Do You Eat Meat?
>
I grew up in Brooklyn and Long Island, eating meat three meals a day, bacon and eggs for breakfast, ham and cheese sandwich for lunch and, say, pot roast or meatloaf for dinner. It never occurred to me that there was an alternative until I went to college and settled down with a hippie chick from Manhattan who was a vegetarian and a GREAT cook. She never told me I was a vegetarian and I never gave it much thought beyond how delicious the meals she prepared were. But when I was traveling through Asia-- and especially Afghanistan-- I noticed all the meat eaters getting deathly sick and me becoming like the caregiver for half the hippie trail kids in Kabul. A lengthy stay in Goa, where I learned about how human-hog recycling worked-- i.e., the sewage "system" (humans eat them and they eat the sewage and we eat them some more)-- made me a vegan for decades.
As I mentioned a few times lately, I'm reading Thom Hartmann's newest book, Threshold. I want to quote a couple of short paragraphs that stuck with me the other day:
[W]hile there are more than six billion humans, there are more than twenty billion livestock mammals (pigs, cows, goats, sheep) and about sixteen billion chickens in the world, over 99 percent of them grown by humans as food for humans. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in a 2007 report noted that 37 percent of the world's total methane production (and 9 percent of all CO2 and 65 percent of all nitrous oxide emissions) comes from our livestock. Because nitrous oxide is 296 times stronger than CO2, the combined greenhouse effect of our livestock worldwide is greater than the sum total of all our cars, trains, buses, trucks, ships, airplanes and jets.
A sudden and worldwide shift to vegetarianism (or even close to vegetarianism-- most indigenous societies historically have used meat as a flavoring rather than a staple, eating less than a fifth of the meat and dairy products Americans do) would have more impact on global warming than if every jet plane and car in the world were to fall silent forever.
University of Chicago research found that simply going vegetarian would reduce the average American's carbon footprint by over 1.5 tons of carbon per year: That's half again more than doubling the gas mileage of your car by moving from a big sedan to a small hybrid (which typically saves about a ton of carbon per year).
Hartmann then goes on to explain how methane concentrations in the atmosphere will eventually-- actually, fairly soon-- probably end most life, certainly human life-- on earth. And then there's all the solid polution. I was speaking with North Carolina Secretary of State Elaine Marshall about the problem the other day. She reminded me that in 2007 her state, the #2 hog producer (over 10 million annually) after Iowa, became the first in the nation to ban the construction or expansion of lagoons and sprayfields on hog farms-- the Swine Farm Environmental Performance Standards Act. Marshall, who is running against reactionary Republican Richard Burr for the U.S. Senate has a long career working for environmentally sound hog farming operations. "Locally," she told me on the phone, "I've been helping a North Carolina inventor who has patients and EPA approval for a hog-farm operation that produces no waste, but in this economy it's been difficult for him to get funding for a demonstration project." She also mentioned that she's been eating a lot more environmentally herself. In fact, more and more candidates have mentioned that to me than I've ever heard before. And you know what? It's the one thing each and every one of us can do on a personal, nonpolitical level to help save our planet.
Last week and old friend of mine, Cheri Shankar, wrote a very provocative piece for HuffPo, Can You Be A Meat-Eating Environmentalist?. She has the most environmentally advanced, green-friendly home I've ever been in. She's very sweet and doesn't like hectoring people but she's come to the conclusion that it's difficult to talk the talk without walking the walk.
Probably the best thing we can do for the planet is abstain from meat, fish, and dairy. Our food choices have the most profound impact of all. More than driving a hybrid, recycling, solar panel installation or LEED architecture. So for all of our efforts, our carbon footprint is huge, thanks to our diet full of hamburgers, steaks, bacon and chicken salads. The energy it takes to produce a pound of meat versus a pound of vegetables is mind boggling. Meat eating is a biggie! It matters ... a lot.
Last year my friend Phil took me to the screening on a groundbreaking movie that is mostly filmed, Bold Native; they're still working on it. I still haven't gotten it out of my mind. There's an incongruous, almost random 14 second clip from the movie at the top of this post. Here's the blurb from the Bold Native website:
Bold Native is a fiction feature film. Charlie Cranehill, an animal liberator wanted by the United States government for domestic terrorism, emerges from the underground to coordinate a nationwide action as his estranged CEO father tries to find him before the FBI does. The film simultaneously follows a young woman who works for an animal welfare organization fighting within the system to establish more humane treatment of farmed animals. From abolitionists to welfarists, Bold Native takes on the issue of modern animal use and exploitation from several angles within the context of a road movie adventure story.
The filmmakers’ background in documentary informed the creative approach to Bold Native. Self-financed and shot with a four person team in real-world locations, sometimes using real activists, lawyers, and formerly imprisoned animal liberators, the film weaves an intricate tale of one of the most important issues facing America and the world morally and ecologically-- the impact and consequences of industrialized animal use. And with a character who faces prosecution and potential lifetime imprisonment under the recently passed Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) for property crimes currently considered terrorism, the film also illuminates the danger of corporate interests influencing the law in a post-9/11 world.
Meet Casanova and Sonny:
Labels: AETA, Bold Native, Elaine Marshall, environment, Thom Hartmann, vegans
15 Comments:
As a hindu, I have eaten meat (when I was five) but have automatically regretted it, and now find any type of meat absolutely disgusting. At the same time, I am only 13 at the time, so take my view with a grain of salt for the future.
Thom and Cheri are right on the money. The negative environmental impact of raising and killing animals for food is immense. Furthermore, the industrialized manner of dealing with living beings influences our psyche and spirit in a way that encourages us to tolerate abuse and violence against human beings as well. When you commoditize a living being's body, you will end up treating that living being poorly - we see it not only in non-human animals that we consider food, but also in human beings in the "health care" system and the military industrial complex. These things are related, just as meat-eating is related to environmental degradation.
One of the big failings of the progressive movement right now is the unwillingness to make connections between the single cause you care about and the other causes that don't seem to directly affect you - or in this case may even force you to change your lifestyle. It is a real wake-up call for people who soapbox about the environment to accept the hamburger or steak or turkey sandwich on their plate is doing more harm than the hummer or unrecycled bottle they're criticizing someone else for. But it's a wake-up call who's time has come. Thanks Howie, Sheri, and Thom for adding your voices to it.
And thanks for mentioning Bold Native. The film is in sound mix and will be released this summer. There will be a full length trailer up in the next few days!
I suppose I was the only one sick enough to wonder when I saw this title if it was was some subset of the "Homophobia Sucks", and not in a good way post...oy
Howie,
This is a great post as always...but this is so cool...thank you.
This film will change peoples understanding of what animal liberation is really about.
Being against tyranny and being for equality and realizing the environmental implications we also need to look at the moral and ethical aspects of killing.
The same way we would in our political hearts. We all know that everyone born into this world whether human or non human deserves to live a life free from oppression.
Each of us in our brief moment here on earth seek a life filled with respect, dignity, happiness and freedom.
Our own experience of being sentient allows us to reflect on and recognize that other animals all wish for a life filled with the same positive circumstances, conditions and experiences that we wish for ourselves.
This is why we 'care' about progressive politics.
So when our empathy becomes illuminated and we become conscious of this obvious truth it requires us to see others unblurred and more clear.
We are then able to focus on others in the same manner we will at times glimpse ourselves.
When we begin to appreciate that we never need to eat, drink or wear anything derived from animals to live a happy and healthy life we can then notice animal suffering and their death as truly unnecessary. When we notice that the animals we label as food live lonely, fearful, horrendous lives for such trivial motives we can absolutely perceive what a horrible aberration the farmed animal industry is.
When we can look at a pig and see a someone. When we can view a goat, a lobster or a hen and notice a being whose life is of value to herself we can actually begin to change the world we live in. Because the world completely opens up to us when we extend that same sentiment and feeling to everyone around us. The crow on our lawn, the elderly human struggling alone in the super market, the miserable elephant chained in a circus, the terrified rabbit about to be skinned for food or fur, a desperate human female in a far away country who cannot feed her own children and yes, even the slaughterhouse worker who is only doing this job because we demand his product.
Go vegan...and nobody gets hurt!
Thanks Howie...
yeah, Food Inc. was an eye opener for me, seriously, this is totally out of control. thanks for the excellent post!
Philip Steir said "When we can look at a pig and see a someone. "
This is often unavoidable.
Honor it, EAT IT :)
I'm guessing last night's lovely asparagus hadn't really envisioned being part of my process.
Your point that abstaining from meat, dairy and eggs is "the one thing each and every one of us can do on a personal, nonpolitical level to help save our planet" is empowering in its simplicity and immediacy. And the impact that changing your diet has truly is immediate - on the the health and very future of our environment, on your own personal health (and thus on the healthcare issue itself), on corporate influence, of course for the animals themselves, and ultimately on your own life approach to humans and non-humans alike. Thanks for bringing so many great voices together in this provocative post.
OK, I'll bite as a food writer. I eat meat. Period. But here's the deal: I eat it no more than one time a day. Basically, I'm a vegetarian all day--and then a carnivore at dinner. Or if I eat meat (say, sushi) at lunch, I do not eat it at dinner.
And here's another deal, the much bigger one: 1) I will only eat meat I have raised or caught it--AND either slaughtered it or taken it to slaughter myself and 2) I must eat all of it, every single last bit, including the "yucky" parts most Americans will not eat (think innards). I will not eat factory meat.
I will only eat meat under these circumstances.
Mark - That's obviously preferable to the way most people get their meat, and clearly ameliorates a lot of the concerns expressed in this post. But it does betray a fundamental belief (which I realize is shared by the vast majority of humans) that your interests (in this case your sense of taste) are more important than the very life of another living being. As far as I can tell, this belief can only be justified by one of two reasons. 1. You think that you, as a human, have some special quality that they, as non-humans, don't... this would commonly be known as a soul. or 2. You believe in might makes right morality.
I'm curious which it is, or if there is some third rational I'm not thinking of.
Factory farming of livestock is an environmental disaster. Grass farming is environmentally beneficial and continues the cycle of sun> grass > poop > bugs. Chickens eat the bugs, cow and chicken poop naturally fertilizes new grass. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Factory meats are bad for you. Grass-farmed meats, poultry, dairy, eggs are good for you. Vegetarianism is counter to our evolution. Without animal fats and protein we would not have evolved our big giant brains that are made of about 95% cholesterol.
re: # 42
Just because something was necessary for initial evolution does not mean it's necessary for continued evolution. The United States would not exist in the dominant, advanced form it does without the capital created by industries (cotton, tobacco) which would not have been feasible without slavery. So slavery is responsible for our wealth in the same way animal fat/protein may be responsible for human's large brains. But that doesn't mean we should continue slavery.
Animals were the best and sometimes only source of nutrient rich fat and protein during that time. This is no longer the case. Which allows us to re-evaluate the situation and become more moral in our choices. The same way we have become more moral in regards to human slavery.
@42.
We humans (homo rapiens) have evolved into the most destructive nasty species there is on the planet. I would argue that meat eating has guided our species in a very negative way...and has more to do with our destructive and genocidal tendencies than anything else. We have become a plague on our planet and our eating others flesh has less to do with what a creative and thoughtful species we are and more to do with our evolving in such a violent way rather than peaceful.
Look at our closest relatives. Chimps and Bonobos. They look identical but are different species. Bonobos actually walk more like humans than chimps.
Chimps are the only great ape that will (rarely) eat dead animal flesh. Bonobos are stictly vegan. Bonobos have no violence in their society and are all about love (sex) and cooperation. Chimps while cute...are sometimes very violent and patriarchal, yet still pale in comparison to what we do.
I would argue that it is the flesh eating (our species used to be cannibals too) that has turned us into a pathological and murderous species over time.
We must appreciate that what might be considered natural and inherent in human evolution may at the same time also be in direct conflict of what is moral and ethical.
In the same way our species has evolved away from cannibalism and human slavery over centuries, we will eventually do the same in regard to eating and using the other animals on this planet.
If we are still even around....
The world is rapidly approachng an unprecedented climate catastrophe, and a major societal shift to vegan diets isessential to avoid it, as well as other major environmental threats.
For more information, please visit JewishVeg.com/schwartz, wgere I have 140 articles and 25 podcasts, and ASacredDuty.com, to see our acclaimed documentary "A Sacred Duty: Applying Jwish Values to Help Heal the World."
Regarding the Swine act banning the construction of new lagoons, I have understood that nothing has really changed because of two amendments added to the bill:
1) The Tucker Amendment, which created a pilot program to capture and convert methane gas into electricity--this allows the lagoon and sprayfield system to extend into the future.
2) Any lagoons that were considered "dangerous" were allowed to be replaced with a new lagoon.
Did Marshall mention any of this? As far as I know, the lagoon and sprayfield system is alive and well--unfortunately.
2)
Post a Comment
<< Home