Pelosi Is Encouraging A Primary Against Seth Moulton While Opposing Primaries By Progressives Against Corrupt Conservative Incumbents-- She's Losing Her Mind

One month from Tuesday there's a special election to fill the empty congressional seat in PA-12. Haven't heard much about it, have you? You weren't meant to. The DCCC and NRCC have a gentleman's agreement that this one goes to Team Red without a contest. The DCCC is ignoring the district entirely. After all, it's a pretty red district and the Democrat running for the open seat, Marc Friedenberg, is a damned progressive who advocates policies Cheri Bustos thinks are detrimental to the Democratic Party-- like Medicare-For-All. Besides, the DCCC has a rough and tumble civil war of its own making to spend all it's attention on at the moment. "Why fight Republicans when there are progressives to attack," has been a motivating principle of the DCCC since Bustos' guru, Rahm Emanuel, had the position she now occupies.

If you're hung up on political consultants, you're missing the true import of Cheri Bustos' diktat about primaries and Democratic incumbents. The threat to consultants-- that if they work for anyone who challenges a Democratic incumbent, they're finished-- is dastardly and debilitating but also possible for candidates to circumvent. The real problem is that it's another signal from the Democratic establishment that rebels are not welcome; progressives are not welcome; independent minds are not welcome. It's another impediment that the DCCC can throw up against challengers in the never-ending incumbent protection racket that is at the heart of the DCCC.

Two interesting and contradictory things happened in the last few days. Star Intercept reporters Akela Lacy and Ryan Grim blew the whistle on how the DCCC, which is completely controlled by Pelosi, pressured 4 consultants to stop working for Marie Newman, the progressive challenger to anti-Choice, anti-gay, anti-immigrant, anti-healthcare Blue Dog Dan Lipinski in Chicagoland. The DCCC told the consultants that "if they continued working against Lipinski, their future business with the party would suffer."

Grim and Lacy wrote that the DCCC policy "will have the effect of protecting white male incumbents defending seats against challengers in an increasingly diverse party. That’s the case with Lipinski, who inherited the seat from his father in 2005 and has retrograde views when it comes to much of the Democratic agenda, including his opposition to marriage equality and abortion rights. He voted against the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the signature legislation House Democratic leaders are trying to save in their campaign against Medicare for All."

Alexandra Rojas, executive director of the Justice Democrats, told The Intercept that the way progressives are viewing this is that "The DCCC would rather stand with a so-called Democrat who has stood against reproductive, immigrant, and LGBT rights and a $15 minimum wage rather than allow a fair competition and choice for voters. The Democratic Party leadership is choosing machine politics over ushering in a new generation of leaders and the fundamental idea of democracy."

Meanwhile more than 40 official chapters of the Young Democrats-- including Harvard, Yale, Dartmouth, UC Berkeley, Boston College, UCLA, Michigan State, Occidental, Texas State, University of Wisconsin, Rutgers-- are boycotting the DCCC over Bustos' anti-democratic policy. In their letter to Bustos, the Harvard Young Democrats wrote that "Primary challengers are essential to ensure that the Democratic Party is continually held accountable to the needs of our constituents. This blacklist policy is undemocratic and antithetical to our values of inclusion and diversity. As Rep. Ayanna Pressley has put it, as Democrats we 'cannot credibly lay claim to prioritizing diversity and inclusion when institutions like the DCCC implement policies that threaten to silence new voices and historically marginalized communities.' Challengers to incumbents have been essential to making the Democratic Party an institution that truly reflects the progressive values and diverse identities of the people it claims to represent. As young Democrats, we support a national boycott of donations to the DCCC until it reverses this blacklist rule and institutes policies that support, not punish, new voices in the Democratic Party. Until this policy is reversed, we urge donors to contribute to individual candidates." Good idea-- and you can do just that by clicking on the Blue America 2020 congressional thermometer on the right and contributing to Marie Newman and the other progressive candidates on the page.

At the same time that was happening, Pelosi contacted former Congressman John Tierney to recruit him to run against a Democratic incumbent she personally detests, Seth Moulton. And while it's hard to argue with Pelosi that Moulton deserves a primary challenge, the real point is that Lipinski deserves one even more. It's just that Pelosi doesn't feel the same degree of personal animus towards Lipinski as she does towards Moulton, who tried the derail her bid for the speakership.

With Moulton running around wasting his time on a DOA presidential campaign, Pelosi sees an opportunity to knock him off politically at home. I think that's great, although she did run-over the hopes of former state Sen. Barbara L’Italien, who has been planning on running against Moulton herself. And what does Cheri Bustos have to say about all this? Nothing... not a peep so far. I guess she thinks Democratic campaign donors and voters don't understand what hypocrisy looks like.