Anybody But Cuomo? Well Almost Anybody

The 2020 presidential election is a long way off. Trump could be in prison by then-- or living in a dacha in Rublevka or perhaps the "golden ring" northeast of Moscow. The Democrats may be preparing to run against him but may have to face a more conventional Republican like Pence, Rubio, Cruz, Kasich-- is there another Bush yet?-- or even, by then, former Congressman Paul Ryan. All the excitement on the Democratic side is for Bernie and Elizabeth Warren... but don't expect the Republican wing of the Democratic Party to just role over and die; the establishment will do anything in its power to block either of them and there are a number of even-worse-than-Hillary candidates hoping to run-- from Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, Terry McAuliffe, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Jason Kander, Tulsi Gabbard, a Castro brother, Amy Klobuchar, Kirsten Gillibrand, Mark Warner and... believe it or not, one of the worst New Dems in Congress, rot-gut conservative p.o.c. John Delaney, has already declared he's running! Perhaps worse than any of them would be someone more corrupt than any of them, New York's horrifyingly slimy governor, Andrew Cuomo.

Writer and political activist Phillip Anderson, founder of the Albany Project, just launched a fund-raising campaign for a book he's writing about Cuomo. No one knows New York politics better than Anderson and he is absolutely certain-- as am I-- that Cuomo is definitely running for president (or vice-president). "As someone who has covered him closely for over a decade," wrote Anderson recently, "I think he'd be a terrible choice for both the nation as well as the Democratic Party, a party that is already leaving him behind. Given what I know and what I've written about him over the years, I feel compelled to sound a warning to potential primary voters about who he really is."

Anderson plans to finish his book, The Case Against Andrew Cuomo, by this time next year. He explains on his IndieGoGo.com page that his writing "has focused mainly on corruption, ethics and good governance issues as well economic and social justice." For a while he was New Media Director for the New York state Senate.

I’ve long chronicled the career of Governor Andrew Cuomo and how he has dealt with or often simply ignored many of the issues that matter greatly to New Yorkers and progressives across the country. I’ve written for years about the ethical shortcomings and scandals, the petty and vindictive feuds with progressives and progressive policy itself, the legislative cloak and dagger fights, all the progressive policy victories so often championed by Governor Cuomo that never seem to stand up to further scrutiny, and, last but hardly least, the all consuming political ambitions of a man that now wants to be the President of the United States.

All of this is why I feel compelled to write this book and share what I’ve learned over the years with all of those potential Democratic primary voters who maybe haven’t followed Andrew Cuomo as closely as I and others have. I’ve written roughly 700K words about Cuomo over the years, all with links to primary sources, and I’ve come to understand a great many things about the man. What I can tell you is that I feel he would be a terrible choice for the nation and an even worse choice for the Democratic Party.

Rest assured, Andrew Cuomo is definitely running for president and voters across the country deserve to know much more about who he really is as both a politician as well as someone who would seek to lead the Democratic Party forward in the post-Trump era.

...I have no desire whatsoever to write a hit piece. This has been true for all my years of covering Cuomo. I believe the objective facts clearly support my thesis that Cuomo is the wrong candidate at the wrong time for the wrong party. I intend to make the case against Cuomo with facts, not hyperbole, not conspiracy theories, not with bullsh*t. When the governor and his crew come after this book, and they most certainly will, they will have to engage with it on the merits of the case, not on the fact that it is anyway unfair or speculative or factually incorrect.

...The Case Against Andrew Cuomo is also more than just a book. It will also be a living, continuously updated resource on the web with links, audio and video, and commentary as it happens. The site, anybodybutcuomo.com, is nothing but a splash page at the moment, but that will change in the coming weeks and months. A large part of this effort is to build an accessible and genuinely useful resource for potential voters but also for journalists as well. I’ll be putting my many years of experience running online campaigns to build out the site but also a social media element that will put accurate, actionable and shareable information in the hands of citizens across the country.

The NYS Senate mess revisited: In "reform" GOP-style, 30 lockstep partisans + 1 jail-bound Dem = "bipartisanship"

Future Jailbirds of the New York State Senate (FJBNYSS) Pedro "El Presidente" Espada Jr. (left, under investigation for all manner of fiscal chicanery, not to mention not living in the Bronx district he represents, or in the Bronx at all) and freshman Hiram Monserrate, under indictment for slashing his girlfriend with a broken bottle, the Gang of Two who defected from the Senate Democratic conference on June 8, have parted company. Monserrate's return to the Democratic conference (explaining that he'd understood other Democrats would be joining the new "bipartisan coalition") has left the Senate deadlocked at 31-31.

"New Yorkers are running out of ways to describe Albany as a political version of clown school. Perhaps it is time, then, that they examine what the state of the state says about them. If one believes that people in a democracy get the government they deserve, then we in New York should be unable to look in the mirror without cringing."

-- Clyde Haberman, in his Monday NYT "NYC" column, "From Halls of Montezuma to Floors of Albany, Something Went Awry"

by Ken

I expect the last thing you want to hear about is the latest installment of the silly saga of the State Senate That Couldn't. Trust me, we here in the Empire State feel the same way. Except for the awkward matter of the session's worth of business left mostly unfinished when, with two weeks left in the current session, the toothless new Democratic majority was rudely overthrown, on June 8, as the Senate entered the final two weeks of the current session, by a self-styled "reform coalition" comprising the 30 GOP senators plus a Gang of Two turncoat Dems, who had been part of the original Gang of Four that in the aftermath of the historic 2008 election, which turned control of the Senate over to the Dems, threatened to vote with the Republicans.

Since we last peeked in, as noted above, one of the two renegade Dems whose defection set the stage for the Rs' putsch, Sen. Hiram Monserrate of Queens, has returned to the fold, and the Dems have discreetly dumped Malcolm Smith as their leader, even though he remains, quite awkwardly, their nominal claimant as majority leader, since of course the Dem conference has no way of electing a new majority leader, and Senator Smith is having to coexist with the de facto new conference leader, Sen. John Sampson of Brooklyn. Otherwise not much has changed since June 8, when such rudimentary work as the Senate had been doing ground to a halt.

A 31-31 DEADLOCK? GEE, THAT SEEMS UNUSUAL

It doesn't come up often, but the possibility of such a split is of course why virtually all legislative bodies have an odd number of members. And this isn't the only eventuality the state constitution fails to provide for. While in theory the state's lieutenant governor would be available to break a tie, we haven't had one of them since Lieut. Gov. David Paterson replaced departed Gov. Eliot Spitzer.

One thing we do have, in deference to the ambitions of Senator Espada, generally considered one of the least accomplished members of a body known to contain more than its fair share of human sludge, during the one rump session that the Republican-plus-Pedro "majority" managed to hold in the hours following its coup (since then, with the deposed Democrats boycotting, the Republicans have been unable to muster the 32 warm bodies needed for a quorum), it installed him as president pro tempore. Espada, nothing if not a creative constitutionalist, has advanced the novel theory that in his capacity as "El Presidente" (as his "coalition" partner, Senate Republican leader Dean Skelos called him) the state constitution entitles him to a second vote, thereby making him available both to provide the 32-member quorum and to break the 31-31 deadlock.

With the courts understandably reluctant to get involved, and the June 22 adjournment date looming, the parties are left to find a way out of the mess. The Republicans, however, so far show no inclination to compromise -- their attitude apparently being, "We stole the Senate fair and square, and we'll be damned if we're going to give it up." (Howie's had some notes yesterday on some of the sleazy machinators, notably right-wing moneybags Tom "The Golem" Golisano and sleaze-merchant GOP consultant Roger Stone, who engineered the putsch.)

Basically, the two sides' view of compromise is, as longtime Albany watcher Phillip Anderson (just recently snatched away from hisstate-politics blog TheAlbanyProject.com by the Senate Democratic leadership to spearhead an ambitious new-media operation) explained in a DailyKos post yesterday:

• The Democrats are proposing that there be a Presiding Officer and a Floor Leader, of opposite parties, alternating daily, and an evenly split six-member Conference Committee would "determine which bills and resolutions will reach the floor," with a majority vote required.

* The Republicans are offering, well, nothing. The Senate is to be controlled by the now-familiar "bipartisan" team of Dem turncoat Espada, who was installed as president pro tempore in the GOP putsch, and the GOP Senate leader, or rather majority leader, Dean Skelos. The only visible concession to either the Democratic half of the Senate or to reality is the omission of any mention of a second vote for Senator "El Presidente" Espada.

To compound the hilarity, while the Dems' proposal is designed to get the Senate functioning again on a power-sharing basis for the rest of 2009, the Republicans see their "plan" as solving the problem of Senate operations for the rest of this legislative term, through 2010. (Not much discussed in this is the traditionally huge disparity in financial and other perks between those in the majority and those in the minority in the NYS Senate. One presumes that under the GOP proposal, "coalition" members stand ready to shoulder the burden of all that extra loot.)

Of course the first impulse is to laugh at the children at play. But my favorite curmudgeon, Times metro columnist Clyde Haberman, happens to have returned to this nonsense from a visit to the D-Day landing beaches of Normandy, and as you'll notice from the start of the column reproduced above, he's not so amused. It is, not surprisingly, a fine outing from Clyde, enthusiastically commended to your attention.

#

What if more of "our" people took the cause into gov't service? Now The Albany Project's Phillip Anderson has gone to Albany

Our colleague and friend Phillip Anderson has headed for Albany.

"One can only accomplish so much from the sidelines and this opportunity to work to diminish the space between people and the government that serves them was one that I simply could not pass up."

-- The Albany Project's Phillip Anderson, in a Monday blogpost
announcing his new career undertaking

by Ken

As regular DWT readers know, I have a sentimental attachment to the strange workings of the New York State Legislature, dating back in particular to the last time the Democrats took control of the State Senate (and the Assembly as well), in the LBJ landslide of 1964 -- a tenure that, remarkably, lasted less than a year.

The problem for Albany Democrats back then was a split in the state party (between factions loyal to New York City Mayor Robert Wagner and to U.S. Senator Robert Kennedy), which made them unable to elect a leadership in either house until, finally, an exasperated Nelson Rockefeller, the imperial Republican governor at the time, ordered "his" legislators to vote with one faction to organize the two houses of the legislature. As I wrote way back when, that exercise in legislative comedy and futility figured prominently in the story of how I got into Harvard, except for this one tiny niggling hitch where as it turned out I didn't get into Harvard, the joke was on me, ha ha. I laughed about it a lot, and for a long time after. (If you think I'm going to retell that particular humiliation, you're wrong. The link is above.)

As we've had a number of occasions to chronicle, this year's Democratic takeover of the NYS Senate hasn't been exactly a thing of beauty. In the spirit of the recently passed Passover season, it's hard not to think of the Senate Democrats emerging from their 40-year servitude as a permanent minority as something like the Israelites' emergence from slavery in Egypt. It's often suggested that the Israelites' ensuing 40 years of wandering in the desert were needed to gradually rid them of their slave mentality. The Senate Democrats don't have another 40 years to spare, however; they have a host of legislative urgencies to deal with.

I confess that I don't pay intimate attention to the arcane workings of our esteemed legislature, but I have the highest regard for the people who actually make it their business to. You know they haven't taken on the job for the glamour. And I'm far from the only one who has come to depend in particular on Phillip Anderson and the fine website he's developed, The Albany Project, devoted to the inner workings of New York State government and politics.

(On a personal level, I think of Phillip as a comrade in the tiny band led by the indefatigable Mike Stark to turn the tables on Bill O'Reilly by visiting his Long Island home to offer him the sort of "accountability moment" he continues to inflict on people he thinks need to be held to account for things they've said or done. Alas, Phillip missed the grand confrontation in Billo's driveway, as he caught the train out of Penn Station in Manhattan after the one I took, and it unfortunately turned out to be a train doomed by the Long Island Railroad gods never to get farther east than Queens. None of the wild improvisations he and Mike concocted in a steady stream of mobile-phone traffic could get him any closer to Manhasset.)

Here's Phillip's announcement of his new undertaking (from the TAP blogpost noted above):

I'm writing this on a train barreling northward into the belly of the beast - Albany. All melodrama aside, I'm writing this to tell you about what I'm now doing and, perhaps most importantly, why I'm doing it. I've accepted the job of Director of New Media Communications with the New York State Senate. Before the words "selling out" cross your lips, let me tell you why I believe I am "buying in."

When we started this site in 2006, we did so because we believed that the state government in Albany was, amongst other things, dysfunctional and opaque. Over the years I and others have relentlessly critiqued the lack of transparency in the way our government goes about the business of serving those whom they were elected to represent.

The majority of the remedies needed to facilitate a more open and transparent government are policy and process based, but a great number of them are grounded in using technology. I'm happy to report that I think great strides are being made in that arena. I've written some about the work that Andrew Hoppin, the Senate's new CIO, and his team are working to open up that body using new media tools. After seeing them working up close, I feel confident in saying that they are doing a hell of a job, building some amazing tools and working their tails off to bring tons of data that belongs to the people of New York to the light of day. (The first big rollout will be the new Senate website.It will blow the doors off the current Senate site. Trust me, it'll be a quantum leap.)

So, I've decided to put my money where my mouth is. Instead of critiquing the Senate's new media efforts from the sidelines, I am signing on to make these efforts as effective and as useful to the public as they possibly be. Instead of complaining from the sidelines about an institution that has historically hidden data bought and paid for by the people of New York, I am joining the effort to free that data.

And that's why I call it "buying in." It's easy to heckle from the cheap seats. It's quite another to take some responsibility for this stuff and work like a dog to make things better. Besides working with Andrew Hoppin and his CIO team, I'll also be working with another TAP alum, our very own Brian Keeler. One can only accomplish so much from the sidelines and this opportunity to work to diminish the space between people and the government that serves them was one that I simply could not pass up.

Is it necessary to add that this seems a splendid hire by the Senate leadership? I know how frustrated progressive sympathizers working in government are by the naivete or even cluelessness they see in the pontificating we do from the sidelines, and they're right: Making government work better -- both more effectively and more accountably -- really requires actual knowledge of how government works.

Phillip explains in his post that The Albany Project has been carefully established and nurtured to be more than any one of its participants, and so is expected to continue doing the same job it's been doing -- with occasional contributions from him.

It seems to me an altogether healthy development to see more of our most respected denizens of the blogosphere venturing into actual government service. When another friend of DWT, Matt Stoller, announced in early January that he had taken a job in the House of Representatives, I wrote a post about his remarkably thoughtful explanation, for which he coined the term "rootsgap" to describe the growing gap between Democratic Party leadership and the party's actual grass roots.

The job Matt took turned out to be senior policy adviser to FL-08 freshman Rep. Alan Grayson, who was one of our favorite House candidates and has become one of our favorite House members. Alan hit the ground running, and as Howie has had frequent occasion to note, he has been a whirlwind of activity and good sense in his first months in the House. It certainly appears from the outside that Matt has made an invaluable contribution.

I don't see any reason to doubt that both Phillip and Matt will be fighting for the objectives and agendas they've championed so persuasively. At the same time they're going to know a whole lot more about the workings of government than they knew going in.


UPDATE FROM HOWIE: Another Kind of Infiltration

Ken's right about Stoller doing a magnificent job for Rep. Grayson. Several other bloggers have been working on the campaigns of some of the most exciting candidates out there. Recently Todd Beeton, who you might know from MyDD, started working with Judy Chu who's running for Hilda Solis' old House seat (CA-32), for example. But I was struck with an entirely different kind of infiltration story this week, more of a hit and run kind. A student from Brown University, Kevin Roose, transfered to a Buy Bull "college" in Virginia to write a book about the experience. Roose went to Jerry Falwell's subversive Liberty "University" and wrote The Unlikely Disciple: A Sinner's Semester at America's Holiest University.

He was determined to not mock the school, thinking it would be too easy — and unfair. He aimed to immerse himself in the culture, examine what conservative Christians believe and see if he could find some common ground. He had less weighty questions too: How did they spend Friday nights? Did they use Facebook? Did they go on dates? Did they watch Gossip Girl?

#

A new Blue Dog to replace Kirsten Gillibrand in NY-20?

Scott MURPHY for Congress from Elizabeth Benjamin on Vimeo

by Ken

Thanks to our colleaague Phillip Anderson of The Albany Project for calling attention to a post on the blog of New York Daily News political reporter Elizabeth Benjamin, "Scott Murphy's Challenge," in which she notes about the Democratic challenger in the March 31 special congressional election in NY-20 to replace now-Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand:

"Murphy also said he plans to be a Blue Dog, just like Gillibrand when she represented the 20th, and has already applied for membership to the caucus."

Benjamin, reporting on "an event in Albany this weekend at which he was formally endorsed by Gillibrand and another local pol, freshman Rep. Paul Tonko," notes that Senator Gillibrand --

heaped praise on Murphy at Saturday's event, saying his experience as a venture capitalist (or in her words, "entrepreneur") makes him uniquely qualified to be a congressman at a time when the economy is tanking.

She also noted that he married into a Washington County dairy family and knows how to milk a cow, which "matters in this district, matters in upstate New York."

Murphy is taking his cues from Gillibrand and hewing closely to her pre-Senate ideology on hot-button issues like gun control. He called himself a "strong supporter of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms," adding that while he agrees it's crucial to keep guns out of the hands of children and the mentally ill, "we also need to respect the rights of law-abiding citizens."

If that's the bad news, then the also-bad (or maybe not-so-bad, depending on how you look at it) news is that Murphy doesn't seem to stand too terribly much of a chance.

He's largely unknown in the 20th CD, particularly compared to his GOP opponent, Assembly Minority Leader Jim Tedisco, who has served for more than two decades in the Legislature, and the accelerated special election timetable makes raising his name recognition that much harder.

(You can see from the video below [the one I've posted it at the top of this post] that even seasoned Democrats have a bit of trouble recalling Murphy's surname from time to time).

For the record, The Albany Project's devtob offers a more glass-half-full view of the event, and in general of "the excellent Scott Murphy" -- there is, after all, plenty to dislike about GOP candidate Tedisco.

#

Former NYS Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno is indicted

Joe Bruno (right) and his lawyer, William Dreyer, enter the federal courthouse in Albany, where Bruno was indicted today on eight counts.

by Ken

Ooh, that Rod Blagojevich! Here we New Yorkers are, thinking that when it comes to the most dysfunctional state government in an actual functioning U.S. state, we're sitting pretty. Now, thanks to that damned Governor Blago, we have to scramble.

Okay, take this, Illinois! It was hardly unexpected, but today former State Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno was indicted on eight counts of corrupt dealings. Here's how the Albany Times Union's online report starts:

Bruno indicted
Grand jurors accuse Bruno of trading power for money

By BRENDAN J. LYONS AND JAMES M. ODATO, Staff writers
Last updated: 2:56 p.m., Friday, January 23, 2009

ALBANY -- A federal grand jury today indicted former state Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno on felony charges alleging he used his position to extract $3.2 million in private consulting fees from clients who sought to purchase his influence.

An 8-count indictment handed up today charges the 79-year-old Republican with corruption charges that carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

Bruno pleaded not guilty at his arraignment in U.S. District Court in Albany and was released without bail.

In a 35-page indictment filed at noon, grand jurors asked Bruno to forfeit much of his fortune and assets for his alleged crimes.

Bruno, who reigned for years as one of the most powerful lawmakers in New York, is charged with using his office to deprive the public of the honest services of government.

The indictment marks the culmination of a three-year FBI investigation into the shadowy public and private dealings of the Brunswick politician who rose through the ranks of state government and became arguably the Capital Region's most iconic political leader.

Bruno retired from his state Senate seat in July after 32 years in legislative service. He is now a lobbyist, chief executive of friend Kay Stafford's Latham company, CMA Consulting.

The indictment lays out Bruno's alleged deceptions, such as not disclosing his dealings to ethics authorities. It describes "schemes" involving use of his public office to do business with labor unions, who he steered to Wright Investors Service, a Connecticut firm that paid him nearly $1.4 million from 1994 to 2006, and McGinn, Smith & Co., an Albany investment firm that paid Bruno $632,116 from 1993 to 2005. The firms ended up receiving investment advisory fees or brokerage fees paid by the union benefit funds.

Etc. etc. etc.

On New York political matters I turn to The Albany Project. Here's what Phillip Anderson has had to say so far:

Reading The Bruno Indictment

I'm reading through the indictment filed by the feds against Joe Bruno. It's 35 pages long and describes corruption going back to 1993 - before he even became Majority Leader. All the familiar names are there -- Abbruzzese, McGinn, Wright Investor's Service as well as most of the major unions in the state. The indictment seems to be pretty exhaustive and the numbers cited are simply enormous. Let's just say that it's easy to understand why Uncle Joe was so adamant about not releasing a list of his sham "consulting" firm's clients. These entities were paying him fabulous sums of money and he was going to great lengths to hide these payments, all described in detail in the indictment itself.

It's interesting reading, to say the least. I've uploaded the PDF here, so you can take a look as well.

Happy hunting.

Of course Bruno hasn't been tried yet, but we're looking at a pretty damning indictment. I guess I won't be surprised if it turns out that he was indeed a crook, but I have to say -- and I know this is going to sound preposterous, even embarrassing -- I have kind of a soft spot for the guy.

Maybe it has something to do with the bozos I mentally bracket him with. Like when I think of NYS Senate majority leaders, I think of the great Earl Brydges (1966-72, succeeding the last Democratic majority leader, Sen. Joseph Zaretzki, whose entire tenure was limited to part of 1965, as I wrote about here awhile ago), Warren Anderson (1973-88 -- and weren't those 16 years chock full of fun and good government?), and Ralph Marino (1989-94). Wow, what a bunch! Maybe I'm the only one who thought so, but Bruno actually seemed to evolve in office, and to sort of sometimes think about issues, and even grow with regard to some.

Plus, during the years when Senator Bruno, Republican Gov. George Pataki, and Democratic Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver were the famous "three men in a room" who basically were the state government, it was hard not to feel that Bruno was the most reasonable and reachable. Again, I'm speaking comparatively, but still.

#