Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Can Obama Turn Around His Rapidly Diminishing Support? We'll See Tomorrow

>

Time for a real change by admitting a bad mistake

Yesterday's L.A. Times reported that Obama is rapidly losing the support he had among white voters, never his strongest demographic group to begin with.
New surveys show steep declines in Obama's approval ratings among whites -- including Democrats and independents -- who were crucial elements of the diverse coalition that helped elect the country's first black president.

Among white Democrats, Obama’s job approval rating has dropped 11 points since his 100-days mark in April, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. It has dropped by 9 points among white independents and whites over 50, and by 12 points among white women-- all groups that will be targeted by both parties in next year's midterm elections.

Obama's strategy of wooing (angry, white) McCain voters has not only failed completely, he's managed to alienate many voters who were enthusiastic supporters by bending over backwards for the losers of last year's elections. Many former supporters feel let down and politically adrift by Obama's wishy-washy waffling and after seeing him surround himself with a gaggle of sleazy, Republican-like Wall Street operators and insiders from Rahm Emanuel and Jim Messina in the political department to corporate shills Tim Geithner, Ben Bernancke and Lawrence Summers looking after the economy.

Union members, for example-- one of Obama's core bases-- are starting to get wobbly as they see the Hope and Change they thought they were voting for turn into compromises with the worst elements of Republican Party corporatism. More and more union members are seeing Emanuel's push to please big corporate contributors as antithetical to their own most basic interests. There is a "mixture of frustration and unease, as union leaders are growing concerned that the Obama White House has not delivered as much as they had expected."

He hasn't been the kind of leader voters thought they were getting on crucial issues like Employee Free Choice, on trade, on immigration and, most notably, on health care reform. On many of the most fundamental aspects of domestic policy he has just continued the disastrous policies set in motion by decades of failed Republican rule. Anyone who imagined we were electing an FDR has to be extremely let down. Just 8 months into his term, his honeymoon is not just over, there are increasingly more people muttering about divorce-- and it's not just the fringe fanatics who made all the noise at the teaparties and town hall forums. Normal Americans are wondering if they made a big mistake. Peter Baker says tomorrow will be a watershed moment for Obama. Unless Obama can weasel out of it-- something people are also getting sick of-- Baker is right. "Obama faces what friends and foes alike call a make-or-break moment in his young administration. Because he has elevated health care to such a singular priority, advisers said he must force through a credible plan or risk crippling his presidency."
“It goes without saying that a lot is riding now on his ability to re-energize the health care debate and bring it home to a successful conclusion,” said John D. Podesta, who ran Mr. Obama’s transition and still advises him on health care, energy and other issues. “Nothing will influence the perception of the presidency more than whether he can be successful in getting a health care bill through the Congress.”

Recognizing the stakes, Mr. Obama has worked on a strategy for autumn to regain the initiative. He talked on Thursday from Camp David with Nancy Pelosi, the House speaker, and Harry M. Reid, the Senate majority leader. He spent part of Sunday working on this week’s speech to the nation and dispatched top surrogates to the talk shows to try to reframe the health care debate. And he has two meetings scheduled for Monday with his health policy and political advisers planned around a trip to Cincinnati to observe Labor Day.

It's probably impossible for him to succeed with throwing Emanuel under the bus-- and driving back and forth over him a few times. After all, the shady and disgraceful deals with the Insurance Industry and Big Pharma are untenable if Obama is going to actually go for meaningful health care reform. Emanuel made those deals and if Obama reneges on them-- and picks the American people over campaign donors-- Emanuel will be crippled to wheel and deal in the future.

In Cincinnati yesterday for the AFL-CIO's annual Labor Day Picnic, Obama, once again, sang a sweet tune for working families. Now he has to deliver. His message is powerful and it's why he's president today. If he can't deliver on it, it's all over for him. Listen and tell me if this message is what he's been delivering:

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

At 9:42 AM, Blogger Daro said...

Israel's given him the finger too.

 
At 11:56 AM, Blogger 333 said...

The problem with Obama could be that he is A.D.D. Maybe he spends too much time worrying about palnning his next speech? I know this: The economy is turning around. I am in real estate and I see it. I saw it in the Grocery stores this weekend for Labor Day.

Will he get the credit? NO! Why? Because the chuckle head has let this Health Care debate get so far out of control, its ruining his life.

This reminds me so much of what Republicans did to Clinton in 1996. They figured out where their voice was on one issue and then the Gift of Blood was given when Monica Lewinsky broke. The Brokers of Hate had 3 issues, Waco, Ruby Ridge, and Lewinsky.

The Brokers of Hate have 1 issue: Healthcare. They'd rather die than get free healthcare. What are the other 2 Nails for the Coffin?

 
At 12:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

From the beginning, I felt he was "soft". He chose Emmanuel to be his tough guy & now, those of us who supported him will pay the price for his inexperience.

I'd rather his Wife was President. I think she's every bit as smart & much tougher.

He will set the Progressive movement back 50 years if he caves on the Public Option.

 
At 1:00 AM, Blogger rr8004 said...

Very nice information. Thanks for this. Please come visit my site Nova Scotia when you got time.

 
At 5:12 AM, Anonymous Paul said...

I supported him strongly through the primaries and general election. I gave money, repeatedly, to his campaign and thought, FINALLY we had a President who would do some good.

Naw, we were all suckers. Beats the hell out of me how any human being could get elected on one platform, and then turn around and do exactly the opposite. He's turned in Bush/Cheny...on health care, on the wars, on transparency in government, on detention, he's taking away civil liberties and siding with banks over home owners. So why don't the Republicans like him? He's turned out to be one of them?

 
At 6:25 AM, Anonymous Balakirev said...

"Naw, we were all suckers."
_____________________________

No offense meant, Paul, but what do you mean, we? I looked up his voting record in Congress online. He was conservative--not quite as conservative as Landrieu or Ben Nelson, but not that far away. I was pretty jaded about him when he was running, and told my wife that the best thing for progressives would be the election of McCain, since it practically assured us much worse times were ahead, and a good progressive in 2012.

I really have some trouble with folks who claim they were fooled, I guess. Obama didn't come out of nowhere, or with a history as a progressive. He had a conservative, corporate-supporting record. He was never about change, unless it was change back to the old way of doing things before the neo-cons took over.

And given his war in Afghanistan (which the neo-cons love) which was promised to us last year, remember, and his support for torture, he's not that far away in some respects from Emperor Bush, either.

 
At 9:36 PM, Anonymous Charles Swain said...

I simply am shocked that Obama has added a provision to the healthcare bill to buy a Plasma Screen TV for everyone that would sign up for a Public Option Healthcare Plan. Of course Obama claims that this networked plasma TV technology would allow our doctors to communicate directly with their patients, therefore saving money, but I think he's being patronizing and trying to buy our approval of his proposal. And I think he's just trying to undermine our insurance industry by doing this.

I'm very deeply disappointed that the GOP has not made a bigger deal of this. The columnist Gail Collins of the New York Times reported this already, but our Republican leadership has hardly made a peep about this. I can't say that I trust a gift horse such as this coming from the Democrats, and how do we know that they wouldn't also be using this technology to secretly monitor our behaviour and lives? We need to stand together against this!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home