When Republicans steal from other Republicans, isn't the defense obvious? "I was just trying to uphold my party's principles"
"[Christopher J.] Ward first came under scrutiny in late January when, under pressure from House Republicans worried about the NRCC's finances, he admitted that he had forged audits of the committee's books for several years. The NRCC asked the FBI to investigate.
"In mid-March, the NRCC accused Ward of taking at least 'several hundred thousand dollars' dating back to 2004. The government's filing yesterday alleges that the diversion of funds goes back to at least April 2003."
--from a report by Paul Kane and Del Quentin Wilber
in today's Washington Post
in today's Washington Post
So now we're talking about a cool half million smackers, eh?
As a point of fact, Mr. Ward still hasn't been charged with a crime. What the federal prosecutors filed was paperwork for a civil suit, seeking to have the Ward home in Bethesda seized by the government to prevent him from selling it while the legal wheels continue to grind. The papers purport to document mortgage payments of $72K and renovation payments of nearly $200K made with money embezzled from the National Republican Congressional Committee, for which Ward had worked since the '90s.
Former NRCC Treasurer Embezzled $500,000, Court Papers Say
By Paul Kane and Del Quentin Wilber
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, June 7, 2008; A03
The former treasurer of a key Republican campaign committee embezzled more than $500,000 over a five-year period, using it to fund mortgage payments and a six-figure remodeling of his Bethesda home, according to court documents filed yesterday.
The papers were filed by federal prosecutors in an attempt to force the former treasurer, Christopher J. Ward, to forfeit his home to the government.
The government alleges that Ward, who had worked for National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) since the 1990s, made numerous unauthorized diversions of funds from its accounts and joint accounts set up with Senate Republicans. He often shifted money into his personal account just as payments for his mortgage or home remodeling were due, according to the court filing.
Ward, who was fired earlier this year, has not been charged with a crime, but the civil action filed yesterday seeks to seize his home in the 6300 block of Massachusetts Avenue. Such efforts prevent subjects of investigations from selling properties that were allegedly part of their crimes and hiding the proceeds.
Ronald Machen, Ward's lawyer, said yesterday he had not seen the government filing.
Ward first came under scrutiny in late January when, under pressure from House Republicans worried about the NRCC's finances, he admitted that he had forged audits of the committee's books for several years. The NRCC asked the FBI to investigate.
In mid-March, the NRCC accused Ward of taking at least "several hundred thousand dollars" dating back to 2004. The government's filing yesterday alleges that the diversion of funds goes back to at least April 2003.
Ward allegedly targeted fundraising panels set up with the National Republican Senatorial Committee for the annual President's Dinner, the biggest event of the year, according to the court papers.
Investigators said they have pinpointed $198,841 in payments to contractors from Ward's personal accounts that appear to have been made with money taken from the political committees. In a three-month span in 2007, the government charges, Ward transferred $95,000 from the 2006 President's Dinner committee to his own Wachovia Bank account and then made payments to the contractors.
Over the 21 months after April 11, 2003, Ward made $72,000 in mortgage payments with money taken from President's Dinner committees, according to the court document.
We just have to wonder, now that the official motto of the modern Republican Party is "Steal anything you can get your mitts on that isn't nailed down, and even then do what you can do," how they distinguish what Mr. Ward is alleged to have done from standard operating procedures. Is it that he didn't get someone's permission to steal the money? Or that he was stealing from his own people? Or did he just violate another Republicrook principle: Don't get caught!
Maybe when the time comes he'll just throw himself on the mercy of the court, explaining, "I wouldn't've done it if I knew there was, like, a rule or something against it."