Thursday, February 25, 2010

Will Gays Start Flocking To The GOP Now That Obama Has Been Such A Huge Disappointment?

>

For now, conservative out of the closet gays like Steve Pougnet are only welcome in one party

I read a story about Palm Springs Mayor/Democratic candidate for Congress Steve Pougnet in the Advocate today. I gathered from chatting with him on the phone a couple months ago that he's a pretty conservative Democrat, not the kind that Blue America is likely to ever endorse. His Advocate story is called Married With Children. The Riverside County Democrat and his husband have a pair of young twins. Pougnet may be conservative for a Democrat, just the way Harold Ford is. But neither Ford nor Pougnet would feel all that comfortable in the Republican Party regardless of their policy ideas. Ford is African American and Pougnet is gay-- gay and out and married and proud of who he is. (I don't think Pougnet is quite as conservative as your garden variety 2010 Republican either-- and maybe not even as conservative as Ford.) Pougnet is running against Mary Bono Mack-- who is also having to fend off a pack of drooling fringy teabaggers howling for her blood for being, in their eyes, too liberal. She and Pougnet aren't all that far apart on economic issues.
[T]o portray the race as one between a gay rights activist and a right-wing obstructionist is arguably misleading. While not a leader on gay issues, Bono Mack, who was initially elected to fill the congressional seat of her late first husband, Sonny Bono, hasn’t been a true roadblock either. She broke party lines last fall to vote for hate-crimes legislation attached to a military spending bill and recently voiced support for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (Bono Mack voted for ENDA in 2007). A spokesman confirmed that she also supports gender identity protections in the current ENDA legislation (the 2007 House bill passed with no transgender-inclusive language). Bono Mack’s stepson Chaz Bono revealed last year that he was a transgender man and had begun taking steps in transitioning. Bono Mack declined requests for an interview.

“Mary is highly respected in Washington and has always been a strong supporter of gay rights,” says Chuck Vasquez, president of the Riverside County-Palm Springs chapter of the Log Cabin Republicans, which has endorsed Bono Mack. “She’s not a candidate of political party lines, but of her own convictions. And with the economic state of the district, and with city and local governments in California trying to get everything they can from the federal government, which has raided our budgets, I don’t see how changing to an unknown [candidate] will lead to getting a better job done.”

Pougnet, who has the support of California senator Barbara Boxer and gay representatives Barney Frank and Jared Polis, further points out that his opponent did not take a public stance on Prop. 8, nor has she been a strong advocate for repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” one of Pougnet’s chief concerns among gay issues. Bono Mack has said she believes any changes must be made only with extensive consultation with the Pentagon—a strategy that many DADT opponents insist would fail to end the policy.

“To me, ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ is something that should change as quickly as possible. If I were in Congress, I would have been cosponsoring the [repeal] bill with Rep. Patrick Murphy,” says Pougnet, referring to the lead sponsor of a House bill that would eradicate the 16-year-old ban. “Times are changing, and we’ll beat her.”

Yesterday CBS News did a canned feature called Have Gays Found Their Place In The GOP?, based on what they called "the dramatic moment" at CPAC last weekend in which a shrill, embarrassingly demented homophobe was vociferously boo-ed. It's certainly good that there were more boos than cheers, but then again, college student fave-rave Ron Paul beat slaughtered Palin, Newt and Pawlenty in the straw poll too. Does it mean there's really a place for gays in the GOP?

Interesting question. For one thing, there always has been. If you're rich and you stay in the closet, you could have a brightish future in the GOP. Self-loathing predator and vicious McCarthyite Roy Cohn was a gay Republican icon in his day. Terry Dolan, founder of CPAC back in Reagan's day was a raging homophobe who rarely missed a night in the sleaziest of gay s&m bars. The Bush Regime was loaded with closet cases from Karl Rove and Josh Bolton to Ken Mehlman and Scott McClellan. Anti-gay Republicans in Congress who have been outed in the last few years include Mark Foley (FL), David Dreier (CA), Larry Craig (ID), and Ed Schrock (VA). But there are a dozen currently serving in Congress-- like Dreier-- all as deeply in the closet as they can get, from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham to a whole array of House members like Patrick McHenry (NC), Aaron Schock (IL), Trent Franks (AZ), Mark Kirk (IL) and Adrian Smith (NE), all of whom, except Kirk, are raging homophobes. How could a handful of kids booing a psychopath be "a turning point" when all Republican gay electeds are cowering in their closets?
Gay Republicans say it was a telling moment: Evidence that the GOP is "moving away from a negative hate-based connotation with homosexuals in the Republican party," according to Charles T. Moran, spokesman for the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay Republican group.

"The conservative movement is so focused on the issues that bring us together-- limited government, personal responsibility and freedom-- that the social issues have kind of gotten pushed off to the side," he said. "Even the Tea Party movement-- these people are not talking about social issues."

That isn't to say there hasn't been controversy: Liberty University Law School pulled its sponsorship of the event over GOProud's inclusion as a sponsor, and the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer said following the conference that true conservatives should abandon CPAC for the AFA's Values Voter Summit, where organizers believe "that protecting one man-- one woman marriage is the most fundamental conservative value of all."

Maybe so... but gay Republicans say they have Dick Cheney on their side.

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At 3:20 PM, Blogger maryjeandc@gmail.com said...

In the short term, I don't think gays are going to flock to the Republican Party because of a few high profile Republicans suporting some aspect of the LGBT agenda. Just as few African Americans are going to join the Republicans because Michael Steele is the Chair. When Cheney was in power, the congress or White House did nothing to pass legislation or repeal policies that discriminate.

In the long term, it is in the interest of the Republicans who are fiscal conservatives, to get the Party off the social issues: abortion, gay rights and back on to economic issues. It is understandable that gay and gay friendly Republicans are going to push this line.

Democrats have taken the lead (even if they don't always suceed) in challenging practices and policy that discriminate against the LGBT community. Philosophically, Dems have been more inclusive and over the years, LGBT activists have organized withing the party to push these changes.

I happen to believe that President Obama is going to deliver on a number of critical issues. He and congress already passed hate crimes. I believe Don't Ask, don't tell repeal will come in this administration and probably ENDA. Make no mistake, the overwhelming number of votes will come from Democrats.

Republicans who are not tea baggers or hard liners can read the polls and watch the voting of younger voters. They can't get back in power bashing gays and supporting criminalization of abortion. So they will try to persuade gay voters to come on over.

As disappointing as Democrats can be, I still believe the party label matters. Yes, there are the blue dogs, but the party dependence on a broad coaltion of voters including women and the LGBT community as well as more traditional groups.

To take the changed position of a few prominent Republicans (some of whom have openly gay children) as an indication that the Republican Party is to be trusted on these issues is foolhardy.

Mary Jean Collins

 
At 3:58 PM, Blogger storypronto said...

"It is a fundamental tenet of the Republican Party that goverment ought not intrude in the private lives of individuals where no state purpose is served, and there is nothing more private than who you live with and who you love." -Lee S. Dreyfus, R. Gov. '79-'83 Wisconsin, Signed First Statewide Gay Rights Law in USA, 1982, WPost, Obit. 01.05.2008.

Unfortunately for our country we haven't had a Republican party that Governor Dreyfus would recognize or be proud of for many election cycles. I agree with Mary Jean that if the GOP ever returns to its fundamental values and eschews easy fundamentalist demagoguery then LGBT voters would have interesting choices.

We can look forward to that day but no one should be holding their breath. Today the true contrast between the parties is too stark - lives and livelihoods are on the line everyday and we have no champions in the R column that any LGBT person can count on. And that's a shame, isn't it?

 
At 4:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mary Jean is right. To think that the party of John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Sarah Palin, John McCain and Glenn Beck (I mean - those ARE their leaders, right?) is going to be a little better on LGBT issues is to be, in a word, snookered.

Every Democrat isn't better than every Republican, but most Democrats are better than most Republicans; in fact, for every LGBT-friendly Republican you can name, I can name - or heck, even you can name - ten LGBT Democrats.

It's easy to boo screaming homophobes but tell me where their votes are when it comes to marriage equality in their states or when it comes to an out LGBT candidate. 40 years ago, the racists of the south were Democrats. Those same folks are the Republicans of today. They don't want to be labeled bigots, but if you are drowning in 10 feet of water, they will throw you 5 feet of rope. They are not really with you, and they don't want you to make it, but they don't want to feel bad when you drown.

But make no mistake, if you count on their help, one thing is certain. You. Will. Drown.

 
At 5:36 PM, Anonymous me said...

"I happen to believe that President Obama is going to deliver on a number of critical issues."

And just when do you believe he will start working on that?

I recommend that you don't hold your breath while waiting.

But you can expect him to start making noises, and even take a couple of small and reversible steps, starting about a year before the next election. It might well work too, since the majority of voters are dumb as hell.

 
At 8:58 PM, Anonymous Balakirev said...

I think Me's correct, and remain so unless the GOP starts making dramatic overtures to gays. If they do that, Obama will issue an executive order on DADT, and push Congress to do its own work on that. But unless this happens, he'll make supportive noises and just push them aside with the same smooth, confident assurance he's pushed all of us progressives to one side. After all, nobody disses its base like the Democrats.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home