Wednesday, April 16, 2008

SENATE ETHICS... KINDA-- AND IRAQI SEAT BELT LAWS

>


Barbara Boxer chairs the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, which is a pathetic joke. David "Diapers" Vitter? Nothing, although he publicly admitted breaking the law. Ted Stevens? Nothing, although the FBI and several other agencies have been searching his home in conjunction to a widespread corruption conspiracy that has tainted most of the Alaska GOP (including his son  Ben). Pete Domenici? Nothing, even though he used his position as a senator to threaten a U.S. Attorney and attempted to force him to take on a punitive political role and, failing that, conspired with Heather Wilson, Alberto Gonzales, Karl Rove and others to fire the upright Justice Department official. Larry Craig? Next to nothing, although he actually pleaded guilty to a crime. The Senate certainly takes care of its own; and really well. Remember all those senators who were taking bribes from Jack Abramoff? Well Abramoff is in prison. Not one senator has even been admonished.

That isn't to say Boxer doesn't do anything regarding ethics. In fact, right now she's trying to figure out how to go after Alaska's arch-criminal Don Young on ethics charges. No, I don't mean arch-criminal, Senator Ted Stevens; I mean Congressman Don Young. She's promises to figure out a way of making this constitutional-- she'll fail-- since the House takes care of its own ethical lapses (or doesn't) and the Senate... well the Senate is supposed to watch it's own 100 miscreants.

Now, this isn't about Boxer's Select Committee on Ethics. You see, that Committee has nothing whatsoever to do so they gave her another job as well, chairing the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. She's the one taking care of Global Warming for us. Except right now she's working on putting together some kind of amendment to a highway corrections bill that is meant to spur an investigation into one of Congress' most notorious crooks, Young who stealthily modified an earmark in the 2005 highway bill when he was chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, a time that caused Rolling Stone to dub him America's third worst member of Congress and the King of Pork.

Boxer claims she working on his with the Committe's unlikely vice chairman, Global Warming denied and general all around loon, James Inhofe. If ever there was an odd couple... but I guess Inhofe is just happy to see her busy with something that doesn't move forward any kind of climate change agenda.
And along the same lines, Iraq's police force is cracking down on seat belt scofflaws; about time. I wonder if McCain, Lieberman and Miss Lindsey will claim credit for this.
“The citizens are learning the laws step by step,” said General Mraweh, sitting in his office in the Karada neighborhood. “We have applied all the laws concerning traffic, so it’s time for the seat belt law to be practiced.”

Some might say that there are more pressing issues, like the car bombs that can turn a morning commute into a nightmare of blood and body parts, the daily killings and kidnappings, the political and sectarian infighting.

Or that enforcing the seat belt law might not do enough in a city where traffic rarely moves above a crawl, checkpoints are ubiquitous, roads are often blocked and it is not uncommon to see a vehicle charging down a street in the wrong direction or swerving across lanes.



UPDATE: BOXER WANTS DON YOUNG ARRESTED AND THROWN IN PRISON-- GOOD FIRST STEP, BUT WHAT ABOUT AT LEAST CENSURE OR EVEN ADMONISHMENT FOR VITTER?

This morning's CongressDaily reports that Barbara Boxer sparred With Oklahoma reactionary loon Tom Coburn on the Senate floor over the infamous secret Coconut Road earmark. Yesterday she demanded "jail time for those responsible for the 'very devious' changing of the disputed Coconut Road earmark." You go, girl! She and the OK nutcase "sparred on the Senate floor for about a half-hour over whether Congress or the Justice Department should investigate how an earmark in the 2005 surface transportation reauthorization bill was modified after the House and Senate voted final passage and before President Bush signed it."
In competing amendments to a bill making corrections to the 2005 reauthorization measure, Boxer is seeking a Justice Department probe and Coburn wants to set up a bicameral congressional committee to investigate before potentially handing over findings to law enforcement agencies.

Boxer said a Justice probe would ensure tougher action and avoid the partisan spectacle that could come with a high-profile probe.

[Referring to Don Young, she said that] "At the end of the day, we want to put people in jail; that's what we're talking about," she said of the "evil doers" who modified the earmark. "I don't want political theater; I want justice done. ... When justice is done and somebody goes to jail ... that sends the best possible message."

The earmark in question was changed from providing $10 million to improving Interstate 75 in Ft. Myers, Fla., to specifically going to build an interchange at Coconut Road. Public watchdog groups charge that Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, then chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, changed the earmark at the behest of a campaign contributor who was tied to the project.

A vote in the Senate is expected today. And even as crooked and partisan a GOP hack as Roy Blunt agrees-- now that it's all out in the open-- that Young has to be investigated, knowing full well that an investigation of Young will lead directly to prison.

Labels: , , , , , ,

10 Comments:

At 5:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, Boxer is worthless. I wonder how much PR money it took to buy her that reputation as a "liberal".

She sure as hell doesn't deserve it.

Just another Likud stooge.

 
At 6:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I quit reading when you chose to start making chit up.

David Vitter ONLY admitted to a "sin". He NEVER admitted to ANY crime.

No matter what your opinion, when you choose to distort the truth, your credibility crashes.

 
At 6:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Howie, I've said it before and I'll say it again - you get the government you deserve. As a nation more interested in American Idol and Jamie Lynn Spears than what their elected officials do, is it any wonder that politicians don't bother policing their own?

 
At 8:02 AM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

My dear Ms Anonymous (6:12), Diapers can call his crimes a "sin;" that doesn't mean they're not a crime. It happens to be a criminal act to hire prostitutes in DC and in Louisiana. Vitter admits he did that in DC-- and scores of witnesses have claimed he did the same thing in Louisiana going back over a decade or more-- but he calls it a sin. OK, fine. But what twisted logic did you hear from Limbaugh or Hannity-- or from whomever you get your talking points-- to make you claim he didn't commit a crime?

 
At 8:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

..."that doesn't mean they're not a crime."

A "sin" does NOT necessarily constitute a crime, either.


"It happens to be a criminal act to hire prostitutes in DC and in Louisiana."

So. What PROOF do you have that ANY crime was committed?

"Vitter admits he did that in DC"

No, he did NOT. Try reading the transcript. You are either working through ignorance, basing your OPINION on other false articles, or you are purposely using your delivered talking points to fabricate an outright LIE.

"and scores of witnesses have claimed he did the same thing in Louisiana going back over a decade or more"

Yet, the investigators CLEARED Senator Vitter of any involvement claimed by those upstanding citizens on Bourbon Street. Again you fail to read the entire record.

"but he calls it a sin."

And the Federal/State attorneys found NO PROOF OF A CRIME. Did you see an indictment?

Even more telling was the fact that Palfrey's attorney did NOT call Vitter to the stand, clearly showing that Vitter had NOTHING material to offer to the crimes for which his client was charged.

What is really unfortunate, and likely a significant cause for the degradation we suffer in our political system, is that people can go out in public and proclaim whatever lies they want against a political figure without any accountability.

"OK, fine. But what twisted logic did you hear from Limbaugh or Hannity-- or from whomever you get your talking points-- to make you claim he didn't commit a crime?"

The most simple of reasons; the lack of PROOF.

I would suggest you read a sample of a judge's instructions to a jury. Those instructions are very clear as to what should be considered in determining guilt or innocence. Perhaps if you followed similar instructions, your obvious bias would not be so obvious.

 
At 10:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gee Howie, does this guy work for Vitter? Talk about parsing words to deny the man paid money for hookers. Just look at Senator Vitter's own "appology statement"

"This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.[90]

This statment also goes on to say that his telephone number was included in phone records dating from his days as a member of the House of Representatives. The Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times. Now maybe they were discussing Gumbo recipes or something, but I kind of doubt it.

A politician not being convicted of a crime isn't the same as a politician not committing said crime. I'm not sure how that's distorting the truth.

 
At 11:30 AM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

Yes, it's Pierre from Vitter's office playing with words again.

 
At 12:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well golly gee, if Senator Vitter had played with words instead of hookers, Pierre might have something better to do...

 
At 2:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why does Boxer keep missing votes? Look at her record on govtrack, she missed a lot of votes this year.

Maybe Boxer has too much on her hands trying to counter all the bullshit Jim InDenial (R-Naturally) has done in the Committee on the Environment and Public Works. Why does she have to chair two committtees? Is there not someone else who's up to the task? Like Sheldon Whitehouse? Now, he would make a great chairman.

 
At 3:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't this kind of like signing statements?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home