Thursday, September 24, 2020

In Minnesota, The GOP Is Running On Bigotry And Against Masks And Wayfair

>

 


Minnesota is closing in on 100,000 COVID cases and will get there before election day.

Despite a significant and ongoing investment in the state by the Trump campaign, the margin between Trump and Biden continues to grow-- against Trump. The Real Cleat Politics polling average shows Biden up 10.2%-- 51.6% to 41.4%, which has got to be a big letdown for Trump since Hillary barely beat him in 2016-- 1,367,716 (46.44%) to 1,322,951 (44.92%). On the kind of electoral map Trump understands better than numbers, he looks like he could have won the state because he did so well in rural areas and the map is pretty red:

The Minnesota poll by Langer that came out yesterday-- from the Washington Post and ABC News-- shows Trump losing spectacularly among likely voters-- 41% to Biden's 57%. That's a 16 point margin.

Maybe Trump thinks the way to flatten that curve-- since he sure ain't flattening' the other one-- is to use his own brand of bigotry, racism and misogyny to attack Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. Minnesotans, however, enjoy a good fight and Ilhan sure bested Trump on their latest match. She delivered a pretty devastating comeback to The Donald after his dog-whistle attack on her Somali origins at his Pennsylvania rally Tuesday night. Trump’s racist fans jeered Omar’s name when he mentioned it outside Pittsburgh, apparently making him feel bold enough to say: "She’s telling us how to run our country. How did you do where you came from? How was your country doing?"

Jamie Ross for the Daily Beast: "Omar, who was born in Somalia but left as a kid and is a naturalized U.S. citizen, hit back: 'Firstly, this is my country and I am a member of the House that impeached you. Secondly, I fled civil war when I was 8. An 8-year-old doesn’t run a country even though you run our country like one.' As the pièce de résistance, she posted the Mean Girls gif of Regina George asking the pertinent question: 'Why are you so obsessed with me?'"

Minnesota elected a Democratic governor and a Democratic state House, where they told 75 seats to the Republicans' 55. (There are also 4 "New Republicans.") But the State Senate is a problem. The GOP has 35 seats to the Democrats' 32. The state party's and the DLCC's efforts to flip the Senate are being helped by the Minnesota Republican Party is veering off-track and into conspiracy theory and fascism territory.

Writing for the Star-Tribune, Stephen Montemayor reported that "At least a half-dozen Minnesota Republicans running for state legislative seats in November have promoted the sprawling, false QAnon conspiracy that claims Satanists and pedophiles run the government and that COVID-19 is part of a plot to steal the election. Once a fringe fiction, QAnon is quickly seeping into mainstream Republican politics as scores of GOP candidates across the country express support for it. Among them are six candidates endorsed by the Minnesota Republican Party for state House and Senate seats from the Iron Range to the metro suburbs. In some cases, Minnesota candidates have used official social media pages for their campaigns to post slogans in support of QAnon, which the FBI has warned is a conspiracy theory that could inspire domestic terrorism or violence. Some posts include references to a 'Great Awakening' or 'The Storm,' a prophesied reckoning in which elected officials, journalists and other members of 'the Deep State' are rounded up for imprisonment or execution."

One of them, Julie Dupré, the official Republican Party challenger to state Sen. Melisa Franzen in the suburbs southwest of the Twin Cities, called QAnon "a really great information source."

In Trump's first public comments on Q-Anon, he said-- conflating himself with the country-- "I heard that these are people that love our country."
Melissa Moore, a state delegate for the GOP party since 2016, is running for a House seat that covers St. Louis Park and Hopkins. She has posted references to the Great Awakening and popular QAnon phrases like “WWG1WGA,” an acronym for “Where we go one, we go all” on her campaign Facebook page. She also maintains two Twitter accounts, one of which describes her as a #DigitalSoldier and includes frequent QAnon references. That account has more than 1,000 followers and follows 1,450 other accounts-- many of which support QAnon.

Moore did not respond to messages seeking comment. In a recent AP interview, she said she liked following QAnon, describing it as “an exciting movement that opens our minds to different possibilities of what’s going on, of what’s really happening in our world today.”

In a since-deleted video shot outside a church and later posted to Twitter last December, Gary Heyer, the GOP-endorsed candidate for a Minnesota House seat in Bloomington, described “inviting all of the churchgoers to partake in the great awakening.” In the video, preserved by the nonprofit research group Media Matters for America, congregants drove past a sign with “Q” and “Patriots Unite” emblazoned on its front. The sign included a disclaimer that it was paid for by “Gary Heyer for Congress” and included a hyperlink that now redirects to the website affiliated with Heyer’s state House campaign.

On Twitter, Heyer follows nearly 80 accounts that express support for QAnon in their handles or bios. Heyer, who campaigned for Ron Paul in 2012 and traveled as a delegate to that year’s Republican National Convention, declined to comment on QAnon in an interview.

But he predicted that herd immunity would be a pathway out of the COVID-19 pandemic and vowed that, if elected, he would advocate for Minnesota to become the financial technology capital of the U.S. Heyer advocates for cryptocurrency and said he is “working with some different folks right now but I can’t really discuss all the details.”

Julie Buria, a Mountain Iron City Council member, is running for a state House seat. Buria sparked controversy this summer when she posted a graphic image comparing the Holocaust to Minnesota’s response to the pandemic. Minnesota GOP party leaders later said that Buria had apologized but, days later at a council meeting, Buria claimed that she was forced to apologize and did nothing wrong.

Earlier this year, according to images reviewed by the Star Tribune, Buria tweeted several references to QAnon. She tweeted a May 30 report from a QAnon site purporting to show “Black Patriots” protecting a lone police officer from “Antifa Terrorists.” In April, she retweeted a woman who wrote “If only people knew how many Satanists are actually in the government” and “Pedophilia is going to bring the whole house of cards down.”

Elizabeth Bangert, a child-care center owner running for the state Senate in the Mankato area, frequently posts videos recorded from inside her vehicle to her Minnesota Citizen Lobbyist page on Facebook. Bangert has also shared posts in support of QAnon and “the great awakening” on the social media platform, according to a screenshot of her personal account shared with the Star Tribune. About a dozen of the 56 accounts she follows on Twitter allude to QAnon.

Bangert did not respond to requests for comment. In her Facebook videos, references to human trafficking-- a frequent theme of QAnon messaging-- are prevalent.

“I’m going to go ahead and tell you that if you think that some form of T-R-A-F-F-I-C-K-I-N-G isn’t happening in America or hasn’t been concealed for decades if not longer, then you’ve been duped,” Bangert said in a July 13 video claiming the Wayfair online home furnishings store is involved in child sex-trafficking.

In a statement, a Wayfair spokesperson said, “There is, of course, no truth to these claims.”

Bangert also believes in the Operation Lockstep Theory that COVID-19 is a plot by global elites to control the population. The theory distorts a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report on how the world could be affected by scenarios that included a global pandemic. It falsely frames the report as an operation manual of sorts to create a police state via a manufactured virus.

Other videos have seen her proudly flout the state’s face mask requirement in public spaces.

In a July 5 tweet in response to Walz asking Minnesotans to don masks over the holiday weekend, Bangert wrote: “You will be removed from office for your treasonous acts, for our safety.”

Joe Thalman, running for a Minnesota House seat that covers parts of the southwest metro suburbs, concluded his remarks at a candidate forum hosted by the League of Women Voters in Bloomington last month by saying, “We’re seeking truth and justice and where we go one, we go all,” the QAnon catch phrase.

The Minnesota Republican Party did not respond to messages seeking comment.





Labels: , , ,

Friday, July 24, 2020

Hearing AOC's Inspiring Floor Speech About Ted Yoho's And Roger Williams' Assault On Her Shouldn't Be Just Read-- It Should Be Heard

>





AOC's speech should stand alone and there is no man nor any woman who should not hear it in full. In the words of New Yorker editor David Remnick, in was a rare example of the kind of "rhetorical dynamism long ago vanished from the hallways and chambers of the United States Congres." She called out a boor and a bully in front of all his friends and colleagues in Congress, someone who should have never have been elected to Congress to begin with, someone who voted-- along with just 3 of his vicious extremist collaborators-- against making lynching a crime. We covered the confrontation before her speech.

Remnick noted that Yoho's pretend-"apology" and lack of remorse by quoting his own speech: "No one was accosted, bullied, or attacked. This was a brief policy discussion, plain and simple, and we have our differences... The fact still remains, I am not going to apologize for something I didn’t say." Remnick noted that "With confused logic, Yoho invoked his wife and daughters and said that he objected to Ocasio-Cortez’s views because he had experienced poverty when he was young. 'I cannot apologize for my passion or for loving my God, my family, and my country,' he said. It was unclear who had asked him to apologize for his religious faith, his patriotism, or his love of family, but he was ardent all the same. In all, Yoho’s was at best a deflective, jittery performance that was in no wise enhanced by his spokesman, Brian Kaveney, who e-mailed the Washington Post to say that Yoho 'did not call Rep. Ocasio-Cortez what has been reported in The Hill or any name for that matter. . .  Instead, he made a brief comment to himself as he walked away summarizing what he believes her policies to be: bullshit.'"
The politics of our moment are dominated by a bully of miserable character, a President who has failed to contain a pandemic through sheer indifference, who has fabricated a reëlection campaign based on bigotry and the deliberate inflammation of division. His language is abusive, his attitude toward women disdainful. Trump is all about himself: his needs, his ego, his self-preservation. Along the way he has created a Republican Party in his own image. Imitators like Ted Yoho slavishly follow his lead. On the House floor Thursday, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez exemplified a different sort of character. She defended not only herself; she defended principle and countless women. And all in just a few short minutes on the floor of the House of Representatives.
The coordinated forces of hard core conservatism and special interests just an immense sum of money trying to destroy AOC in her own district. New York has 27 congressional districts and quite a bit of money is being spent in contested primaries-- like the one that saw AOC ally Jamaal Bowman defeat Pelosi ally Eliot Engel-- and in red hot general election contests-- like the one in Syracuse where Trump enabler John Katko is desperately clinging to a seat that has slipped out of his grasp. Yet known of the other 26 districts witnessed the amount of vitriol and hatred-- nor the amount of cold hard cash-- thrown against AOC. Nearly $16 million was spent in NY-14, far more than anywhere else in NY. They put in a life-long Republican and Wall Street whore, Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, pretending to be a Democrat to run against her and she raised over $3 million from fellow fat cats. One, Dan Backer, the founder of both the Stop Hillary PAC and the sleazy Trumpist Great America PAC and treasurer of the Conservative Action Fund, the Citizen Revolt SuperPAC, the Special Operations Speaks PAC and the Tea Party Leadership Fund, started a PAC devoted specifically to defeat AOC-- Stop the AOC PAC. Although Backer put over $30,000 of his own into it and got a couple of cronies to write checks-- like Shaun McCutcheon-- the attempt to smear Ocasio-Cortez fell flat. AOC won the primary-- overwhelmingly:
AOC- 72.6%
Michelle Caruso Cabrera- 19.5%
Badrun Khan- 5.4%
Sam Sloan- 2.5%
Goal ThermometerIn the general election, she will face Caruso Cabrera again, this time running on the Serve America Movement Party, as well as the official GOP/Conservative Party nominee John Cummings, who has raised $3,291,224. But these nefarious political and economic forces have largely moved on from NY-14 to MN-05, to take aim, as we noted last week, at AOC-ally Ilhan Omar. Millions are being funneled into Minneapolis to try to do to Ilhan what they failed to do to AOC. There is a similar smear campaign against Rashida Tlaib in Detroit, where Republicans David Dudenhoefer and Al Lemmo (a wealthy self-funder) have already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars lying about her, in the hopes of seeing establishment conservative Democrat Brenda Jones, Detroit's City Council President, beat her in the primary. The primary is August 4. If you'd like to contribute to Rashid, Ilhan and AOC all in one shot, you can find the three of them by clicking on the Blue America 2020 Worthy Incumbents thermometer on the right.



UPDATE: An Open Letter to Ted Yoho, From a Former Congressional Intern
Rep. Ted Yoho, as one of your former Congressional interns, I’m incredibly disappointed and appalled not only by your misogynistic behavior towards Rep. AOC and women at large, but your dismissive behavior as a whole.

I used to look up to you, for your role as a former Chairman on the House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific. As someone who intends to pursue a similar career path, I should have known better when you asked me whether or not I considered having a family instead. When you voted against making lynching a federal crime. When you don’t believe the Civil Rights Act is constitutional. When I had to personally ask you what your thoughts on the separation of children and families were because you were silent for days while hundreds of constituents-- mothers, nurses, professors, teachers, students-- demanded answers. And when your reply to me was to stop buying into everything the media said, you dismissed me, too. The unwanted pats on the back didn’t help either.

Congressman Yoho, you may not have directly uttered “f — b — ” to AOC, but you accosted her by telling her she was “disgusting, crazy, out of her mind, dangerous.” You denied and tried softening what reporters have corroborated. You tried to justify your actions by using poverty as a back up. That is inexcusable.

You’re right about one thing though, Congressman Yoho-- women are dangerous. We will not stand by as you, and other members of Congress, continue propagating this behavior. The reason for this post is to encourage others-- former congressional interns, staff, anyone who might be looking for a voice, who might be afraid-- to speak out about these kinds of experiences. It’s time to hold our elected officials accountable for this behavior.

Rep. AOC, thank you for using your voice to embolden and empower individuals to #SpeakOut.

Also, Congressman Yoho, don’t forget to pay your interns.

Labels: , , , ,

Most Big Corporations Don't Mind Funding GOP Racism And Homophobia-- As Long As They Get Their Tax Breaks And Special Favors... And Congress Refuses To Call It Bribery

>


A few days ago, the NY Times published an essay by Andrew Sorkin, A Company Backs a Cause. It Funds a Politician Who Doesn’t. What Gives? He wrote that "At a time when Corporate America is speaking up on some of the most important issues of our time, there is a contradiction between companies’ words today and the role they played in helping create the moment we find ourselves in. An examination of political spending over the past decade shows how those companies-- and dozens of other Fortune 500 corporations-- quietly funded political efforts that are antithetical to their public stances. They financed state attorneys general seeking to undo the Affordable Care Act, which has provided health insurance for millions of Americans during the pandemic; they provided funds that backed local legislators who tried to roll back L.G.B.T.Q. rights; and they gave money that supported candidates challenging federal climate change initiatives."
Uniquely, public companies are the biggest benefactors of key political committees supporting the campaigns, donating more than individuals or other groups.

...Walmart is among the companies that donated money to the Republican Attorneys General Association, which supported a group of state attorneys general including Ken Paxton of Texas, who was narrowly re-elected in 2018 and is now leading a group of Republican-run states in a Supreme Court case that seeks to overturn key aspects of the Affordable Care Act.

AT&T, which says its policies prohibiting discrimination against employees based on sexual orientation date back to the 1970s, provided funds to the same group, which helped elect Pat McCrory in North Carolina in 2012. Mr. McCrory, the former governor, signed the “bathroom bill,” which required transgender people to use public bathrooms corresponding to the gender listed on their birth certificates (and was later overturned).

Microsoft, which says it supports sustainability, provided money to the Republican Governors Association, which funneled money to help elect Tom Corbett in Pennsylvania in 2010, who reduced emissions standards for the oil and gas industry.



These corporate donations to state-level political groups go to associations known as “527s,” named after a section of the tax code. The 527 designation allows companies to channel money to candidates without giving to specific individuals. The donations, which come from corporate treasury departments-- not via company political action committees-- can be tracked by following the money paid to a 527 and examining how it is distributed.

The numbers tell the story: Of the $1.3 billion raised over the past decade by the Democratic and Republican governors associations, state legislative campaign committees and attorneys general associations, 46 percent-- or nearly $600 million-- came from public companies and their trade associations, far more than the 22 percent share from individuals and 16 percent from private companies, according to the Center for Political Accountability. Two-thirds of the corporate and trade association money, around $390 million, went to Republican-affiliated groups.

...[C]ompanies are motivated to make such political donations because it potentially buys them access-- and they hope, favor-- with politicians who can directly affect their businesses. They may want to bend a politician’s ear on a tax treatment, government contract or regulatory action. During the pandemic, having a direct line to the governor’s office has been critical in how some businesses have sought to influence reopening plans.
Yesterday, Judd Legum and Tesnim Zekeria, writing for Popular Info shined a light in the direction of Minnesota neo-fascist Congressman Jim Hagedorn and the companies that bankroll his racism-- while claiming to support Black Lives Matter. Hagedorn, an extreme right freshman who represents a district just about an hour south of where a police officer murdered George Floyd, wrote that the Black Lives Matter movement is "at war with our country, our beliefs and western culture." He's campaigning for reelection on a Trumpist platform and insists that Americans must oppose the Black Lives Matter movement to defend the nation’s "Judeo-Christian values" and "way of life."

Last cycle Hagedorn barely defeated-- 146,200 (50.2%) to 144,885 (49.8%)-- conservative Democrat Dan Feehan for the open seat in southern Minnesota. Feehan spent $4,117,708 to Hagedorn's $1,584,057. (Right wing outside groups, like corporately funded America First Action and the Congressional Leadership Fund, threw $6,911,780 in independent expenditures into smearing Feehan.) So far this cycle, Feehan, who wants a rematch, has raised $2,102,934 and Hagedorn has raised $1,579,022. In 2016 Trump had won MN-01 with 53.3% against Hillary's 38.4%. In 2018, Amy Klobuchar's reelection campaign won the district without breaking a sweat and, though with a smaller margin, so did Tim Walz, the former congressman from the district who was seeking the governor's job (which he won). It's likely that in November Feehan will oust Hagedorn and his ugly racist, Trumpist, homophobic politics. Legum and Zekeria wrote that "major corporations that publicly champion racial justice, equality, and inclusion-- including UnitedHealth Group, U.S. Bank, Intel, and Best Buy-- have donated thousands of dollars to Hagedorn's reelection campaign." Other corporations funding Hagedorn's politics of hatred and support for fascism include General Mills, Boston Scientific, Bayer, and Bank of New York.



Up the road apiece is MN-05-- Minneapolis. It's a deep blue district that Trump lost with just 18.5% in 2016. Two year later, state Rep. Ilhan Omar won the open congressional seat by a landslide against Republican vanity candidate Jennifer Zielinski, 267,703 (78.0%) to 74,440 (21.7%). This cycle Ilhan faces a crowded primary field in less than a month, on August 11. There are 5 Democrats challenging her, but AIPAC has rallied its forces around one mystery meat candidate, Antone Melton-Meaux, who has "raised" $3,690,827 out of the blue and now has more cash on hand than Ilhan-- $2,016,669 to $1,111,861. Andrew Perez, reporting for Too Much Information, wrote that Melton-Meaux "has paid nearly $1.2 million-- 65 percent of his overall spending-- to three anonymous companies, a move that circumvents traditional campaign finance disclosure standards." One, WCPA (or perhaps WPCA) is a company on paper only that started just over a month ago, seemingly to help Melton-Meaux-- who funneled $1.3 million of his contributions into the firm-- defeat Ilhan. Since the the DCCC "has threatened to punish vendors who work for candidates who run primary challenges to Democratic incumbents, Melton-Meaux’s financial maneuver keeps hidden the vendors who are working for his campaign against Omar, a first-term Democratic incumbent." Two other brand new companies-- North Superior Consulting LLC and Lake Point Consulting-- seem to be playing the same role, one for communications and one for polling and strategic consulting.
“The law requires campaigns to report their spending so that the public can know how political campaign money is being spent,” said Brendan Fischer, a lawyer at the Campaign Legal Center. “When 65 percent of a campaign's spending is flowing through anonymous Delaware LLCs, the public is kept in the dark. Schemes like this hide which individuals or companies are working for the campaign, the nature of the work, and how much they are being paid.”

While Omar’s polling shows she’s popular in her district, Melton-Meaux raised $3.2 million between April and June and has been blanketing the airwaves with ads. Omar brought in less than $500,000 in the same time. The first Somali refugee elected to Congress, Omar has been a frequent target of Israel supporters for her criticisms of the country’s influence over U.S. policy. Pro-Israel political action committees have raised more than $400,000 for Melton-Meaux’s campaign.

A super PAC funded by frequent GOP donors last week disclosed spending $228,000 on mailers opposing Omar. The group-- which is called Americans for Tomorrow’s Future-- recently bankrolled a Democratic pro-Israel super PAC that has been weighing in on Democratic primary races.

“There are people who are invested in keeping that status quo, people who don’t want these structural changes to take place, and those are really the people who have the resources to oust someone like me,” Omar said on Sunday.

Melton-Meaux’s TV ad buys have been placed by Canal Partners Media, according to filings with the Federal Communications Commission. Canal Partners Media isn’t listed in Melton-Meaux’s latest FEC report, suggesting that some of the WCPA spending has been subcontracted. Canal Partners Media has reportedly placed ad buys for the Biden campaign under the name “Media Buying & Analytics.”

Canal Partners Media didn’t respond to a request for comment.

  “The FEC has generally said that if a campaign hires, for example, a consulting firm to produce its ads, and the consulting firm subcontracts with a videographer to film the ads, the campaign need only report the payments to the consulting firm, and not separately itemize the payments to the videographer,” Fischer said. “But if a vendor is just acting as a conduit to hide the ultimate recipients of the campaign's spending, then the campaign is violating the law.”
Goal ThermometerWhich corporations are funding these quasi-criminal manuevers to defeat Ilhan Omar? It's going to take months-- long after the election results are in-- to unravel all the opaque reporting and figure out which corporations and which billionaires are putting the big bucks behind AIPAC's effort to end Ilhan's career. If you'd like to help thwart that effort, please contribute to Ilhan Omar's reelection campaign by clicking on the 2020 Blue America Worthy Incumbents thermometer on the right. There aren't enough members with her spirit and courageousness; let's not let a flood of Dark Money remove her from a Congress that desperately needs more women like her, not fewer.


Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

AIPAC Goes In For The Kill-- Their Members And Allies Will Spend Anything To Defeat Ilhan Omar

>


Most of the freshmen from 2018 have terrible voting records. In fact most of them have been rated "F" by ProgressivePunch. The half dozen worst Democrats in Congress-- at least in terms of this metric, several of them voting more conservatively than some Republicans:
Jared Golden (Blue Dog-ME)- 38.03
Ben McAdams (Blue Dog-UT)- 30.99
Kendra Horn (Blue Dog-OK)- 29.58
Abigail Spanberger (Blue Dog-VA)- 29.58
Anthony Brindisi (Blue Dog-NY)- 26.76
Joe Cunningham (Blue Dog-SC)- 25.35
Only 11 freshmen have been rated "A" by Progressive Punch:
Andy Levin (D-MI)- 100
Joe Neguse (D-CO)- 97.18
Ayanna Pressley (D-MA)- 97.18
AOC (D-NY)- 95.77
Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)- 95.77
Chuy Garcia (D-IL)- 95.77
Ilhan Omar (D-MN)- 92.96
Veronica Escobar (D-TX)- 92.96
Lori Trahan (D-MA)- 92.96
Sylvia Garcia (D-TX)- 91.55
Debra Haaland (D-NM)- 91.55
Of course voting records aren't the only way to judge a member of Congress Voting is just one function-- at least for some of them. For example, I would argue that even though Cunningham has the lowest score of any Democrat, Brindisi is much worse. He runs around whining and blustering every time anything remotely progressive comes up. "Are you trying to make me lose my seat?" is his constant refrain. Many members would very much like to see him lose his seat. On the other side of the coin, AOC has arguably had more impact on Congress and the country than any other freshman and more than the vast majority of members. Same with Ilhan Omar, who we're here to say a few words about today.

Goal ThermometerFirst though, let me note that she has been a good fundraiser, although she takes nothing from corporate PACs. But she's made some real enemies by speaking her mind and by organizing around positions not appreciated by Big Money status quo interests, especially AIPAC who is 100% out to destroy her. As are Republicans who know they can't win the seat (PVI is D+26 and Trump only took 18.5% of the vote and is expected to do even worse this year). In 2018, Ilhan was elected 78.0 to 21.7%, after winning a 6-way primary with an astounding 48.2% of the vote, her closest challenger at 30.4%. But because they can't win the seat they have a star candidate they're backing Antone Melton-Meaux, an unknown who popped up out of nowhere late last year. Please consider contributing to Ilhan's campaign by clicking on the 2020 Blue America Worthy Incumbents thermometer on the right.

Yesterday, Briana Bierschbach, a reporter of the Minneapolis Star Tribune noted that "Millions of dollars are pouring into the primary race for Minnesota’s Fifth Congressional District, where opposition to Minneapolis U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar is fueling an unprecedented surge in donations to her top Democratic opponent, political newcomer Antone Melton-Meaux. Melton-Meaux, a mediation lawyer who emerged on the DFL scene late last year to challenge Omar, told the Star Tribune he raised a staggering $3.2 million between April and the end of June, with $2 million cash left in the bank before the Aug. 11 primary. He dramatically outraised Omar, who took in $471,624 during the same time period. Omar’s campaign said she has $1,111,861 left on hand ahead of the primary election."
The fundraising gap would be striking for any newcomer challenging an incumbent, but it’s especially notable in a race against Omar, a freshman Democrat and member of “The Squad” who has risen to prominence as one of the first Muslim women elected to Congress. Omar herself is a prolific fundraiser, fueled in part by her national profile and her unabashed criticism of President Donald Trump.

But Omar’s policy positions and not infrequent Twitter flaps with the president have made her a popular target for conservatives, and she has faced criticism from Jewish leaders and some fellow Democrats for several past tweets and remarks about the political influence of Israel. Omar apologized after criticism that she was using anti-Semitic tropes in her comments, but she reaffirmed her criticism of the “problematic role of lobbyists in our politics.”




It’s a dramatic surge for Melton-Meaux, who reported raising nearly $400,000 between December and the end of March. The influx of money came, in part, from some conservative donors and pro-Israel groups like nonpartisan NORPAC, which held a virtual fundraiser for Melton-Meaux in May. According to data from ActBlue, an online fundraising tool, a number of individual donors outside of the district contributed the maximum amount allowed in May. He’s also received donations from prominent Minnesota Democratic fundraisers such as Sam and Sylvia Kaplan.

“It’s about the residents who live there, but they’ve certainly invited in enough outside money that now it’s become more of a regional or national battle,” said Todd Rapp, a longtime veteran of DFL campaigns. He said he’s never seen so much money flood in a single intraparty contest. “It’s kind of moved beyond our borders.”

Melton-Meaux said he’s gotten support from nonpartisan groups that have contributed to members of both parties. He said Omar’s past comments have diminished her trust with the Jewish community and fueled support for his campaign.

“We started at a time when people really believed we had no shot at this,” said Melton-Meaux. “We were told by most that we couldn’t do it. Our strategy has been really simple, being honest and transparent and going right to the public with a message that may be kind of cultural right now, and that is that people want leadership that shows up.”

In a statement, Omar’s campaign said an “overwhelming majority” of her constituents approve of the job she’s doing in Congress and her donations were a result of grassroots organizing, with her average contribution coming in at $18.

“Rep. Omar has been fighting for big structural changes to address systematic inequalities in education, health, environment, and the economy at home and across the nation. That’s why Wall Street and GOP donors are threatened by her,” said Deputy Communications Director Isi Kirshner-Breen. “Our campaign is about organizing people. That’s what progressives do. And organized people will always beat organized money.”

Melton-Meaux has emerged as the most prominent of four DFL primary challengers to Omar, running on a message of focusing on the needs of the Fifth District, which includes Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Richfield, Crystal, Robbinsdale, Golden Valley, New Hope, Fridley and parts of Edina.

The district is one of the safest Democratic seats in the nation, meaning the winner of the August primary is all but certain to head to Congress next year. Republicans have endorsed north Minneapolis businessman Lacy Johnson, who also has cashed in on donations from around the nation, raising more than $1.1 million by March.

Melton-Meaux has picked up prominent endorsements in the primary race from civil rights activists Josie Johnson and Nekima Levy Armstrong, Golden Valley Mayor Shep Harris, former U.S. Attorney Andy Luger and others.

But Omar secured the DFL Party’s endorsement in the race in May and the backing of prominent Democrats such as Attorney General Keith Ellison, who previously held the Fifth District seat in Congress, and unions like the AFL-CIO and Education Minnesota. On Monday, Omar’s campaign announced endorsements from Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman, who served with Omar during her one term in the Legislature, and U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.





Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, May 11, 2020

This Is True: The Democratic Party Isn't As Bad As The Republican Party. But For How Long?

>


The Democratic Party establishment is conservative in the sense of defending and bolstering the status quo-- not as perniciously as the GOP, but perniciously enough. It is also incredibly corrupt-- no less so than the Republican Party. Of course there are notable exceptions-- like House members AOC, Jamie Raskin, Ro Khanna, Pramila Jayapal, Ted Lieu, Ilhan Omar, Andy Levin, Barbara Lee, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, a few others intermittently-- but they're exceptions. Last week, The Intercept published a piece that gets to the heart of the Democratic Party by Ryan Grim and Akela Lacy, New Jersey's Cartoonishly Corrupt Democratic Party Is Finally Getting Challenged. Before we get into it, I want to point out that New Jersey has a Democratic member of Congress who isn't corrupt and doesn't belong in a federal penitentiary-- Bonnie Watson Coleman, who represents the Trenton area.

Grim and Lacy start with Albio Sires, but could have started anywhere in the state other than, ironically, Trenton, the state capital that is one of the biggest founts of corruption on the planet. "A quintessential New Jersey game of musical chairs brought Albio Sires to Congress," they wrote. "The music started in November 2005, when Sen. John Corzine was elected governor. To fill his Senate seat, the party machine tapped Rep. Bob Menendez, which created an opening for Menendez’s House seat. Albio Sires, the mayor of West New York, had previously run for Congress in the 1980s as a Republican, but was by then also state assembly speaker and a loyal member of the Democratic machine. He won a special election in 2006 with 90 percent of the vote and has represented the North Jersey district, home to the largest Cuban diaspora outside Miami, ever since."

Party identification-- partisanship-- gets these scumbags elected. Simply put-- they're not Republicans, so they must be better or, at least, the lesser evil. It isn't always the case and one day, suddenly, the New Jersey electorate will wake up and switch their idea of partisanship and it will be too late for the Democrats to do anything about it-- even if they want to, which is far from likely. They hate their own reformers far more than they hate Republicans (who they can easily "do business" with). Bernie, to most establishment Dems, is a worse option than Trump. And AOC is more an enemy than any Republican. Both are too disruptive.

How AOC became the enemy of almost every Democrat in Congress


"Sires has kept a low profile," continued Grim and Lacy, "largely voting with the party on the House floor. It’s hard to measure obscurity, but fewer than 70 Democrats have served in the House as long as Sires, and suffice it to say that Sires has not managed to translate that seniority into a national profile or measurable power in Washington. Corzine, a Wall Street baron, was unseated by Republican Chris Christie after one term; Menendez remains in office, and both he and Corzine have escaped prison despite being the targets of federal investigators. Sires has hung on, but as New Jersey’s Cuban population ages and migrates south to Florida, his district has become more diverse, with growing Central and Caribbean American populations."
In South Jersey, the Norcross bosses, whose family has had a longstanding stranglehold on local politics, are holding on. George Norcoss, known as one of New Jersey’s most influential unelected bosses, holds an outsize influence over parts of the state legislature’s South Jersey delegation. An insurance executive, he’s been accused of pulling strings to benefit from a state corporate tax incentive program that came under federal investigation last year. His brother, Donald, represents parts of South Jersey in the U.S. House. Donald is a former labor leader who was elected to the state assembly in 2009. He was later appointed to fill a vacant state Senate seat, which paved the way for his eventual transition to Congress.

Now Sires, who did not respond to requests for an interview for this article, is facing his first serious primary election since 2006, from insurgent challenger Hector Oseguera, an attorney with roots in Honduras and the Dominican Republic who specializes in fighting money laundering. Oseguera, who attended Boston University at the same time as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but didn’t know her then, was one of the earliest volunteers on her 2018 campaign to unseat then-Rep. Joe Crowley in Queens and the Bronx.

Oseguera is part of a wave of challengers taking on the local machine in North Jersey. Sires, a functionary of the West New York/Union City machine, known as the Hudson County Democratic Organization, or, often, simply, “the Organization,” is just one of many targets, with a slate of six Hudson County Freeholder candidates allied with Oseguera challenging incumbents up and down the ballot.

Elsewhere in the Garden State, similar battles are taking place, as the coalescing of activist groups and insurgent candidates launches a statewide assault on the cartoonishly corrupt New Jersey Democratic establishment, which long considered itself immune from the biannual annoyance of elections. So immune that the party did nothing to shunt aside Menendez in 2018, even as he faced trial for corruption charges in the midst of his reelection. Little-known challenger Lisa McCormick, with next to no financing, stunned the party by winning 38 percent of the vote in the primary that cycle against Menendez, who got off on a mistrial due to a hung jury and won reelection.

Now McCormick, a perennial candidate for local and federal office who has never disclosed the names of any campaign donors, is challenging state Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman. Coleman was elected in 2014 as the state’s first African American woman in Congress and has a pretty solid progressive voting record.


Rep. Josh Gottheimer, among the most conservative House Democrats, is facing a serious challenge from Dr. Arati Kriebich, a neuroscientist and former Gottheimer volunteer. In South Jersey, Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a party boss elected in 2018 and concerned about losing a primary challenge from the left this cycle, switched and became a Republican. Democratic Reps. Bill Pascrell and Donald Payne Jr. are also facing primary challenges from Zina Spezakis-- who’s also running under the “Not Me. Us.” slogan--  and Alp Basaran, and Eugene Mazo and John Flora, respectively.
None of the challengers were rated good enough to be endorsed by Blue America, and I suspect they will all lose, not because the incumbents don't stink to high heaven-- they do-- but because most of the challengers are inept and incompetent candidates. Some of the country's worst House Democrats-- Gottheimer, of course, as well as Frank Pallone, Albio Sires, Mikie Sherill-- are from New Jersey, but not one of them has a primary opponent capable of winning a campaign.

I hope I'm wrong about Oseguera and I haven't spoken with him personally, so maybe I am. Grim and Lacy wrote that he "lucked into an advantage on the ballot-- or, more accurately perhaps, he made his own luck-- that may be consequential in a race between two people with such little name recognition. In New Jersey, machine politicians for decades have implored supporters to 'vote column A all the way,' a phrase that became synonymous with loyalty to the party machine. Column A on New Jersey ballots is reserved for candidates running as a slate, from the president down to the freeholder, a county legislative position. Typically, it is only the machine that is able to put together that sort of slate, as progressives rarely have a Senate candidate fielded, and even more rarely a body in the presidential primary. But this time, Sanders supporters recruited veteran activist Larry Hamm to run for Senate against Cory Booker, enabling a slate to be formed with Hamm and down-ballot insurgents. (They had wanted Sanders to sit at the top of their slate; his campaign, however, never filed the paperwork needed to join it.) The machine, meanwhile, was torn between various presidential candidates-- including Booker-- and so declined to make any endorsement. That meant that the progressive slate in Hudson and Union counties, the population centers of the 8th District, was eligible for the A column. Because there was more than one slate, the A spot was decided in an April 9 drawing-- which the insurgents won. Voters accustomed to casting their ballots “A all the way” will wind up supporting Oseguera." That's actually funny.

The Junta: Christie, Norcross, Sweeney-- New Jersey's Axis of Evil

“There’s going to be a set of voters that show up and do their regular Democratic duty of ‘vote A all the way,’ and they might swing this election,” said Oseguera, who was raised in the district by a mother who taught and a father who held a variety of jobs, from handyman to cashier to driver. Oseguera said that when his phone bankers end the call by reminding voters to “vote column A,” they often reply with a version of “Of course, we always vote line A.”

Ron Bautista is one of the six freeholder candidates running under the Sanders-inspired slogan of “Not Me. Us.,” in a district that largely covers Hoboken. “[Oseguera’s] campaign has brought together grassroots progressives like it has never been done before,” said Bautista, who last year challenged a 16-year city council incumbent, picking up a third of the vote without a slate or developer money, which the New Jersey establishment tends to rely on. “We are at the heart of machine politics in New Jersey, and sometimes progressives have run individually against the machine. For the first time, we have a progressive slate of candidates from Senate to county government.”

Three of the slate’s nine freeholder candidates failed to qualify for the ballot, coming short on signatures, while a number of those who qualified did so by collecting electronic signatures amid the pandemic. Roger Quesada was one of them, drawing on his professional experience in e-commerce and marketing. “There’s no slate in recent memory that has ever been this organized and with a strong digital infrastructure,” he said.

...Oseguera's race against Sires presents intriguing parallels to Ocasio-Cortez’s, as well as divergences. Where Crowley was a local machine boss with national ambitions, on his way to becoming speaker of the House, Sires is merely a local machine boss. Like Ocasio-Cortez, Oseguera has raised precious little money, relying instead on a network of volunteers and local activist groups to power him to victory in what is likely to be an extremely low-turnout election against an incumbent with little name recognition in a community that has changed underneath him. (Crowley was far better known in Washington than in his home district, which cost him dearly in the primary.)



Oseguera, unlike Ocasio-Cortez, does not label himself a democratic socialist; given the number of refugees of the Cuban Revolution in the district, the term remains deeply toxic. But he supports the gamut of policies that tend to define more progressive Democrats: a Green New Deal, Medicare for All, a wealth tax, $15 minimum wage, and so on. He does not, however, have the support of Justice Democrats, the group that backed Ocasio-Cortez’s challenge and has been conservative in handing out endorsements since then. He said that when he appealed to the group for an endorsement, they told him that Sires’s voting record wasn’t egregious enough to merit the group’s scarce resources. (The group recently launched a Super PAC.) Unlike the incumbents whose challengers Justice Democrats has backed this cycle, like Dan Lipinski and Henry Cuellar, Sires is a reliable Democratic vote and has such a low profile that ousting him would barely make a ripple.

Like Ocasio-Cortez, Oseguera’s campaign, two months out from the primary, is broke, with $22,731 raised and less than $4,000 cash on hand, according to the latest filing. For Ocasio-Cortez, a viral campaign ad, combined with national coverage, helped elevate her profile and raise last-minute money, which she pumped into canvassing, phone and text banks, and digital ads. But Osegeura is campaigning amid a pandemic, with effective shelter-in-place orders, so there’s likely to be very little canvassing between now and the July 7 primary. The Oseguera-Sires contest will be fought out digitally and over the phone, a disadvantage for Sires, who has virtually no virtual presence and doesn’t even have a campaign website. Oseguera managed to buy Sires’s domain name-- AlbioSires.com-- and redirect it to his own fundraising page.


For a machine boss, Sires has little to show in the way of money, though he’s well ahead of Oseguera. This cycle, Sires has raised just $340,000 and had $237,000 cash on hand as of March 31. His biggest donors are the local trade unions and the Desert Caucus, an extremist, pro-Israel group that endorses settlements and the annexation of Palestinian territory.

...Oseguera's campaign is using its limited funds to target Democrats likely to vote by mail ahead of the primary, which was postponed from June. Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy has been pushing for an all-mail primary, but backtracked after pushback from machine leaders across the state. Because of their lack of cash, Oseguera said, his campaign narrowed its voter data purchase to 75,000 Democrats in the district who regularly vote in general elections but don’t show up for primaries. Vote-by-mail, he hopes, will make those people more likely to return a ballot if volunteers can get texts and calls in front of them enough. He expects 50,000 votes will be enough to win.

The postponement of the primary and the expansion of vote-by-mail add to the uncertainty around how the election will go, said Farmer of Rutgers University. While the changes could hamper the machine’s overall advantage, the insurgents’ fundraising barriers could also make it difficult to reach voters. “The burden of getting the information to the voters is greater because of the restrictions that we’re all operating under now,” he said.

Partial vote-by-mail “does put an additional burden on the parties if they want to maintain their encouragement of straight-ticket voting that they really have to be sort of out there and more aggressive in encouraging that then probably they have been in the past,” he said, noting that campaigns’ inability to do in-person canvassing is another complicating factor.

The shift toward vote-by-mail has made the machine nervous. DeGise told the New Jersey Globe that she opposes mail-in voting and was pushing for an all in-person vote because loyal machine voters are more likely to turn out to the polls, whereas making mail an option would bring more voters in. Mail-in voting, she said, is “just not in the culture here. … Our strongest voting blocks are not going to vote by mail,” adding that voting by mail is more popular among Democrats who don’t typically vote.

Eleana Little, a Hudson County freeholder candidate, cited the machine’s machinations as evidence that they’re nervous about insurgents harnessing that strength. “We’ve got people,” she said. “We’re building a grassroots movement and have over 100 volunteers. We’re phone-banking every day and hearing from people that they’re excited about what we’re doing. Hector comes from a working-class background and has mountains of student loan debt, like so many millennials. He didn’t have $50,000 to drop on his own campaign like some candidates do, and he doesn’t have wealthy family connections. So the war chest is small, but there are a lot of people involved. I think the fact that the machine is so nervous shows that we’ve built substantial momentum, and it’s not just all in our heads.”

As the pandemic worsens it's not just the virus itself that threatens human life. The corruption, cronyism and incompetence of those in power is adding fuel to the fire.

It's been said that the virus doesn't discriminate, but politicians and CEOs continue to prioritize their own power and profits over the lives of the most vulnerable.


Whether you consider Josh Kraushaar journalism's version of a silly clown or not, he really is the voice of the Inside-the-Beltway political establishment. He writes, at the National Journal their reality. His column yesterday, for example, began exactly the way any establishment ass-licker would begin a post if he was starving to lick more ass: "Joe Biden's decisive drubbing of Bernie Sanders in the presidential primary squelched the socialist stirrings that had been percolating within the Democratic Party. It’s probably no coincidence, then, that three of Congress’s most far-left members, all aligned with Sanders, are facing credible challenges of their own in upcoming House primaries. Three of the four freshmen members of the left-wing "Squad" that President Trump calls “AOC+3”-- Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota-- have drawn opponents who have made the case that they’re too extreme for the districts they represent. Tlaib is at risk at losing her seat to an experienced [and utterly corrupt and incompetent] African-American official in her Detroit-area district. And while Ocasio-Cortez and Omar are favored to prevail, they will face their first serious test over the popularity of their progressive messages in deep-blue districts." Oh gee, he forgot to mention that the Democratic establishment recruited a Republican pretending to be a Democrat to run against AOC. The hopes of the corrupt party establishment channelled through their boy Josh:
The unusual and unpredictable turnout patterns for upcoming summer primaries taking place during a pandemic will also add some uncertainty to these races. New York Democratic officials have been working to cancel the presidential primary for their June 23 elections, a decision overruled by a federal judge and currently under appeal. Without a presidential race driving turnout and with the coronavirus keeping many voters home, tiny turnout for state and local primaries raises the likelihood of unpredictable outcomes. Indeed, the low turnout in the 2018 New York primary was a major factor in Ocasio-Cortez’s upset of longtime Rep. Joseph Crowley.

Ocasio-Cortez’s primary against former CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera hasn’t drawn a lot of attention, but it’s worth watching closely. The congresswoman’s district, which spans Queens and the Bronx, has been one of the hardest-hit areas in the country from the pandemic. But Ocasio-Cortez was the only House Democrat to vote against the coronavirus-relief bill, a lonely and unpopular position on Capitol Hill. She told the New York Times that, after the vote, she felt more alienated in Congress than ever before and was facing a personal existential crisis.

Those personal feelings are undoubtedly authentic, but by making the crisis about herself, it offers a tempting opportunity for Caruso-Cabrera to portray her as someone driven more by ego than the needs of her constituents. Caruso-Cabrera is no novice: The granddaughter of Cuban and Italian immigrants, she served as the chief international correspondent for CNBC for nearly a decade. More notably, she raised over $1 million in the first three months of the year, an impressive amount for a seemingly long-shot challenger. Her strong fundraising gives her enough cash to run a professional campaign. Ocasio-Cortez, one of the best-funded members of Congress in the country, raised $2.7 million during the same period and has $3.5 million in the bank.

Ocasio-Cortez’s supporters appear to be taking notice of her upstart challenger. The Intercept, an antiestablishment publication that promotes left-wing candidates like Ocasio-Cortez, published a hit piece against Caruso-Cabrera this month for serving on the board of directors for a life-insurance company that “profits from death.” For a campaign that hasn’t drawn much attention, especially during the pandemic, the piece looked like a sign that they were taking Caruso Cabrera’s insurgent campaign seriously.

There has been no recent public polling of the race. When I reached out to Ocasio-Cortez pollster Celinda Lake to get her perspective on the race, she declined comment. An April 2019 Siena poll found her support in the district surprisingly lukewarm, with 52 percent of district voters viewing her favorably and 33 percent viewing her unfavorably. This, in a district that Hillary Clinton carried by a 57-point margin (77-20 percent).

With turnout expected to be very low-- and without a presidential campaign to drive Sanders supporters to the polls-- this is a race that’s worth watching. Even a weaker-than-expected showing by Ocasio-Cortez might tempt the congresswoman to run for president in 2024 instead of remaining as a lonely voice in a party that’s rediscovered the merits of political pragmatism.

While Ocasio-Cortez is the biggest name of the three renegades, Tlaib is the congresswoman facing the toughest challenge. She’s facing a rematch against Detroit City Council president Brenda Jones, whom Tlaib defeated by fewer than 1,000 votes in the 2018 primary. The congresswoman benefited from numerous African-American candidates splitting up the black vote on the primary ballot, allowing her to win with a 31 percent plurality. Tlaib won over the white voters in the Detroit district, but struggled to win support among African-Americans. Jones is hoping to consolidate the black vote behind her this time around.


Tlaib holds a fundraising advantage, with $1.4 million in the bank at the end of March. Jones, who announced her candidacy in March, is starting her fundraising from scratch in the middle of a pandemic.

Tlaib has faced criticism from her fellow Democrats over her anti-Israel activism and support for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. But pro-Israel Democratic voters and donors are wary of Jones as well, given her past praise of anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

Between Tlaib’s underwhelming electoral history and the racial dynamic in the district, it’s clear that she’s vulnerable. A March survey conducted by longtime Michigan pollster Ed Sarpolus found Tlaib only leading Jones 43 to 34 percent. Her 9-point lead was down 28 points since the survey’s last poll in June. Being well under 50 percent as a high-profile incumbent is a glaring warning sign. Another reason why Tlaib should be worried: Joe Biden comfortably defeated Sanders in her district despite her high-profile surrogacy for Sanders.

The other Sanders-supporting member of the squad, Ilhan Omar, looked like she didn’t have too much to worry about. While she’s drawn plenty of criticism for her use of bigoted tropes to attack Jewish supporters of Israel-- and faced the risk of censure from her own party-- she’s been insulated by support from both white progressives and a Somali-American base in her heavily Democratic Twin Cities district.

But she’s facing a spirited challenge from Antone Melton-Meaux, an attorney and mediator who has criticized the congresswoman for her divisive record and has courted support in the district’s Jewish community. “Omar has made statements that have been reckless and harmful to the Jewish community," Melton-Meaux told Jewish Insider last month. "There’s a deep sense of betrayal by her actions and displeasure with the way that she has handled herself in the process with regard to the residents in this district.”

Melton-Meaux raised $210,000 in the last fundraising quarter, a respectable amount that will allow him to get his message across. Omar ended March with $1.3 million in cash on hand, giving her a significant advantage.

But in a sign that Omar may be sensing a backlash, she quietly signed onto a letter urging the Trump administration to extend a United Nations arms embargo against Iran. While it was signed by over 380 members of Congress, the document backed by The American Israel Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC] was a departure from her previous positioning on the Middle East. Indeed, she drew backlash from her anti-Israel supporters for supporting the policy.

It’s still hard to see Omar losing in a primary after emerging as a progressive star in her first term. But it’s very possible that her sudden repositioning is a result of her looking to shore up political vulnerabilities.

Goal ThermometerThese three competitive races are a reminder that even among liberal primary voters, many Democratic voters aren’t fans of the in-your-face brand of socialism that these three freshman members have promoted in their first terms in office. And with an establishment figure like Biden comfortably leading the presidential race, they’re at risk of being marginalized in a way they’ve never experienced-- even if they win their contested campaigns.
Please help defeat Kraushaar (and his ilk) by clicking on the Blue America 2020 incumbents thermometer above and contributing what you can. Kraushaar certainly makes a very convincing case to always beware of any candidate he endorses, whether implicitly or explicitly.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, January 20, 2020

Do YOU Imagine Yourself Morally Evolved While Still Afflicted With The Latent Illness Of Privilege That Resists The Messiness Of Loud, Aggressive, Angry Justice?

>


People don't go around saying "Happy Martin Luther King Day" to each other, right? It's not that kind of a holiday. More, though, should do what John Pavlovitz did on his blog this morning, a powerful and compelling meditation on how Martin Luther King's message resonates in him today. He wishes he'd have written it soon but it's taken him this long to figure out there are words to say what he knows he had to say. For much of his life, he explained, he had imagined he was fighting the good fight of equality because he believed in it philosophically, because intellectually he agreed with it. "I’d frequently recited your words and loudly amen-ed your sermons and easily claimed affinity in your declarations of the worth of every human being. I’d have said that I was trying to live as a man after your own courageous heart-- but at best I was really play-acting.
Looking back at the path of journey, for far too many of those years I’d actually been one of the white moderates you castigated from a cell in a Birmingham jail: people imagining themselves morally evolved but still afflicted with the latent illness of privilege that resists the messiness of justice-- especially when it rattles your blind prejudices and brings turbulence to your places of comfort. As often as I raised my voice to uplift the oppressed, I scolded them when they spoke in ways I deemed too loud, too aggressive, too angry.

In the wake of passionate protests and falling monuments and desperate pleas for equality that spilled over into violence, I too often took a posture of correction, defending some “right way” of protesting, that only reflected the fact that the law and the system never required me to scream to be heard or fight to be considered. I’ve never known that kind of desperation and often mischaracterized it as recklessness, unintentionally quieting the turbulence necessary for justice to come.

Dr. King, I’ve always known you deserved my respect, but it’s only recently that I realized that I owe you an apology.

I’m sorry for the times I stayed silence in the presence of my white friends while they perpetuated caricatures of people of color: when they made the lazy joke or wielded the most dehumanizing stereotypes-- and for the times I myself generated the ignorant laughter of my peers, never considering the collateral damage of making human beings into punchlines.

I’m sorry that I assumed myself progressive, while never talking ownership of my privilege or facing my culpability in the systemic racism of this nation; the times I wanted to see myself as one of the good guys, yet wasn’t able or willing to see or confront the ways I have profited from my whiteness since birth.


I’m sorry that I was such a lousy student of History; never stopping to realize that it had largely been written by people who needed to be the heroes even as they perpetuated the villainy.

I’m sorry that I so often spoke in the cause of vulnerable and marginalized people, instead of actually first listening to them-- because the former was much easier and the latter more potentially uncomfortable.

I’m sorry that I wanted to proudly wear the bleeding heart badge of being for equality, but didn’t want to enter the jagged, bloody trenches of the white anti-racist; that I wasn’t willing to get my hands dirty and draw the bruises and broken bones that come when bigotry is confronted by its direct counterpoint.

I’m sorry that as a Christian minister, I once participated in a conservative Church that has been an agent of inequity and harborer of white supremacy since its inception-- and later in a progressive Christian Church that has grown shamefully silent in days when it should be a visible, vocal prophetic voice condemning the present supremacy.

I’m sorry for assuming that simply because a man of color finally occupied the seat of greatest power in this nation, that we could be less vigilant or passionate in the cause of equality, or that the malignant cancer of racism wasn’t as metastatic as it had ever been. I regret the way I and so many of my peers fell asleep.

I’m sorry for not being brave enough in my church gatherings or family conversations or neighborhood interactions or social media exchanges, to speak explicitly when bigotry reared its head; choosing to avoid conflict rather than share the full contents of my heart, relational fractures be damned.

I’m sorry for the hubris that was always so hesitant to look inward, for fear that I might not be as evolved as I was in the story I told myself.

I make this repentance knowing full well that I have many more sins that go undiagnosed and confessed; grievous errors that I’m unable to see but that will be revealed in time. I share these words because those particular scales have fallen from my eyes, but am not too arrogant to know that there is much I still have not seen.

The only thing I am certain of, is that the dream you told us you held within your furiously beating heart is still not a reality; that that glorious mountaintop summit is still a ways above us.

And while this is true, I will need to keep learning and listening, and keep shining the brilliant light of truth into the dark corners of both who we are and of who I am.

I will need to be in two wars simultaneously: the battle outside to condemn racism as a white human being living in a nation where privilege still bends the arc of the moral universe away from justice—and the equally brutal, relentless internal battle to expose the parts of me still acting as a conscientious objector in the fight for the value of every human being.

I pray I fight in a way that honors you.


Ilhan Omar (D-MN): "In the last months of his life, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave a speech in which he warned of three evils in our world: the evil of racism, the evil of poverty, and the evil of war. Dr. King was not one to sit down when faced with injustice. He launched the Poor People’s Campaign to build a multiracial working-class coalition to end these evils in the United States of America. Because Dr. King was taken from this world entirely too soon, activist and minister Ralph Abernathy carried out the Poor People's March, bringing tens of thousands of demonstrators to D.C. to advocate for better employment and housing conditions for those in poverty. Dr. King believed in this vision because the people had been ignored by politicians in Washington for too long. In his words:
"People ought to come to Washington, sit down if necessary in the middle of the street and say, 'We are here; we are poor; we don't have any money; you have made us this way... and we've come to stay until you do something about it.'"
The Poor People’s Campaign led to more funding for free and reduced lunch programs and the expansion of food stamps. It was a monumental step in showing Americans how the destinies of all working people are linked. In Congress and in my daily life, I will carry on with Dr. King’s vision of radical love. I won’t stop fighting to make sure every person’s most basic needs are met. Each and every one of us deserves the wages and housing we need to have a real chance at not just surviving, but thriving, in this country. May we never forget Dr. King's legacy."

One thing I know for certain, there will never be a Donald J Trump Day. Although thousands of ugly, white, male gun nuts in Richmond are celebrating his fascist approach today. "Gov. Ralph Northam declared a temporary state of emergency days ahead of the rally, banning all weapons, including guns, from the event on Capitol Square. The expected participation of fringe militia groups and white supremacists raised fears the state could again see the type of violence that exploded at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville in 2017.



This morning Judd Legum published a piece in his Popular Information newsletter on how the Virginia extremists are using Facebook to spread their hatred and organize their rally:
For years, supporters and opponents of gun control have squared off in Virginia’s capital, Richmond, on the third Monday in January. With Democrats in charge of the state legislature for the first time in decades-- elected in part on promises to enact gun-control measures in response to a mass shooting-- a call went out over national pro-gun and right-wing networks to converge today.

This increased attention has brought threats from white supremacist and anti-government extremists. Federal agents say at least one white supremacist group was caught planning a massacre with hopes of provoking a civil war. Virginia’s Democratic Governor Ralph Northam has declared a state of emergency.

Many of the pro-gun groups are trying to distance themselves from the white nationalists in advance, stressing their intention for a peaceful demonstration. But other groups have been using Facebook to broadcast couched threats and promote violence.

On December 13, the leader of American Warrior Revolution, a paramilitary organization allied with the militia movement, posted a video to its Facebook page, which has more than 540,000 followers. Joshua Shoaff, a popular right-wing personality who goes by the pseudonym Ace Baker, went on an extended rant threatening Virginia state representative Donald McEachin.

Shoaff was incensed by a quote, published by the Washington Examiner, in which McEachin suggested that Virgina could mobilize the National Guard to enforce new gun laws if local law enforcement refused to do so. McEachin’s comments came in response to a Republican-backed “sanctuary counties” movement, in which sheriffs have pledged not to enforce new laws such as expanded background checks.

Shoaff declared that McEachin's statement amounted to treason and McEachin, who is African American, should be lynched:
This message is directly to you. We're coming to your state. I live in Tennessee. My name is Ace Baker. I'm coming to the state of Virginia on January 20th and I hope to see you personally on Lobby Day. Because I would love nothing more than to tell you to your face, you are a coward. You are a tyrant, committing treason. And as a good friend of mine said a few minutes ago, treason is punishable by death. I'm not telling you that I'm going to kill you. I'm telling you that your acts constitute treason and the punishment for treason is hanging in the middle of the street ... You should be pulled out of office by the hair on your head, walked down the streets of the capital, walked up to the steps of a swinging rope that's placed around your neck.
Popular Information contacted Facebook on Friday and asked whether this video violated their rules. Facebook responded by taking down the video and removing Shoaff's personal profile.

"We have removed this individual and these videos from Facebook. We are monitoring the rally and actively reviewing content against our Community Standards so that we can take action accordingly," a Facebook spokesperson told Popular Information.

But Facebook did not take any action against the American Warrior Revolution page itself. Shoaff used the page on Friday to post another video, in which he said he stood by his previous video, and reiterated his belief “that tyrants should be hung in the streets to be made an example of.”


I would recommend you read the rest of Judd's essay at Popular Information here and I'll leave you with something more uplifting and inspiring... from Michigan state Rep. Jon Hoadley, the progressive candidate running to replace Trump ass-kisser Fred Upton in southwest Michigan. "Today," he wrote, "we celebrate the life and work of Dr. Martin Luther King. It's hard to find words that can adequately capture the gravity of his mission or paint a full picture of the forces he faced. Dr. King's message embodied the soul of our nation. He showed us how to build the more perfect union we had always hoped to become. Through protest, determination and tenacity, Dr. King organized a movement capable of speaking truth to power. I have strived to follow his example, working to codify his lessons in government. In the age of Trump, it can seem as if Dr. King's lessons and spirit are being forgotten by those in power. It can feel as if corruption and division are consuming us beyond repair. However, Dr. King's legacy is far too powerful to be reduced by any event or any political moment. Our commitment to democracy, practice of tolerance and compassion, our dedication to enrich the lives of our neighbors and ensure equality for all, are all based on his blueprints. It's up to all of us to carry Dr. King’s message forward and work to build another cultural reformation. It is up to all of us to make government serve people and community. And as was the theme of the Kalamazoo Women’s March, we must build power together. I hope you'll join us."




Labels: , , , , , , ,