Wednesday, June 15, 2011

So you want to be a lawyer? Are you sure about that?

>

Looks like you don't have to worry
about that $275K, friend

"The grunt work in corporate litigation is being farmed out to contract attorneys. More and more law school graduates, steeped in student-loan debt, are settling for this unsteady, monotonous work for surprisingly low pay. WSJ's Vanessa O'Connell and Jason Bellini report."
-- blurb for the WSJ article
"Lawyers Settle . . . for Temp Jobs"

by Ken

A colleague smuggled this out from behind the WSJ paywall, and I'm still shaking my head over it.

I know, I know, we all have automatic responses to bad news for lawyers. (All of us who aren't lawyers, I mean.) "Serves 'em right!" "Nobody held a gun to their heads and forced them to become lawyers!" Still, I can't help thinking there's something wrong here, maybe something deeply wrong.

Lawyers Settle... for Temp Jobs
As clients seek to cut costs, the field of 'contract' attorneys expands

By VANESSA O'CONNELL

When he decided to become a lawyer, Jose Aponte followed a familiar path: He took the LSAT, spent more than $100,000 on law school, took a grueling bar exam and paid for continuing education.

But the work the 37-year-old New York lawyer, a graduate of American University's Washington College of Law, is getting is a far cry from the stable, lucrative type he originally envisioned.

Mr. Aponte is part of a growing field of itinerant "contract" attorneys who move from job to job, getting paid by the hour, largely to review documents for law firms and corporate clients. These short-term jobs, which can pay as little as $15 an hour, have increasingly become a fixture in the $100 billion global corporate legal industry as law firms and clients seek to lower their costs.

This new "third tier" of the legal world illustrates the commoditization of the legal profession, which once offered most new entrants access to prestige and power, as well as a professional lifestyle. It also shows how post-recession belt-tightening is permanently altering some professions.

For 10 to 12 hours a day—and sometimes during graveyard shifts—contract attorneys such as Mr. Aponte sit silently in a big room, at rows of computer monitors. Each lawyer reads thousands of documents online and must quickly "code" every one according to its relevance in litigation or an investigation.

Supervisors discourage talking and breaks are limited. The computer systems count each lawyer's speed. Some law firms use their own contract attorneys, while others hire them through third-party agencies.

The increasing reliance on temporary workers comes as the industry continues to struggle from a downturn that has produced a glut of unemployed U.S. lawyers, including crops of indebted recent law school graduates. About 10% of all private practice jobs accepted by last year's law school graduates were reported as temporary, a steady increase from 5.4% in 2007, according to the National Association for Law Placement.
Responses to a June survey of top legal officers, conducted for The Wall Street Journal by the Association of Corporate Counsel, a bar association for in-house counsel:

Approximately 34% of 876 respondents said their companies had used non-staff "contract" attorneys in the previous fiscal year.

The most common reason for their use was given as "project cost management," by 29% of those respondents using contract attorneys. About 26% said they were looking "to satisfy the need for a specific skillset." Another 20% said their use was the result of "cost management" by a law firm.

About 35% of 319 respondents said their companies typically paid more than $80 an hour for document review work by contract attorneys; 18% said they paid less than $40 an hour.

Source: Association of Corporate Counsel/WSJ Contract Attorney Use Survey


To make a living, Mr. Aponte, who works for a variety of agencies, must scramble for the next gig. He has worked for as little as $33 an hour and has endured up to seven months' unemployment. The duration of a job is unpredictable. "A case can settle at any time. One night they'll call you, and the next day the project ends," he says.

A typical contract lawyer with an average flow of work can make $40,000 to $50,000 annually, according to Veronica Maldonado, a contract attorney in Chicago who recently started a website for contract lawyers. That compares with an average starting salary of $160,000 for associates—who may also get bonuses of $10,000 or more annually— at some of the big corporate law firms in New York.

Temporary legal staffing in the U.S. is projected to increase by 25% cumulatively over the next two years, according to Staffing Industry Analysts, a temp-industry tracking group. The hourly rates that temp agencies charge for contract attorneys are just a fraction of what a first-year associate at a big law firm typically bills per hour.

Large firms are billing $325 to $550 for an hour's work this year by freshman associates, while smaller firms bill them as low as $100, according to research firm Valeo Partners. Temp staffing agencies, in contrast, might bill around $50 an hour or less for document review work by contract attorneys. . . .

Sure, every profession is subject to redefinition, even extinction, as the world changes. But I don't think that's really what's happening here, or at least not entirely. It seems more a part of a process of social stratification which is spreading into more and more areas of our lives. I suppose it counts for something that it's not based on accident of birth, like the old forms of aristocracy, but it's sure as heck not based on merit either. I'm sorry, you can't tell me that these lawyers reduced to sweatshop-style piecework are less skilled than the people exploiting them. No, the new class stratification is based, as far as I can tell, on: money, connections, and chutzpah.

So, we now have a permanent underclass of lawyers, a piecework commodity, an unexpected (to me, anyway) expansion of the working model of a transformed workforce envisioned by the economic elites who have been so busy remaking the world economy into their private stomping ground, where they get to do the stomping and the rest of us are the ground.
#

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 10:57 AM, Blogger Toof Brown said...

When I graduated from law school in '97 there were a lot of us who took temp work or non-lawyer jobs. When my school published employment figures later that year for our class it was somewhere around 95% employed. All the schools put out these misleading figures to attract more students or better quality students. Some schools have actually been sued over their misleading figures, though I don't think successfully. Nevertheless, it seems that there is a big trend in being honest about the prospects for recent graduates. Also, the legal profession was never traditionally one where graduates stepped into high paying jobs. It was always a struggle of building a practice through establishing a reputation, attracting good clients, and that was even at good firms. In the 80's there was a real shortage of lawyers and the good firms ran up the starting salaries of grads from top schools. What with double the number of law schools in the US since the 80's and an economic climate that does not support the corporate work that really drives the amount of legal business, some of this is a return to the way it was. The news that new lawyers have to struggle to build a practice again is a shock to many lured in by a very profitable legal academic system.

 
At 12:36 PM, Blogger KenInNY said...

A valuable perspective, Toof, and thanks for sharing it.

However, my lay impression from reading the whole of the WSJ piece, with the statistics the paper and reporters gathered, is that younger lawyers are realizing that they are not engaged in a "struggle to build a practice," that barring some stroke of extraordinary luck or ingenuity they are now permanent "third tier lawyers," as the article describes this new breed of contract lawyers.

I get the feeling we're talking about something not only new but permanent, because the people running the show are thrilled by it.

Cheers,
Ken

 
At 3:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I keep getting hung up on the phrase "as little as $33 an hour"...

 
At 8:02 PM, Blogger KenInNY said...

But not hung up on the $100K Aponte spent on law school, Anon? Or that contract jobs like Aponte's pay "as little as $15"? Interesting.

Cheers,
Ken

 
At 7:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The same thing is happening, and has been happening in the engineering profession, particularly software, but not limited to it. Curiously, that $40,000 to $50,000 figure is prevalent there as well. Add to that the requirement that you have to leave that contract position for a specific period of time before that firm can hire you back, typically 6 months off, one year on, so that $40, 000 now becomes $26,666 or about $13/hr, unless you pick up work elsewhere. In the meantime, assuming your one year is one calendar year, you pay taxes on $40k and not $26k.

When I was first offered a contract position, in 1998, it was at $65/hr. Now I routinely see ads for the same or better qualifications as low as $15, but usually $20/hr.

 
At 1:42 PM, Blogger KenInNY said...

Very interesting, Anon. This certainly fits with what I'm imagining.

Cheers,
Ken

 
At 8:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Law school requires an immense amount of work, but it is very intellectually stimulating if you care about being stimulated. However, thinking about going to law school and thinking about being a lawyer are two entirely different things. The practice of law is not an extension of law school. Worry more about whether you want to devote your life working at a law firm, than worrying about law school. Law firms in general are populated by a$$holes. People who literally believe that somehow you have agreed to give them your life in exchange for the scraps they give you in your paycheck. In general, the lawyers with the power and money who will decide your fate are cheap, manipulative greedy bast@rds with no loyalty but to themselves, who could care less about you and your family. Think seriously twice before joining this band of modern day pirates and scum. The legal profession has been grossly corrupted by law students turned lawyers, who only went to law school in order to make a bucket of money. The number one determining factor about whether a case is taken is “how much money can I make off it?” An associate is not a colleague – but a piece of machinery to be used to make money off of. Here’s how it works. Partner gets client – gives associates files – bills client for work of associates – pays associates as little as possible – keeps difference. More associates – more money. An associate is but a cog in the partner’s money making machine. And, of course, the partner believes it is entirely fair that he pays the associate as little as possible, because that is what the market will bear. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the partners will generally lie to you to make you believe otherwise. If you resist, well simple enough. We’ll just fire your a$$, and replace you with another desperate associate. There are far more sane places for a lawyer to work besides a law firm. Try government. Try solo practitioner. Many lawyers, unfortunately, believe that the only thing that counts in life is how much money you make. They are greatly mistaken and are wasting their lives. Don’t be one of them!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home