Pages

Sunday, September 10, 2017

Trump Owns The GOP Now-- And If Republicans Don't Like It, They Can Start Their Own Party


Saturday we saw how Trump is fracturing the Republican Party to the point where the risk of wholesale retirements and resignations will be high from mainstream lawmakers. Ros-Lehtinen (FL), Reichert (WA) and Dent (PA) could well be just the tip of the iceberg. We'll have to see. Talk about Ryan bailing have been growing louder and louder-- although that may just be wishful thinking on the part of Republicans recognizing that the toxicity of his brand-- like Trump's-- will serve as negative coattails during the midterms. On Friday, Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin reported for the NY Times that SeƱor Trumpanzee's mercurial politics are already rattling Republicans heading into the 2018 midterm campaign, sparking Trump-like primary challenges in two high-profile Senate races and a host of lower-profile House contests, while pushing a growing number of moderate House members to the exits. And, as Josh Kraushaar noted in Politico on the same day, "the next generation of Republican candidates are more likely to be running in the image of Trump-- substance-free, needlessly confrontational, and playing to a hardcore base. When Trump loyalists characterize House Speaker Paul Ryan as a squishy RINO, it’s clear that antiestablishment forces care more for revolutionary zeal than party affiliation. It’s no secret why Republican leaders have been working tirelessly for years to prevent such candidates from emerging in primaries. But with a president egging on nihilistic elements, it’s becoming a thankless undertaking. If the pace of congressional retirements accelerates, it’s not just the House majority that will be at risk. It’s the future of the Republican Party."
Trump-inspired candidates have emerged to challenge Senators Dean Heller of Nevada and Jeff Flake of Arizona, two Republicans who have been targets of the president’s ire, as well as House members seen as insufficiently devoted to Mr. Trump, such as Representative Mark Sanford of South Carolina.

And in a closely watched special Senate election in Alabama later this month, Mr. Trump is waffling on his commitment to the incumbent, Senator Luther Strange, buoying the hopes of Roy Moore, a former State Supreme Court justice and darling of the hard right.

Republicans fear that Mr. Trump has relinquished his role as leader of the party, instead assuming the mantle of his own political movement. And they are bracing for an election season in which their deeply unpopular president does more to undermine than aid candidates of the party he ostensibly oversees.

“It’s a cult of personality,” said Mr. Sanford, who faces a primary challenge from a state legislator who charges that the congressman has been inadequately loyal to the president. “He’s fundamentally, at the core, about Donald Trump. He’s not about ideas. And ideas are what parties are supposedly based on.”

Such open divisions between a president and elected officials of the same party mark an extraordinary departure from modern political tradition. Even if they feuded at times with their president, lawmakers knew they could ultimately count on the White House to endorse and raise money for incumbents, because controlling as many seats as possible would serve both their interests.

But Mr. Trump’s decision to align himself with congressional Democrats this week over federal spending and hurricane relief cemented a view that he will not operate according to any such conventions. Relations between the president and congressional Republicans have frayed over the lawmakers’ failure to deliver on key legislation and Mr. Trump’s constant badgering and personal attacks against them.

The president has repeatedly assured Republicans that he will be an active campaigner for the party next year. But Republican leaders fret that he will gravitate toward candidates who share his distinctive political priorities and anti-Washington attitude, and that nominating some of the Trump-driven candidates could imperil their control of Congress. He will have spent as much time in his first year in office raising money for his own re-election as helping others.

Yet even Republicans who are uneasy about Mr. Trump say lawmakers need to understand the grip he holds on the conservative grass roots.
Just a quick look at Breitbart yesterday includes a post about Bannon accusing Ryan and McConnell of "trying to 'nullify' the 2016 election because they do not believe in the economic nationalist agenda that got President Donald Trump elected;" 2 posts on anti-American neo-Nazi Roy Moore looking like a winner in Alabama (one about his support from the Duck Dynasty psychopath and one that appears to be an endorsement from a dead right-wing freak, Phyllis Schlafly); and an attack on relatively Texas mainstream conservative Mike McCaul, who they refer to as No Wall McCaul. They want to head off any chance of Trump naming him head of the Department of Homeland Security to replace John Kelly.

Senate Republicans are worried that Trump-backed candidates may win primaries against GOP incumbents in Nevada and Arizona and then lose the general elections to Democrats. "Hopefully the president recognizes it’s in his best political interest to have as many Republicans in the Senate as possible," said Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, adding, "I think he can count."
Nearly as worrisome to Republicans is what the president is not doing for another incumbent: Mr. Strange. Mr. Trump endorsed Mr. Strange, who was appointed to fill the seat vacated by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, shortly before the senator’s primary last month. At that time, he signaled to the senator that he would campaign with him before a runoff on Sept. 26.

“He’s offered to do whatever he can to help,” Mr. Strange said the day before the primary.

But now that Mr. Strange finds himself locked in a difficult race with Mr. Moore, Mr. Trump has gone quiet. Stephen K. Bannon, the president’s former chief strategist, is loudly urging Mr. Trump to back away from Mr. Strange, while some current White House officials counsel the president to be careful about spending political capital on a candidate who may lose, according to a senior administration official.

In a phone call with Mr. Trump on Tuesday, Mr. Strange highlighted a radio interview that Mr. Moore had done with Laura Ingraham last month in which Mr. Moore said the president was disconnected from his base and suggested that Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and adviser, was behind the endorsement of Mr. Strange, according to a Republican briefed on the call.

However, any attempt at luring the president into scheduling an Alabama trip has yet to work: Mr. Strange, who has based his entire campaign on his support for and from the president, told Mr. Trump that a presidential or vice-presidential visit could win the race, but no commitment has come.

Republican leaders are holding out hope that Mr. Trump may still appear with Mr. Strange. Privately, they are furious about the prospect of being saddled with as polarizing a figure as Mr. Moore, who was removed from his post as chief justice of the State Supreme Court over his refusal to remove a Ten Commandments monument. And they are fuming that, even with his loyalists, Mr. Trump cannot be depended upon.

Uncertainty is also gripping the House, where this week two Republicans, Mr. Reichert and Mr. Dent, announced their retirements.

Their decisions, just months after Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, another center-right stalwart, said she would also leave, has Republicans fearing a wave of retirements going into next year. Representative Dave Trott of Michigan is considering retiring, and another Michigan Republican, Fred Upton, may retire or run for the Senate, according to multiple party officials.

“Is the House at risk? Absolutely,” Mr. Dent said.

Mr. Dent’s announcement came a day after a pro-Trump candidate announced plans to run against him. That candidate, State Representative Justin Simmons, attacked Mr. Dent as a “ringleader” of opposition to the White House.

“I’m appalled by the way he’s acted in his votes since President Trump was elected,” Mr. Simmons said in an interview.

While they have not gotten the same attention as the threats to Mr. Flake and Mr. Heller, about a half-dozen pro-Trump Republicans have opened primary challenges against Republican members of the House, accusing the incumbents of inadequate fealty to the president. The House Republican campaign arm has quietly started a new incumbent-protection effort called the “Primary Patriot” program.

Mark Harris, a North Carolina minister running against Representative Robert Pittenger in a Republican primary, said voters had plainly validated Mr. Trump’s agenda last year, and expect cooperation from the Republican-led Congress.

“The average person blames Congress for the failure to enact this president’s agenda,” Mr. Harris said. “And personally, I think they’re right.”

Mr. Trump will also leave his imprint on races beyond Congress by whom he chooses to support with his time and fund-raising power. Representative Jim Renacci of Ohio, a wealthy former auto dealer who is running for governor, said he had broached the subject of his race during an Oval Office meeting with the president, and Mr. Trump was tuned in.

“The president has always been supportive of Jim Renacci, because I’ve been supportive of him,” Mr. Renacci said.

But skeptics of the president say Mr. Trump simply does not understand that his own fate may well hinge on the success of the party’s candidates.

Congressional Republicans are “carrying water on the Trump agenda up to their eyeballs,” said Josh Holmes, a top lieutenant to Mr. McConnell, while “you’ve got a Democratic minority that is doing nothing less than trying to impeach the man.”




Republican frustrations boiled over this week after Mr. Trump torpedoed his own party on a fiscal deal, and then flew on Air Force One with Senator Heidi Heitkamp to North Dakota, where he handed Ms. Heitkamp, a Democrat, a ready-made commercial for her re-election next year by praising her as “a good woman.”

It was a vivid illustration of just how inconstant his enthusiasm for Republicans might be. Faced with a choice between helping his party weaken a vulnerable Democrat, and indulging a Democrat who has been nice to him and whose support he wants for a tax overhaul, Mr. Trump opted emphatically for the latter.


5 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:08 AM

    If the Rs can start THEIR own party, why can't progressives start OUR own party?

    I continue to be flummoxed at DWT's myopia in the left eye while it has hallucinations in the right eye.

    There won't be ANY new parties. American voters barely have the cognizant ability to deal with 2 nearly identical parties. 250 million heads would 'splode if there were any actual opposed parties or more than 2 (1, in actuality).

    What this fool may do is to noodge the existing fascist party further toward naziism and nationalism (no, not redundant in this case). It was already pretty far along that path. The voting base is already there. It is just the corporate and elite party apparatus that continues to try to keep it focused only on making corporations into oligarchies and billionaires into gods.

    Sounds a lot like the democraps' charter, don't it? It is. But the democraps' voters haven't figured out yet that their continued loyalty to the ideas of FDR et al are really enabling the same economics as the Rs have been striving for since 1920.

    And if the Rs become full-blown Nazis, the Ds will move into their void and become the party of ryan, mcturtle, norquist et al. Won't be that far to move.

    And progressives will follow... who else they got? Can't have more than 2 parties. That would defy the laws of physics.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The idea that Donald Trump has any loyalty to EITHER party is a myth concocted by the media. Donald Trump's sole loyalty is to himself. I have come to wish I'd had some means for eavesdropping on the discussions that must have taken place at the GOP convention last year, because watching him bamboozle all those hardcore pols who thought they were making him toe the line would have been the best comedy event of the season.

    The biggest problem is that most people really don't know what Trump has actually said half the time, because the media pounce on the bits they can twist to fit their desired propagated image of him as a crazy moron fascist. That's why his refusing to renew DACA, instead saying that if people want to keep it Congress needs to do what it should have done years ago and make it a law, has been turned into a circus when all he did was what Obama should have done from day one instead of sending out a memo.

    I don't trust Donald Trump because he's a narcissist, and I've had enough personal experience with that ilk to know they are never to be trusted. I am, however, willing to consider that his very narcissism is going to, in the end, result in his pursuing his own agenda, which may or may not be that of the GOP. Given what I said up top, to say he'll "destroy his own party" is a joke, because his only party is the party of Trump.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trump is a bull in the china shop of our government. Nothing he says can be trusted. He is all over the place and lies, lies, lies. Yes, he is a narcissist extraordinaire and that is his political party, the party of Trump. Our political system is in ruins and he has only been in office for seven months. The 2018 elections are much more than that in the future and who the hell knows what will happen by then. It is unbelievable how fast he is ruining this country. Warp speed. And if more of these hard right wingers get into office we will become the new Nazi Germany. Jews beware, we are on the hate list of white supremacists, maybe even ahead of the Muslims and people of color. The chanting in Charlottesville was chilling to the bone.

    Every day I wake up and he has not dropped a nuke is a good day. That day may still come.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:47 PM

    The deep rifts in both parties continue to grow, and at some point there will be open splits. I can see where the most right-wing Democrats form a party with the most leftish Republicans while the Tea Baggers and Free-to-be-Dumb Caucus hang ten on the edge of reality. The only question at this point is whether the most leftish former Democrats can dump the remains of that abusive relationship they once had with the DNC and create a new party which represents the majority of the citizenry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:24 PM

    3:47, the left won't ever have their own party if DWT and other well-meaning (I think) folks refuse to see the light that's burning through their retinas.

    Voters are too stupid to do it themselves. They need to be led. And none will lead when billions are spent to make sure they can't.

    ReplyDelete