CRAZY RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA HACK INSINUATES HARRIET MIERS IS TOO PRO-BLACK
>
Right-winger blogger and closet case Matt Drudge is seeking to help discredit Harriet Miers by posting a copy of some sworn testimony of hers from 1989. Ironically, while it is sure to raise the dander of far right ideologues and the lunatic fringe of Bush's coalition, it makes her sound reasonable and kind of all-American to a non-Nazi.
Drudge gets his panties all in a knot because Miers said she wouldn’t belong to the Federalist Society, a partisan rightist attack group, because it was “politically charged" but didn't categorize more mainstream groups like the NAACP and the Black Chamber of Commerce the same way. Drudge claims, in his overwrought, annoyingly breathless style, that "word of the testimony circulated late last week, roiling conservatives and setting off a scramble among lawyers to obtain the actual testimony. Sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT that conservatives demanded that the White House and its allies release copies of the testimony, but their demands were ignored."
Much to the dismay of roiled hate groups like the KKK, Christian Identity, Aryan Nation, GOP, Posse Comitatus, and other key parts of the Bush coalition, it comes out that Miers testified in a voting rights lawsuit claiming the Dallas City Council had too few black and Hispanic members. She didn't have much to say one way or the other but her few lines of testimony can be parsed and twisted by right-wing loons like Drudge to make it sound like she's probably a Negro in disguise and that as soon as she gets onto the Supreme Court she'll do whatever pathetic white people fear Negroes want to do to them.
"The DRUDGE REPORT can now reveal," Miss Drama Queen writes, "that not only did Harriet Miers testify that she would not join the 'politically charged' Federalist Society -- she testified that she had joined a liberal organization – the Democratic Progressive Voters League. Miers was also asked whether she considered 'the NAACP [to be] in the category of organizations' that she considered to be 'politically charged.' Her answer: 'No, I don’t.' To a neo-Nazi that is damning testimony.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home