Saturday, January 24, 2009

The judge's plea for ideological restraint in filling 4th Circuit Court vacancies would ring truer if his court wasn't a hotbed of right-wing activism

>

In the Powell Courthouse in Richmond, home of the U.S. Fourth Circuit, it often seems as if Jefferson Davis is still president. (Though never tried, he was arraigned in this building, which served as the Confederate treasury.)

by Ken

There seems to be general agreement that J. Harvie Wilkinson III is a congenial, gracious judge, in the mold of his mentor, for whom he clerked in 1972-73, Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell Jr., for whom the building in which he works is named: the Lewis F. Powell Jr. Courthouse, the Richmond seat of the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. (It is often pointed out in notes on Judge Wilkinson that Powell was a good friend of his father, Richmond businessman J. Harvie Wilkinson Jr.)

Judge Wilkinson was appointed to the Fourth Circuit in 1984 by Ronald Reagan. He served the allowed seven-year term as chief judge (1996-2003), and now is the senior-most active judge on the court.

Now, for all Judge Wilkinson's graciousness and congeniality, it is generally agreed that he played a leading role in establishing the Fourth Circuit -- long the proprietary enclave of the late Sen. Jesse Helms, who was said to at least sign off on, if not actually propose, every court appointment -- as the most conservative of the 13 circuit courts, a hotbed of right-wing judicial activism.

There was a time when the judge was thought to be a leading candidate for elevation to the Supreme Court. It's generally thought that the fact that he talked publicly about his interview with President George W. Bush ended his chance. In fact, not one but two Fourth Circuit judges were thought to be on the Bush short list: Wilkinson and his more stridently conservative colleague-rival, J. Michael Luttig. Apparently neither of them was judged to be a John Roberts, a Harriet Myers, or a Sammy Alito, and Judge Luttig didn't hang around waiting for another shot. In 2006, at the age of 51, he gave up his lifetime federal court appointment to take a job with Boeing.

Judge Luttig was replaced on the court, but the Bush regime has had a tough time getting appointments to the Fourth Circuit confirmed by the Senate. Maybe it's just a coincidence that Jesse Helms is no longer around to watch over "his" court. Probably it has more to do with Senate Democrats' growing unwillingness to rubber-stamp more of the judicial sludge Chimpy the Prez pumped into the federal judiciary. In any case, there are now a total of four vacancies on the Fourth Circuit awaiting appointments by President Obama.

Yesterday Judge Wilkinson weighed in with a Washington Post op-ed plea to the president not to "polarize" the Fourth Circuit. For anyone familiar with the court's recent history, it was a pretty astonishing exercise. Well, read for yourself:

Storming the 4th Circuit

By J. Harvie Wilkinson III
Friday, January 23, 2009; A15

So the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit is set for a takeover. Popular commentary has it that the court, on which I serve, is a fortress or bastion or citadel of conservatism. Discussion of coming changes suggests more the fruits of a successful military campaign than the result of an election giving our new president the right to nominate members to a judicial body.

This is all understandable -- to a point. Victory is exhilarating. There are no Supreme Court vacancies. With four vacancies on our 15-member court, the 4th Circuit may be the best game in town. With the new numbers in the Senate, the temptation is there to go for an ideological makeover.

Yet the tempting course would prove a misguided one. Of course there will be change, as there should be after every presidential election. While no two judges will ever agree on everything (regardless of who appointed them), the differences between appointees of Republican and Democratic administrations can be important. "I don't understand how someone so nice and so smart can be so wrong," I have told my wife. Her reply? "And did you stop to think, Jay, that they could be saying the same -- or worse -- about you?"

But these differences, however significant, are not the whole story. And ideology should not be the foremost criterion for selecting a judge. Many people may not believe it, but judges are not politicians in robes. Many of us found out long ago that we weren't all that good at politics. (I left law school to run for Congress, and the voters sent me back with a spanking.) So we became law nerds. We focused on standards of review, burdens of proof, and somnolent textual and structural discussions. And, when we were at our best, these arcana were not things unto themselves but became connected to the larger purposes of liberty and order that it is our duty to uphold and serve.

Law, then, is a medium through which judges of disparate beliefs often can find common ground. Ideological fervor is law's great antithesis. This is especially true on the courts of appeal, which, unlike the Supreme Court, do not have self-selected dockets and whose cases are often more technically challenging than ideologically flavored. Congress put federal circuit judges on panels of three for a reason -- namely, so that we could listen as well as talk, give as well as take and make the accommodations (more narrow rulings, less strident opinions) without which appellate courts cannot function. The 4th Circuit has never prided itself on ideology but on the collegiality that takes minds out of concrete and prevents personal animosities from clouding and distorting the essential act of judgment.

Courts of appeal, while inferior in constitutional rank to the Supreme Court, do matter. And it's not just because the Supreme Court cannot answer every question. Our two great oceans once marked a neat divide between domestic and foreign policy. It was easier for earlier courts to say which was which and to stay out of the latter. But the oceans are no longer the barriers they were, and the courts at all levels have become inescapably involved in matters pertaining to armed struggle and conflict. Today, the misadventures of the third branch can, like the miscalculations of elected bodies, place tens or hundreds of thousands at risk or, conversely, hasten the loss of our priceless heritage of personal liberty.

Wisdom in judging resides, now more than ever, in knowing all that we do not know, in resisting the urge to become ideologically self-assured. Perhaps, too, it resides in recognizing that persons throughout public and private life often, though by no means always, go about the tasks that society has assigned them with the same good faith that we go about our own. Perhaps it resides in understanding that judges, as quintessential generalists, occupy a vital role in this age of specialization, though it is one in which whole realms of knowledge will elude the powers of even the most incandescent judicial intellect. Wherever wisdom resides, it does not lie with the ideologues; activism of all persuasions is a trade best practiced away from the bench.

If all this marks me conservative, I wear that designation proudly. But far more than a conservative, I am an American. Our country faces deep and endemic difficulties, and the need for a successful presidency has seldom been so great. While the views I express here are solely my own, I feel certain that every judge on our small plot of public earth would bend every effort, within the limits of the laws and Constitution, to contribute to the larger good.

To be sure, there will be change and disagreement on the 4th Circuit, but I pray that coming appointments to our court will not cause the doors of communication and compromise to slam shut. A polarized 4th Circuit would bring no discernible public benefit. At the end of the day, it's not lines of battle; it's not us and them. Americans are in this together, and that includes the courts.

The writer is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.

It all sounds swell, of course. But then, there's the Fourth Circuit's record. One can understand the sensititivity of its judicial conservatives to President Obama's Lincolnesque associations; inside the Lewis F. Powell Jr. Courthouse, there seems to be a hazy illusion that Jefferson Davis is still the president. (The building now known as the Powell Courthouse served as the Confederate government's treasury, and C.S.A. President Davis -- although never tried -- was arraigned there.)

This is a court so commitedly conservative that one suspects the less conservative Clinton appointees have learned to shut up because they have so little chance of having any influence. As I understand it, the general procedure has been that, on rare occasions when a three-judge panel of the Fourth rules "wrong," the decision is bucked up to the full court to make it "right."

Of course, it could be that Judge Wilkinson is saying something different when he warns about polarization of the Fourth Circuit: that if the president appoints some really uppity judges to overturn the present conservative majority, he and his heretofore collegial colleagues are prepared to become the shrieking ideologues of our worst nightmares.
#

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At 2:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good article, and I agree completely.

A Constitutional Law professor as president! I would imagine that Obama knows a few people who would make good judges.

Getting rid of the disastrous Nixon-Reagan-Bush "judicial" branch would be a major achievement.

Impeachment and prosecution of the four surviving members of the original Supreme Court Five who violated the Constitution to appoint Bush in 2000 might be wishful thinking, but I still wish it.

 
At 2:28 PM, Blogger Koshem Bos said...

My wife has a case against a governmental agency under the 4th circuit. The need for solid proof on every small item is haunting us for the last four years (and several hundred thousands of dollars).

My view of judge Wilkinson's letter is of some kind of sedition. In any event, a demand of a judge to appoint colleges that he "likes" is by itself an outrage. Above all it demonstrates the extraconstitutional attitude of the this Confederate like circuit has with its added to its demands from the Union.

 
At 8:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

air jordan 22 xx2 pe denver nuggets edition white white metallic silver university blue tx 338

air jordan 22 xx2 pe detroit pistons edition white metallic silver varsity royal vrs 337

air jordan 22 xx2 pe seattle supersonics edition white metallic silver dp forest pro gold 335

air jordan 3 retro black cement grey 123

air jordan 3 retro black 122

air jordan 3 retro white fire red cement grey 119

air jordan 3 retro white metallic silver 118

air jordan 3 retro flip white black metallic silver varsity red 116

air jordan 3 retro ls silver sport red lt graphite orange peel 114

air jordan 4 retro mars blackmon edition white varsity red black 140

air jordan 4 retro black black lt graphite 139

air jordan 4 retro black cool grey 138

air jordan 4 retro black red 137

air jordan 4 retro cool grey 136

air jordan 4 retro white black cement 135

air jordan 4 retro white chrome 134

air jordan 4 retro white columbia blue midnight navy 133

air jordan 4 retro white green 132

 
At 8:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

air jordan 4 retro white metallic silver 131

air jordan 4 retro laser white varsity red black 129

air jordan 4 retro ls mist blue university blue gold leaf white 128

air jordan 4 retro rare air laser edition black varsity red medium grey 126

air jordan 5 v retro black silver red 158

air jordan 5 v retro silver green bean flint grey 157

air jordan 5 v retro white black fire red 156

air jordan 5 v retro white fire red black 155

air jordan 5 v retro white royal blue stealth 154

air jordan 5 v retro 3 4 high white royal maize 153

air jordan 5 v retro 3 4 high white silver black 152

air jordan 5 v retro ls army olive solar orange black 151

air jordan 5 v retro ls black university blue white 150

air jordan 5 v retro ls deep burgundy lt graphite silver 149

air jordan 5 v retro ls white emerald green grape ice 148

air jordan 5 v retro ra rare air laser edition white army olive solar orange bison 147

air jordan 6 retro oreo white black 161

air jordan 6 vi olympic edition white varsity red green bn new blue 166

 
At 8:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

air jordan 7 retro black red 183

air jordan 7 retro olympic edition 182

air jordan 7 retro white blue 181

air jordan 7 vii retro black chambray lt graphite 180

air jordan 7 vii retro black citrus varsity red 179

air jordan 7 vii retro pearl white ceramic pacific blue 178

air jordan 7 vii retro white black cardinal red bronz 177

air jordan 7 vii retro white maize black 175

air jordan 7 vii retro white varsity purple flint grey 176

air jordan 8 retro white 196

air jordan 8 retro low black red 195

air jordan 8 retro low white chrome 194

air jordan 9 low white 202

air jordan 9 retro pure white anniversary edition 1493

air jordan 9 retro grey grey patent 201

air jordan 9 retro white blue patent 200

air jordan 9 retro white grey 199

air jordan dub zero white black red 1365

 

Post a Comment

<< Home