Did We Learn Anything About November From Yesterday's Primaries?

The DCCC found something to run on that probably won't mean much as most voters decide who to pull the lever for-- nor will it get many people out to the polls-- the Republican tax bill. But Dan Sena, executive director of the DCCC, is all over it. He hired the over-priced Democratic polling firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, to reassure him that more people oppose the GOP tax bill than favor it. That's what the graph up top shows-- 50% oppose it and 41% favor it. I hope that gave Sena district by district breakdown too, because this national polling doesn't mean a hell of a lot.

Greenberg Quinlan Rosner certainly know how to wrap this stuff up in shiny, colorful paper and put a bow on it. "The dropping popularity of the tax bill," they sent in their memo, "is no surprise considering that voters do not expect to benefit from much of the trillion-dollar tax bill, which reflects the reality that the vast majority of the bill’s tax cuts flow to the wealthy and large corporations. This drop in support is also consistent with the fact that Republicans have dramatically decreased their promotion and advertising of the tax bill since it was signed into law. Reuters reports that Republicans are not talking about this unpopular piece of legislation in their districts. In the special election in Pennsylvania, Republicans stopped all advertising on the tax bill in the final weeks-- after Congressman Conor Lamb successfully push backed on the realities of the bill. Republicans did not even attempt to sell the bill in a too-close-for comfort special election in Arizona... [T]he DCCC’s latest national polling provides several key metrics on the national environment when comparing Democrats in Congress versus Republicans in Congress.

• Asked which group would “stand up for people like me,” Democrats in Congress have a 9-point advantage (54-45%).
• Voters believe Republicans in Congress are more likely to “enrich themselves and their friends at the expense of taxpayers,” by a 14-point margin (56-42%).
• Voters believe Republicans in Congress are more “out of touch with people like me,” by a 10-point margin (54-44%)
•While many voters believe the economy is improving, this does not translate to a Republican advantage: voters divide evenly between the parties (49-50%) on who they trust more to handle jobs and the economy.

So how will this impact Republican incumbents? Let's take a look at two races-- a Senate race in Texas and a House race in Kentucky. JMC Analytics and Polling released their own poll yesterday for Texas Republicans. And while Greg Abbott would be reelected with double digit majorities, not so for Senator Ted Cruz. His lead over Beto O'Rourke is just 7 points-- 47-40%. His unfavorables (42%) are also higher than his favorables (44%). Beto's favorables are much bigger than his unfavorables-- 35% to 20%. He has a lot of ground to make up though. 44% either have no opinion of him or have never heard of him.

Cruz trails in Austin and El Paso and Dallas/Ft Worth is a tie. The worst news for Cruz is that among Independents, he trails O’Rourke 38-45%.

The DCCC would love to win KY-06. The Lexington-centered district has an R+9 PVI and Trump "only" beat Hillary there 54.7% to 39.4%. Obama did better than her both times he ran. She was the wrong candidate for the district, although in Fayette County-- which is the only county in the district with a significant population-- Hillary and Bernie both had way more voters than any-- or even all-- of the Republicans.

• Hillary- 20,014
• Bernie- 17,048
• Cruz- 4,330
• Trumpanzee- 3,727
• Rubio- 3,320
• Kasich- 3,266

Going into the KY-06 primary, none of the candidates looked any good to me-- which means none of them looked like they would add anything worthwhile to Congress. McGrath looked like a collection of identity politics bullshit looking for a career with an excellent video someone made for her. Jim Gray, mayor of Lexington, looked worse-- a mixed up gay conservative Blue Dog. Two wastes of House seats. By the May 2 FEC reporting deadline she had spent $1,727,325 and Gray had spent $876, 368, including on a terrible negative ad, accusing her of not living in the district while she was in the service. That may have lost him the race. And that whole Blue Dog thing. Party bosses, and especially the DCCC, love those Blue Dogs. When will they ever learn that Democratic voters don't? Amy beat Gray 48,859 (48.7%) to 40,684 (40.5%) in a 6-canddiate race. Andy Barr, the Republican incumbent also had a primary. Amy drew considerably more voters than he did. A National Journal story worth looking at, before the votes were cast:

Mark Nickolas, the campaign manager for Kentucky congressional candidate Amy McGrath, took a late flight on April 25 to have breakfast the next morning on Capitol Hill with a top political strategist at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

The contested primary was more than three weeks away, but the conversation centered on general-election strategy: how McGrath, a retired Marine fighter pilot, could best take on Republican Rep. Andy Barr in November.

It was a meeting that would have been unremarkable, except that it signaled a stunning reversal by the same national Democrats who recruited Lexington Mayor Jim Gray into the primary in December, four months after McGrath launched a credible, well-funded campaign.

“They thought they had a better option,” Nickolas said. “I wanted to show them that they made a mistake, and I think I succeeded at it.”

That behind-the-scenes maneuvering, which incensed McGrath’s team and instantly relegated her to underdog status, led to a multimillion-dollar primary battle. Top Kentucky Democrats watching the race now say McGrath is at least slightly favored in Tuesday’s primary against the well-known and wealthy mayor of the district’s largest city who boasts high name ID from a 2016 Senate run.

Though Gray started as the overwhelming favorite, McGrath has since caught him in internal polling, outpaced him in total TV ad spending, and built a formidable ground game in the district’s rural counties to counter his support in the major cities.

“He’s underestimating me,” McGrath said in a Monday phone interview between campaign events. “I just think the DCCC sometimes is disconnected with real America. It’s sad that they recruited him, but we’re going around them.”

In what is perhaps an acknowledgement of McGrath’s late surge, Gray, after largely ignoring her for much of the nearly six-month primary, released an eleventh-hour attack ad Friday that accused her of being a carpetbagger. The spot drew public criticism from veterans’ groups and Rep. Ted Lieu of California, a DCCC vice chairman.

“At the moment, she’s got the momentum,” said Terry McBrayer, a former Kentucky Democratic Party chairman who is friendly with both candidates. “The big question is whether he can pull it off and stop that. His name recognition is better, but she’s gained name recognition in a big way.”

McGrath’s insurgent campaign stayed largely positive, using her compelling history-- as the first female Marine to fly in an F-18 fighter jet in combat-- to tap into a national donor base and raise her profile. Eventually she won tacit support from a Democratic establishment that initially insisted that her opponent would be the stronger foil against Barr.

McGrath retired from the Marines to run for Congress only after receiving assurances from Gray in the spring of 2017 that he was not interested in running. But the committee repeatedly urged Gray to enter the race, according to multiple sources, hoping to capitalize on his high approval ratings and ability to self-fund-- much to the chagrin of prominent Democrats allied with McGrath who warned the committee that it was creating an unnecessarily costly contest.

At the start of the primary, McGrath and her allies made no secret of their disdain for the DCCC’s meddling and hit Gray as a pawn of the establishment. Her campaign even considered going nuclear on the national party that burned them. It spent $17,000 to film a video on Nickolas’s Woodford County farm where McGrath, direct-to-camera, bashed “party bosses for choosing the same, old, unelectable candidates.” But her campaign team scrapped it.

Initial polling indicated that there was a hunger in the district for someone with her background and message, a political outsider and military veteran. Still, McGrath started out with 44 percent name ID, while Gray had 92 percent.

By February, Nickolas watched with apprehension as the DCCC tore into Texas congressional candidate Laura Moser, whom it deemed unviable in the general. He initiated contact with the committee-- for the first time since Gray entered-- and shared recent internal general-election polling to blunt that argument against his candidate. McGrath trailed the incumbent by 4 points, while Gray was up 2 points, though less than half the electorate was familiar with McGrath.

Nickolas asked the campaign pollster, Fred Yang, to brief the DCCC political team on the full findings, which he did in a mid-March phone call. The committee acknowledged that McGrath would be a credible nominee, according to a source familiar the call.

Tensions continued to thaw; Jason Bresler, the DCCC’s political director, texted frequently with Nickolas during the past couple of months. And in May, McGrath received donations from Democratic Rep. Lois Frankel and from Rep. Cheri Bustos’s leadership PAC. They are the first members to contribute since Gray entered the race, according to McGrath’s campaign.

When reached for comment, DCCC spokesman Jacob Peters said: “It is common and expected for us to be in regular contact with Democratic campaigns running in targeted districts. Rep. Andy Barr is one of the most vulnerable incumbents in the country.”

Privately, some Kentucky Democrats attribute McGrath’s rise, in part, to a series of missteps by the Gray campaign. Though he has personal wealth, he invested relatively little in his campaign and let McGrath outspend him on the air every week in April. In fundraising emails, Gray trained his focus on Barr, rarely using a primary threat to persuade donors to write checks.

But Jamie Emmons, Gray’s campaign manager, disputed that narrative.

“Of course, we took it seriously, we raised and spent a million-and-a-half dollars. That’s a very serious primary,” Emmons said, adding that the campaign’s recent internal polling showed Gray in the lead.

Multiple internal polls conducted as late as early March showed McGrath trailing Gray by more than 30 points. Then, an April internal poll by McGrath’s campaign surprised even her staunchest allies—she led Gray by 7 points, a swing of more than 50 points from its December primary poll. Her name ID shot up nearly 40 points to 83 percent, and her favorables more than doubled to 64 percent.

It was the results of that poll that precipitated Nickolas’s meeting with the DCCC.

“Conventional wisdom tells you Jim Gray should be winning and winning big,” said a national Democratic source based in Kentucky granted anonymity to speak candidly. “David and Goliath is what this is. It should never have been happening.”

McGrath and Gray spent more than $550,000 apiece in April alone. If she wins Tuesday, McGrath admitted she will start with very little in her campaign coffers, but said the fierce primary battle helped hone her skills.

“It’s kind of like you do the minor leagues before you get into the major leagues,” she said.

Time for the DCCC to stop recruiting the damn Blue Dogs already? Past time, way past time.

The 2018 Congressional Races Are Starting To Take Shape: Oklahoma City

Will Tom Guild Be Our Revolution's First Big Red State Congressional Win?

Good news and bad news to start the day. Let's get the bad news over with first. Congressional voting patterns are starting to indicate trends. When you examine the crucial vote scores for the 115th Congress so far, there aren't many surprises. Seeing members like Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Ruben Kihuen (D-NV), Mark Pocan (D-WI), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Jim McGovern (D-MA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) and Luis Guttierrez (D-IL) with 100% scores should come as no surprise. They have been loud, clear voices for The Resistance inside Congress. But at the other end of the spectrum, there are the "Democrats" from the Republican wing of the Democratic Party voting consistently with the Republicans. They are primarily Blue Dogs and New Dems are Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy put great value on them, since they use their votes to brag to the media-- and to their own constituents-- that the ghastly, destructive legislation they're passing is "bipartisan." These are the worst of the worst, each of whom is earning primary challenges as we speak:

• Kurt Schrader (Blue Dog chairman-OR)- 25%
• Charlie Crist (FL)- 25%
• Ed Perlmutter (New Dem-CO)- 25%
• Jim Himes (New Dem chairman-CT)- 20%
• David Scott (Blue Dog-GA)- 20%
• Ann Kuster (New Dem-NH)- 20%
• Dutch Ruppersberger (MD)- 20%
• Julia Brownley (CA)- 20%
• Brad Schneider (New Dem-IL)- 20%
• Scott Peters (New Dem-CA)- 20%
• Josh Gottheimer (Blue Dog-NJ)- 20%
• Stephanie Murphy (Blue Dog-FL- 20%
• John Delaney (New Dem-MD)- 0
• Tim Walz (MN)- 0
• Tom Suozzi (NY)- 0
• Dan Lipinski (Blue Dog-IL)- 0
• Jim Cooper (Blue Dog-TN)- 0
• Tom O'Halleran (Blue Dog-AZ)- 0
• Ami Bera (New Dem-CA)- 0
• Lou Correa (Blue Dog-CA)- 0
• Jim Costa (Blue Dog-CA)- 0
• Collin Peterson (Blue Dog-MN)- 0
• Henry Cuellar (Blue Dog-TX)- 0
• Kyrsten Sinema (Blue Dog-AZ)- 0

Painful! A zero, by the way, means just want you probably fear it means: these Democrats have voted with the GOP on every single important roll call so far. Michigan Republican Justin Amash scored a 40-- significantly better than any "Democrat" on the list above. We're not trying to recruit a candidate against him. I wonder if that right-wing, bigoted schlemiel, Steve Pestka, who the Michigan Democratic Party thinks is such a stand-up guy, will run again. Last time he ran against Amash (2012, from the right on many issues) he outspent Amash $2,076,680 to $1,193,611 but Amash beat him anyway, 53-44%. And that brings us to the good news: congressional recruiting.

I have to admit, it was getting me down. Potential candidate after potential candidate was telling me the same thing everywhere in the country: it just wasn't worth the effort of running just to be eventually rat-fucked by the DCCC. Local Democrats hate them even more than I ever imagined-- and for good reason... over a decade of good reasons. But-- and this may be important-- executive director Kelly Ward was finally fired, and is now running some doomed-to-fail initiative for Obama and Holder-- and there's a new executive director with a decent reputation, Dan Sena. Although he started out in politics working strictly for sewer-dwelling garbage candidates like Blue Dog (now Republican) Joe Baca, Jane Harmon and Wendy Greuel, he went on to run progressive Senator Tom Udall's successful reelection campaign in 2014 and sources at the DCCC are telling me he isn't driven by the kind of all-encompassing and self-destructive hatred of progressives that drove his predecessors and D-Trip chairmen Rahm Emanuel and Steve Israel.

New PPP survey released yesterday

In any case, word is getting out that Sena isn't going to treat progressives the way Kelly Ward and Steve Israel did and-- lo and behold!-- people are changing their minds about running-- from coast to coast... and in between. It looks like Ed Royce (CA), Peter King (NY), Steve Knight (CA), Lamar Smith (TX) are all about to get excellent opponents who can be backed by a wide array of Democrats from progressives to mainstream party types and even the DCCC. Of course, ether will always been the Cheri Bustos types who are desperately trying to recruit horrible Blue Dogs (like herself) to screw things up, but after her spate of horrible failures in 2016, the DCCC may be listening less seriously to her Emanuel-channelling bullshit. Thursday, Oklahoma progressive Tom Guild let his supporters know that after consulting with family, friends, and supporters, he "decided to start organizing and raising money to run against Tea Party extremist Steve Russell (R-Choctaw) in 2018. Russell is the Tea-publican incumbent from Oklahoma’s Fifth Congressional District. Russell 'isn’t sure' if we should have a minimum wage. I support raising the minimum wage to a living wage, and indexing it to inflation, so that in the future hard working Americans who work full-time won’t be at or below the poverty level." He went on contrasting his own stands with the policies Russell and the Republicans have been espousing.

Russell opposes additional infrastructure spending to repair, create, and rebuild America’s roads, bridges, highways, high speed internet access, and schools. I favor $600 billion in additional spending over ten years to invest in our country and fix our crumbling infrastructure. The additional spending will also create millions of good-paying jobs for Americans.

There are many crucial issues where Mr. Russell and I have opposing views. As the campaign progresses, these differences will be made crystal clear to folks in the fifth district."

If Tom pulls this off with the help of Our Revolution Oklahoma, expect him to stand up for OK-05 working families against Trump and the destructive Trumpist agenda. This morning he told us that "Trump is dangerous to American democracy and our constitutional system of government. He rejects our system of checks and balances and is a bully attempting to run rough shod over due process and equal protection. Trump and his approach must be resisted, rejected, and turned back before he goes too far and we are no longer able to enjoy our precious and revered Republic, and exercise our historic democratic rights."

This isn't going to be an easy race. OK-05 (which as a PVI of R+12), is the Oklahoma City district and was Trump's weakest in the state but he still won with 53.2%. That was 6 points weaker than Mitt Romney had done. The Democrats ran a worthless corporate conservative, Al McAffrey, and Russell beat him 160,012 (57.1%) to 103,122 (36.8%). Russell spent $847,193 and McAffrey insulted the district by ignoring fundraising entirely and spending exactly $687. Guild expects to raise $300,000 to fund a fully grassroots campaign. If you'd like to help Tom get started, please tap the thermometer below.