiming only that they’d seek to do it differently than the GOP-- Democrats and the White House now seemingly agree with the GOP that the budget deficit is the biggest obstacle to the nation’s future prosperity.
The budget deficit is not the biggest obstacle to our prosperity. Lack of jobs and growth is. And the largest threat to our democracy is the emergence of a radical right capable of getting most of the ransom it demands.
Labels: Robert Reich
4 Comments:
The difference between Obama and McCain would have been the difference in the way the congress reacted to their policies. It would also have been the difference in the way we the people reacted at the poles in the mid-terms.
So McCain might have put off recovery for awhile, but do you really think he would have involved us in any more wars than Obama has? Would McCain have attacked whistleblowers with more rigor? Would he have increased the national security state more than Obama?
Some victories in the LGTB area are all that Obama has given us. That would have happened when McCain was thrown out of office in 2012.
So other the Health Care thing he is using to give the large health care industries more money then they ever dreamed of, and the assurance that the financial markets will remain completely unregulated for decades if not for ever how do you see Obama as an even D- president?
Lawguy, you really don't know McCain, do you? If McCain had won, he'd have intervened for Georgia against Russia, he'd have troops on the ground in Libya, he'd be at war with North Korea, and he'd likely as not be carpet-bombing Somalia and have started a war against Iran (directly instead of just covertly as we are now). Obama's a big disappointment, but he's far better than McCain in every way. Please don't tell me you believe in the egomaniac Nader's "not a dime's worth of difference". As it is, you've neglected to mention the rest of the domestic progressive/liberal agenda Obama's already initiated or is moving through policy channels. Perhaps you're not informed beyond the headlines.
Anonymous, I would like to know the medications you are on as I would also like to indulge.
Keller, TX, was 1 of the top 10 'better' cities to live in (Yes, I'm here). Paying out the butt for taxes. The school district has a contracted service to handle ALL school buses. We are being told there is no bus service to her school without paying a contract fee to this bus service. The bus was free last year. There are NO bike paths nor sidewalks. Most roads are still the old two lane drop off into the 2 foot dirt or rock ditch. We cannot take her as we both go to work before the school's allowed 15 minute drop off time. What's next? Paying for the school? Keller school taxes are some of the highest!
Post a Comment
<< Home