Sunday, June 12, 2011

Sunday Classics: Gotta dance -- Bach the suite-maker, Part 3

>


János Starker (born 1924) plays the Prelude of the Bach Cello Suite No. 3 at a recital in Tokyo, July 29, 1988. For a markedly different approach, considerably less inclined to make songlike phrases out of the writing, watch Mstislav Rostropovich. (We'll be hearing his performance later.)

"One night in my studio it dawned on me that in the year of Orwell, 1984, I will be sixty years old. For pianists, violinists, and especially conductors, sixty denotes a possible time of maturity. For cellists it represents the outer limits of physical ability to handle the instrumental demands."
-- János Starker (February 1984), in the booklet
with his 1983-84 Sefel recording of the Bach cello suites

by Ken

Before we proceed, I think we should note that when János Starker wrote his 1984 booklet account of his long relationship with the Bach cello suites, dreading the imminent arrival of his 60th birthday, he probably wasn't imagining giving the performance we saw at the top of this post (several weeks after his 64th birthday), let alone that he would make yet another complete recording of the complete Bach, the one from which we've heard a number of movements in Part 1 (Friday night) and Part 2 (last night) of this series, in 1992!

In the course of Parts 1 and 2 we took a quick look at five of the basic dance types that occur most frequently in Bach's suites (or partitas, or overtures, forms that were essentially interchangeable in his time), bearing in mind that he wrote them for orchestra, for keyboard solo (notably the six French Suites, the six English Suites, and the six keyboard partitas), and for solo cello, violin, and lute. Friday night we test-drove the sarabande and bourrée, and last night the allemande, courante, and gigue.

Of the dance movements that Bach incorporated frequently in his suites, I think the only ones we haven't touched on are the gavotte and menuet. This was partly because I think they're more likely to be familiar to listeners for their continued use in the classical era, but also because we actually didn't need them for our destination today. With the weighting of the examples toward the six cello suites, you may have guessed that that was our destination, and I even let slip a hint Friday night that it's the C major Suite, No. 3, toward which we were headed.

It's almost impossible to generalize about the format of Bach's many suites for diverse instruments (orchestra, keyboard, solo violin, solo cello, lute), but generally there's a prelude of some sort followed by a selection of dance movements, typically five. He also felt free to include a "ringer" -- an unexpected nondance movement, the most dramatic instance being the monumental Chaconne of the Violin Partita No. 2. The Cello Suite No. 3 could hardly be more expected in its formal plan, with six movements: prelude, allemande, couratne, sarabande, bourrée(s), gigue.

I suppose, though, that we should say something about those preludes, though here again it's impossible to generalize. Bach after all could do anything he damn pleased -- including, for example, starting off by dashing of a descending C major scale. (Watch János Starker's performance of the Prelude to No. 3 above.)

One thing I thought we might do is the same thing we did with a couple of the dance-type suite movements: listen first to a Stokowski orchestral arrangement alongside the Bach original. So why don't we do that?

BACH: Partita for Solo Violin No. 3 in E, BWV 1006:
No. 1, Preludio


orchestral version arr. Stokowski
Symphony Orchestra, Leopold Stokowski, cond. Capitol/EMI, recorded August 1957

original version for solo violin
Ruggiero Ricci, violin. Westminster/MCA, recorded c1966


FOR MORE ON THE PRELUDES, AND MORE ABOUT
AND OF BACH'S CELLO SUITE NO. 2, CLICK HERE

#

Labels: , , ,

Friday, April 27, 2007

Mstislav Rostropovich (1927-2007): He was the greatest cellist ever, one of the leading musical presences of his time, and a crusader for good

>


Mstislav Rostropovich (1927-2007) was 80 and in poor health, so this morning's news of his death in Moscow isn't a total shock. (The shock was seeing that Wikipedia already had his death incorporated!) Nor is the gap left by his passing news, since he had of course been retreating for some time from his once-central position in international musical life. Still, the size of the gap is enormous--as cellist, conductor, genial spirit, and humanitarian.

I heard him described on the radio this morning as the greatest cellist since Casals. With all respect to Casals--a great musician, conductor, and humanitarian--Rostropovich was in another league as a cellist, able to produce any kind of sound on the instrument from a whisper to a bronze roar, with a vast range of colors and shading. The only cellist I'm aware of who might have been in his class is the tragically short-lived Emanuel Feuermann (1902-1942).

I'm listening now to one of Rostropovich's numerous recordings of the greatest piece written for his instrument, Dvorak's B minor Cello Concerto. It's the only version of his I have on CD--the 1985 Erato one with Seiji Ozawa and the Boston Symphony, coupled with Tchaikovsky's Rococo Variations--but I like it a lot.

Earlier, on the subway, I listened to EMI's CD coupling of the famous 1969 recordings of the Beethoven Triple Concerto (with Herbert von Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic) and the Brahms Double Concerto (with George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra) with Rostropovich and his great colleagues violinist David Oistrakh and (in the Beethoven) pianist Sviatoslav Richter.

Because we in the West knew Oistrakh, Rostropovich, and Richter as their country's foremost violinist, cellist, and pianist, we tended to assume they must be great pals and play together all the time. They weren't and didn't, of course. Although as far as I knew they all not only respected but liked one another, they were very different sorts of musicians and led very different sorts of musical lives. Still, it's fascinating to hear them scale their playing styles and personalities down to a common idiom for the eerily yet hauntingly self-effacing Beethoven concerto. In this titanic performance of the Brahms, Oistrakh and Rostropovich (who both recorded the piece with various other partners) sound more like their full-blooded selves and still manage to partner each other beautifully.

There's actually a fair amount of Rostropovich on video, but probably tonight I'll pop out the precious video documentation of a collaboration with Richter. At the 1964 Edinburgh Festival, at a single concert that started at midnight (don't ask me!) and was televised live by the BBC, they played all five Beethoven cello sonatas, and the concert is now available as an EMI DVD. It's black and white and mono, but something special, even though again this was in many respects an odd pairing. In fact, the audio recording of the Beethoven sonatas they made for Philips, presumably around this same time, which I happen to love, has always been controversial. Basically Richter seems to have decided to make himself a "Rostropovich-compatible accompanist."

Rostropovich only recorded the Beethoven sonatas once (and did the two sonatas of Brahms in 1984 with another unlikely partner, Rudolf Serkin, in what turned out to be a splendid collaboration), and waited till 1991 to record in full the cello's greatest legacy: Bach's set of six suites for unaccompanied cello. In the invaluable video commentary that accompanies the video edition of the Bach suites, which is part commentary on the music and part musical autobiography (including, for example, a wonderful recounting of his first meeting with his idol, Casals), he acknowledges his extreme uneasiness about finally tackling this project, which he had delayed as long as he could. He'd been playing the Bach suites all his musical life, of course, but committing them to record was something else again.

He secluded himself for several weeks in rural France, at the Basilique Sainte-Madeleine in Vezelay, and went to work. I'm sorry it was a church he picked for the recording site, because the acoustics seem to me less than ideal for the music. Nevertheless, the locale clearly stimulated him, and the absorbing and often riveting performances are what he intended to leave us, and the commentaries--with R often illustrating at the piano (which he plays quite well)--are wide-ranging and consistently absorbing. The performances are also available on CD, but be warned that they contravene his strict stricture about the importance of maintaining Bach's order of the suites (for the obvious reason that in most performances, these included, you just can't get Suites Nos. 4-6 on one CD).

Since the cello repertory is too limited to contain the interests of so vast a spirit, Rostropovich (like Casals) drifted into conducting, and had a long and successful run at it, including his long stint (1977-94) as music director of Washington's National Symphony Orchestra, which made him a larger presence in this country than he might otherwise have been. In that time, and until the fall of the Soviet Union, Rostropovich and his wife, the distinguished soprano Galina Vishnevskaya, were exiles, having been stripped of their citizenship.

Their problems with the Soviet regime came to a head in the '70s. As Wikipedia explains it:

Rostropovich fought for art without borders, freedom of speech and democratic values, resulting in a reprimand from the Soviet regime. His friendship with Alexander Solzhenitsyn and his support for dissidents led to official disgrace in the early 1970s. He was banned from several musical ensembles and his Soviet citizenship was revoked in 1978 because of his public opposition to the Soviet Union 's restriction of cultural freedom. Rostropovich left the Soviet Union in 1974 with his wife and children and settled in the United States.

When Rostropovich and Vishnevskaya became nonpersons in the Soviet Union, Slava was quoted as saying that what perhaps distressed him most was the official purging of the Bolshoi Opera history and roster to exclude his wife, who had been one of the company's leading soloists for two decades.

One of the first things the Rostropoviches did when they were able to return to their homeland was to establish the Vishnevskaya-Rostropovich Foundation (VRF) for the Health and Future of Children [above], whose mission was announced as "to improve the health care of children in the Russian Federation and other Newly Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union."


PS: ROSTROPOVICH AND BRITTEN, AND A NICE ANECDOTE

I couldn't think of a way of working in a reference to a Rostropovich recording for which I have a special fondness: the Schubert Arpeggione Sonata with Benjamin Britten accompanying on the piano. (It was actually written for the arpeggione, an odd and short-lived six-stringed instrument, with frets like a guitar but played with a bow like a cello.) It's not all that consequential a piece, and yet in the hands of two musicians of this caliber it takes wing.

Now, having stumbled across the blog "The Overgrown Path," I feel especially remiss in omitting mention of Rostropovich's relationship with Britten (1913-1976), who was not just among the handful of the greatest composers of the 20th century, and a singularly fine pianist and conductor, but one of the century's most inspired and inspiring humanists. It's one of the signature qualities of Britten and his partner, tenor Peter Pears, that the better musicians and human beings seemed to find their way to their Aldeburgh Festival. It was for Rostropovich that Britten composed his Cello Symphony, Cello Sonata, and three solo cello suites.

"Pliable," the blogger of "The Overgrown Path" (who notes that in the 1970s he was EMI’s international marketing manager, under division director Peter Andry--who, by the way, was responsible for bringing the Soviet superstars together for those recordings of the Beethoven Triple Concerto and Brahms Double Concerto), also shares this anecdote about Rostropovich:

For me, an incident away from the recording studio showed the difference between Rostropovich and other superstar musicians. We decided to celebrate the release of the Haydn record [of the two cello concertos] by inviting Slava to the EMI offices in 1977 to present him with the lavish EMI-Pathé gatefold edition of the concertos. The visit summed up Slava’s approach to life - energy, enthusiasm, passion, but above all a love for music and a love for the human race. He made sure he spent time talking to all the background staff who rarely came into contact with the artists, yet alone superstars. We were working with many other great musicians at the time, but the prospect of Herbert von Karajan visiting our offices, yet alone hugging a secretary was unthinkable.

Labels: ,

Thursday, June 12, 2003

[6/12/2011] Gotta dance -- Bach the suite-maker, Part 3 (continued)

>

The video version of Mstislav's 1991 recording of the Bach cello suites is all available on YouTube, but isn't embeddable. The performances are fascinating but in some ways problematic. Probably the best part of the video presentation, though, is Rostropovich's commentaries, ruminations, and demonstrations filmed during the recording project.


WHY DON'T WE PROCEED BY JUST LISTENING
TO SUITE NO. 3 STRAIGHT THROUGH?


In that 1984 booklet essay, János Starker has fond memories of making his famous Mercury recording of the Bach suites, his second complete traversal. (He had recorded four of the six suites for Period in 1951, and in 1984 honestly couldn't recall why Nos. 2 and 5 weren't recorded. Then in 1958, when he was recording for EMI, he did a complete cycle that, inexplicably was never released in the U.S. (We're going to hear a few excerpts from it.) Starker made a number of truly splendid recordings for Mercury, including the set of Bach suites. Here's what he had to say about the project:
IN 1965 Mercury Records, with a triumverate at its apex, Wilma Cozart, Robert Fine, and Harold Lawrence, asked me to record the definitive (?) version of the Bach Cello Suites. These three people, whose contributions to the record industry have rarely if ever been matched, guaranteed the standards I was aiming at, and I felt I was ready. Definitive Version? Nonsense. High level? Yes. I was and am satisfied with the results.

As well he should have been. Here's the Third Suite from that set.

BACH: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3 in C, BWV 1009
i. Praeludium [0:00]
ii. Allemande [4:10]
iii. Courante [7:04]
iv. Sarabande [9:14]
v. Bourrée I-II [12:31]
vi. Gigue [15:42]

János Starker, cello. Mercury, recorded 1965


NOW THERE'S ANOTHER SCHOOL OF THOUGHT . . .

In 1991, after ducking the challenge for decades, decades in which he was clearly the world's dominant cellist, at a time when the competition was a lot stiffer than it is now, Mstislav Rostropovich (1927-2007) finally recorded the Bach cello suites, for video as well as audio. In the absorbing video presentation that accompanies the video version, virtually a musical autobiography and testament (really, no music lover can afford not to see it), he voices disapproval of the common cellist habit of making melodies out of the note and chord progressions with which Bach constructed the suites' preludes in particular.

It's not so much the heaving and hauling, the pushing and pulling, the stretching and squeezing, or even the rhetorical exaggerations and flourishes that he objects to. It's his conviction that the this sing-songy format misses the point of the music, which is a (for him) mesmerizing pattern of building and releasing and otherwise playing with harmonic tension. This sounds abstract but is much less so as he demonstrates -- not with his cello, but at the piano.

I think the point will be made by listening to Rostropovich's Prelude to the Third Suite alongside the performance from the 1992 Starker-BMG recording, from which we've heard a number of the dance movements from the cello suites. They had become if anything more vivid and zestful in the 1992 recording, but there's no question that once you've been alerted to the Rostropovich objection, you can't help noticing that the 1992 Prelude is even more extreme than Starker's earlier recordings.

BACH: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3 in C, BWV 1009:
No. 1, Preludio


Mstislav Rostropovich, cello. EMI, recorded March 1991
János Starker, cello. BMG, recorded June 1992

"Very French" is how I recall Rostropovich describing (not fondly) this way of playing the Bach suites. I'm sure it didn't carry much weight with him that the dance-based suite is by origin French. It did occur to me that some of my favorrite recordings of the suites are by a storied line of great French cellists: Pierre Fournier (1906-1985, DG Archiv), Paul Tortelier (1914-1990, EMI), and Maurice Gendron (1920-1990, Philips). They do all do what Rostropovich complains about, they nevertheless give quite lovely -- and quite different -- performances, which I thought it might be fun to hear.

BACH: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3 in C, BWV 1009:
No. 1, Preludio


Pierre Fournier, cello. DG Archiv, recorded Dec. 21-22, 1960
Paul Tortelier, cello. EMI, recorded Apr. 14-26, 1982
Maurice Gendron, cello. Philips, recorded 1964

Before we move on to the other movements, here's something different: the Prelude played an octave higher on the viola. Violists have so little repertory they can call their own, and the Bach suites adapt readily enough to their instrument that they frequently appropriate them, and a number of violists have recorded them. This is a version I happen to have on CD.

BACH: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3 in C, BWV 1009:
No. 1, Preludio


Barbara Westphal, viola. Bridge, recorded c1998


THE REST OF THE SUITE

A REMINDER OF WHERE TO FIND OUR
SUITE MOVEMENT PREVIEW SAMPLES


Sarabande, bourrée: Part 1
Allemande, courante, gigue: Part 2

ii. ALLEMANDE

Mstislav Rostropovich, cello. EMI, recorded March 1991
János Starker, cello. EMI, recorded May 22-23, 1958

iii. COURANTE

Gaspar Cassado, cello. Vox, recorded 1957
Mstislav Rostropovich, cello. EMI, recorded March 1991

iv. SARABANDE

Gaspar Cassado, cello. Vox, recorded 1957
Mstislav Rostropovich, cello. EMI, recorded March 1991

v. BOURÉE I-II

Yuli Turovsky, cello. Chandos, recorded Aug. 19-22, 1991
János Starker, cello. EMI, recorded May 22-23, 1958

vi. GIGUE

Gaspar Cassado, cello. Vox, recorded 1957
Yuli Turovsky, cello. Chandos, recorded Aug. 19-22, 1991


FINALLY, I THOUGHT WE'D HEAR THAT RECORDING
STARKER MADE WITH HIS 60TH BIRTHDAY LOOMING


The recording was produced, by the way, by Harold Lawrence, one of the members of that old Mercury "triumvirate" Starker wrote about with such respect and affection in his booklet essay.

BACH: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3 in C, BWV 1009
i. Praeludium [0:00]
ii. Allemande [4:04]
iii. Courante [8:03]
iv. Sarabande [11"06]
v. Bourrée I-II [15:29]
vi. Gigue [18:51]

János Starker, cello. Sefel, recorded in Bloomington, Indiana, 1983-84


AND MORE-THAN-FINALLY, HERE'S A SPECIAL
BONUS: THE THIRD SUITE ON THE GUITAR


Not just on the guitar, but a guitar in the hands of the great Andrés Segovia.

BACH-SEGOVIA: Suite for Solo Cello No. 3, BWV 1009,
transposed from C major to A major

i. Praeludium
ii. Allemande
iii. Courante
iv. Sarabande
v. Bourrée I-II
vi. Gigue

Andrés Segovia, guitar. American Decca/DG, recorded in New York, April 1961


RETURN TO THE BEGINNING OF THE POST
#

Labels: , , ,