PA DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS HIGH ON CARNEY-- EVEN THOUGH HE VOTES LIKE A REPUBLICAN AND ENDORSED ONE FOR PRESIDENT
>
Carney still calls himself a Democrat for some reason
One way to tell how "Democratic" a member of Congress is, is to fire up Progress Punch and ask it to rank all the members based on how they voted when the chips were down. In the 2007-'08 session, only 7 Democrats (5 Dixiecrats-- Dan Boren, Gene Taylor, Jim Marshall, Nick Lampson and John Barrow) and two Indiana reactionaries (Brad Ellsworth and Joe Donnelly) have voted more frequently with Bush and the GOP than Chris Carney. This makes all of us at DWT ill because we were bamboozled by his sweet-talking lies-- even though we were warned to beware-- and we recommended him to Pennsylvania voters and helped raise money for his bid to unseat Don Sherwood. Since Carney has gotten into Congress he has broken nearly every promise he made, voted with Republicans on substantive matters and pandered to corporate interests, throwing every Democratic constituency under the bus. He is the only congressmember we endorsed last year who we asked to return the money we gave him (722 donations totalling over $8,000). He refused to return the money to Blue America or to any of the individual donors who demanded he do so. We've covered this before-- more than once. So wasn't I surprised today when I received an e-mail from Abe Amorós of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, extolling the virtues of Carney's candidacy. I sold my place in Stroudsberg and live full time in L.A. so there really was no reason to send me the mail except to get me to write about Carney. OK.
Our real problem with him, by the way, isn't even how reactionary he is. There are worse. It is how he blatantly lied to us-- telling us specifically that he would support a ban on hate crimes and then voting with the Republicans against the ban.
Now, the e-mail talks about how Bush has become less and less popular in the very Republican leaning 10th CD in northeast PA and how a poll the Democratic Party took shows how Carney will beat either of the two unknown Republicans, Dan Meuser and Chris Hackett, who want to run against him. Half the Republicans responding to the poll are satisfied with Carney's job so far. [Why shouldn't they be. Look at his Republican-lite voting record.]
Carney leads Republicans Dan Meuser and Chris Hackett by more than 20 points each. The poll found that neither Meuser nor Hackett were well known. Less than one 10 knew Meuser (8 percent) while Hackett was slightly better off (15 percent) after having run two weeks of radio ads prior to the poll.
In head-to-head competition, Carney outperformed Meuser (31-11) while maintaining a higher lead over Hackett (34-10).
"These numbers not only show that Congressman Carney has done an excellent job in his district but that he also enjoys support with Republican voters that should be very discouraging to the Republican candidates," Rooney said. "Congressman Carney is well known, popular and well regarded with most voters in the 10th Congressional District.
I think what the numbers show is that the Republicans couldn't come up with a credible candidate and that Carney votes like a Republican often enough to satisfy GOP voters anyway. Too bad the Pennsylvania Democratic Party is more interested in power than in values or principles. Carney endorsed Bloomberg and Hagel for president, by the way. Corrupt Democratic leader Rahm Emanuel donated $10,000 to Carney's current re-election campaign-- the highest to any candidate; in fact, Emanuel donated large sums to all reactionary freshmen who vote frequently for the Bush agenda (like Carney). Great job, Rahm!
Labels: Chris Carney, Pennsylvania, Rahm Emanuel, reactionary Democrats
4 Comments:
I think what these numbers show is that an incumbant is scoring higher on a Democratic poll against to unknowns. Wow!!!!!!!! There's a shock. A lot to read in to there.
Well, its really quite simple. PA-10 is historically a Republican district and it took a sex scandal to remove the incumbent Republican Don Sherwood (and it was good to see him turned out of office). However, if the PA Dems. wish to keep the seat, Rep. Carney must vote the will of his constituents (which is the point of having a representative democracy in the first place) and the will of this Republican-leaning district is a more conservative-to-moderate voting record. If he doesn't do this, the Republicans will re-capture the seat. Pennsylvania may be a blue state, but there are parts of it, such as PA-10, and PA-03, PA-05, PA-09, PA-16, and PA-19 that are unapologetically conservative and Republican in nature.
Anonymous at 5:30 AM, I don't necessarily disagree with your analysis. But our beef with Carney isn't that he votes moderately instead of liberally. First of all, moderate and even conservative voters agreed that the hate crime bill was a good thing. Only 8 Democrats-- mostly Dixiecrats-- voted with the Republicans against it. Far more Republicans voted for it. It passed overwhelmingly. And the real problem with Carney wasn't even how he voted; it was that he lied. Trying to coax progressives into supporting him, he flat-out promised to support the exact bill that he later voted against-- even with polls showing there would be ZERO political cost to pay for doing the right thing.
Agreed. And no one's saying that you should support him. Especially if he voted contrary to a position that he had taken. Who knows what goes on in the mind of a Member of Congress? I certainly do not, as I am not one of them. However, I would imagine that there are very few Members over the years who have remained 100% consistant with everything they have told their constituents. Granted, there might be a few...but they are few and far between.
Post a Comment
<< Home