Sunday, June 19, 2011

"Austerity": the price we've gotta pay to keep the World's Greediest rollin' in dough

>

by Ken

From today's Washington Post:
Special Report: Breakaway Wealth
With executive pay, rich pull away from rest of America



By Peter Whoriskey

It was the 1970s, and the chief executive of a leading U.S. dairy company, Kenneth J. Douglas, lived the good life. He earned the equivalent of about $1 million today. He and his family moved from a three-bedroom home to a four-bedroom home, about a half-mile away, in River Forest, Ill., an upscale Chicago suburb. He joined a country club. The company gave him a Cadillac. The money was good enough, in fact, that he sometimes turned down raises. He said making too much was bad for morale.

Forty years later, the trappings at the top of Dean Foods, as at most U.S. big companies, are more lavish. The current chief executive, Gregg L. Engles, averages 10 times as much in compensation as Douglas did, or about $10 million in a typical year. He owns a $6 million home in an elite suburb of Dallas and 64 acres near Vail, Colo., an area he frequently visits. He belongs to as many as four golf clubs at a time — two in Texas and two in Colorado. While Douglas’s office sat on the second floor of a milk distribution center, Engles’s stylish new headquarters occupies the top nine floors of a 41-story Dallas office tower. When Engles leaves town, he takes the company’s $10 million Challenger 604 jet, which is largely dedicated to his needs, both business and personal.

The evolution of executive grandeur — from very comfortable to jet-setting — reflects one of the primary reasons that the gap between those with the highest incomes and everyone else is widening.

For years, statistics have depicted growing income disparity in the United States, and it has reached levels not seen since the Great Depression. In 2008, the last year for which data are available, for example, the top 0.1 percent of earners took in more than 10 percent of the personal income in the United States, including capital gains, and the top 1 percent took in more than 20 percent. But economists had little idea who these people were. How many were Wall street financiers? Sports stars? Entrepreneurs? Economists could only speculate, and debates over what is fair stalled.

Now a mounting body of economic research indicates that the rise in pay for company executives is a critical feature in the widening income gap.

The largest single chunk of the highest-income earners, it turns out, are executives and other managers in firms, according to a landmark analysis of tax returns by economists Jon Bakija, Adam Cole and Bradley T. Heim. These are not just executives from Wall Street, either, but from companies in even relatively mundane fields such as the milk business. . . .

We've spent a fair amount of time here at DWT pondering this business of barely precedented economic inequality -- not so much the fact of it (except occasionally to set out some numbers to document it) as the fact that it goes on, and multiplies, with barely a whimper from the rest of us.

So I don't know that there's all that much in this WaPo "special report" on "breakaway wealth," except for (1) its appearance in the house organ of Village complacency, and (2) some additional nuts 'n' bolts documentation of the phenomenon.

PROJECTS FOR HOME STUDY

(1) Write a brief essay on the topic: Is it possible to run a dairy company from a domicile less exalted than a Dallas-market $6 million one? You may wish to consider what the absolute rock-bottom-price home is necessary for running a dairy company.

(2) Step 1: Find out the average salary for such sucker professions as schoolteacher, policeman, and firefighter and calculate the applicable compensation multiple for running a dairy company Dean Foods-style. Step 2: Write a brief essay on the topic: What makes running a dairy company Dean Foods-style worth XX [fill in the applicable figures from Step 1] more than schoolteaching, policing, and firefighting?


COMING UP: You can't have a bitchin' "austerity" movement without an International Conspiracy of Dunces -- meet David Brooks


Coming up in my 6pm PT post. Oh, quit moaning. There has to be a reason why he continues to write the stuff he continues to write -- and get paid, and taken "seriously."


SUNDAY CLASSICS SCHEDULE NOTE

The post on Berg's Wozzeck will appear at 2pm PT. It just worked out better for me schedule-wise that way.
#

Labels: ,

5 Comments:

At 11:10 AM, Anonymous me said...

When I saw the picture, I just about puked. I can't stand the sight of that dickhead.

Scum like him are the reason I will never buy a subscription to the NY Times.

 
At 2:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting about managers.

In a major engineering firm during the 60's, managers rose from the engineering folks. However, the tendency was to pick the best engineers for that job, which turned out to be not a good idea. Many were horrible managers and yearned to go back to straight engineering, except for one thing: They were paid better. So now we have a conundrum: shall a merely competent manager be paid more than the brightest engineer, simply because he is a manager? If not, consider the specter of a manager being paid, say $50K/yr to manage people making twice that much (and worth it).

In a world where performance counts for value rather than position on a flow chart, this would be so. But not in todays world of greed.

 
At 2:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Brooks and other pro-austerity make-the-status-quo even worse media millionaires and politicians all say the same thing every time they write or speak but say it in slightly changing words:

"Stuff it, suckers. Game's over and you lost. Now listen to my tangential dissembling to make you sick to your stomach and help keep you defeatist and depressed about your situations."

The interviewers and token liberals Brooks et al appear conjoinedly with on TV are just as guilty of professional malfeasance as Brooks and his let-them-eat-cake brethren. They shouldn't even dignify the lying rationalizations Brooks et al spew.

- L.P.

 
At 6:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It depends on how you look at it. I work at a golf course for 4 hours on Sunday which gives me access to three excellent courses for $5. per round. I play with lots of interesting people and they don't sit around the country club saying the same tired things (good to see you) to the same boring people.

I buy two fifty dollar gift cards to Smoke Stack for $80. and get the best BBQ in the world. I eat delicious and healthy food every day.

I live in a fairly large beautiful home which I get to share with others and therefor it is very economical. I can only be in one room at a time and people with more than one sink get to clean more sinks but can only wash their hands in one at a time.

My car gets 38 miles to the gallon and it gets me there just like the BMW. I love watching them drive by in their convertibles when its 110 degrees outside with their hair blowing knowing they are unable to talk to each other for the noise. My car is air conditioned and I stay as cool as the rich folk. No hot leather for me.

I have a loving wife who is passionate about plants and animals and me.

I am healthy and don't have much stress.

The best things in life are free.

The rich have nothing on me so I am very content to let them be.

 
At 8:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes but people with two sinks can wash their hands and feet at the same time.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home