Monday, April 26, 2010

Playing "If the Shoe Were on the Other Foot" across America's ever-popular racial divide

>

"Armed Patriots gather on the Potomac overlooking D.C.," cheered this headline on the Conservative Examiner website. Now imagine: What if the "armed patriots" had been black?

"Imagine that even one-third of the anger and vitriol currently being hurled at President Obama, by folks who are almost exclusively white, were being aimed, instead, at a white president, by people of color. How many whites viewing the anger, the hatred, the contempt for that white president would then wax eloquent about free speech, and the glories of democracy? And how many would be calling for further crackdowns on thuggish behavior, and investigations into the radical agendas of those same people of color?"
-- Tim Wise, in a Sunday AlterNet post,
"What If the Tea Party Were Black?"

by Ken

One of my favorite games here at DWT is "If the Shoe Were on the Other Foot," which we usually play by vice-versa-ing Dems and Republicans. In January, for example, after the State of the Union address, I welcomed guest contestant Glenn Greenwald, nailed what I characterized as "right-wing blithering that the bad actor in the SOTU controversy was not Justice Alito but President Obama."

"As usual, the disingenuousness levels are off the charts," Glenn wrote in the post "Justice Alito and the Court's credibility." "Imagine the reaction if Ruth Bader Ginsburg had done this at George Bush's State of the Union address."

Now that's how you play ISWOF!

Hats off to Tim Wise for playing his own version of the game, under the name "Imagine." Working the country's ever-popular racial divide, he wondered in a Sunday AlterNet post: "What If the Tea Party Were Black?"
[W]e’ll envision recent happenings in the news, but then change them up a bit. Instead of envisioning white people as the main actors in the scenes we’ll conjure -- the ones who are driving the action -- we’ll envision black folks or other people of color instead. The object of the game is to imagine the public reaction to the events or incidents, if the main actors were of color, rather than white. Whoever gains the most insight into the workings of race in America, at the end of the game, wins.

And he went on to "imagine" ten exquisite racial switcheroos -- "ripped from the headlines," as they say in the TV Law & Order promos. He didn't number them; that's strictly my pedantic contribution as I set about limiting myself to five to quote here. Eventually I gave up and cribbed six of the ten, and even that was made possible only by my conviction that you wouldn't be able to resist clicking through to see the other four. Here are my chosen six:
(1) Imagine that hundreds of black protesters were to descend upon Washington DC and Northern Virginia, just a few miles from the Capitol and White House, armed with AK-47s, assorted handguns, and ammunition. And imagine that some of these protesters -- the black protesters -- spoke of the need for political revolution, and possibly even armed conflict in the event that laws they didn’t like were enforced by the government? Would these protesters -- these black protesters with guns -- be seen as brave defenders of the Second Amendment, or would they be viewed by most whites as a danger to the republic? What if they were Arab-Americans? Because, after all, that’s what happened recently when white gun enthusiasts descended upon the nation’s capital, arms in hand, and verbally announced their readiness to make war on the country’s political leaders if the need arose.

(2) Imagine that white members of Congress, while walking to work, were surrounded by thousands of angry black people, one of whom proceeded to spit on one of those congressmen for not voting the way the black demonstrators desired. Would the protesters be seen as merely patriotic Americans voicing their opinions, or as an angry, potentially violent, and even insurrectionary mob? After all, this is what white Tea Party protesters did recently in Washington.

(3) Imagine that a rap artist were to say, in reference to a white president: “He’s a piece of shit and I told him to suck on my machine gun.” Because that’s what rocker Ted Nugent said recently about President Obama.

(5) Imagine that a black radio host were to suggest that the only way to get promoted in the administration of a white president is by “hating black people,” or that a prominent white person had only endorsed a white presidential candidate as an act of racial bonding, or blamed a white president for a fight on a school bus in which a black kid was jumped by two white kids, or said that he wouldn’t want to kill all conservatives, but rather, would like to leave just enough--“living fossils” as he called them -- “so we will never forget what these people stood for.” After all, these are things that Rush Limbaugh has said, about Barack Obama’s administration, Colin Powell’s endorsement of Barack Obama, a fight on a school bus in Belleville, Illinois in which two black kids beat up a white kid, and about liberals, generally.

(7) Imagine a black radio talk show host gleefully predicting a revolution by people of color if the government continues to be dominated by the rich white men who have been “destroying” the country, or if said radio personality were to call Christians or Jews non-humans, or say that when it came to conservatives, the best solution would be to “hang ‘em high.” And what would happen to any congressional representative who praised that commentator for “speaking common sense” and likened his hate talk to “American values?” After all, those are among the things said by radio host and best-selling author Michael Savage, predicting white revolution in the face of multiculturalism, or said by Savage about Muslims and liberals, respectively. And it was Congressman Culbertson, from Texas, who praised Savage in that way, despite his hateful rhetoric.

(9) Imagine that a popular black liberal website posted comments about the daughter of a white president, calling her “typical redneck trash,” or a “whore” whose mother entertains her by “making monkey sounds.” After all that’s comparable to what conservatives posted about Malia Obama on freerepublic.com last year, when they referred to her as “ghetto trash.”

Wow! This is championship-caliber ISWOF!

From his imaginings, Tim ventures:
In other words, imagine that even one-third of the anger and vitriol currently being hurled at President Obama, by folks who are almost exclusively white, were being aimed, instead, at a white president, by people of color. How many whites viewing the anger, the hatred, the contempt for that white president would then wax eloquent about free speech, and the glories of democracy? And how many would be calling for further crackdowns on thuggish behavior, and investigations into the radical agendas of those same people of color?
To ask any of these questions is to answer them. Protest is only seen as fundamentally American when those who have long had the luxury of seeing themselves as prototypically American engage in it. When the dangerous and dark “other” does so, however, it isn’t viewed as normal or natural, let alone patriotic. Which is why Rush Limbaugh could say, this past week, that the Tea Parties are the first time since the Civil War that ordinary, common Americans stood up for their rights: a statement that erases the normalcy and “American-ness” of blacks in the civil rights struggle, not to mention women in the fight for suffrage and equality, working people in the fight for better working conditions, and LGBT folks as they struggle to be treated as full and equal human beings.

And this, my friends, is what white privilege is all about. The ability to threaten others, to engage in violent and incendiary rhetoric without consequence, to be viewed as patriotic and normal no matter what you do, and never to be feared and despised as people of color would be, if they tried to get away with half the shit we do, on a daily basis.
#

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At 7:42 PM, Anonymous joel hanes said...

Copy-paste error?
Much of the text of the posting appears twice.

 
At 9:59 PM, Anonymous USN (Ret.) said...

Many valid assertions here, and the more hostile groups are allowed to conduct such outrageous 'protests' the more danger to America...I especially deplore those of the Radical Right Wing who think their agenda with guns in hand is their right under the Second Amendment.
Bullcrap. They're the terrorist element of America, in my opinion, hiding under the American flag.

Great article!

 
At 12:19 PM, Blogger KenInNY said...

Sorry about that, Joel! Don't know what happened, and wouldn't you know, I didn't look at the posted version till now!

Hmm, as I think back, there were all sorts of edits that seemed to disappear. I must have had two active versions of that thing going, and then wound up pasting together.

Ken

 

Post a Comment

<< Home