Sunday, July 26, 2009

Jimmy Carter: Male religious leaders have "overwhelmingly chosen" to "subjugate" rather than "exalt" women

>

Authentic Christians: Rosalynn and Jimmy Carter

"Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it."
-- former President Carter, in an op-ed in The Age

by Ken

When Jimmy Carter's in a funk, you don't want to mess with him. Apparently the Southern Baptist Convention still hasn't gotten the message.

The former president left the church in which he was raised very publicly in 2000, saying, "I have been disappointed and feel excluded by the adoption of policies and an increasingly rigid SBC creed, including some provisions that violate the basic premises of my Christian faith." The press release he issued said that he and Rosalynn preferred to associate with "other traditional Baptists who continue to share such beliefs as separation of church and state, servanthood and not domination of pastors, local church autonomy, a free religious press and equality of women." He stressed his objection to the SBC's rigid enforcement of its objectionable new doctrines, to the point of excluding those who resisted.

At that time, though, the Baptist Standard reported, "He said he will remain a deacon and Sunday school teacher at Maranatha Baptist Church in Plains and support the church's recent decision to send half of its missions contributions to the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship."

President Carter wrote about this latest crisis of conscience for, of all venues, the Australian national newspaper The Age. That remarkable op-ed piece has gotten some attention, but not nearly enough. At a time when the country is choking on our epidemic of Crap Christianity, it's both startling and in the deepest sense reassuring to hear the authentic voice of "a practising Christian."

THE AGE

Losing my religion for equality

Jimmy Carter
July 15, 2009

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

I HAVE been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.
#

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At 4:10 PM, Blogger Celestite said...

Jimmy Carter wasn't much of a politician. I hope he is remembered as a statesman, he has earned it.

 
At 4:34 PM, Anonymous Balakirev said...

Oh, he was a fine politician--on a state level. On a national level, he achieved more than he's given credit for among the myths generated by the DC pundit animals, but he fell afoul of the lobbying minefield and bureaucracy that his team didn't understand well.

I agree with you, though, he has been a far more effective statesman than he was a politician.

 
At 8:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So called religious leader are not leaders at all but are lairs and fakers. Most have conveniently found a way to make a living off the stupid and gullible waving their arms in the air waiting for the rapture which of course will never happen, or waiting for the return of Jesus Christ which is something that will never happen.

Dogs play fetch the ball to please their masters only humans play the game of masks and monuments let's bury our dead so they can soon be raised.

The religious fakers are the lowest form of humanity except for the politicians who are nothing but a bunch of lying weasels. Jimmy Carter falls into both categories.

Jimmy is truly the howdy dowdy man.

 
At 8:12 PM, Anonymous Balakirev said...

Another member of the Anonymous clan, come temporarily down from the mountains to shout incoherently and wave his arms about. Sigh.

 
At 4:50 PM, Blogger William C said...

Balakirev, LOL that was a great response to anonymous! I'm going to use that line in the future, if I may

 

Post a Comment

<< Home