Agents Of Our Own Oppression

Did you happen to notice the Wall Street Journal headline just before voting closed in Michigan yesterday-- Black Voters Hope To Deliver Key Victory For Biden In Michigan? And they did. Biden took Michigan and 3 of the other 4 primary states. Washington state is too close to call and Bernie appears to have won the North Dakota caucus.

• Idaho- 48.86% to 42.48%
• Michigan- 52.87% to 36.50%
• Mississippi- 81.04% to 14.89%
• Missouri- 60.12% to 34.56%
• Washington- 32.75% to 32.54% (Bernie leading)

• North Dakota- 48.54% to 42.38%

In 2016, the Michigan primary was a godsend to Bernie. He beat Hillary 595,222 (49.8%) to 576,795 (48.3%)and the headlines we're all about how he won. The reality wasn't as sanguine. Clinton and her DNC allies has already fixed the primary so that Bernie got 65 delegates to her 73 delegates. But that wasn't what the headlines were about the next day.

Bernie won a lot of rural counties and a lot of white counties and Hillary won a lot of counties with big African American populations. She beat him handily in Genessee County (Flint)-- 31,284 (51.7%) to 28,117 (46.5%). She beat him in Oakland County (Detroit suburbs)-- 92,296 (51.4%) to 84,158 (46.8%). And, most of all, she beat him in Wayne County (Detroit), where over 40% of the residents-- and more than half the Democrats-- are African-American.

Last Thursday, Glen Ford, editor of the Black Agenda Report explained why African American voters-- especially the most dependable voters, seniors-- support status quo establishment candidates like Hillary... and Biden. "Black voters in South Carolina," wrote Ford, "kicked off Joe Biden’s political resurrection last Saturday, and stuck with the worthless corporate hack through Super Tuesday’s primary contests. Although the craven Black Misleadership Class will no doubt shout hallelujahs that 'hands that picked cotton now pick presidents' and claim Black voters exercised brilliant 'strategic' judgment in making themselves indispensable to the corprate Democratic party establishment, the true motivator of Black Biden supporters is a pervasive and deeply corrosive fear. Not just dread of four more years of Trump, although that is central to Black political behavior, but abject terror at the very thought that the Democratic Party-- 'our' party, in many Black folks’ minds-- might fracture under the challenge of the Sandernistas."

Voluminous data over many years has shown that African Americans are to the left of Hispanics on issues of bread and butter and, especially, war and peace, and far to the left of white Democrats. But, unlike Hispanics, Blacks cannot be depended on to uphold their own historical political consensus in Democratic Party primary elections for fear of weakening the chances of defeating The White Man’s Party. Hyper-conscious of their minority and despised status-- and surrounded by hostile, race-obsessed white Republicans in the southern states-- older Blacks cling to Democratic Party structures as if their lives depend on it. The ascent of Donald Trump has only tightened the duopoly trap, causing Blacks to invest their votes in candidates they perceive as "good for the party," as if that is synonymous with Black interests.

"Older Blacks cling to Democratic Party structures as if their lives depend on it."

Ruling class panic at the prospect of losing control of the top of Democratic ticket has deeply infected the party’s most loyal constituency. Thus, Black folks over 40, and many younger ones, are behaving like Malcolm X’s “house Negro,” who asks with genuine concern, “Is we sick, boss?” when the master is feeling poorly. The screechingly raucous, out-of-control Democratic debate in Charleston just days before the South Carolina primary appears to have scared the hell out of Black voters--and lots of white ones, too-- who perceived “their” party coming apart at the seems and blamed the mayhem on Bernie Sanders. With Sanders and Michael Bloomberg bearing the brunt of the assault, Joe Biden appeared like the tranquil eye of the storm, a safe haven for fearful party loyalists. Biden’s endorsement by Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg on the eve of Super Tuesday, enveloped Obama’s former vice president in an aura of consensus.

Bloomberg’s presidential persona was punctured, but he wasn’t really in it to win it. The odious oligarch knew he couldn’t win the nomination of a party whose rank-and-file overwhelmingly support Sanders’ austerity-busting agenda, even if they doubt Bernie’s chances against Trump or his ability to get his program through Congress. The formerly Republican Bloomberg’s candidacy was a necessary (and affordable) charade to certify him as a born-again Democrat, thus legitimizing his billion-dollar bid to buy control of the party’s machinery to insulate it against infection by more upstarts like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and her mentor, Sanders.

"Joe Biden appeared like the tranquil eye of the storm, a safe haven for fearful party loyalists."

On Tuesday night CNN pundit and former Virginia governor and Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe confirmed that the party welcomed Bloomberg’s billions. Bloomberg had already promised to pay the cost of 500 political operatives answerable to the DNC through the November election, no matter who wins the nomination. McAuliffe looked forward to Bloomberg putting his entire state-of-the art New York City headquarters in service to the party. The aim is to progressive-proof the Democrats by making the party a hostile environment for leftish politics.(See BAR, Feb. 19, “Bloomberg Wants to Swallow the Democrats and Spit Out the Sandernistas.”) Bloomberg’s presidential run is a way to “launder” his billion dollar purchase of the party infrastructure. Other oligarchs can be expected to make it a joint venture to shore up their class’s hegemony over the U.S. electoral system, to safeguard the ruling class agenda of endless war and the global Race to the Bottom.

The allure of Bloomberg’s gold has exposed the cockroaches of the Black Misleadership Class, hordes of whom scurried across the linoleum to enlist as mercenaries of Obscene Capital. This is the undiluted essence of Black Democratic “strategic” politics. Four members of the Congressional Black Caucus -- Meeks (NY), McBath (GA), Plaskett (VI), and Rush (IL), plus the despicable former Tennessee congressman Harold Ford, and the Black mayors of Little Rock AR, Compton CA, San Francisco CA, Stockton CA, Charlotte NC, Columbia SC, Houston TX and Washington DC, plus former mayors of Columbus OH, New York City, Baltimore MD, Philadelphia PA, and Flint MI-- whored for Bloomberg, and can be expected to be at his and the other oligarchs’ service for the duration of the party’s battles with leftish interlopers.

"Bloomberg’s gold has exposed the cockroaches of the Black Misleadership Class."

Bloomberg’s withdrawal from the race and endorsement of Biden only further sanctifies his larger mission to purge the party of any taint of leftism. Elizabeth Warren will now choose how she will express her “capitalist to the bone” sentiments. The Black Lives Matter elements-- notably, Alicia Garza-- that joined the party when they left the "movement," will follow.

The rot is deep, a product of generations of capital-subordinate Black politics that followed the violent suppression of Black self-determinationist movements and the imposition of a counterinsurgency, mass incarceration regime at the end of the Sixties. Rather than resist the New Jim Crow/Same Old Rich White Man’s Rule, the Black Misleaderhip Class eagerly offered themselves as co-managers of oppression-- for a small cut of the spoils, and the privileges of racial “leadership.”

It has always been clear to Black Agenda Report that the post-Sixties betrayals of the Black Misleadership Class necessitated that a future Black liberation movement must be largely an internal Black struggle to uproot the corrupted elements in our polity. False unity has become Black folks’ Achilles Heel, allowing Black charlatans free rein in our communities and reserving most elected positions for servants of Capital. The Democratic Party is a predatory edifice of Black disempowerment, from which our people must either free themselves, or become agents of their own perpetual oppression and accomplices in the degradation of humanity, worldwide.

Black youth see the truth, and will act on it, we are certain.

Of Crowns and Kings: Behind The Seen by Dr. Fahamu Pecou

UPDATE by emorejahongkong: After-Bern: Burn It down? Depends On What "It" Is-- And Will Be

• The Democratic Presidential primaries are proceeding without any waivering of the establishment’s determination to prevent nomination of Bernie Sanders by deploying all its powers-- whether formal or informal, and legal or illegal). In response, Bernie’s supporters will need to decide whether to obediently accept another lost game of "chicken," or to "burn down" the Democratic half of the two-party game that is sustained partly by their continued participation. The decision, of whether or not to "burn it down," largely depends on how they view the definition of "it"-- in the present and in the future.

• MainStream Media description of "it" is: anti-Bernie Democratic leaders in a loose and pragmatic coalition in which many are at least trying (constrained by their good-faith view of voter preferences) to deliver at least some progress towards:

• less economic inequality (less-dictated by identity),
• more climate and habitat preservation, and
• less global unilateralism,
• etc.

• An alternative description of "it" is: a top-down herding, into an increasingly conscious conspiracy, of political and economic power-holders and power-seekers, to continue doubling down on “manufacturing consent” while pushing in the following directions:

• Prioritizing the political class’s need, to "leave no Big Donors behind," over everybody else’s need to stop Big Pharma and health insurers from impoverishing and killing not only much of the American population, but also many other American industries;
• Subordinating the economic and health needs, of most people of every ethnic/etc. identity, to the political “benefits” strengthening and co-opting elite "representatives" of each ethnic/etc. identity; • Subordinating the climate & environment damage, to the global strategic “benefits,” of extracting, processing and exporting fossil fuels from North American shale and tar sands;
• Maximizing expenditure on military, surveillance and intelligence infrastructure and activities against foreign and domestic “enemies” (while blurring lines between these activities);
• Redefining dissent and debate as anti-American and anti-democratic (while blurring lines between allegations of conscious treason and unconscious dupe-ism);
• Redefining surveillance and censorship as "protecting democracy" (while eliminating transparency of vote counting and voter opinion monitoring);
• Formalizing National Security Bureaucracy’s power to decide even broad strategic goals of foreign policy (asserting this power was the tail wagging the "personal benefit" dog of testimony at impeachment hearings),
• Demonizing and provoking Russia (up to elevating, to top strategic priority, the "urgent need to fight Russia in Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine") even after collapse of a multi-decade strategy to strategically co-opt China; and
• Coronating, as Democratic Congressional candidates, many veterans (if they are not continuing formal or informal agents) of the Intelligence Community.

• Many elements of the above directions:

• Can be seen as a logical path of least resistance in response to (a) long-term trends, among "Left" and "Right" voters, towards opposing never-ending military interventionism abroad, and (b) feuding (originally driven by Trump’s personality, but potentially outlasting Trump’s individual role) between the National Security State and the Republican President.
• Can be understood as replacement, of the old two-party domination of electoral politics, with new domination by a single "Centrist" umbrella party, which can continually reinforce its power through feedback loops between a party-supporting-government and a government-supporting-party; and
• Can be summarized as a merger of the National Security State with the Democratic Party establishment and with the anti-Trump remnants of the Republican Party establishment.

• If the real "it" is closer to the above "merger" than to the MSM’s sports-style cheer-leading, then which would be more harmful, to Progressives’ local battles and national transition to post-Bernie leadership, between the following choices?

• Four more years of Trump feuding with the National Security State; or

• Eight years for the newly reconfigured system to fine-tune its elite consensus, to expand its technical and psychological capabilities, and to propagandize, bribe and bully the public into accepting the system as being inevitable and immutable and even as embodying "Progress."