Monday, March 02, 2020

Who's Going To Win Tomorrow?

>


Last week, Danny Goldberg-- author, former chairman of Warner Bros Records, former manager of Nirvana-- penned an article for The Nation, In California Before the Democratic Primary, 'Nobody Knows Anything'. He was talking about Hollywood and the Biz. "Political Hollywood," he wrote, "reflects a national divide among Democrats that is as much generational as it is ideological. The son of a prominent TV show runner recently sent a widely circulated e-mail to his “moderate” parents explaining why he and his friends are campaigning for Sanders-- whose celebrity supporters include Cardi B, John Cusack, Ariana Grande, Emily Ratajkowski, Mark Ruffalo, Susan Sarandon, Danny Glover, Tim Robbins, Steve Skrovan, The Strokes, and Vampire Weekend. On the Sunday before the primary, Sanders is appearing at the Los Angeles Convention Center with Public Enemy, Sarah Silverman, and Dick Van Dyke... The Vermont senator’s lead in California polls is causing angst among many more traditional Democrats, some who believe the debatable theory that Sanders was partially responsible for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss, and many who are worried about his electability."


On Saturday, Status Quo Joe won among elderly, conservative rural African-Americans. But Bernie is leading among African American voters nationally. Maddow, who is an excellent reporter on PutinGate and knows absolutely nothing at all-- and never had-- about American electoral politics, announced on Saturday that "If anybody knows anything about winning the Democratic nomination and about what it takes for a Democratic nominee to win a general election, it is black voters. And if Sen. Sanders continues to underperform systematically with black voters, and if we see him get shellacked-- not just beaten but shellacked tonight in South Carolina-- because of his performance with black voters, that’s an existential question about that nomination." Do you still watch her show? I turn MSNBC off as soon as Chris Hayes is finished. Three of The Intercept sharpest reporters, Nausicaa Renner, Aída Chávez and Akela Lacy burst Maddow's balloon, noting that "Last week, the Reuters-Ipsos poll found Sanders besting Biden by three points nationally among black voters-- certainly a relevant data point when considering whether Sanders can win among black voters... the Hill/HarrisX poll had Sanders up nine. A Morning Consult survey recently found Sanders beating Biden by five among all black primary voters, and thumping him by a 3-1 margin among black voters under 45. In other words, the national picture does not exactly portend a shellacking among black voters-- important context that was kept from MSNBC viewers, who would be left to conclude that the same minority-voter problem that hobbled Sanders’s campaign in 2016 remains a major obstacle. It simply isn’t true."
A handful of commentators, including former Sen. Claire McCaskill, a vituperative opponent of Sanders, acknowledged that South Carolina’s results may not necessarily translate into victory for Biden nationwide. “Unfortunately,” said McCaskill on MSNBC, “there aren’t a lot of Jim Clyburns.” Clyburn, an iconic civil rights leader and the uncontested party leader in South Carolina, as well as the number three Democrat in the House, endorsed Biden last week, giving his campaign the kind of boost that can’t be replicated elsewhere. (McCaskill now works for a dark-money group with links to a project opposing Medicare for All, a major plank of Sanders’s campaign.)

There are other reasons to suspect that Biden’s campaign won’t be able to sustain its high note after South Carolina. The state is one of the demographically oldest. According to CNN exit polls, six percent of voters were between the ages of 17 and 24, and five percent were between the ages of 25 and 29. Around 28 percent of voters in South Carolina were under age 45, compared to 45 percent in Iowa, 35 percent in New Hampshire, and 36 percent in Nevada.

What’s more, Biden spent an enormous proportion of his resources in South Carolina, which he hasn’t done in Super Tuesday states or beyond, and is running low on cash.

...While MSNBC more or less omitted the forward-looking picture of the race, Fox News was more sanguine about Biden’s chances. Ari Fleischer, former press secretary to President George W. Bush, played down what the win could mean for Biden in other states. Only one of the 14 races Biden will compete in on Super Tuesday have a demography similar to South Carolina: Alabama. “If he cannot win anywhere without huge numbers of African American votes, the upcoming battlefield is not favorable to him still,” Fleischer said.





So back to our question, who's going to win tomorrow? I'd bet on Bernie-- big. Let's look at the state polls via RealClearPolitics:

California- 415 delegates
Bernie- 34.3%
Elizabeth- 17.3%
Biden- 13.0%
Bloomberg- 10.5%
Mayo Pete- 9.5%
Klobuchar- 5.3%
Tulsi- 1.3%
Texas- 228 delegates
Bernie- 29.7%
Biden- 20.8%
Bloomberg- 18.0%
Elizabeth- 12.7%
Mayo Pete- 7.5%
Klobuchar- 3.8%
Tulsi- 0.7%
North Carolina- 110 delegates
Biden- 25.6%
Bernie- 23.4%
Bloomberg- 16.0%
Elizabeth- 11.0%
Mayo Pete- 6.8%
Klobuchar- 5.0%
Tulsi- 1.0%
Virginia- 99 delegates
Bernie- 25.0%
Bloomberg- 19.5%
Biden- 18.5%
Mayo Pete- 11.5%
Elizabeth- 11.0%
Klobuchar- 7.0%
Tulsi- 1.0%
Massachusetts- 91 delegates
Bernie- 24.7%
Elizabeth- 20.7%
Mayo Pete- 13.3%
Bloomberg- 11.7%
Biden- 10.7%
Klobuchar- 6.0%
Tulsi- 2.0%
Minnesota- 75 delegates
Klobuchar- 29%
Bernie- 23%
Elizabeth- 11%
Biden- 8%
Bloomberg- 3%
Mayo Pete- 3%
Tulsi- 1%
Colorado- 67 delegates
Bernie- 30.5%
Elizabeth- 17.5%
Mayo Pete- 13.0%
Bloomberg- 12.5%
Biden- 10.5%
Klobuchar- 6.0%
Tulsi- 1.0%
Oklahoma- 37 delegates
Biden- 21%
Bloomberg- 20%
Bernie- 13%
Mayo Pete- 10%
Elizabeth- 9%
Klobuchar- 7%
Tulsi- 0%
Arkansas- 31 delegates
Bloomberg- 20%
Biden- 19%
Bernie- 16%
Mayo Pete- 16%
Elizabeth- 9%
Klobuchar- 5%
Tulsi- 0%
Utah- 29 delegates
Bernie- 27.5%
Elizabeth- 14.5%
Bloomberg- 14.5%
Mayo Pete- 11.5%
Biden- 9.0%
Klobuchar- 3.5%
Tulsi- 0%
Maine- 24 delegates
Bernie- 25%
Mayo Pete- 16%
Bloomberg- 14%
Biden- 12%
Elizabeth- 9%
Klobuchar- 4%
Tulsi- 3%
Vermont- 16 delegates
Bernie- 51%
Mayo Pete- 13%
Elizabeth- 9%
Bloomberg- 7%
Biden- 5%
Klobuchar- 4%
Tulsi- 1%
There is no available public polling for Tennessee (64), Alabama (52), Democrats Abroad (13) and American Samoa (6), though Biden is presumed to be leading significantly in Alabama and very tightly in Tennessee, while Bernie is likely to win in American Samoa and among Americans Abroad. Although Bloomberg spent incredible amounts of money for Super Tuesday, he isn't expected to win any states but will gather delegates in Alabama, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia. So the money is working to some extent and there are Democrats stupid enough to be brainwashed by advertising.



These are the number of delegates each candidate has won so far, the day before Super Tuesday.





Labels: , ,

9 Comments:

At 5:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why should anybody care who gets the endorsement of a bunch of celebs? They're as meaningless as (maybe more meaningless than) Trump's support from employees of Vince McMahon or NASCAR personalities.

I fear our four-year national nightmare is about to go for eight.

 
At 6:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The nightmare is in its 40th year, 8:50. That's part of why we got trump -- everyone is used to the nightmare, so another worser one didn't seem unusual.

Is anyone else struck by which states poll for biden and Bloomberg? I mean, you would never say THOSE states had "smarter" populations, now would you?

I'm going to have to include MN in that list. Amy isn't as "klaxon blaring" evil as either biden or Bloomberg, but ... I mean... really?

I'm still waiting to see who mckinsey's supporters migrate to before, after or in spite of whom he endorses, as well as who that someone might be. The logical choice based on issues would be biden, but I'm leaning toward a bought endorsement of Bloomberg. He cannot endorse Bernie or Elizabeth or it would expose his whole campaign as a lie.

 
At 7:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:06 - As one of the candidates has said, more than once: "A healthy democracy doesn't elect a Donald Trump." That doesn't negate the fact that the descent into hell that is Trump's presidency is a difference in more than degree.

Unlike Bernie and his cult, I don't know what the answer is. I'm fairly confident I know what it isn't.

 
At 8:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's time for someone with national standing to endorse Biden. Why aren't there more calls for Hillary Clinton to do so?

 
At 9:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maddow a reporter? Nada, she's a spokesperson for the DNC, as facts have no influence on her broadcast, unless they align with scripted DNC talking points.

 
At 2:01 PM, Blogger Knockout Zed said...

Whose cult are YOU in, 7:10? Some centrist’s no doubt.

 
At 3:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Knockout Zed, Is it not obvious? I'm a member of the Trotsyite-Zinovievite Terrorist Centre. Or am I part of the Bukharinist Right Opposition? I seem to have forgotten.

Let the show trial begin!

 
At 3:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

With Mayo Pete turning rancid, and Keystone Kop Klobuchar being bought off with a promise that the Party won't honor, will American media headlines read something like "Hardliners Win Super Tuesday Primary Elections But With Little Voter Enthusiasm"?

 
At 6:18 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

KZ, why does someone have to be in a cult? What is it with americans that they feel the need to claim one cult or another?

yeah, I forgot, we stopped teaching our kids to think for themselves in the '60s. and we've cajoled them to join a hive since about 1990.

The answer to the title question is, as it always is, THE MONEY.

Even if you think that a win for Bernie is a win for America, you'd be wrong.

You see, a win for Bernie is a win for the democrap party. And that means it's a win for the democrap party's corporate and billionaire sponsors, chiefly wall street, health insurance and phrma. Pelosi is salivating (at the very least) over how much money $he can "earn" from phrma over covid19.

so, the real answer is NOT the 99.99% no matter which candidate "wins".

go vote. but don't expect change. you'll be disappointed (betrayed) again. still.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home