A Prominent Psychologist Looks At The GOP Presidential Candidates-- And Hurls
|
The contenders |
Dr. Tiffany Sanders has a PhD and is a licensed psychologist and certified Chicago school psychologist. She did a brief psychological analysis of part of the Republican 2016 presidential field-- and it looks pretty piss-poor. She doesn't trust politicians to keep their word when it comes to upholding campaign promises to constituent groups once they're elected and safely in seats that rarely change. She specializes in treatment of depression, anxiety, trauma and other mental health challenges, treatment a lot of Republicans will need late next year... or treatment all of America will need the following year. Here's how she graded each of the candidates:
Jeb Bush
Positives: Confident and experienced.
Negatives: Entitled and privileged due to the presidency because of family’s lineage. Americans may feel uncomfortable due to the Iraq war fallout from his brother.
Grade: C
Ted Cruz
Positives: Organized, efficient.
Negatives: Rigid, Unknown, uncertainty of who he is and what he stands for. Lacks personality. which may make it hard for others to connect with him as an everyday American.
Grade D
Rand Paul
Positives: Rebel rouser and gutsy… willing to take risks and to openly object to those within and outside of his party.
Negatives: Aggressive, Dominating and outspoken
Grade C
Marco Rubio
Positives: Appealing, open-minded, youthful, and tries to connect with millenials and non-traditional music artists. Likely to connect with younger voters.
Negatives:
Grade B
Ben Carson
Positives: Talented, smart and savvy. Traditional conservative views that fit well with Republican party.
Negatives: Inflammatory and hostile. Doesn’t connect with those outside of the base and he is inflammatory. Beyond health care, his lack of knowledge of important governmental areas kills his presidency.
Grade D -
Carly Fiorina
Positives: Blank Slate. Can rebrand herself as an ally for main street commensurate with America
Negatives: Lacks personality and character to connect outside of traditional base. She’s likely to conjure up images of other failed republican female candidates (Sarah Palin, Michelle Backman), especially since she’s never held office.
Grade C
Mike Huckabee
Positives: Experienced, confident.
Negatives: Out of touch, polarizing.
Grade D
Scott Walker
Positives: Decisive.
Negatives: Insensitive, indifferent, watchful
Grade D
Rick Santorum
Positives: Friendly, Experienced.
Negatives: Passive, doesn't appear to have toughness needed for this position
Grade C
Donald Trump
Positives: Personality, engaging, and Smart.
Negatives: Belligerent Inflammatory, Hostile, Unrelatable
Grade D
Chris Christie
Positives: Driven
Negatives: Sneaky, Suspicious and bully
Grade F
Bobby Jindal
Positives: Composed, comfortable
Negatives: Weak, lacks assertion and aggressiveness
Grade D
No Rick Perry? By the way, in case you were wondering, Blue America backs Bernie Sanders for president.
|
The second tier |
Way to generous with the grades.
ReplyDeleteNo negatives for Rubio? I can think of a truckload.
You forgot to write that Santorum is a religious nut. A Dominionist
Trump has personality? Ummm Yeah, whatever.
Forgot to say that Carson is a traitor to his party.
What about the Dem candidates?
ReplyDeleteJohn Puma