Tuesday, June 13, 2006



On June 3rd, when we talked about the role of primaries in holding wayward Dems' feet to the fire, Paul Lukasiak left a suggestion that we look into and get to know Donna Edwards NOW (Paul's emphasis). "One reason I didn’t wind up giving to Winograd last week was that it would be 'late money' to a candidate whose chances were indistinct… With limited funds, I’d much rather send in 'early money' to establish a candidate’s credibility as soon as possible." OK, let's give it a shot. Today's awesome, grassroots, progressive Democrat is Donna Edwards.

Maryland's 4th congressional district is just east of DC, stretching from north of Germantown down past Hillcrest Heights. People think of the district as Prince George's County, although it also contains a hefty chunk of Montgomery County. It's a majority African-American district and is one of the bluest districts in the entire country. Even though it is fairly affluent by national standards, Bush still only drew 21% of the vote in both 2000 and 2004. Al Wynn has been the congressman since 1992 and he wins by margins nearly as lopsided as Gore and Kerry did.

Although overall his voting record indicates a garden variety moderate Democrat, all too often when Wynn has had to choose between Business interests and the interests of consumers and workers, he comes down firmly on the side of Big Business, especially if we're talking about the kinds of big businesses that are generous with campaign contributions. Wynn's record of consistent support for corporations is out of line with most Democrats in the House. He often votes with the Republicans on issues effecting energy industries and was one of the disgraceful batch of Democrats that joined the GOP to vote yes on the odious and blatantly unfair bankruptcy bill and FOR repealing the Estate Tax. He was also the lead Democrat in trying to gut the Shays-Meehan bill banning soft money from politics and was one of the minority of Democrats in the House who supported Bush's unjustified attack on Iraq.

In short, Wynn is a business-friendly hack with the kind of sketchy voting record you could expect from a Democrat in a red-leaning or toss-up district. His district has more government employees than any congressional district in the entire country. He never has to fear being displaced by a Republican. What he does have to fear, on September 12, is being displaced by a progressive Democrat.

Donna Edwards officially launches her campaign Thursday (June 15). In a message to residents of the 4th CD she explained why she is running against Wynn:
Some people will ask, why run against an incumbent Democrat in a Democratic district? The answer is simple. Our current representative in Congress consistently votes against the interests of ordinary Americans, casting his lot with Bush and the Republicans on such critical issues as Iraq, the industry lobbyist-written energy bill, and the bankruptcy bill.
My record is one of leadership on these issues. I listen to people, not special interests. And in Congress, I will work tirelessly for the common good.

Record? She has a record? She sure does! After realizing her career dreams lay in the direction of public interest advocacy, she co-founded and served as the first executive director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, giving battered women legal and political support they had lacked as a class. She helped pass the 1994 Violence Against Women Act, providing comprehensive funding for shelter and services for victims of domestic violence and their children, something that has been targeted for extinction by Bush and his rubber-stamp Congress. She has been very active in citizen-initiated efforts to reform the grotesquely anti-democratic campaign finance system and lobbying laws, first with Public Citizen and then as the executive director for the Center for a New Democracy. Since 2000 she's been the executive director of the Arca Foundation and she's made a great reputation for herself working with grassroots groups to support living wage campaigns, to reinforce the importance of an independent judiciary, on protecting Social Security and supporting labor and human rights internationally (the only way to guarantee that so-called "free trade" is also "fair trade").

When it comes to Wynn, who Donna supported in 1992 when he first ran, she explains her disappointment. He "was one of only a few members of the Congressional Black Caucus to support the resolution authorizing the invasion of Iraq as well as all subsequent spending. He has led efforts to bring casinos to the district. He voted for the Republican energy bill, to weaken the Endangered Species Act, drill for oil in Alaska’s protected land, and give billions of dollars in tax breaks to the oil and gas companies. He sided with the Republicans and the pharmaceutical companies on drug policy, the credit card companies on the bankruptcy bill, and just recently, he joined the telecommunications industry in supporting privatizing the Internet. The money his campaign has received reveals these new alliances. We haven’t left Albert Wynn; he’s left us."

When I spoke with Donna a couple of days ago she told me that for her to win against an entrenched incumbent like Wynn, voters have to see her as authentic and as someone who wants to represent their interests in a meaningful way. She's lived and worked in the district for 25 years and has put together a potent grassroots network of people in the district who are not content with the current leadership and who have diverse interests, from the war to the environment to transportation, development and economic issues. "Al's changed substantially since he's gotten into Congress-- and not for the better for this district." She says he was a decent state senator and had been open to listening to people, Now, for everyone I talk to familiar with Prince George's County, all I hear is that Al is a boss who gives orders and that he is deaf to the people in the district. That's certainly reflected in his voting record. Donna says there is "no level of accountability" and that she wants "Al Wynn to run on his record because his record is deplorable."

If you already understand why progressives are so heartily in favor of Ned Lamont's primary campaign against Joe Lieberman in Connecticut, you will have no trouble in understanding why progressives need to get behind Donna's campaign. When he last reported, Wynn had $377,919 on hand. Unlike most Democrats, his PAC contributions came overwhelmingly-- and not surprisingly-- from Business (79%) rather than Labor (20%)-- a disparity that has grown markedly since he was first elected. His stance against net neutrality has guaranteed that the big telecoms will continue to fund his career and his pro-corporate activities on behalf of the energy and pharmaceutical companies will keep the "contributions" rolling in. To combat that, Donna has people interested in good government, like us. Most of us don't write $2,000 checks... but there are a lot more of us than there are of them. In a race like this, small contributions, if made by enough people, will give Donna a chance to get her message out to Maryland residents, many of whom have no idea that their Democratic congressman votes with Republicans again and again and again.

She is on track to topping the $200,000 goal she set for herself by the end of this month. Unlike most grassroots candidates I've talked with, she has taken a leave of absense from her job so that she can run a full-time campaign. Talking about Marcy Winograd's valient campaign against Jane Harman, Donna says it took "a lot of courage and that Marcy was one of only a few around the country." She believes that progressives can successfully challenge incumbents like Wynn and that what voters are craving are "clarity and authenticity and not double-talk."

An old friend of mine who lives in Prince George's County is excited about the campaign. He phoned me today and told me that "everybody has Joe Lieberman; I have Al Wynn." And now he has Donna Edwards-- and hope.

First 10 donations for Donna thru the ACT BLUE Page get an autographed copy of David Sirota's brilliant new book, HOSTILE TAKEOVER. AND... we have a matching offer as well, for the next 24 hours, Zach, a fellow progressive from Portland, Oregon, has agreed to match the Donna Edwards contributions up to $1,000. That means whatever you give is doubled. Zach actually does work in a highly sensitive job for the military helping protect our country from attack. When he offered to match the donations for Donna he told me he's "just a conscientious American that sees the Progressive movement as the key to taking back the government from unaccountable corporations."


At 10:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's one Winograduate (is that a word?) and Green Party member who's just kicked 50 bucks to Donna Edwards.

Thanks for advancing the progressive cause.

And be on the lookout for Marcy Winograd in '08!

Patrick Meighan
Venice, CA

At 10:58 AM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

Thanks Patrick-- you're the first and you'll get one of Sirota's signed books in the mail. It's great and very much to the point about why we need people like Marcy and Donna and Ned running against make-believe Democrats like Harman and Wynn and Lieberman. Meanhwile, Marcy told us about her interest in a Shadow Congress for CA-36.

(And "Winograduate"... brilliant!!")

At 1:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sweet. Thanks for the Sirotage.

I've heard about Marcy's Shadow Congress idea, and I'm eagerly hoping to be involved here in CA-36.

Thanks again,

Patrick Meighan
Venice, CA

At 9:26 PM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

An old friend of mine lives in the 4th and he sent me this nore about the race between Donna and Wynn.

"My view on the 4th.

In a nutshell it is untapped potential. The most frustrating thing about the 4th is not what it is but
what is could be. Lack of leadership is one of the main factors of the district's underperformance and sad to say Rep. Al Wynn may be at the center of a lot of the problems. Rep. Wynn's role as the "puppet master" of Prince George's county seems to have stunted Prince George's County political growth. Infighting is not the exception but the rule in county politics. Rep. Wynn seems to want his hand into everything, be it state, County or Federal. Does in make sense to ask a local elected official if Rep. Wynn has approved something that the local elected official has jurisdiction over?

It seems at the end of every primary season there is talk of people growing tired of Rep. Wynn’s tactics. People say someone ought to challenge him. Maybe Donna Edwards is that someone. If she can form a local coalition to take Wynn on, then there is a chance that Ms. Edward could cut the puppetmasters strings."

At 8:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is it that Al Wynn publicly claims that he doesn't face any competition from the Edwards camp, yet his folks are tearing down Edwards signs as fast as they go up. He's desperate to marginalize his opponent and cast the spotlight away from his voting and fundraising record.

Let's not forget, he voted to keep Terri Schaivo hooked-up to a machine. He likes his voters vegetative too.

At 2:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello. I love your blog. I have lived in the MD 4th even before the redisticting when it was the former MD 5th. I am so disappionted in Wynn's voting record that I am going to throw all my support to Donna Edwards. If she means what she says she stands for then I really will have a voice in The U.S. Congress that represents not just me,but millions of ordinary,hardworking,patriotic Americans who do not like the direction of this Administration (Bush),The Congress(bought by big business lobby) or the country in general with our tax dollars unaccounted for from waste/fraud/death in Iraq to the unwillingness to rebulid New Orleans & the Gulf region. The American People are not being served by this current government. I want a return to government of,government by & most importantly government for the people...That's why I will help & vote for Donna Edwards for U.S. Congress.

At 12:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hope Donna Edwards wins. I hope she beats the pants off of Al Wynn. There needs to be a change and I think that Mr. Wynn has taken Prince Georges County for granted. I really hope that she beats the pants off of him. I am a registered voted and I am voting for Ms. Edwards. You go Donna!

At 7:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

June 20, 2007

Dear Americans,

I consider myself an Independent and live in Anne Arundel County. I have as of late been very concerned about our Senator Barbara Mikulski which is why I am trying to reach out to other Marylanders. You and others like you are in a position to help change things…even if all you do initially is to have a quiet conversation amongst yourselves.

As you know, the internet can supply us with information that we may not find on TV, newspaper or radio. It’s not all true of course, but I have no reason to doubt Gregory Levey’s article concerning our senator’s blatant remarks at a Washington DC convention in March of this year. Senator Mikulski was heard saying that she contacted the special interest group AIPAC "like everyday." Please see the salon.com article or just do a keyword search--Mikulski, Gregory Levey.

I find it particularly interesting that Mr. Levey used to work for the government of Israel. He appears to be among the growing number of Jews/Israelis who are increasingly concerned about the machinations of AIPAC. AIPAC and groups like it have succeeded in hog tying congressmen and senators across the country into supporting what it wants. This has been a gradual process over decades. Senators such as Paul Findley (founder of Council for the National Interest) have learned what happens if you don’t tow their line. The lesson of their experiences has not been lost on the current batch of representatives and senators. Does this organization which Senator Mikulski calls “like every day” truly represent what is in the best interests of Americans and Marylanders? Do we want our representatives calling special interest groups “like every day”?

While Mikulski’s behavior is certainly a reason for Republicans to rally against her, are some Republicans guilty of the same behavior? Probably. As you discuss Mikulski’s behavior with others, you may find that higher ups in your party apparatus do not share your apprehension. In fact, they may be horrified that you even raised the issue! Whether this is due to political “realism” or pragmatism on their part or because they actually buy into the same political thinking will vary. Both parties have a history of pandering to this organization because they know how skillful it is in playing both sides of the aisle. Both parties also have those who refuse to see any connection between the problems in the Middle East (which have become our problems) and US foreign policy (which is very much influenced by AIPAC). Where do you stand?

People are busy...they may not have the time or ability to go beyond the traditional sources of news. I guess I’m fortunate in that I picked up on this story…unfortunate in the sense that it is very unsettling. Please ask yourself…Is this really what we want our elected representatives to be doing? Have you ever heard of AIPAC and did you know that it had this kind of influence? Thank you for taking the time to read this.


Concerned American


Post a Comment

<< Home